360 and PS3 AAAE comparison.

[QUOTE="-General_Ram-"]

[QUOTE="Star67"]i wonder which one deserves the score more?Star67

well in PD0's defense, PD0 was a 9 in 2005. If it was reviewed now it would barely get a 7.

Point is PD0 was AAAE *********for its time*************.

yeah, i can agree with that good point

[QUOTE="carlisledavid79"][QUOTE="-General_Ram-"][QUOTE="Night_stalker01"]

PS3 got a AAAAE June 2008.

Xbox 360 got AAAAE... oh, wait...

-General_Ram-

GTA4 will be AAAAE (sorta) when the dlc hits.

sorta :lol:

no it wont

ya...i thought that was funny. but ya, if the dlc is AAA, u never know.

Dude....what?

[QUOTE="Star67"]i wonder which one deserves the score more?-General_Ram-

well in PD0's defense, PD0 was a 9 in 2005. If it was reviewed now it would barely get a 7.

Point is PD0 was AAAE *********for its time*************.

[QUOTE="-General_Ram-"]

[QUOTE="Star67"]i wonder which one deserves the score more?jmdude

well in PD0's defense, PD0 was a 9 in 2005. If it was reviewed now it would barely get a 7.

Point is PD0 was AAAE *********for its time*************.

It never deserved anything special.

Wat about NGS?Sony-tha-champ0

Just like GRAW, not exclusive

Oh wait...

NGS imo is an exclusive game if GRAW is. Otherwise none is.

Well, how about this.

TC, the 360 has been out a Full Year longer than the PS3, so it has had PLENTY of time to get a foothold on AAAE's.

Heck, that first year, it proved that being first allows games to get better ratings perhaps, since their was no next gen counterpart to compare too.

In essence, the 360 set the bar with that full year of having no competition.

Heck, the 360 is 3 years old in a typical 5 year cycle, it's older and the 360 is approaching it's FOURTH XMAS!

.

.

.

So, how did the newer rookie PS3 get a AAAAE before the 360?

SolidTy

First of all, what are you getting at? MGS 4 was in development for 6 odd years or something.

Second the xbox wasn't a success in spite of the PS3, it was a success because the PS3 failed compared to older PS consoles.

The whole one year thing is truly lame, considering the position MS were in before the 360, they did a damn good job getting it to the level of the Playstation brand.

See if its an argument for the 360 as in "well it had a whole extra years advantage" it doesn't work because it still makes Sony look bad, if only for not having far more when it did come out, especially combined with Sonys experience in the market.

And if its an argument against the 360 as in "it had an extra year and still it hasnt...", it still doesn't work because Sony could still be doing a whole lot better considering the market share they had, the developers they had and the raw brand power they had.

Its frankly pathetic either way.

360 didn't even have nearly as many 3rd party devs then as it does now because everyone was holding out for Sony.

Also labeling the PS3 the newer rookie console as if its some sort of underdog hero of this gen is a bit of a stretch considering their pedigree. Not trying to put words in your mouth but the PS3 was never a rookie under the PS brand, it always had far too much experience behind it.

[QUOTE="mgs_freak91"][QUOTE="CaseyWegner"][QUOTE="mgs_freak91"][QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

[QUOTE="Bigboi500"]Wow you guys take GS scores way too seriously.CaseyWegner

it's what we use here since it's the lesser of the two evils...the other being gamerankings.

yea but watchin so many people argueing like....well lets say crazy... is just idiotic, its just a number, and someone elses thought on the game, even a review is just an opinion. unless its a 10 or a...0 :?

gotta use something.

lol true. but it just gets way overboard....some one is gonna do something stupid one day :?

like what?

"
Like take review scores so seriously that they think they're the mark of whether a game is successful or not. Or try and use review scores to determine the best system on the market.

I know it sounds insane, but there are people here who do that. Can you believe that?"

what subrosian said is pretty much spot on. who knows, people might become so obsessed that they might hurt someone for some reason, yep kinda weird and probly not true - but some people stalk others, some times when they dont even know the person - obsession goes a long way. yea insane, and might not happen anytime soon, but still possible.

[QUOTE="TPOJ-TPO"]

• 360 AAAE: PDZ, GRAW, Halo 3 (And a fourth one I can't remember).
• PS3 AAAE: LBP

carlisledavid79

PS3 AAAAE: MGS4

360 AAAAE:

Well, how about this.

TC, the 360 has been out a Full Year longer than the PS3, so it has had PLENTY of time to get a foothold on AAAE's.

Heck, that first year, it proved that being first allows games to get better ratings perhaps, since their was no next gen counterpart to compare too.

In essence, the 360 set the bar with that full year of having no competition.

Heck, the 360 is 3 years old in a typical 5 year cycle, it's older and the 360 is approaching it's FOURTH XMAS!

.

.

.

So, how did the newer rookie PS3 get a AAAAE before the 360?

SolidTy

[QUOTE="SolidTy"]

Well, how about this.

TC, the 360 has been out a Full Year longer than the PS3, so it has had PLENTY of time to get a foothold on AAAE's.

Heck, that first year, it proved that being first allows games to get better ratings perhaps, since their was no next gen counterpart to compare too.

In essence, the 360 set the bar with that full year of having no competition.

Heck, the 360 is 3 years old in a typical 5 year cycle, it's older and the 360 is approaching it's FOURTH XMAS!

.

.

.

So, how did the newer rookie PS3 get a AAAAE before the 360?

desyple

What point? You're fooling yourselfs if you think the PS3 will get 8 AAAE in a year to even it up with the 360. Sure you guys have the only AAAAE game this gen, but seriously it's just ONE GAME! I don't buy a console for ONE GAME!

[QUOTE="desyple"][QUOTE="SolidTy"]

Well, how about this.

TC, the 360 has been out a Full Year longer than the PS3, so it has had PLENTY of time to get a foothold on AAAE's.

Heck, that first year, it proved that being first allows games to get better ratings perhaps, since their was no next gen counterpart to compare too.

In essence, the 360 set the bar with that full year of having no competition.

Heck, the 360 is 3 years old in a typical 5 year cycle, it's older and the 360 is approaching it's FOURTH XMAS!

.

.

.

So, how did the newer rookie PS3 get a AAAAE before the 360?

xsubtownerx

What point? You're fooling yourselfs if you think the PS3 will get 8 AAAE in a year to even it up with the 360. Sure you guys have the only AAAAE game this gen, but seriously it's just ONE GAME! I don't buy a console for ONE GAME!

Why not just use MGS4? Unless were really trying to be specific...Broman6015

Why not judge the games for themselves, and finally put a stop to the nonsense that is "AAAE" and "gamespot scores only"?

[QUOTE="Night_stalker01"]

PS3 got a AAAAE June 2008.

Xbox 360 got AAAAE... oh, wait...

-General_Ram-

GTA4 will be AAAAE (sorta) when the dlc hits.

[QUOTE="desyple"][QUOTE="SolidTy"]

Well, how about this.

TC, the 360 has been out a Full Year longer than the PS3, so it has had PLENTY of time to get a foothold on AAAE's.

Heck, that first year, it proved that being first allows games to get better ratings perhaps, since their was no next gen counterpart to compare too.

In essence, the 360 set the bar with that full year of having no competition.

Heck, the 360 is 3 years old in a typical 5 year cycle, it's older and the 360 is approaching it's FOURTH XMAS!

.

.

.

So, how did the newer rookie PS3 get a AAAAE before the 360?

xsubtownerx

What point? You're fooling yourselfs if you think the PS3 will get 8 AAAE in a year to even it up with the 360. Sure you guys have the only AAAAE game this gen, but seriously it's just ONE GAME! I don't buy a console for ONE GAME!

Don't you understand?

This thread had issues when it was conceived. The TC's logic was broken, and this is the opposite logic, for him to deal with.

In the end, what matters isn't scores at all, but the games poeple enjoy, on any system. If the TC wants to be some sort of fanboy, we can all play his game, but he loses.

[QUOTE="Star67"]i wonder which one deserves the score more?-General_Ram-

well in PD0's defense, PD0 was a 9 in 2005. If it was reviewed now it would barely get a 7.

Point is PD0 was AAAE *********for its time*************.

it would barely get a 6 and PD0 was AAAE for its time...it was crap the only reason people bought it was because they didn't want to have a 360 with no games...or their was really no point in owning it.

and their was hope that it was a good as the original

[QUOTE="jmdude"][QUOTE="-General_Ram-"]

[QUOTE="Star67"]i wonder which one deserves the score more?Spybot_9

well in PD0's defense, PD0 was a 9 in 2005. If it was reviewed now it would barely get a 7.

Point is PD0 was AAAE *********for its time*************.

It never deserved anything special.

It scored so high because of hype (next-gen PD game) and the lack of competition at the time.

Some of the worse damage control I seen.