This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="ps3_owns_360Wii"]i play games, not look for minor detail that make different version inferior:(_rpg_FANyou also forget what sony promised and why in the name you pay 500$ if you are playing inferior version (even a little bit inferior)well, since KZ2 looks the way it look, it very safe to say it at the dev fault
[QUOTE="_rpg_FAN"][QUOTE="ps3_owns_360Wii"]i play games, not look for minor detail that make different version inferior:(ermacnessyou also forget what sony promised and why in the name you pay 500$ if you are playing inferior version (even a little bit inferior)well, since KZ2 looks the way it look, it very safe to say it at the dev faultit's the dev's fault that they don''t have 5 years and $25 million to work on the PS3 version? seriously, stop making excuses
[QUOTE="urdead18"]Killzone 2 graphics > Everything on the 360, but hey, keep disputing these tiny insignificant differences if it makes you feel better.GTR_FXmaybe in your opinion in the ign review kz2's graphics couldn't even outscore geow2 i agree personaly,i dont think graphics are that impresive,not even one review said "omg best graphics ever" they all said more or less that game is beautifull with FEW PROBLEMS!! yes and they said something about poor textures here and there
[QUOTE="ermacness"][QUOTE="_rpg_FAN"] you also forget what sony promised and why in the name you pay 500$ if you are playing inferior version (even a little bit inferior)EndorphinMasterwell, since KZ2 looks the way it look, it very safe to say it at the dev faultit's the dev's fault that they don''t have 5 years and $25 million to work on the PS3 version? seriously, stop making excusesok, just look at the ps3 exclusive line-up. It totally destroys most of the 360 exclusives in the visuals. Only KZ2 took alot of money and 4 years to develpoe the game. What about GT5p, Uncharted, MGS4, R & C, and plenty of other exclusives that looks great on the ps3?
Are you guys serious? The differences are so minor they are negligable. I'm not going to trash the game because a 360 owner can see one more vein on some guy's face than I can. Geez people, dont be rediculous now. The PS3 always suffers slightly with multiplatform games, but the differences are hardly worth mentioning.efruchthmmm when your console is 200$ more expencive and you (sony) PROMISED best graphics and "1080p @60 fps every game" than things like this are MORE THAN WORTH MENTIONING! especialy when oyu have to install demo / game on HD and buy things you dont need (br)
[QUOTE="efrucht"]Are you guys serious? The differences are so minor they are negligable. I'm not going to trash the game because a 360 owner can see one more vein on some guy's face than I can. Geez people, dont be rediculous now. The PS3 always suffers slightly with multiplatform games, but the differences are hardly worth mentioning._rpg_FANhmmm when your console is 200$ more expencive and you (sony) PROMISED best graphics and "1080p @60 fps every game" than things like this are MORE THAN WORTH MENTIONING! especialy when oyu have to install demo / game on HD and buy things you dont need (br)uhh!!! ps3 is still worth it 360 only owners dont get uncharted, killzone 2, gow3, r2, mgs4. sheesh just knowing gow3 is coming out makes owning a ps3 sweet!!!
Not only textures looks bad and all blurry on ps3 but it also has much more jaggies!!!!! OWNAGE TO COWS RIGHT THERE. Sad part is that it was a ps3 exclusive 1stSyferoniklol RE 5 was announced for 360 a year before the Ps3 launched
Killzone 2 graphics > Everything on the 360, but hey, keep disputing these tiny insignificant differences if it makes you feel better.urdead18
Killzone 2 has lower rez textures then HL2. Only thing that game has going for it is hype. You would think with a blue ray disk they could afford the space to use higher rez textures or maybe its a limitation of the PS3's gpu?
[QUOTE="urdead18"]Killzone 2 graphics > Everything on the 360, but hey, keep disputing these tiny insignificant differences if it makes you feel better._Kikode_
Killzone 2 has lower rez textures then HL2. Only thing that game has going for it is hype. You would think with a blue ray disk they could afford the space to use higher rez textures or maybe its a limitation of the PS3's gpu?
yeah the low res textures were one of the biggest complaints in the KZ2 ign and GT reviews[QUOTE="Syferonik"]Not only textures looks bad and all blurry on ps3 but it also has much more jaggies!!!!! OWNAGE TO COWS RIGHT THERE. Sad part is that it was a ps3 exclusive 1stPolaris_choicelol RE 5 was announced for 360 a year before the Ps3 launched I am talking about way back...
[QUOTE="efrucht"]Are you guys serious? The differences are so minor they are negligable. I'm not going to trash the game because a 360 owner can see one more vein on some guy's face than I can. Geez people, dont be rediculous now. The PS3 always suffers slightly with multiplatform games, but the differences are hardly worth mentioning._rpg_FANhmmm when your console is 200$ more expencive and you (sony) PROMISED best graphics and "1080p @60 fps every game" than things like this are MORE THAN WORTH MENTIONING! especialy when oyu have to install demo / game on HD and buy things you dont need (br)That why Ps3 version is called RE5gb lol
[QUOTE="urdead18"]Killzone 2 graphics > Everything on the 360, but hey, keep disputing these tiny insignificant differences if it makes you feel better._Kikode_
Killzone 2 has lower rez textures then HL2. Only thing that game has going for it is hype. You would think with a blue ray disk they could afford the space to use higher rez textures or maybe its a limitation of the PS3's gpu?
Just stop posting , visually KZ2 stomps Hl2 in every concevable way especialy in texture quality . Not only that it obliterates anything on the 360 look at the reviews .[QUOTE="_Kikode_"][QUOTE="urdead18"]Killzone 2 graphics > Everything on the 360, but hey, keep disputing these tiny insignificant differences if it makes you feel better.Polaris_choice
Killzone 2 has lower rez textures then HL2. Only thing that game has going for it is hype. You would think with a blue ray disk they could afford the space to use higher rez textures or maybe its a limitation of the PS3's gpu?
Just stop posting , visually KZ2 stomps Hl2 in every concevable way especialy in texture quality . Not only that it obliterates anything on the 360 look at the reviews . :lol: lets look at the IGN review oh wow kz2 graphics couldn't even outscore geow2 :lol:[QUOTE="Polaris_choice"][QUOTE="_Kikode_"]Just stop posting , visually KZ2 stomps Hl2 in every concevable way especialy in texture quality . Not only that it obliterates anything on the 360 look at the reviews . :lol: lets look at the IGN review oh wow kz2 graphics couldn't even outscore geow2 :lol: Ohh wow, the guy who posted that they added run and gun mechanics to RE5 and then ignored the fact that I debunked it. Dude first off you haven't seen KZ2 in action so you can't judge. Second off this is about Resident evil 5 so stay on Topic. Why does it matter KZ2 has been worked on, and you have not seen it yet. Judge it when you do.Killzone 2 has lower rez textures then HL2. Only thing that game has going for it is hype. You would think with a blue ray disk they could afford the space to use higher rez textures or maybe its a limitation of the PS3's gpu?
GTR_FX
you lems are going overboard now. KZ2 looking worse than Gears2 and HL2????
denial hurts. we all know deep down inside you would kill to get to play this game. just like hitler in those youtube videos
[QUOTE="urdead18"][QUOTE="GTR_FX"] yeah the low res textures were one of the biggest complaints in the KZ2 ign and GT reviewsGTR_FXYou're both on crack. There is absolutely no disputing Killzone 2's graphics, I played the beta and it obliterated any game I've played. Nothing on the 360, nothing else on the Ps3 looks as good as Killzone 2, especially in motion. Lens flares, bloom, dynamic lighting, THE SHELLS MAKE A NOISE IF THEY BOUNCE OFF EACH OTHER IN MID AIR AFTER BEING SHOT OUT OF THE GUN. It's incredibly detailed and beautiful, and yeah, it absolutely is because of the huge budget and 4-5 years of dev time, but who cares, I get to play it in less than a month, I could care less about how long it took to get up to that point.
:lol: your a fanboy in denial
go watch the gamespot KZ2 impressions-
andre (the guy who played the full single player campaine) - "well it does some things very well, animation lighting, I think the lens flare is the best i've ever seen. But I don't think its totally consistent, for one some of the textures are lacking in detail, up close they just look hideous. And the character models...they are some of the ugliest characters i've seen since oblivion, they are hideous. And though the animation is great, overall the lip syncing is off consistently."
http://n4g.com/ps3/NewsCom-270422.aspx
you=selfowned
Killzone 2 graphics > Everything on the 360, but hey, keep disputing these tiny insignificant differences if it makes you feel better.urdead18Na that's just a fanboy opinion..
[QUOTE="_Kikode_"][QUOTE="urdead18"]Killzone 2 graphics > Everything on the 360, but hey, keep disputing these tiny insignificant differences if it makes you feel better.Polaris_choice
Killzone 2 has lower rez textures then HL2. Only thing that game has going for it is hype. You would think with a blue ray disk they could afford the space to use higher rez textures or maybe its a limitation of the PS3's gpu?
Just stop posting , visually KZ2 stomps Hl2 in every concevable way especialy in texture quality . Not only that it obliterates anything on the 360 look at the reviews . No you should stop it lol,Half Life 2 has better textures than KZ2 lol.[QUOTE="GTR_FX"][QUOTE="urdead18"] You're both on crack. There is absolutely no disputing Killzone 2's graphics, I played the beta and it obliterated any game I've played. Nothing on the 360, nothing else on the Ps3 looks as good as Killzone 2, especially in motion. Lens flares, bloom, dynamic lighting, THE SHELLS MAKE A NOISE IF THEY BOUNCE OFF EACH OTHER IN MID AIR AFTER BEING SHOT OUT OF THE GUN. It's incredibly detailed and beautiful, and yeah, it absolutely is because of the huge budget and 4-5 years of dev time, but who cares, I get to play it in less than a month, I could care less about how long it took to get up to that point.Animal-Mother
:lol: your a fanboy in denial
go watch the gamespot KZ2 impressions-
andre (the guy who played the full single player campaine) - "well it does some things very well, animation lighting, I think the lens flare is the best i've ever seen. But I don't think its totally consistent, for one some of the textures are lacking in detail, up close they just look hideous. And the character models...they are some of the ugliest characters i've seen since oblivion, they are hideous. And though the animation is great, overall the lip syncing is off consistently."
http://n4g.com/ps3/NewsCom-270422.aspx
you=selfowned
why are you bring reviews into the discussion?
no where did I mention the reviews, 9.3 is diappointing considering how much this game was hyped
my response was to the graphics, which were supposed to be the best looking this gen, and are flopping everywhere, heck even on ign review kz2's graphics could even outscore geow2 which cows said looked like garabage,
I guess that makes KZ2 even bigger garbage, not to mention how some said it looked better than crysis,
deny it all you want, the facts are right there in black and white :|
you lems are going overboard now. KZ2 looking worse than Gears2 and HL2????
denial hurts. we all know deep down inside you would kill to get to play this game. just like hitler in those youtube videos
shakmaster13
I don't see anyone saying KZ2 looks worse than Gears 2 and HL2. All I see is them saying that it didn't outscore Gears 2 in graphics and it doesn't have as polished textures and HL2. I guess you need to read better
[QUOTE="_Kikode_"][QUOTE="urdead18"]Killzone 2 graphics > Everything on the 360, but hey, keep disputing these tiny insignificant differences if it makes you feel better.Polaris_choice
Killzone 2 has lower rez textures then HL2. Only thing that game has going for it is hype. You would think with a blue ray disk they could afford the space to use higher rez textures or maybe its a limitation of the PS3's gpu?
Just stop posting , visually KZ2 stomps Hl2 in every concevable way especialy in texture quality . Not only that it obliterates anything on the 360 look at the reviews . Na again you're just passing your fanboy opinion as fact.[QUOTE="urdead18"]Killzone 2 graphics > Everything on the 360, but hey, keep disputing these tiny insignificant differences if it makes you feel better.McdonaIdsGuyNa that's just a fanboy opinion.. And alot of professionals as well
Well, I know what I say doesn't mean anything to you guys since you all are fanboys and are biased one way or another, but I have dled both version and Compared them....and Graphics wise they are pretty equal I played at 720p since the ps3 demo doesn't upscale to 1080p weird so I just set both to 720p and the demos were equally pretty >.>
But the big difference I did notice is that the ps3 version is a lot light game than the 360 version and the 360 version is dark kinda orangers or dirtier ....I don't think you know what i mean
If you own a samsung HDTV set it to cinema and you'll know what I mean, it looks more like that >.>
but they are equally good graphics wise, I kinda like the orangier look on the 360 version but I love the controls on the ps3 version they seem more fluid, I will be picking it up on the ps3
also when the people grab you shaking the left analog on the ps3 is alot more responsive and you get out of it alot quicker than doing it on the 360 controller
Just my 2 cent
[QUOTE="McdonaIdsGuy"][QUOTE="urdead18"]Killzone 2 graphics > Everything on the 360, but hey, keep disputing these tiny insignificant differences if it makes you feel better.Animal-MotherNa that's just a fanboy opinion.. And alot of professionals as well sorry opm and psx extreme doesn't count
[QUOTE="Animal-Mother"][QUOTE="McdonaIdsGuy"]and it probably will be. so far: empire - 5/5 OPM - 5/5 OPM doesn't count?SHOULD be a good game
GTR_FX
[QUOTE="Animal-Mother"][QUOTE="GTR_FX"] so far: empire - 5/5 OPM - 5/5GTR_FXOPM doesn't count? those were the only 2 reviews ATM, I could care less after the ign and gs reviews come in Wait but you said OPM doesn't matter. Why use it then?
[QUOTE="ps3_owns_360Wii"]i play games, not look for minor detail that make different version inferior:(_rpg_FANyou also forget what sony promised and why in the name you pay 500$ if you are playing inferior version (even a little bit inferior)
Though this isn't really confirmed (and so is the graphics bit) i heard that the Ps3 version will have more enemies on screen than the Xbox 360 version.
People that are using the excuse of killzone's graphics not outscoring gears of war 2's graphics on ign really need to start thinking for themselves instead of having an article determine their opinion for them. You have all seen Killzone 2 in action and it looks much more dynamic and technically impressive than Gears of War 2's.
Furthermore about the guy in the GS First impressions video that complains about texture issues and character models in KZ2; the same can be applied to GEOW. 2 For example, when you start a match or a level, there is texture pop-in for the armor and the texture pop-in also occurs during cutscenes as well. Also, the character models for GEOW2 aren't that good-looking either, they are unproportianate and their faces have some jaggies when the camera zooms in.
By the way, why am I talking about Killzone 2 and GEOW2 in a thread concerning RE5? haha.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment