3D Coming to PS3, all consoles will be supported via firmware upgrades!!!

  • 143 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for mr-krinkles
mr-krinkles

1641

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#101 mr-krinkles
Member since 2008 • 1641 Posts

ITHOUGHT IT ALREADY DID 4-D!!!!!!!!!!!!

gensigns

Lawlz, beat me to it. Downgrade mate :lol:

Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#102 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts

[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"][QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

No, just 3d viewing glasses... ever heard of 3d movies?

Bebi_vegeta

Which require much more than most current HDTVs, unless you are talking about the magenta/cyan glasses.

You'll probably need 120Hz HDTV.

Which hasn't been the standard before now. I know my TV certainly isn't 120 Hz and it is fairly new, and I am in no hurry to buy a new TV.
Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts

[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"] Which require much more than most current HDTVs, unless you are talking about the magenta/cyan glasses.SpruceCaboose

You'll probably need 120Hz HDTV.

Which hasn't been the standard before now. I know my TV certainly isn't 120 Hz and it is fairly new, and I am in no hurry to buy a new TV.

What's your TV?

Avatar image for 789shadow
789shadow

20195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#104 789shadow
Member since 2006 • 20195 Posts

3D just hurts my eyes. Do not want.

Avatar image for kimbokasteniv
kimbokasteniv

3892

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#105 kimbokasteniv
Member since 2004 • 3892 Posts
I am always up for new technology, so this seems good to me. Although I don't quite understand how some older games are going to be converted to 3D. Otherwise, from the comments I'm getting the impression that it is now possible to produce a 3D effect without the use of any glasses, and if that is the case, then I may become very interested in this.
Avatar image for DoomZaW
DoomZaW

6475

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#106 DoomZaW
Member since 2007 • 6475 Posts

Didn't it require a special high class tv?

Avatar image for 93soccer
93soccer

4602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#107 93soccer
Member since 2009 • 4602 Posts
You need a 3D capable TV and those are about $3000-5000 for a 37"!
Avatar image for bigM10231
bigM10231

11240

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#108 bigM10231
Member since 2008 • 11240 Posts

its another gimmic. i say forza 3 looks better than that and gt5 better than that

Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#109 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts

You need a 3D capable TV and those are about $3000-5000 for a 37"!93soccer

Can you link to that TV, i've never seen one.

Avatar image for sonic_spark
sonic_spark

6196

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#110 sonic_spark
Member since 2003 • 6196 Posts

Don't you have to have the HDTV that supports this though?

Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#111 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

let's just call this what it is, 3D = sixaxis

Avatar image for santoron
santoron

8584

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#112 santoron
Member since 2006 • 8584 Posts

[QUOTE="93soccer"]You need a 3D capable TV and those are about $3000-5000 for a 37"!Bebi_vegeta

Can you link to that TV, i've never seen one.

Here's a 60" 3D ready tv a buddy of mine got a couple months ago. 1,200 at Best Buy, cheaper than that on the web.

Avatar image for ShadowriverUB
ShadowriverUB

5515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#113 ShadowriverUB
Member since 2009 • 5515 Posts

Ehhh, they at least could add classic color-coded 3D support for those who don't have those TV :P since pixels get distance values, i don't think it would be complicated.

I don't see reason why not include 3DTVs they might get standard in 1-2 years in acceptable price, and PS3 owners will be rewarded... anyway isn't 360 version of Avatar will have 3dTV support?

Avatar image for djsifer01
djsifer01

7238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#114 djsifer01
Member since 2005 • 7238 Posts
It will be awesome like everything Sony brings to the table.
Avatar image for Dogswithguns
Dogswithguns

11359

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#116 Dogswithguns
Member since 2007 • 11359 Posts
I dont think I like wearing those 3D glasses all the time when playing games. thanks but no can do.
Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#117 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts

[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

[QUOTE="93soccer"]You need a 3D capable TV and those are about $3000-5000 for a 37"!santoron

Can you link to that TV, i've never seen one.

Here's a 60" 3D ready tv a buddy of mine got a couple months ago. 1,200 at Best Buy, cheaper than that on the web.

So basicaly, your just pointing me to a HDTV ? Unless you can tell me, what makes this TV 3D ready?

Avatar image for SLIisaownsystem
SLIisaownsystem

964

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#118 SLIisaownsystem
Member since 2009 • 964 Posts

3D vision is still better and is supported in every game.

Avatar image for Cait__Sith
Cait__Sith

2326

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#119 Cait__Sith
Member since 2009 • 2326 Posts
[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

[QUOTE="santoron"]

[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

Can you link to that TV, i've never seen one.

Here's a 60" 3D ready tv a buddy of mine got a couple months ago. 1,200 at Best Buy, cheaper than that on the web.

So basicaly, your just pointing me to a HDTV ? Unless you can tell me, what makes this TV 3D ready?

"Technical Details Smooth 120Hz Exclusive 6-Color Processor Plush 1080p 5G Improved 12-bit Processing 3D Ready - 3D video, gaming and dual-screen features require compatible 3D source devices, 3D glasses and IR emitters Improved Video Noise Reduction " right from the website.
Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#120 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts

[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

[QUOTE="santoron"]

Here's a 60" 3D ready tv a buddy of mine got a couple months ago. 1,200 at Best Buy, cheaper than that on the web.

Cait__Sith

So basicaly, your just pointing me to a HDTV ? Unless you can tell me, what makes this TV 3D ready?

"Technical Details Smooth 120Hz Exclusive 6-Color Processor Plush 1080p 5G Improved 12-bit Processing 3D Ready - 3D video, gaming and dual-screen features require compatible 3D source devices, 3D glasses and IR emitters Improved Video Noise Reduction " right from the website.

And this is not in every HDTV? Because it just seems like it's crap in order to boost sells. But anyways, what's in red is the most important... if it's the same as Nvidia 3D... then you need view glasses and 120Hz monitor.

Avatar image for Cait__Sith
Cait__Sith

2326

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#121 Cait__Sith
Member since 2009 • 2326 Posts
[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

[QUOTE="Cait__Sith"][QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

So basicaly, your just pointing me to a HDTV ? Unless you can tell me, what makes this TV 3D ready?

"Technical Details Smooth 120Hz Exclusive 6-Color Processor Plush 1080p 5G Improved 12-bit Processing 3D Ready - 3D video, gaming and dual-screen features require compatible 3D source devices, 3D glasses and IR emitters Improved Video Noise Reduction " right from the website.

And this is not in every HDTV? Because it just seems like it's crap in order to boost sells. But anyways, what's in red is the most important... if it's the same as Nvidia 3D... then you need view glasses and 120Hz monitor.

Yeah I hope its just 120Hz, because I just got 2 new and ****ing expensive HDTVs in the past 3 years (52inch XBR4, and 50inch Elite Kuro). And I'm not sure if I even have a place for a 3rd...:P
Avatar image for tubbyc
tubbyc

4004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#122 tubbyc
Member since 2005 • 4004 Posts

I remember someone posted this article a while back:

http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/ps3s-new-3d-mode-captured-on-video-coming-in-2010-to-all-exist/

It looks like you need to get a 200hz TV. I don't know if I would get into it, considering I just bought a nice new TV about a year ago.

Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#123 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts

I remember someone posted this article a while back:

http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/ps3s-new-3d-mode-captured-on-video-coming-in-2010-to-all-exist/

It looks like you need to get a 200hz TV. I don't know if I would get into it, considering I just bought a nice new TV about a year ago.

tubbyc

200hz... wow... that's above standard... good luck with that Sony. But then again, how true is this blog or article... i've heard of 120Hz,240Hz and 480Hz... but 200hz? And could the PS3 pump up 200FPS and HD.... I think not.

Avatar image for tubbyc
tubbyc

4004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#124 tubbyc
Member since 2005 • 4004 Posts

[QUOTE="tubbyc"]

I remember someone posted this article a while back:

http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/ps3s-new-3d-mode-captured-on-video-coming-in-2010-to-all-exist/

It looks like you need to get a 200hz TV. I don't know if I would get into it, considering I just bought a nice new TV about a year ago.

Bebi_vegeta

200hz... wow... that's above standard... good luck with that Sony. But then again, how true is this blog or article... i've heard of 120Hz,240Hz and 480Hz... but 200hz? And could the PS3 pump up 200FPS and HD.... I think not.

120 (NTSC) would be the equivalent of 100 (PAL/SECAM). 240 would be the equivalent of 200.

From what I understand, I think the TVs with the new Motionflow technology can add in extra frames, even for gaming, hence doing a lot of extra work to avoid jerky motion.

http://www.electricpig.co.uk/what-is-motionflow-200hz/

Avatar image for z4twenny
z4twenny

4898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#125 z4twenny
Member since 2006 • 4898 Posts

if all thats required is a high hz tv then im set. mine goes up to 600 :D

Avatar image for Cait__Sith
Cait__Sith

2326

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#126 Cait__Sith
Member since 2009 • 2326 Posts

if all thats required is a high hz tv then im set. mine goes up to 600 :D

z4twenny

well that might not be true, your TV (assuming plasma) is actually 50hz, because plasma refreshes 12 times per Hz so 600Hz, but I was actually about to ask that. Becuase my Elite Kuro does 72Hz (72x12 = 864Hz) but because its just going really really fast (12 times) it might not be able to do 3D because its actualy limit is 50Hz for you and 72Hz for me and thats not even close to the 240Hz i've been hearing about.

Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#127 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts

[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

[QUOTE="tubbyc"]

I remember someone posted this article a while back:

http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/04/ps3s-new-3d-mode-captured-on-video-coming-in-2010-to-all-exist/

It looks like you need to get a 200hz TV. I don't know if I would get into it, considering I just bought a nice new TV about a year ago.

tubbyc

200hz... wow... that's above standard... good luck with that Sony. But then again, how true is this blog or article... i've heard of 120Hz,240Hz and 480Hz... but 200hz? And could the PS3 pump up 200FPS and HD.... I think not.

120 (NTSC) would be the equivalent of 100 (PAL/SECAM). 240 would be the equivalent of 200.

From what I understand, I think the TVs with the new Motionflow technology can add in extra frames, even for gaming, hence doing a lot of extra work to avoid jerky motion.

http://www.electricpig.co.uk/what-is-motionflow-200hz/

And if the source, which is the PS3, can't give 240Hz or 200Hz... what's the point?

Avatar image for AnnoyedDragon
AnnoyedDragon

9948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#128 AnnoyedDragon
Member since 2006 • 9948 Posts

I expect there is more to it than just getting a high refresh rate screen.

Splitting the image requires performance, seeing how PS3 is already using all of its performance to run the game; you probably need a special Sony TV that can accelerate the effect.

Avatar image for Supafly1
Supafly1

4441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#129 Supafly1
Member since 2003 • 4441 Posts

I wont care as long as its optional, if it isnt Ill be mad, 3D things (you know what I mean, like popping out of TV 3d) give me a headache.

dragonfly110
Yep, some people will feel discomfort at first but some get even headaches. It's not good for your eyes.
Avatar image for skektek
skektek

6530

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#130 skektek
Member since 2004 • 6530 Posts

[QUOTE="tubbyc"]

[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

200hz... wow... that's above standard... good luck with that Sony. But then again, how true is this blog or article... i've heard of 120Hz,240Hz and 480Hz... but 200hz? And could the PS3 pump up 200FPS and HD.... I think not.

Bebi_vegeta

120 (NTSC) would be the equivalent of 100 (PAL/SECAM). 240 would be the equivalent of 200.

From what I understand, I think the TVs with the new Motionflow technology can add in extra frames, even for gaming, hence doing a lot of extra work to avoid jerky motion.

http://www.electricpig.co.uk/what-is-motionflow-200hz/

And if the source, which is the PS3, can't give 240Hz or 200Hz... what's the point?

WTF? Who said it couldn't.

Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#131 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts

[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

[QUOTE="tubbyc"]

120 (NTSC) would be the equivalent of 100 (PAL/SECAM). 240 would be the equivalent of 200.

From what I understand, I think the TVs with the new Motionflow technology can add in extra frames, even for gaming, hence doing a lot of extra work to avoid jerky motion.

http://www.electricpig.co.uk/what-is-motionflow-200hz/

skektek

And if the source, which is the PS3, can't give 240Hz or 200Hz... what's the point?

WTF? Who said it couldn't.

Wow, how many games are doing 200fps on the ps3 while being in HD?

Avatar image for ShadowriverUB
ShadowriverUB

5515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#132 ShadowriverUB
Member since 2009 • 5515 Posts

[QUOTE="skektek"]

[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

And if the source, which is the PS3, can't give 240Hz or 200Hz... what's the point?

Bebi_vegeta

WTF? Who said it couldn't.

Wow, how many games are doing 200fps on the ps3 while being in HD?

*facepalm* people, Pixel Transmition =/= Pixel Rendering. In other words PS3 and any other device don't need to render another frame to trasmit any frame for TV, they can trasmit the same frame as last time since it's still somewhare in memory. Why we have 200Hz TV's still it wen you plag DVB tuner that can reseve more then 50/60 frames still TV display them at 200Hz.

Now exmaple how 3DTV would work on PS3, Sony say that HDMI chip that inside PS3 can trasmit 3DTV this mean 120Hz to TV, to make 3DTV work GPU need to render double number of frames, two frames rendered in other camera angle and some pixel tuning. Now we got Wipeout HD that renders 60fps, in 3DTV mode it can render 30 "3D frames" per secend for sure. It renders one "3D frame", HDMI transmits it and retrasmit same data until new 2 frames will come. Simple as that. Maybe it's 30fps, but it's 3DTV that can be display on TV that supports that technology.

Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#133 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts

[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

[QUOTE="skektek"]

WTF? Who said it couldn't.

ShadowriverUB

Wow, how many games are doing 200fps on the ps3 while being in HD?

*facepalm* people, Pixel Transmition =/= Pixel Rendering. In other words PS3 and any other device don't need to render another frame to trasmit any frame for TV, they can trasmit the same frame as last time since it's still somewhare in memory. Why we have 200Hz TV's still it wen you plag DVB tuner that can reseve more then 50/60 frames still TV display them at 200Hz.

Now exmaple how 3DTV would work on PS3, Sony say that HDMI chip that inside PS3 can trasmit 3DTV this mean 120Hz to TV, to make 3DTV work GPU need to render double number of frames, two frames rendered in other camera angle and some pixel tuning. Now we got Wipeout HD that renders 60fps, in 3DTV mode it can render 30 "3D frames" per secend for sure. It renders one "3D frame", HDMI transmits it and retrasmit same data until new 2 frames will come. Simple as that. Maybe it's 30fps, but it's 3DTV that can be display on TV that supports that technology.

HELLO? Do you even know how the 3D will work? Hence why I said the source can't handle it, not the output!

If it's anything like Nvidia, you'll need 2 images, both needing 60FPS for smooth gaming... which the PS3 can't even deliver for 99.9% of all games.

Avatar image for Ravenlore_basic
Ravenlore_basic

4319

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#134 Ravenlore_basic
Member since 2003 • 4319 Posts

requirement of new 3d tv that will cost a ton makes this pointless PR. Ontain

???? does anyone know the process ... HOW can people say it will cost $$$

They way i thought it was is that you need a TV that accepted 120Hz input to be able to create 2 seprate pictures running at 60FPS.... is there more that is needed??

Avatar image for mr-krinkles
mr-krinkles

1641

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#135 mr-krinkles
Member since 2008 • 1641 Posts

My tv is around 100Hz so not enough. In all honesty though, this 3D concept just sounds headache-inducing. What is it, like stereoscopic vision/glasses? If that's what it is then no thanks.

Avatar image for Ravenlore_basic
Ravenlore_basic

4319

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#136 Ravenlore_basic
Member since 2003 • 4319 Posts

For TVs to be able to do 3D they need to accept a 120Hz INPUT.. not run at 120HZ or more.

Avatar image for ShadowriverUB
ShadowriverUB

5515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#137 ShadowriverUB
Member since 2009 • 5515 Posts

[QUOTE="ShadowriverUB"]

[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

Wow, how many games are doing 200fps on the ps3 while being in HD?

Bebi_vegeta

*facepalm* people, Pixel Transmition =/= Pixel Rendering. In other words PS3 and any other device don't need to render another frame to trasmit any frame for TV, they can trasmit the same frame as last time since it's still somewhare in memory. Why we have 200Hz TV's still it wen you plag DVB tuner that can reseve more then 50/60 frames still TV display them at 200Hz.

Now exmaple how 3DTV would work on PS3, Sony say that HDMI chip that inside PS3 can trasmit 3DTV this mean 120Hz to TV, to make 3DTV work GPU need to render double number of frames, two frames rendered in other camera angle and some pixel tuning. Now we got Wipeout HD that renders 60fps, in 3DTV mode it can render 30 "3D frames" per secend for sure. It renders one "3D frame", HDMI transmits it and retrasmit same data until new 2 frames will come. Simple as that. Maybe it's 30fps, but it's 3DTV that can be display on TV that supports that technology.

HELLO? Do you even know how the 3D will work? Hence why I said the source can't handle it, not the output!

If it's anything like Nvidia, you'll need 2 images, both needing 60FPS for smooth gaming... which the PS3 can't even deliver for 99.9% of all games.

This makes 3DTV impossible on PS3? No

Also you consider PS3 3DTV playable (yes, playable) demos on CES as some kind of massive illusion? Whatever standard they showed they useing stereo frames (double frames needed).

Avatar image for bad_fur_day
bad_fur_day

1988

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#138 bad_fur_day
Member since 2008 • 1988 Posts

This is getting confusing, 3d 3d games...

Avatar image for ShadowriverUB
ShadowriverUB

5515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#139 ShadowriverUB
Member since 2009 • 5515 Posts

This is getting confusing, 3d 3d games...

bad_fur_day

Well in theory the 3D that we had and have now it's just an illusion :P in reality your TV screen is flat and can only display 2D matrix of pixels alone

Avatar image for Phaze-Two
Phaze-Two

3444

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#140 Phaze-Two
Member since 2009 • 3444 Posts

requirement of new 3d tv that will cost a ton makes this pointless PR. Ontain

you can use it with a monitor

Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#141 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts

[QUOTE="Bebi_vegeta"]

[QUOTE="ShadowriverUB"]

*facepalm* people, Pixel Transmition =/= Pixel Rendering. In other words PS3 and any other device don't need to render another frame to trasmit any frame for TV, they can trasmit the same frame as last time since it's still somewhare in memory. Why we have 200Hz TV's still it wen you plag DVB tuner that can reseve more then 50/60 frames still TV display them at 200Hz.

Now exmaple how 3DTV would work on PS3, Sony say that HDMI chip that inside PS3 can trasmit 3DTV this mean 120Hz to TV, to make 3DTV work GPU need to render double number of frames, two frames rendered in other camera angle and some pixel tuning. Now we got Wipeout HD that renders 60fps, in 3DTV mode it can render 30 "3D frames" per secend for sure. It renders one "3D frame", HDMI transmits it and retrasmit same data until new 2 frames will come. Simple as that. Maybe it's 30fps, but it's 3DTV that can be display on TV that supports that technology.

ShadowriverUB

HELLO? Do you even know how the 3D will work? Hence why I said the source can't handle it, not the output!

If it's anything like Nvidia, you'll need 2 images, both needing 60FPS for smooth gaming... which the PS3 can't even deliver for 99.9% of all games.

This makes 3DTV impossible on PS3? No

Also you consider PS3 3DTV playable (yes, playable) demos on CES as some kind of massive illusion? Whatever standard they showed they useing stereo frames (double frames needed).

It's exactly like Nvidia 3D... which requiered good hardware in order to have good FPS... and guess what, PS3 has a hard enough time with frames per seconds. I'll just leave it has, you have no idea and beleive what Sony says to you...I'm sure you're still waiting on the 120fps with full 1080p games that Sony promised you, right?

Avatar image for Jake145222
Jake145222

230

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#142 Jake145222
Member since 2009 • 230 Posts
your still going to need a new TV which is going to cost alot..soo I really don't see this kind of thing going anywhere anytime soon.
Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#143 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts

For TVs to be able to do 3D they need to accept a 120Hz INPUT.. not run at 120HZ or more.

Ravenlore_basic

Nvidia requierements are 120Hz output for monitors... so I assume it will be the same for HDTV and Sony.