This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="Wii4Fun"]
Yet devs are 'utilizing' 3D for 3DS. There are thing devs have to do to make 3D work at its best. They don't have to just throw it in.
Right, I'm a 'mainstream' gamer and you're in some special group. :roll:
Believe it or not, everything that comes to console wasn't inspired by the almighty PC. Yeah, I care about motion controls, because I was never a big fan of DA and I can see potential in the tech.
Like everything else, 3D will feel gimmicky until devs learn to truly make it enhance gameplay.
AnnoyedDragon
Apparently "utilizing" means just using the actual effect it seems...
I call you a mainstream gamer, because despite this being readily available even before this console generation started; you are only hyped by it now. Now, when the console companies decided to push it. You weren't hyped about it before because chances are you didn't know it was available, because no one was paid to make you aware. In other words, you rely on mainstream sources for your information.
And game play? I seriously doubt any meaningful form of game play will be invented using 3D depth. 3D isn't being pushed for game play, it is being pushed for 3D, the "it's like I can touch it" effect.
I stand my my original accusation, people only care because the big companies paid to make them care.
Oh, so I'm a 'mainstream' gamer because I don't have money to be buying every tech I see that interests me? I'm not even thinking of getting a gaming PC until years from now because I can't handle the expense. And you are what? Some sort of special gamer because you can? I didn't know gamers had some sort of social ranking.
Like I said, 3D can add to immersion and that is something that has increasingly become inportant to me .
That is all.
It will be a nice visual effect, I probably won't use though since the 3D kills the battery.FIipModeYou know last season all of Nintendo's top games barely used motion or if it was used it was more of a negative than a positive. A feature that was supposed to revolutionize gaming is now either a hinderance or mostly ignored by games like DKCR, Kirby, Metroid, and SMG2. Shows you what the future of motion really turned out to be. Those burnt by this clearly have not learned their lesson if they feel 3D will do anything to change gaming.
[QUOTE="AnnoyedDragon"]
[QUOTE="Wii4Fun"]
Yet devs are 'utilizing' 3D for 3DS. There are thing devs have to do to make 3D work at its best. They don't have to just throw it in.
Right, I'm a 'mainstream' gamer and you're in some special group. :roll:
Believe it or not, everything that comes to console wasn't inspired by the almighty PC. Yeah, I care about motion controls, because I was never a big fan of DA and I can see potential in the tech.
Like everything else, 3D will feel gimmicky until devs learn to truly make it enhance gameplay.
Wii4Fun
Apparently "utilizing" means just using the actual effect it seems...
I call you a mainstream gamer, because despite this being readily available even before this console generation started; you are only hyped by it now. Now, when the console companies decided to push it. You weren't hyped about it before because chances are you didn't know it was available, because no one was paid to make you aware. In other words, you rely on mainstream sources for your information.
And game play? I seriously doubt any meaningful form of game play will be invented using 3D depth. 3D isn't being pushed for game play, it is being pushed for 3D, the "it's like I can touch it" effect.
I stand my my original accusation, people only care because the big companies paid to make them care.
Oh, so I'm a 'mainstream' gamer because I don't have money to be buying every tech I see that interests me? I'm not even thinking of getting a gaming PC until years from now because I can't handle the expense. And you are what? Some sort of special gamer because you can? I didn't know gamers had some sort of social ranking.
Like I said, 3D can add to immersion and that is something that has increasingly become inportant to me as a gamer.
That is all.
I do not look forward to every game throwing stuff at the screen to immerse the gamer. Immerse me with good story telling gameplay, and incredible worlds. Not cheap tricks.Oh, so I'm a 'mainstream' gamer because I don't have money to be buying every tech I see that interests me? I'm not even thinking of getting a gaming PC until years from now because I can't handle the expense. And you are what? Some sort of special gamer because you can? I didn't know gamers had some sort of social ranking.
Like I said, 3D can add to immersion and that is something that has increasingly become inportant to me as a gamer.
That is all.
Wii4Fun
Interesting that your financial situation changed in line with when consoles decided to start hyping this...
Regardless, "that is all" usually indicates a desire to stop talking on a matter.
Wii4fun...I have to address your signature. Without all of the items on the right your precious gameplay wouldn't exist. FYI. PIZZA > Cheese, tomato sauce, bread. See how dumb that sounds?Bread_or_Decide
Gameplay is a term used to describe the interactive aspects of game design. An alternative name for gameplay that is finding favor with academics is game mechanics, however, it can be argued that gameplay and game mechanics are different concepts. Gameplay is what distinguishes a game from a non-interactive medium such as a book or film through the interaction with the game by the player.
Arising alongside video game development in the 1980s, gameplay was used solely within the context of video or computer games, though now its popularity has begun to see use in the description of other, more traditional, game forms. Generally, the term gameplay in video game terminology is used to describe the overall experience of playing the game excluding factors like graphics and sound. Game mechanics refers to sets of rules in a game that are intended to produce an enjoyable gaming experience. Often academic discussions tend to favor terms like game mechanics specifically to avoid 'gameplay'.
Interesting that your financial situation changed in line with when consoles decided to start hyping this...
Regardless, "that is all" usually indicates a desire to stop talking on a matter.
AnnoyedDragon
My financial situation is the same as it always was and will continue to be so until I leave College and start working.
THAT is all.
[QUOTE="Bread_or_Decide"]Wii4fun...I have to address your signature. Without all of the items on the right your precious gameplay wouldn't exist. FYI. PIZZA > Cheese, tomato sauce, bread. See how dumb that sounds?Wii4Fun
Gameplay is a term used to describe the interactive aspects of game design. An alternative name for gameplay that is finding favor with academics is game mechanics, however, it can be argued that gameplay and game mechanics are different concepts. Gameplay is what distinguishes a game from a non-interactive medium such as a book or film through the interaction with the game by the player.
Arising alongside video game development in the 1980s, gameplay was used solely within the context of video or computer games, though now its popularity has begun to see use in the description of other, more traditional, game forms. Generally, the term gameplay in video game terminology is used to describe the overall experience of playing the game excluding factors like graphics and sound. Game mechanics refers to sets of rules in a game that are intended to produce an enjoyable gaming experience. Often academic discussions tend to favor terms like game mechanics specifically to avoid 'gameplay'.
Okay...the gameplay of certains games would not be possible without graphics, A.I., and physics. Without the intense AI in demons souls the gameplay wouldn't be what it is. Without the intelligent A.I. in the harder difficulty modes in Halo that game wouldn't have been as enjoyable to me. Without the physics of the weapons in Bioshock that game would not have been as fun and immersive. Graphics make gameplay possible. Without 8 bit graphics you wouldn't have had mario jumping from one end of a level to the other. Gameplay is not possible without the other elements. PONG isn't possible without the graphics available at the time which were top of the line. That's like trying to say that you prefer the house to the hammer used to build that house.[QUOTE="FIipMode"]It will be a nice visual effect, I probably won't use though since the 3D kills the battery.Bread_or_DecideYou know last season all of Nintendo's top games barely used motion or if it was used it was more of a negative than a positive. A feature that was supposed to revolutionize gaming is now either a hinderance or mostly ignored by games like DKCR, Kirby, Metroid, and SMG2. Shows you what the future of motion really turned out to be. Those burnt by this clearly have not learned their lesson if they feel 3D will do anything to change gaming. there's a difference. 3D isn't directly hindering the gameplay like motion controls tend to do most of the time.
If anything it's a nice bonus, but at the end of the day it's the games that are going to be the main attraction. (just like the DS before it)
Yeah there's a major difference between a company adding 3-D to a few select games that you need an expensive new TV and glasses for, and a company releasing a $300 handheld where every game is 3-D and no glasses are required :roll:.Funny, when Sony was pushing 3D everybody seemed to say 3D adds nothing and is a waste. Suddenly Nintendo starts doing it and it adds stuff to games.
Wasdie
[QUOTE="Wii4Fun"]Okay...the gameplay of certains games would not be possible without graphics, A.I., and physics. Without the intense AI in demons souls the gameplay wouldn't be what it is. Without the intelligent A.I. in the harder difficulty modes in Halo that game wouldn't have been as enjoyable to me. Without the physics of the weapons in Bioshock that game would not have been as fun and immersive. Graphics make gameplay possible. Without 8 bit graphics you wouldn't have had mario jumping from one end of a level to the other. Gameplay is not possible without the other elements. PONG isn't possible without the graphics available at the time which were top of the line. That's like trying to say that you prefer the house to the hammer used to build that house.[QUOTE="Bread_or_Decide"]
Gameplay is a term used to describe the interactive aspects of game design. An alternative name for gameplay that is finding favor with academics is game mechanics, however, it can be argued that gameplay and game mechanics are different concepts. Gameplay is what distinguishes a game from a non-interactive medium such as a book or film through the interaction with the game by the player.
Arising alongside video game development in the 1980s, gameplay was used solely within the context of video or computer games, though now its popularity has begun to see use in the description of other, more traditional, game forms. Generally, the term gameplay in video game terminology is used to describe the overall experience of playing the game excluding factors like graphics and sound. Game mechanics refers to sets of rules in a game that are intended to produce an enjoyable gaming experience. Often academic discussions tend to favor terms like game mechanics specifically to avoid 'gameplay'.
Bread_or_Decide
It's not as if my sig says all that matters is gameplay and the rest don't. It just says that gameplay is the foundation of it all, the building block.
I do not look forward to every game throwing stuff at the screen to immerse the gamer. Immerse me with good story telling gameplay, and incredible worlds. Not cheap tricks. Bread_or_Decide
Then hopefully, like the 3DS, there will an option to turn it off for people who have problems with it or cannot see 3D or whatever.
If used well, it will be more than just a cheap trick.
You know last season all of Nintendo's top games barely used motion or if it was used it was more of a negative than a positive. A feature that was supposed to revolutionize gaming is now either a hinderance or mostly ignored by games like DKCR, Kirby, Metroid, and SMG2. Shows you what the future of motion really turned out to be. Those burnt by this clearly have not learned their lesson if they feel 3D will do anything to change gaming. there's a difference. 3D isn't directly hindering the gameplay like motion controls tend to do most of the time.[QUOTE="Bread_or_Decide"][QUOTE="FIipMode"]It will be a nice visual effect, I probably won't use though since the 3D kills the battery.Shinobishyguy
If anything it's a nice bonus, but at the end of the day it's the games that are going to be the main attraction. (just like the DS before it)
It remains to be seen if it is not a hindrance or not. We know it eats up processing power, so if a developer is sloppy (and we know developers tend to be), it could easily hurt the base experience rather than help.[QUOTE="AnnoyedDragon"]
[QUOTE="BigDaddyPOLO"]
That's what they said about audio coming into films.
Jelley0
The only reason people care right now is because the big companies like Sony are hyping it, people didn't care at the beginning of this generation; when it was readily available.
They care because someone was paid to make sure they care.
3D neither improves game play or graphical quality, it just adds depth to a game. If the game sucks, it will suck in 3D.
HD doesn't improve gameplay, it just adds depth to a game. If the game sucks, it will suck in HD. So whats your point exactly...?
I'll take HD more than 3DHow many people even played a game in 3D? Seems like alot of people know what they're talking about, but won't share if they had any experiences with 3D games. Anyone wanna provide some insight?
I can't see 3D effects if I have to wear glasses, but once it is 3D without glasses I will be interested.
Why can't you see 3D effects with glasses?
glez13
Some people just cannot see stereo 3D, it's rare but it happens, a friend of my sisters cannot.
[QUOTE="AnnoyedDragon"]
[QUOTE="glez13"]
Why can't you see 3D effects with glasses?
glez13
Some people just cannot see stereo 3D, it's rare but it happens, a friend of my sisters cannot.
But can they see it with glasses-free, if they can't see it with glasses?
It is called stereoblindness, and all forms of 3D are affected by it. Not to sure how it results, could be over dominance of perception from one eye for instance, but they can't perceive 3D effect. Now, depth perception is probably affected too, but it may not be as noticable to the person since there are many other aspects to true depth perception.Funny, when Sony was pushing 3D everybody seemed to say 3D adds nothing and is a waste. Suddenly Nintendo starts doing it and it adds stuff to games.
Wasdie
Funny, when Nintendo was pushing touch screen and motion controls everyone called it a gimmick and was not cool. Suddenly Sony adds a touch screen on NGP and make a look alike wii-mote everyone is on board.
Funny, when Nintendo was pushing touch screen and motion controls everyone called it a gimmick and was not cool. Suddenly Sony adds a touch screen on NGP and make a look alike wii-mote everyone is on board.
p3anut
I'd just like to point out that neither of these have changed my opinion on 3D or motion sensors.
Never mind that PC had 3D before either of the current gen systems, and that Nintendo got their motion sensor technology from a PC mouse developer.
[QUOTE="Wasdie"]
Funny, when Sony was pushing 3D everybody seemed to say 3D adds nothing and is a waste. Suddenly Nintendo starts doing it and it adds stuff to games.
p3anut
Funny, when Nintendo was pushing touch screen and motion controls everyone called it a gimmick and was not cool. Suddenly Sony adds a touch screen on NGP and make a look alike wii-mote everyone is on board.
Where were you when people made fun of the wand?:? Not to mention, both Kinect and Move are often frowned upon around here anyways.:P Also iPod got the touch screen before NGP and so did many other smart phones. It's pretty much standard nowadays, (even though I dislike my iPhone's touch screen). Can't really fault on the NGP for having it now that's basically on MANY other devices now can we?:P That's like saying, "The PSP has terrible battery life! But when the 3DS has a bad battery life, it's all good."... Oh wait.:lol:
Since this has proved completely untrue for cinema, its obvious it won't make any difference in games either.It can also add to immersion. Like seeing bullets fly out at you in an FPS game, or shrapnel flying out of the screen during an explosion and many other such things.
I [/spoiler]
Wii4Fun
i think nintendo's way is better, since you can actually use it to peak around objects where ps3's is to have **** flying at you pop out which i don't really fidn all that interesting.Funny, when Sony was pushing 3D everybody seemed to say 3D adds nothing and is a waste. Suddenly Nintendo starts doing it and it adds stuff to games.
Wasdie
I think it's cool on a handheld, not when it requires thousands on a TV and a pair of stupid glasses. All that for 3D is definitely a waste. Either way it's a gimmick though.Funny, when Sony was pushing 3D everybody seemed to say 3D adds nothing and is a waste. Suddenly Nintendo starts doing it and it adds stuff to games.
Wasdie
[QUOTE="Wii4Fun"]Since this has proved completely untrue for cinema, its obvious it won't make any difference in games either.It can also add to immersion. Like seeing bullets fly out at you in an FPS game, or shrapnel flying out of the screen during an explosion and many other such things.
I [/spoiler]
meetroid8
Playing isometric games and having the graphics pop out of the screen is amazing. Torchlight, for example, is like watching toys come to life.
But I like the 3D acting more like a window.
What exactly does 3d bring to gaming? Nothing I can think of.
Graphics updates at the very least allow for more creative freedom and increased visual clarity helps with games where, for example, you might need to hit something far in the distance.
All 3d does is make things very slightly look like they come off the screen. oooooohh aaaaahh.
3DS has a great lineup but I care about as much for the 3d as I did for the virtual boy.
[QUOTE="AnnoyedDragon"]
[QUOTE="glez13"]
Why can't you see 3D effects with glasses?
Some people just cannot see stereo 3D, it's rare but it happens, a friend of my sisters cannot.
But can they see it with glasses-free, if they can't see it with glasses?
I know my case is because I only see through one eye at a time (its a very fats transistion, but only one at once).Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment