3D adds nothing to games huh? Sure...

  • 92 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#51 Bread_or_Decide
Member since 2007 • 29761 Posts
I weep for our eyes when we have to play a 20 hour game in 3D. 3DS games have to be playable in 2D in case the gamer wants to turn off the shutter to rest their eyes or maybe they are one of the few unlucky people who can't see in 3D. After the initial moment where people spend 30 minutes trying to touch the picture popping out of the screen they are going to tire of the effect, turn off the 3D mode, and then just play the game normally.
Avatar image for DerekLoffin
DerekLoffin

9095

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 47

User Lists: 0

#52 DerekLoffin
Member since 2002 • 9095 Posts
It adds nothing substantial, to the point that 3DS comes with a shut off switch for it. It will be a nice graphic, the same way HD is a nice graphic, but gameplay wise, no, it adds really nothing to write home about. In fact, to substantially add to gameplay, it would have to deliberately sabotage all the usual 2D depth perception trickery that is used now. In the end, it is a gimmick, a graphic gimick. I mean, look at your own signature OP, 3D slips in very nicely under graphics.
Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#53 Bread_or_Decide
Member since 2007 • 29761 Posts
Wii4fun...I have to address your signature. Without all of the items on the right your precious gameplay wouldn't exist. FYI. PIZZA > Cheese, tomato sauce, bread. See how dumb that sounds?
Avatar image for FIipMode
FIipMode

10850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#54 FIipMode
Member since 2009 • 10850 Posts
It will be a nice visual effect, I probably won't use though since the 3D kills the battery.
Avatar image for Wii4Fun
Wii4Fun

1472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 Wii4Fun
Member since 2008 • 1472 Posts

[QUOTE="Wii4Fun"]

Yet devs are 'utilizing' 3D for 3DS. There are thing devs have to do to make 3D work at its best. They don't have to just throw it in.

Right, I'm a 'mainstream' gamer and you're in some special group. :roll:

Believe it or not, everything that comes to console wasn't inspired by the almighty PC. Yeah, I care about motion controls, because I was never a big fan of DA and I can see potential in the tech.

Like everything else, 3D will feel gimmicky until devs learn to truly make it enhance gameplay.

AnnoyedDragon

Apparently "utilizing" means just using the actual effect it seems...

I call you a mainstream gamer, because despite this being readily available even before this console generation started; you are only hyped by it now. Now, when the console companies decided to push it. You weren't hyped about it before because chances are you didn't know it was available, because no one was paid to make you aware. In other words, you rely on mainstream sources for your information.

And game play? I seriously doubt any meaningful form of game play will be invented using 3D depth. 3D isn't being pushed for game play, it is being pushed for 3D, the "it's like I can touch it" effect.

I stand my my original accusation, people only care because the big companies paid to make them care.

Oh, so I'm a 'mainstream' gamer because I don't have money to be buying every tech I see that interests me? I'm not even thinking of getting a gaming PC until years from now because I can't handle the expense. And you are what? Some sort of special gamer because you can? I didn't know gamers had some sort of social ranking.

Like I said, 3D can add to immersion and that is something that has increasingly become inportant to me .

That is all.

Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#56 Bread_or_Decide
Member since 2007 • 29761 Posts
It will be a nice visual effect, I probably won't use though since the 3D kills the battery.FIipMode
You know last season all of Nintendo's top games barely used motion or if it was used it was more of a negative than a positive. A feature that was supposed to revolutionize gaming is now either a hinderance or mostly ignored by games like DKCR, Kirby, Metroid, and SMG2. Shows you what the future of motion really turned out to be. Those burnt by this clearly have not learned their lesson if they feel 3D will do anything to change gaming.
Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#57 Bread_or_Decide
Member since 2007 • 29761 Posts

[QUOTE="AnnoyedDragon"]

[QUOTE="Wii4Fun"]

Yet devs are 'utilizing' 3D for 3DS. There are thing devs have to do to make 3D work at its best. They don't have to just throw it in.

Right, I'm a 'mainstream' gamer and you're in some special group. :roll:

Believe it or not, everything that comes to console wasn't inspired by the almighty PC. Yeah, I care about motion controls, because I was never a big fan of DA and I can see potential in the tech.

Like everything else, 3D will feel gimmicky until devs learn to truly make it enhance gameplay.

Wii4Fun

Apparently "utilizing" means just using the actual effect it seems...

I call you a mainstream gamer, because despite this being readily available even before this console generation started; you are only hyped by it now. Now, when the console companies decided to push it. You weren't hyped about it before because chances are you didn't know it was available, because no one was paid to make you aware. In other words, you rely on mainstream sources for your information.

And game play? I seriously doubt any meaningful form of game play will be invented using 3D depth. 3D isn't being pushed for game play, it is being pushed for 3D, the "it's like I can touch it" effect.

I stand my my original accusation, people only care because the big companies paid to make them care.

Oh, so I'm a 'mainstream' gamer because I don't have money to be buying every tech I see that interests me? I'm not even thinking of getting a gaming PC until years from now because I can't handle the expense. And you are what? Some sort of special gamer because you can? I didn't know gamers had some sort of social ranking.

Like I said, 3D can add to immersion and that is something that has increasingly become inportant to me as a gamer.

That is all.

I do not look forward to every game throwing stuff at the screen to immerse the gamer. Immerse me with good story telling gameplay, and incredible worlds. Not cheap tricks.
Avatar image for AnnoyedDragon
AnnoyedDragon

9948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 AnnoyedDragon
Member since 2006 • 9948 Posts

Oh, so I'm a 'mainstream' gamer because I don't have money to be buying every tech I see that interests me? I'm not even thinking of getting a gaming PC until years from now because I can't handle the expense. And you are what? Some sort of special gamer because you can? I didn't know gamers had some sort of social ranking.

Like I said, 3D can add to immersion and that is something that has increasingly become inportant to me as a gamer.

That is all.

Wii4Fun

Interesting that your financial situation changed in line with when consoles decided to start hyping this...

Regardless, "that is all" usually indicates a desire to stop talking on a matter.

Avatar image for Wii4Fun
Wii4Fun

1472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 Wii4Fun
Member since 2008 • 1472 Posts

Wii4fun...I have to address your signature. Without all of the items on the right your precious gameplay wouldn't exist. FYI. PIZZA > Cheese, tomato sauce, bread. See how dumb that sounds?Bread_or_Decide

Gameplay is a term used to describe the interactive aspects of game design. An alternative name for gameplay that is finding favor with academics is game mechanics, however, it can be argued that gameplay and game mechanics are different concepts. Gameplay is what distinguishes a game from a non-interactive medium such as a book or film through the interaction with the game by the player.

Arising alongside video game development in the 1980s, gameplay was used solely within the context of video or computer games, though now its popularity has begun to see use in the description of other, more traditional, game forms. Generally, the term gameplay in video game terminology is used to describe the overall experience of playing the game excluding factors like graphics and sound. Game mechanics refers to sets of rules in a game that are intended to produce an enjoyable gaming experience. Often academic discussions tend to favor terms like game mechanics specifically to avoid 'gameplay'.

Interesting that your financial situation changed in line with when consoles decided to start hyping this...

Regardless, "that is all" usually indicates a desire to stop talking on a matter.

AnnoyedDragon

My financial situation is the same as it always was and will continue to be so until I leave College and start working.

THAT is all.

Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#60 Bread_or_Decide
Member since 2007 • 29761 Posts

[QUOTE="Bread_or_Decide"]Wii4fun...I have to address your signature. Without all of the items on the right your precious gameplay wouldn't exist. FYI. PIZZA > Cheese, tomato sauce, bread. See how dumb that sounds?Wii4Fun

Gameplay is a term used to describe the interactive aspects of game design. An alternative name for gameplay that is finding favor with academics is game mechanics, however, it can be argued that gameplay and game mechanics are different concepts. Gameplay is what distinguishes a game from a non-interactive medium such as a book or film through the interaction with the game by the player.

Arising alongside video game development in the 1980s, gameplay was used solely within the context of video or computer games, though now its popularity has begun to see use in the description of other, more traditional, game forms. Generally, the term gameplay in video game terminology is used to describe the overall experience of playing the game excluding factors like graphics and sound. Game mechanics refers to sets of rules in a game that are intended to produce an enjoyable gaming experience. Often academic discussions tend to favor terms like game mechanics specifically to avoid 'gameplay'.

Okay...the gameplay of certains games would not be possible without graphics, A.I., and physics. Without the intense AI in demons souls the gameplay wouldn't be what it is. Without the intelligent A.I. in the harder difficulty modes in Halo that game wouldn't have been as enjoyable to me. Without the physics of the weapons in Bioshock that game would not have been as fun and immersive. Graphics make gameplay possible. Without 8 bit graphics you wouldn't have had mario jumping from one end of a level to the other. Gameplay is not possible without the other elements. PONG isn't possible without the graphics available at the time which were top of the line. That's like trying to say that you prefer the house to the hammer used to build that house.
Avatar image for Shinobishyguy
Shinobishyguy

22928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#61 Shinobishyguy
Member since 2006 • 22928 Posts

[QUOTE="FIipMode"]It will be a nice visual effect, I probably won't use though since the 3D kills the battery.Bread_or_Decide
You know last season all of Nintendo's top games barely used motion or if it was used it was more of a negative than a positive. A feature that was supposed to revolutionize gaming is now either a hinderance or mostly ignored by games like DKCR, Kirby, Metroid, and SMG2. Shows you what the future of motion really turned out to be. Those burnt by this clearly have not learned their lesson if they feel 3D will do anything to change gaming.

there's a difference. 3D isn't directly hindering the gameplay like motion controls tend to do most of the time.

If anything it's a nice bonus, but at the end of the day it's the games that are going to be the main attraction. (just like the DS before it)

Avatar image for oldkingallant
oldkingallant

4958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 oldkingallant
Member since 2010 • 4958 Posts

Funny, when Sony was pushing 3D everybody seemed to say 3D adds nothing and is a waste. Suddenly Nintendo starts doing it and it adds stuff to games.

Wasdie
Yeah there's a major difference between a company adding 3-D to a few select games that you need an expensive new TV and glasses for, and a company releasing a $300 handheld where every game is 3-D and no glasses are required :roll:.
Avatar image for lordreaven
lordreaven

7239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 lordreaven
Member since 2005 • 7239 Posts

It adds nothing for me tbh. My eyes make me incapable of seeing 3D.

Avatar image for Wii4Fun
Wii4Fun

1472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 Wii4Fun
Member since 2008 • 1472 Posts

[QUOTE="Wii4Fun"]

[QUOTE="Bread_or_Decide"]

Gameplay is a term used to describe the interactive aspects of game design. An alternative name for gameplay that is finding favor with academics is game mechanics, however, it can be argued that gameplay and game mechanics are different concepts. Gameplay is what distinguishes a game from a non-interactive medium such as a book or film through the interaction with the game by the player.

Arising alongside video game development in the 1980s, gameplay was used solely within the context of video or computer games, though now its popularity has begun to see use in the description of other, more traditional, game forms. Generally, the term gameplay in video game terminology is used to describe the overall experience of playing the game excluding factors like graphics and sound. Game mechanics refers to sets of rules in a game that are intended to produce an enjoyable gaming experience. Often academic discussions tend to favor terms like game mechanics specifically to avoid 'gameplay'.

Bread_or_Decide

Okay...the gameplay of certains games would not be possible without graphics, A.I., and physics. Without the intense AI in demons souls the gameplay wouldn't be what it is. Without the intelligent A.I. in the harder difficulty modes in Halo that game wouldn't have been as enjoyable to me. Without the physics of the weapons in Bioshock that game would not have been as fun and immersive. Graphics make gameplay possible. Without 8 bit graphics you wouldn't have had mario jumping from one end of a level to the other. Gameplay is not possible without the other elements. PONG isn't possible without the graphics available at the time which were top of the line. That's like trying to say that you prefer the house to the hammer used to build that house.

It's not as if my sig says all that matters is gameplay and the rest don't. It just says that gameplay is the foundation of it all, the building block.

I do not look forward to every game throwing stuff at the screen to immerse the gamer. Immerse me with good story telling gameplay, and incredible worlds. Not cheap tricks. Bread_or_Decide

Then hopefully, like the 3DS, there will an option to turn it off for people who have problems with it or cannot see 3D or whatever.

If used well, it will be more than just a cheap trick.

Avatar image for DerekLoffin
DerekLoffin

9095

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 47

User Lists: 0

#65 DerekLoffin
Member since 2002 • 9095 Posts

[QUOTE="Bread_or_Decide"][QUOTE="FIipMode"]It will be a nice visual effect, I probably won't use though since the 3D kills the battery.Shinobishyguy

You know last season all of Nintendo's top games barely used motion or if it was used it was more of a negative than a positive. A feature that was supposed to revolutionize gaming is now either a hinderance or mostly ignored by games like DKCR, Kirby, Metroid, and SMG2. Shows you what the future of motion really turned out to be. Those burnt by this clearly have not learned their lesson if they feel 3D will do anything to change gaming.

there's a difference. 3D isn't directly hindering the gameplay like motion controls tend to do most of the time.

If anything it's a nice bonus, but at the end of the day it's the games that are going to be the main attraction. (just like the DS before it)

It remains to be seen if it is not a hindrance or not. We know it eats up processing power, so if a developer is sloppy (and we know developers tend to be), it could easily hurt the base experience rather than help.
Avatar image for soulitane
soulitane

15091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#66 soulitane
Member since 2010 • 15091 Posts
To me it adds nothing worthwhile.
Avatar image for raskullibur
raskullibur

3390

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#67 raskullibur
Member since 2003 • 3390 Posts

[QUOTE="AnnoyedDragon"]

[QUOTE="BigDaddyPOLO"]

That's what they said about audio coming into films.

Jelley0

The only reason people care right now is because the big companies like Sony are hyping it, people didn't care at the beginning of this generation; when it was readily available.

They care because someone was paid to make sure they care.

3D neither improves game play or graphical quality, it just adds depth to a game. If the game sucks, it will suck in 3D.

HD doesn't improve gameplay, it just adds depth to a game. If the game sucks, it will suck in HD. So whats your point exactly...?

I'll take HD more than 3D
Avatar image for michael582
michael582

1064

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 michael582
Member since 2003 • 1064 Posts

How many people even played a game in 3D? Seems like alot of people know what they're talking about, but won't share if they had any experiences with 3D games. Anyone wanna provide some insight?

Avatar image for OreoMilkshake
OreoMilkshake

12833

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#69 OreoMilkshake
Member since 2009 • 12833 Posts
3D adds nothing. 4D however...
Avatar image for dracos9000
dracos9000

1318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#70 dracos9000
Member since 2006 • 1318 Posts

I can't see 3D effects if I have to wear glasses, but once it is 3D without glasses I will be interested.

Avatar image for glez13
glez13

10314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 glez13
Member since 2006 • 10314 Posts

I can't see 3D effects if I have to wear glasses, but once it is 3D without glasses I will be interested.

dracos9000

Why can't you see 3D effects with glasses?

Avatar image for AnnoyedDragon
AnnoyedDragon

9948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 AnnoyedDragon
Member since 2006 • 9948 Posts

Why can't you see 3D effects with glasses?

glez13

Some people just cannot see stereo 3D, it's rare but it happens, a friend of my sisters cannot.

Avatar image for glez13
glez13

10314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 glez13
Member since 2006 • 10314 Posts

[QUOTE="glez13"]

Why can't you see 3D effects with glasses?

AnnoyedDragon

Some people just cannot see stereo 3D, it's rare but it happens, a friend of my sisters cannot.

But can they see it with glasses-free, if they can't see it with glasses?

Avatar image for Kleeyook
Kleeyook

5213

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 1

#74 Kleeyook
Member since 2008 • 5213 Posts
Sadly, it's mostly our own eyes that convert image sent from 3DTV from 2D to 3D. It puts a burden to our eyes. The real 3D should be things like hologram or virtual reality. :( Motion control is the true gimmick.
Avatar image for DerekLoffin
DerekLoffin

9095

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 47

User Lists: 0

#75 DerekLoffin
Member since 2002 • 9095 Posts

[QUOTE="AnnoyedDragon"]

[QUOTE="glez13"]

Why can't you see 3D effects with glasses?

glez13

Some people just cannot see stereo 3D, it's rare but it happens, a friend of my sisters cannot.

But can they see it with glasses-free, if they can't see it with glasses?

It is called stereoblindness, and all forms of 3D are affected by it. Not to sure how it results, could be over dominance of perception from one eye for instance, but they can't perceive 3D effect. Now, depth perception is probably affected too, but it may not be as noticable to the person since there are many other aspects to true depth perception.
Avatar image for Merex760
Merex760

4381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#76 Merex760
Member since 2008 • 4381 Posts

Funny, when Sony was pushing 3D everybody seemed to say 3D adds nothing and is a waste. Suddenly Nintendo starts doing it and it adds stuff to games.

Wasdie
Agreed. Pretty funny.
Avatar image for p3anut
p3anut

6637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 p3anut
Member since 2005 • 6637 Posts

Funny, when Sony was pushing 3D everybody seemed to say 3D adds nothing and is a waste. Suddenly Nintendo starts doing it and it adds stuff to games.

Wasdie

Funny, when Nintendo was pushing touch screen and motion controls everyone called it a gimmick and was not cool. Suddenly Sony adds a touch screen on NGP and make a look alike wii-mote everyone is on board.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b69bebd1b0b6
deactivated-5b69bebd1b0b6

6176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 deactivated-5b69bebd1b0b6
Member since 2009 • 6176 Posts

It's still expensive at the moment.. I'll pass.

Avatar image for AnnoyedDragon
AnnoyedDragon

9948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 AnnoyedDragon
Member since 2006 • 9948 Posts

Funny, when Nintendo was pushing touch screen and motion controls everyone called it a gimmick and was not cool. Suddenly Sony adds a touch screen on NGP and make a look alike wii-mote everyone is on board.

p3anut

I'd just like to point out that neither of these have changed my opinion on 3D or motion sensors.

Never mind that PC had 3D before either of the current gen systems, and that Nintendo got their motion sensor technology from a PC mouse developer.

Avatar image for 205212669269561485377169522720
205212669269561485377169522720

14458

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#80 205212669269561485377169522720
Member since 2005 • 14458 Posts

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Funny, when Sony was pushing 3D everybody seemed to say 3D adds nothing and is a waste. Suddenly Nintendo starts doing it and it adds stuff to games.

p3anut

Funny, when Nintendo was pushing touch screen and motion controls everyone called it a gimmick and was not cool. Suddenly Sony adds a touch screen on NGP and make a look alike wii-mote everyone is on board.

Where were you when people made fun of the wand?:? Not to mention, both Kinect and Move are often frowned upon around here anyways.:P Also iPod got the touch screen before NGP and so did many other smart phones. It's pretty much standard nowadays, (even though I dislike my iPhone's touch screen). Can't really fault on the NGP for having it now that's basically on MANY other devices now can we?:P That's like saying, "The PSP has terrible battery life! But when the 3DS has a bad battery life, it's all good."... Oh wait.:lol:

Avatar image for Baranga
Baranga

14217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#81 Baranga
Member since 2005 • 14217 Posts

Crytek was developing a game that could only be played in 3D. Stuff they learned from that attempt made its way in Crysis 2.

Anyway, I own a 3D monitor. I love playing games in 3D, it enhances the atmosphere a lot. That's the only way I play Starcraft 2 now.

Avatar image for meetroid8
meetroid8

21152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 meetroid8
Member since 2005 • 21152 Posts

It can also add to immersion. Like seeing bullets fly out at you in an FPS game, or shrapnel flying out of the screen during an explosion and many other such things.

I [/spoiler]

Wii4Fun
Since this has proved completely untrue for cinema, its obvious it won't make any difference in games either.
Avatar image for savagetwinkie
savagetwinkie

7981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 savagetwinkie
Member since 2008 • 7981 Posts

Funny, when Sony was pushing 3D everybody seemed to say 3D adds nothing and is a waste. Suddenly Nintendo starts doing it and it adds stuff to games.

Wasdie

i think nintendo's way is better, since you can actually use it to peak around objects where ps3's is to have **** flying at you pop out which i don't really fidn all that interesting.

Avatar image for yellonet
yellonet

7768

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 yellonet
Member since 2004 • 7768 Posts

Funny, when Sony was pushing 3D everybody seemed to say 3D adds nothing and is a waste. Suddenly Nintendo starts doing it and it adds stuff to games.

Wasdie

It could also be that the "how" is more important than the "who".

Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#85 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts

Funny, when Sony was pushing 3D everybody seemed to say 3D adds nothing and is a waste. Suddenly Nintendo starts doing it and it adds stuff to games.

Wasdie
I think it's cool on a handheld, not when it requires thousands on a TV and a pair of stupid glasses. All that for 3D is definitely a waste. Either way it's a gimmick though.
Avatar image for Baranga
Baranga

14217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#86 Baranga
Member since 2005 • 14217 Posts

[QUOTE="Wii4Fun"]

It can also add to immersion. Like seeing bullets fly out at you in an FPS game, or shrapnel flying out of the screen during an explosion and many other such things.

I [/spoiler]

meetroid8

Since this has proved completely untrue for cinema, its obvious it won't make any difference in games either.

Playing isometric games and having the graphics pop out of the screen is amazing. Torchlight, for example, is like watching toys come to life.

But I like the 3D acting more like a window.

Avatar image for Mr_Cumberdale
Mr_Cumberdale

10189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#87 Mr_Cumberdale
Member since 2004 • 10189 Posts
Pretty cool dinosaur. I haven't really seen any 3D image/gifs before. And 3D would be cool, but if it's not done right it can be totally crap.
Avatar image for Vaasman
Vaasman

15878

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#88 Vaasman
Member since 2008 • 15878 Posts

What exactly does 3d bring to gaming? Nothing I can think of.

Graphics updates at the very least allow for more creative freedom and increased visual clarity helps with games where, for example, you might need to hit something far in the distance.

All 3d does is make things very slightly look like they come off the screen. oooooohh aaaaahh.

3DS has a great lineup but I care about as much for the 3d as I did for the virtual boy.

Avatar image for lordreaven
lordreaven

7239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 lordreaven
Member since 2005 • 7239 Posts
[QUOTE="glez13"]

[QUOTE="AnnoyedDragon"]

[QUOTE="glez13"]

Why can't you see 3D effects with glasses?

Some people just cannot see stereo 3D, it's rare but it happens, a friend of my sisters cannot.

But can they see it with glasses-free, if they can't see it with glasses?

I know my case is because I only see through one eye at a time (its a very fats transistion, but only one at once).
Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts

Motion and 3d. I used to play games standing up and moving my controller side to side when I wanted to move my hero. Why didn't these things come out then, when I was actually good with them?!

Avatar image for Twin-Blade
Twin-Blade

6806

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 Twin-Blade
Member since 2005 • 6806 Posts

I hope not. I would like to keep gaming after this generation.

Avatar image for campzor
campzor

34932

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 campzor
Member since 2004 • 34932 Posts
who the hell said graphics add anything to gameplay? :lol: 3d is a gimmick..deal with it... and funny i can seem to jump over obstacles and bottomless pits without 3d..so much for it helping with depth of perception!