2 Isn't a Lucky Number! Killzone 2 Will Still Stink!

Am I the only one here who thinks that Killzone 2 will still suck? I mean, the first one was HORRIBLE and that's an understatement! The graphics were "muddy", the framerate was constantly dropping, the weapons sucked and most of them were like the same thing! Sniper Rifle, WTF was up with aiming with it!? The campaign was repetitive, the story was terrible, the AI acted like a bunch of screaming monkies and the enemies were SO ANNOYING. They said the same things over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again. It was obviously no Halo killer!

Now Killzone 2 is around the corner. It has flashier graphics but it still looks horrible! Same annoying Enemies, same boring squad-mates, etc. Something tells me that Killzone 2 will be as good as the first Killzone, which by the way was horrible if you didnt read the first paragraph! The devs should've started a completley new series. That's how horrible the first Killzone was. Am I the only one who believes that it will stink and the "genes" will be passed down?

so now that the devs have got a huge budget and the backing of sony , its still gonna suck.

its gameplay might not be revolutionary but i think it might get a 9.0 here.

All I can say is wow. What is up with the constant repeated threads?! How many more times does a "the first one sucked so that means the second will too" threads?

By your logic that also means Fable 2 will underdeliver because the first did. Grow up, let the game come out and then compare.

The first one held such high expectations. The demo was pretty cool. But the actual game itself turned out to be a pile of turd. The second one looks similiar to the first one except that it has flashier graphics. Same weapons and enemies.

you're a superstitious fellow aren't you? well i guess the playstation "two" isn't so lucky hu?

The first one held such high expectations. The demo was pretty cool. But the actual game itself turned out to be a pile of turd. The second one looks similiar to the first one except that it has flashier graphics. Same weapons and enemies.

The_Decapitated

I never knew these guys were in Killzone 1...

[QUOTE="The_Decapitated"]

The first one held such high expectations. The demo was pretty cool. But the actual game itself turned out to be a pile of turd. The second one looks similiar to the first one except that it has flashier graphics. Same weapons and enemies.

leviathan91

I never knew these guys were in Killzone 1...

[QUOTE="The_Decapitated"]

The first one held such high expectations. The demo was pretty cool. But the actual game itself turned out to be a pile of turd. The second one looks similiar to the first one except that it has flashier graphics. Same weapons and enemies.

leviathan91

I never knew these guys were in Killzone 1...

[QUOTE="The_Decapitated"]

The first one held such high expectations. The demo was pretty cool. But the actual game itself turned out to be a pile of turd. The second one looks similiar to the first one except that it has flashier graphics. Same weapons and enemies.

leviathan91

I never knew these guys were in Killzone 1...

They werent there but from all those trailers that I saw, the Helgahst foot soldiers consist of most of the enemies and the look just like they did in the first killzone.

[QUOTE="leviathan91"][QUOTE="The_Decapitated"]

The first one held such high expectations. The demo was pretty cool. But the actual game itself turned out to be a pile of turd. The second one looks similiar to the first one except that it has flashier graphics. Same weapons and enemies.

The_Decapitated

I never knew these guys were in Killzone 1..

[QUOTE="The_Decapitated"]

The first one held such high expectations. The demo was pretty cool. But the actual game itself turned out to be a pile of turd. The second one looks similiar to the first one except that it has flashier graphics. Same weapons and enemies.

leviathan91

I never knew these guys were in Killzone 1..

[QUOTE="The_Decapitated"]

The first one held such high expectations. The demo was pretty cool. But the actual game itself turned out to be a pile of turd. The second one looks similiar to the first one except that it has flashier graphics. Same weapons and enemies.

leviathan91

I never knew these guys were in Killzone 1...

They werent there but from all those trailers that I saw, the Helgahst foot soldiers consist of most of the enemies and the look just like they did in the first killzone.

Like how the locusts in Gears 2 look just like the ones from Gears 1 and how there were no new enemies in the footage?

Am I the only one here who thinks that Killzone 2 will still suck? I mean, the first one was HORRIBLE and that's an understatement!

The_Decapitated

It was made by a different team. You may say "no, it's still Guerrilla Games", but that would be correct only in name. The original Killzone was made by around 40 or so people. Killzone 2 is being made by over 120 people, the bulk of which have been brought in from other successful Sony studios. It also has a massive budget which has been used to hire new talent.

The graphics were "muddy", the framerate was constantly dropping, the weapons sucked and most of them were like the same thing! Sniper Rifle, WTF was up with aiming with it!? The campaign was repetitive, the story was terrible, the AI acted like a bunch of screaming monkies and the enemies were SO ANNOYING. They said the same things over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again. It was obviously no Halo killer! The_Decapitated

It's war, what did you expect it to look like? Bright colors and pretty rainbows? The framerate has been a rock solid 30fps in all the recent Killzone 2 media, and it's still got 9 months left of development time to iron out any kinks. It has more weapons than the first Killzone, has a more varied campaign (although I can't comment on the story), and the AI is in the process of being designed by one of the best AI programmers in the industry (it is not ready yet though, hence the dumb placeholder AI seen so far).

Now Killzone 2 is around the corner. It has flashier graphics but it still looks horrible! Same annoying Enemies, same boring squad-mates, etc. Something tells me that Killzone 2 will be as good as the first Killzone, which by the way was horrible if you didnt read the first paragraph! The devs should've started a completley new series. That's how horrible the first Killzone was. Am I the only one who believes that it will stink and the "genes" will be passed down?

The_Decapitated

Killzone 2 is going to improve on the original in every way, as i've shown in the above paragraph. The team is different, and have already demonstrated how skilled they are at exploiting the PS3's power and making a great game to play in the process. They still haven't even shown the online and co-op.

Here's an idea, lets all wait until the game is actually released so that we don't...

Am I the only one here who thinks that Killzone 2 will still suck? I mean, the first one was HORRIBLE and that's an understatement! The graphics were "muddy", the framerate was constantly dropping, the weapons sucked and most of them were like the same thing! Sniper Rifle, WTF was up with aiming with it!? The campaign was repetitive, the story was terrible, the AI acted like a bunch of screaming monkies and the enemies were SO ANNOYING. They said the same things over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again. It was obviously no Halo killer!

Now Killzone 2 is around the corner. It has flashier graphics but it still looks horrible! Same annoying Enemies, same boring squad-mates, etc. Something tells me that Killzone 2 will be as good as the first Killzone, which by the way was horrible if you didnt read the first paragraph! The devs should've started a completley new series. That's how horrible the first Killzone was. Am I the only one who believes that it will stink and the "genes" will be passed down?

The_Decapitated

It was made by a different team. You may say "no, it's still Guerrilla Games", but that would be correct only in name. The original Killzone was made by around 40 or so people. Killzone 2 is being made by over 120 people, the bulk of which have been brought in from other successful Sony studios.

-Spock-

It's amazing how many times this is brought up, but is always ignored...

The story and characters(Reco was the man) in KZ one was actually really good.

I love the logic and according to your last paragraph, the devs should of started a new IP? Well in that case, Rockstar should of just gave up on the GTA series when the first one got a 6.9. :|leviathan91

yup, and nintendo shouldnt have even bothered with the wii. Not after the gamecube lost to ps2 and xbox :roll:

each time a useless threads bashing KZ2, gets me more hyped get this game...

Its funny how haters (mostly blind lemmings) bash KZ2's gameplay, stating its generic or even boring... Can they please tell me where they bought KZ2 so i got get it since i just saw a gameplay vid for the game and from those 2 mins i cannot deduct that THE gameplay is boring...

Ohh so KZ2 will suck because well KZ1 was an average title... mmm wow thats a reason which should have taken weeks and massive hours of thoughts and research in order to come up with that conclusion... come on... Just say that you want KZ2 to flop badly because its a PS3 exclusive... no need for sad reasons...

I have seen many great titles for which their sequels DIDN't live up to the expectations and delivered much less than what was expected and what was delivered by their prequels...

KZ2's problem are not graphically (cause its looking good), not even gameplay wise (it SEEMS fast, frentic and shooting seems good), its only problem is that its a PS3 exclusive.... I have high hopes on this game, but will wait till Feb 2009 when its released and i play the game before i judge... haters should do the same...

Didn't the original Killzone score a 7?

Is that now considered "horrible"? I thought that still meant "good"... >.>
(Never played it, so I can't judge. But the sequel does look interesting IMO)

Didn't the original Killzone score a 7?

Is that now considered "horrible"? I thought that still meant "good"... >.>
(Never played it, so I can't judge. But the sequel does look interesting IMO)

Nightflash28

6.9

Killzone 2 looks bad not because of the first game, but because it looks generic.Willy105

Most new FPS look generic IMO......

Half life 2

DIablo 2

Warcraft 2
Resident Evil 2

super metroid

Just to name a few..

[QUOTE="Willy105"]Killzone 2 looks bad not because of the first game, but because it looks generic.HarlockJC

Most new FPS look generic IMO......

if 2 isn't a lucky number, would that mean Gears of War 2and StartCraft 2 would also stink..??

Am I the only one here who thinks that Killzone 2 will still suck? I mean, the first one was HORRIBLE and that's an understatement! The graphics were "muddy", the framerate was constantly dropping, the weapons sucked and most of them were like the same thing! Sniper Rifle, WTF was up with aiming with it!? The campaign was repetitive, the story was terrible, the AI acted like a bunch of screaming monkies and the enemies were SO ANNOYING. They said the same things over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again. It was obviously no Halo killer!

Now Killzone 2 is around the corner. It has flashier graphics but it still looks horrible! Same annoying Enemies, same boring squad-mates, etc. Something tells me that Killzone 2 will be as good as the first Killzone, which by the way was horrible if you didnt read the first paragraph! The devs should've started a completley new series. That's how horrible the first Killzone was. Am I the only one who believes that it will stink and the "genes" will be passed down?

The_Decapitated

I know logic doesn't exist here in System Wars but, shouldn't we wait until the game comes out and everybody plays it first instead of posting a mindless essay on why you think it "will suck"? Just a thought.

[QUOTE="The_Decapitated"]

The first one held such high expectations. The demo was pretty cool. But the actual game itself turned out to be a pile of turd. The second one looks similiar to the first one except that it has flashier graphics. Same weapons and enemies.

leviathan91

I never knew these guys were in Killzone 1...

a fat guy and a helicopter

innovation!

Killzone 2 looks like it might be good. I'm definitely interested in it.

The original Killzone wasn't "horrible", it was a pretty decent game, and 6.9 is'nt THAT bad of a score either. The only thing that brought killzone down was the hype.

Killzone 2 looks bad not because of the first game, but because it looks generic.Willy105

i agree, the gameplay just looks :|. unlike other games where you look at a screenshotand go "wow that looks really fun"

[QUOTE="Willy105"]Killzone 2 looks bad not because of the first game, but because it looks generic.crunchUK

i agree, the gameplay just looks :|. unlike other games where you look at a screenshotand go "wow that looks really fun"

alot of hate coming from wii fanboys. Just sit back and play something else to it comes out.