$399 PS3 hits america OCT 28th.

  • 85 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for akuma303x
akuma303x

3703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 akuma303x
Member since 2004 • 3703 Posts
Anyone else thinking about getting it if it comes in white like the japanese version?
Avatar image for jackvegas21
jackvegas21

3157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 jackvegas21
Member since 2007 • 3157 Posts

I hope they keep the black one. My white360 gets dusty enough.

Avatar image for MikeE21286
MikeE21286

10405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 MikeE21286
Member since 2003 • 10405 Posts

Anyone else thinking about getting it if it comes in white like the japanese version? akuma303x

that would be so awesome if it was in white.....I wish I had a white one :(

Avatar image for thinicer
thinicer

3704

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 thinicer
Member since 2006 • 3704 Posts
Nope. There are no games on it that I want. If COD 4 was exclusive to PS3 then I would get it, but as it stands there are no exclusive games on PS3 that make me want to own the system. Maybe next year though when dualshock 3 is available.
Avatar image for akuma303x
akuma303x

3703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 akuma303x
Member since 2004 • 3703 Posts
Nope. There are no games on it that I want. If COD 4 was exclusive to PS3 then I would get it, but as it stands there are no exclusive games on PS3 that make me want to own the system. Maybe next year though.thinicer
I wont lie, I just want the Bluray player in it. I really dont care about many PS3 games at the moment. But it may come packed with a Spiderman 3 movie if rumors are to be believed.
Avatar image for jackvegas21
jackvegas21

3157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 jackvegas21
Member since 2007 • 3157 Posts

Nope. There are no games on it that I want. If COD 4 was exclusive to PS3 then I would get it, but as it stands there are no exclusive games on PS3 that make me want to own the system. Maybe next year though when dualshock 3 is available.thinicer

Well I definately want to try out Uncharted, and I doubt they will drop the price any lower than 399 for a while, so I'm picking mines up as soon as possible. Why wait?

Avatar image for Zerostatic0
Zerostatic0

4263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#7 Zerostatic0
Member since 2005 • 4263 Posts
That would be awesome if it was white to go with my white Wii, White DS, and White 360.
Avatar image for akuma303x
akuma303x

3703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 akuma303x
Member since 2004 • 3703 Posts

[QUOTE="thinicer"]Nope. There are no games on it that I want. If COD 4 was exclusive to PS3 then I would get it, but as it stands there are no exclusive games on PS3 that make me want to own the system. Maybe next year though when dualshock 3 is available.jackvegas21

Well I definately want to try out Uncharted, and I doubt they will drop the price any lower than 399 for a while, so I'm picking mines up as soon as possible. Why wait?

agreed. It wont drop price again for a while. If it comes in white I'll get one. If not, I will wait till it does.
Avatar image for Eltroz
Eltroz

5238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Eltroz
Member since 2007 • 5238 Posts
$400 for a console that can not play any of the PS2 games still does not seem worth it.
Avatar image for Zerostatic0
Zerostatic0

4263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#10 Zerostatic0
Member since 2005 • 4263 Posts
If this happened, I'd have to get a Mac to go with all of my white consoles, and I'll have to throw my furniture away and go to Ikea to do a home make over, and . . . . um, sorry, I got too caught up into it . . .
Avatar image for LosDaddie
LosDaddie

10318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 57

User Lists: 0

#11 LosDaddie
Member since 2006 • 10318 Posts

[QUOTE="thinicer"]Nope. There are no games on it that I want. If COD 4 was exclusive to PS3 then I would get it, but as it stands there are no exclusive games on PS3 that make me want to own the system. Maybe next year though.akuma303x
I wont lie, I just want the Bluray player in it. I really dont care about many PS3 games at the moment. But it may come packed with a Spiderman 3 movie if rumors are to be believed.

If not for the blu-ray player, then my PS3 would never get turned on.

In fact, R&C ToD will probably be the only PS3 game I buy for a long while.

Avatar image for BeyondPerfect
BeyondPerfect

136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 BeyondPerfect
Member since 2007 • 136 Posts

Sony took too long to appeal to me.

Hell, they still haven't. Unless Socom Confrontation or Zipper's project turn out to be as great as Socom 1 and 2. I don't plan on buying a PS3. I'll just use that money to either buy more games for my 360, or build a PC if my 360 gets the RROD or something.

Avatar image for asdasd
asdasd

4464

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 asdasd
Member since 2005 • 4464 Posts
If they had a white version with PS2 BC, Id buy one for 500. The PS3 just sticks out on my stand lol. Wii and 360 are white and the PS3 is black. It just looks weird.
Avatar image for neogeo419
neogeo419

1474

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 neogeo419
Member since 2006 • 1474 Posts
[QUOTE="jackvegas21"]

[QUOTE="thinicer"]Nope. There are no games on it that I want. If COD 4 was exclusive to PS3 then I would get it, but as it stands there are no exclusive games on PS3 that make me want to own the system. Maybe next year though when dualshock 3 is available.akuma303x

Well I definately want to try out Uncharted, and I doubt they will drop the price any lower than 399 for a while, so I'm picking mines up as soon as possible. Why wait?

agreed. It wont drop price again for a while. If it comes in white I'll get one. If not, I will wait till it does.

I would not say that. 4 SKUs, 1 major price drop to clear inventory, I think i'll wait for the 20gb@ $250 to be brought backby next spring:lol:
Avatar image for Jaysonguy
Jaysonguy

39454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#15 Jaysonguy
Member since 2006 • 39454 Posts
That's the one that Sony is screwing over everyone because it wont play PS2 or PSOne games right?
Avatar image for ragrdoll21
ragrdoll21

6048

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 ragrdoll21
Member since 2006 • 6048 Posts
$400 for a console that can not play any of the PS2 games still does not seem worth it. Eltroz
It's allway something with you guys. :(
Avatar image for Erkidu
Erkidu

2744

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#17 Erkidu
Member since 2007 • 2744 Posts
That lack of backwards compatibility is an odd decision to me. Apparently, it would cost very little for Sony to include that technology.
Avatar image for ragrdoll21
ragrdoll21

6048

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 ragrdoll21
Member since 2006 • 6048 Posts
That's the one that Sony is screwing over everyone because it wont play PS2 or PSOne games right?Jaysonguy
Yeah, My sister play all of her GC games on Wii! :(
Avatar image for BioShockOwnz
BioShockOwnz

52901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#19 BioShockOwnz
Member since 2006 • 52901 Posts
I pre-ordered the white Japanese PS3 from PlayAsia. I didn't really need another PS3, but I really like the color. Also, my girlfriend wants the Blu-ray player in the bedroom, so I want a PS3 to have in the living room.
Avatar image for Eltroz
Eltroz

5238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Eltroz
Member since 2007 • 5238 Posts
[QUOTE="Eltroz"]$400 for a console that can not play any of the PS2 games still does not seem worth it. ragrdoll21
It's allway something with you guys. :(

Well really come on. You take the whole PS2 libary which had the most AAA exclusive games last gen and most games in general and not be able to play them at all on the new PS3. Meanwhile most of the big games that PS3 fans want on PS3 they have to wait for with some a year away. So why does it make any sense to pay $400 to wait for those games.
Avatar image for Liquid-GEAR
Liquid-GEAR

1574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Liquid-GEAR
Member since 2007 • 1574 Posts
$400 for a console that can not play any of the PS2 games still does not seem worth it. Eltroz
You paid more for a system with worse backwards compatitbility :|
Avatar image for ragrdoll21
ragrdoll21

6048

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 ragrdoll21
Member since 2006 • 6048 Posts
[QUOTE="ragrdoll21"][QUOTE="Eltroz"]$400 for a console that can not play any of the PS2 games still does not seem worth it. Eltroz
It's allway something with you guys. :(

Well really come on. You take the whole PS2 libary which had the most AAA exclusive games last gen and most games in general and not be able to play them at all on the new PS3. Meanwhile most of the big games that PS3 fans want on PS3 they have to wait for with some a year away. So why does it make any sense to pay $400 to wait for those games.

If you guys don't have a PS2 by now, I feel sorry for you guys! There are plenty of games on the PS3 right now.If you want PS2 games.....buy a 60 gig PS3 or a PS2, it's simple.
Avatar image for rockstar183
rockstar183

1637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 rockstar183
Member since 2006 • 1637 Posts
truth fully who really cares about bc , what they need to do is put in a pack in game .
Avatar image for Erkidu
Erkidu

2744

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#24 Erkidu
Member since 2007 • 2744 Posts
[QUOTE="Eltroz"]$400 for a console that can not play any of the PS2 games still does not seem worth it. Liquid-GEAR
You paid more for a system with worse backwards compatitbility :|

:| There is no such thing as "worse backwards compatability" than a console with NO backwards compatability. What are you talking about?
Avatar image for Eltroz
Eltroz

5238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Eltroz
Member since 2007 • 5238 Posts
[QUOTE="Eltroz"]$400 for a console that can not play any of the PS2 games still does not seem worth it. Liquid-GEAR
You paid more for a system with worse backwards compatitbility :|

I have played many xbox games on my 360. On the 40gb you can not play PS2 games at all. So no matter how you spin it the 40gb is worse since 360 users have many xbox games they can play.
Avatar image for Liquid-GEAR
Liquid-GEAR

1574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Liquid-GEAR
Member since 2007 • 1574 Posts

[QUOTE="Liquid-GEAR"][QUOTE="Eltroz"]$400 for a console that can not play any of the PS2 games still does not seem worth it. Erkidu
You paid more for a system with worse backwards compatitbility :|

:| There is no such thing as "worse backwards compatability" than a console with NO backwards compatability. What are you talking about?

Its always easy owning kids :) It plays all PS1 games.

Owned. Try again?

Avatar image for ball_of_air
ball_of_air

2105

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 ball_of_air
Member since 2007 • 2105 Posts

That's the one that Sony is screwing over everyone because it wont play PS2 or PSOne games right?Jaysonguy

Wrong. It's not screwing over anyone, but you knew that because that's why you felt the need to say that because you can't stand the fact that the PS3 is getting better all the time.

Avatar image for ragrdoll21
ragrdoll21

6048

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 ragrdoll21
Member since 2006 • 6048 Posts
[QUOTE="Liquid-GEAR"][QUOTE="Eltroz"]$400 for a console that can not play any of the PS2 games still does not seem worth it. Eltroz
You paid more for a system with worse backwards compatitbility :|

I have played many xbox game son my 360. On the 40gb you can not play PS2 games at all. So no matter how you spin it the 40gb is worse since 360 users have many xbox games they can play.

We'll see when the sales come out.
Avatar image for Liquid-GEAR
Liquid-GEAR

1574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Liquid-GEAR
Member since 2007 • 1574 Posts

[QUOTE="Liquid-GEAR"][QUOTE="Eltroz"]$400 for a console that can not play any of the PS2 games still does not seem worth it. Eltroz
You paid more for a system with worse backwards compatitbility :|

I have played many xbox games on my 360. On the 40gb you can not play PS2 games at all. So no matter how you spin it the 40gb is worse since 360 users have many xbox games they can play.

Many meaning Halo 2 and Ninja Gaiden lol. 40GB plays all PS1 games. That's umm alot more than Xbox library..

No spinning just facts here

Avatar image for Eddie5vs1
Eddie5vs1

6085

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#30 Eddie5vs1
Member since 2004 • 6085 Posts

[QUOTE="thinicer"]Nope. There are no games on it that I want. If COD 4 was exclusive to PS3 then I would get it, but as it stands there are no exclusive games on PS3 that make me want to own the system. Maybe next year though.akuma303x
I wont lie, I just want the Bluray player in it. I really dont care about many PS3 games at the moment. But it may come packed with a Spiderman 3 movie if rumors are to be believed.

ditto. the only reason I want a PS3 is for the Blu-Ray player....it would look pretty sweet on my 1080p TV. While I wouldn't buy aPS3 just for these games, I'd like to get Killzone 2 and Motorstorm.

Avatar image for BioShockOwnz
BioShockOwnz

52901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#31 BioShockOwnz
Member since 2006 • 52901 Posts

[QUOTE="Erkidu"][QUOTE="Liquid-GEAR"][QUOTE="Eltroz"]$400 for a console that can not play any of the PS2 games still does not seem worth it. Liquid-GEAR

You paid more for a system with worse backwards compatitbility :|

:| There is no such thing as "worse backwards compatability" than a console with NO backwards compatability. What are you talking about?

Its always easy owning kids :) It plays all PS1 games.

Owned. Try again?

:roll: You call that "ownage"?:lol:

Avatar image for Erkidu
Erkidu

2744

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#32 Erkidu
Member since 2007 • 2744 Posts

[QUOTE="Erkidu"][QUOTE="Liquid-GEAR"][QUOTE="Eltroz"]$400 for a console that can not play any of the PS2 games still does not seem worth it. Liquid-GEAR

You paid more for a system with worse backwards compatitbility :|

:| There is no such thing as "worse backwards compatability" than a console with NO backwards compatability. What are you talking about?

Its always easy owning kids :) It plays all PS1 games.

Owned. Try again?

I'm probably older than you. Why do tweens constantly throw around the word "kid"? Does it make you feel better about yourself? I don't get it. Yea, like PSone compatability makes it ok. :roll: People only care about PS2 compatabilty, whether you want to admit it or not.
Avatar image for Eltroz
Eltroz

5238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 Eltroz
Member since 2007 • 5238 Posts

[QUOTE="Eltroz"][QUOTE="Liquid-GEAR"][QUOTE="Eltroz"]$400 for a console that can not play any of the PS2 games still does not seem worth it. Liquid-GEAR

You paid more for a system with worse backwards compatitbility :|

I have played many xbox games on my 360. On the 40gb you can not play PS2 games at all. So no matter how you spin it the 40gb is worse since 360 users have many xbox games they can play.

Many meaning Halo 2 and Ninja Gaiden lol. 40GB plays all PS1 games. That's umm alot more than Xbox library..

No spinning just facts here

The best you get is PS1 BC is not something you really want to be proud of. Having BC from games 2 generations ago only is nothing close to ownage.
Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#34 Bread_or_Decide
Member since 2007 • 29761 Posts

I still feel good about my PS3 purchase. 600 beans, but fully compatible with PS2 games.

Still 400 to get into the next gen of gaming AND HD movies, not bad at all, and really that is a sweet spot price for many people.

Avatar image for dobbywii
dobbywii

220

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 dobbywii
Member since 2007 • 220 Posts
my older brother says he might buy it because of the bluray for our living room. he also wants maybe a couple games but mostly movies.
Avatar image for dobbywii
dobbywii

220

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 dobbywii
Member since 2007 • 220 Posts
my older brother says he might buy it because of the bluray for our living room. he also wants maybe a couple games but mostly movies.
Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#37 Bread_or_Decide
Member since 2007 • 29761 Posts

[QUOTE="Liquid-GEAR"][QUOTE="Eltroz"]$400 for a console that can not play any of the PS2 games still does not seem worth it. Eltroz
You paid more for a system with worse backwards compatitbility :|

I have played many xbox games on my 360. On the 40gb you can not play PS2 games at all. So no matter how you spin it the 40gb is worse since 360 users have many xbox games they can play.

Yeah but the 360 doesn't play HD DVD movies without an expensive attachment. So being able to play current gen games and HD movies is a plus for the PS3. Its a good price point for many who are still clinging to their PS2's.

Avatar image for Liquid-GEAR
Liquid-GEAR

1574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 Liquid-GEAR
Member since 2007 • 1574 Posts
[QUOTE="Liquid-GEAR"]

[QUOTE="Erkidu"][QUOTE="Liquid-GEAR"][QUOTE="Eltroz"]$400 for a console that can not play any of the PS2 games still does not seem worth it. BioShockOwnz

You paid more for a system with worse backwards compatitbility :|

:| There is no such thing as "worse backwards compatability" than a console with NO backwards compatability. What are you talking about?

Its always easy owning kids :) It plays all PS1 games.

Owned. Try again?

:roll: You call that "ownage"?:lol:

As sad as it is, its better than Xbox BC :x
Avatar image for BambooBanger
BambooBanger

1360

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 BambooBanger
Member since 2007 • 1360 Posts

Talk about a last ditch effort.

Imagine how much theyre losing on each system! Couple that with the abysmal software sales...

Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#40 Bread_or_Decide
Member since 2007 • 29761 Posts

Talk about a last ditch effort.

Imagine how much theyre losing on each system! Couple that with the abysmal software sales...

BambooBanger

They cut the cost. They aren't losing as much anymore. In fact its probably closer to being profitable. Is Microsoft even making money yet? Probably still feeling the pinch on that extended 3 year warranty.

Avatar image for mmirza23
mmirza23

3457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 mmirza23
Member since 2004 • 3457 Posts
[QUOTE="BambooBanger"]

Talk about a last ditch effort.

Imagine how much theyre losing on each system! Couple that with the abysmal software sales...

Bread_or_Decide

They cut the cost. They aren't losing as much anymore. In fact its probably closer to being profitable. Is Microsoft even making money yet? Probably still feeling the pinch on that extended 3 year warranty.

xbox brand has yet to make a profit, after the warranty extension, even with halo 3 their profit forecasts were still pushed back atleast 1 fiscal year.
Avatar image for BambooBanger
BambooBanger

1360

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 BambooBanger
Member since 2007 • 1360 Posts
[QUOTE="BambooBanger"]

Talk about a last ditch effort.

Imagine how much theyre losing on each system! Couple that with the abysmal software sales...

Bread_or_Decide

They cut the cost. They aren't losing as much anymore. In fact its probably closer to being profitable. Is Microsoft even making money yet? Probably still feeling the pinch on that extended 3 year warranty.

They were losing $200 USD on each $599 PS3 sold 11 months ago, I can't imagine the manufacturing costs have dropped that significantly within a year.

Avatar image for ragrdoll21
ragrdoll21

6048

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 ragrdoll21
Member since 2006 • 6048 Posts
[QUOTE="Liquid-GEAR"]

[QUOTE="Erkidu"][QUOTE="Liquid-GEAR"][QUOTE="Eltroz"]$400 for a console that can not play any of the PS2 games still does not seem worth it. Erkidu

You paid more for a system with worse backwards compatitbility :|

:| There is no such thing as "worse backwards compatability" than a console with NO backwards compatability. What are you talking about?

Its always easy owning kids :) It plays all PS1 games.

Owned. Try again?

I'm probably older than you. Why do tweens constantly throw around the word "kid"? Does it make you feel better about yourself? I don't get it. Yea, like PSone compatability makes it ok. :roll: People only care about PS2 compatabilty, whether you want to admit it or not.

They all have aPS2, it no big deal.
Avatar image for Erkidu
Erkidu

2744

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#44 Erkidu
Member since 2007 • 2744 Posts
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="Liquid-GEAR"]

[QUOTE="Erkidu"][QUOTE="Liquid-GEAR"][QUOTE="Eltroz"]$400 for a console that can not play any of the PS2 games still does not seem worth it. Liquid-GEAR

You paid more for a system with worse backwards compatitbility :|

:| There is no such thing as "worse backwards compatability" than a console with NO backwards compatability. What are you talking about?

Its always easy owning kids :) It plays all PS1 games.

Owned. Try again?

:roll: You call that "ownage"?:lol:

As sad as it is, its better than Xbox BC :x

The word "better" is subjective. Thus, I completely disagree. Admit it - excluding PS2 compatability is ridiculous.
Avatar image for mmirza23
mmirza23

3457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 mmirza23
Member since 2004 • 3457 Posts
[QUOTE="Bread_or_Decide"][QUOTE="BambooBanger"]

Talk about a last ditch effort.

Imagine how much theyre losing on each system! Couple that with the abysmal software sales...

BambooBanger

They cut the cost. They aren't losing as much anymore. In fact its probably closer to being profitable. Is Microsoft even making money yet? Probably still feeling the pinch on that extended 3 year warranty.

They were losing $200 USD on each $599 PS3 sold 11 months ago, I can't imagine the manufacturing costs have dropped that significantly within a year.

Since the system's launch, production costs have been reduced significantly as a result of phasing out the EE chip[48] and falling hardware costs.[49][50] The cost of manufacturing Cell microprocessors has fallen dramatically as a result of moving to the 65nm production process[51][50] and Blu-raydiodes being around $100 cheaper to manufacture.[49][52]

The cumulative reduction in production costs is as follows:

  • Blu-ray (cost reduction: US$100)
  • Cell B.E. (cost reduction: US$29 - US$40)
  • EE removal (cost reduction: US$27)
  • Chipset Modifications: Sony has removed a CXD9208GP, 2 RDRAM chips (US$5), and some passives and are planning on moving the RSX graphics chip from 90nm to 65nm production process and "the unification of separate smaller ICs - such as Bluetooth and Wi-Fi - into single chip solutions and a change to a more specialized Southbridge." (cost reduction: unknown)

This brings the total cost reduction to at least $156 excluding the chipset modifications. Excluding the 65nm Cell B.E. change (which is not yet used), the minimum cost reduction based on this approximation becomes $127

Avatar image for Erkidu
Erkidu

2744

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#46 Erkidu
Member since 2007 • 2744 Posts
[QUOTE="Erkidu"][QUOTE="Liquid-GEAR"]

[QUOTE="Erkidu"][QUOTE="Liquid-GEAR"][QUOTE="Eltroz"]$400 for a console that can not play any of the PS2 games still does not seem worth it. ragrdoll21

You paid more for a system with worse backwards compatitbility :|

:| There is no such thing as "worse backwards compatability" than a console with NO backwards compatability. What are you talking about?

Its always easy owning kids :) It plays all PS1 games.

Owned. Try again?

I'm probably older than you. Why do tweens constantly throw around the word "kid"? Does it make you feel better about yourself? I don't get it. Yea, like PSone compatability makes it ok. :roll: People only care about PS2 compatabilty, whether you want to admit it or not.

They all have aPS2, it no big deal.

Eh, that argument isn't valid. What about those of us that no longer own a PS2? I remember when the Wii launched without DVD playback - the cows attacked it constantly, even though the vast majority of the civilized world's households own at least one or two DVD players.
Avatar image for BioShockOwnz
BioShockOwnz

52901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#47 BioShockOwnz
Member since 2006 • 52901 Posts

[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="Liquid-GEAR"] As sad as it is, its better than Xbox BC :xLiquid-GEAR

Not really. Even upscaled....PS1 games look like trash.

Avatar image for RedMarzBoy
RedMarzBoy

1298

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 RedMarzBoy
Member since 2004 • 1298 Posts
[QUOTE="Bread_or_Decide"][QUOTE="BambooBanger"]

Talk about a last ditch effort.

Imagine how much theyre losing on each system! Couple that with the abysmal software sales...

BambooBanger

They cut the cost. They aren't losing as much anymore. In fact its probably closer to being profitable. Is Microsoft even making money yet? Probably still feeling the pinch on that extended 3 year warranty.

They were losing $200 USD on each $599 PS3 sold 11 months ago, I can't imagine the manufacturing costs have dropped that significantly within a year.

They cut some things that were useless really like sd card, memory stick and flash card readers and 2 extra usb ports not to mention a smaller HDD and a more efficient Cell 65nm.
Avatar image for Liquid-GEAR
Liquid-GEAR

1574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 Liquid-GEAR
Member since 2007 • 1574 Posts
[QUOTE="Liquid-GEAR"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="Liquid-GEAR"]

[QUOTE="Erkidu"][QUOTE="Liquid-GEAR"][QUOTE="Eltroz"]Erkidu

As sad as it is, its better than Xbox BC :x

The word "better" is subjective. Thus, I completely disagree. Admit it - excluding PS2 compatability is ridiculous.

Uhh no..I have a 60GB and I RARELY play a PS2 game.. pop in Street fighter once in a while. I don't even need to since I own a PS2 :|

If its that big of deal I'm sure anybody can get a PS2 for like 20 bucks lol

Avatar image for sparkypants
sparkypants

2609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#50 sparkypants
Member since 2007 • 2609 Posts
[QUOTE="ragrdoll21"][QUOTE="Erkidu"][QUOTE="Liquid-GEAR"]

[QUOTE="Erkidu"][QUOTE="Liquid-GEAR"][QUOTE="Eltroz"]$400 for a console that can not play any of the PS2 games still does not seem worth it. Erkidu

You paid more for a system with worse backwards compatitbility :|

:| There is no such thing as "worse backwards compatability" than a console with NO backwards compatability. What are you talking about?

Its always easy owning kids :) It plays all PS1 games.

Owned. Try again?

I'm probably older than you. Why do tweens constantly throw around the word "kid"? Does it make you feel better about yourself? I don't get it. Yea, like PSone compatability makes it ok. :roll: People only care about PS2 compatabilty, whether you want to admit it or not.

They all have aPS2, it no big deal.

Eh, that argument isn't valid. What about those of us that no longer own a PS2? I remember when the Wii launched without DVD playback - the cows attacked it constantly, even though the vast majority of the civilized world's households own at least one or two DVD players.

Why would you sell you PS2? Its still going strong....

and things like a DVD should be standard by now