Final verdict = meh. I honestly believe that other than CoD4 (a multiplat), consoles have yet to pull out a shooter that can match Rainbow Six: Vegas (another multiplat), both online and offline. R6V was disappointing for the PC because of a shoddy port job and some dumbing down of complex features from previous R6 games, but seen purely as a console shooter which have different standards, it's tough to top it.
For Halo 3, I think the graphics that so many hate on are fine (even impressive at times) and the enemies are cool. My main issues with it are that the overall gunplay is weak as hell and the level design is completely unimaginative, and annoying to navigate through sometimes (a couple of those levels near the end of the campaign were god-awful).
It's a huge issue when both gunplay and level design are lacking. It's fine if it's just one of the two, and the other one makes up for it. For example, F.E.A.R. had poor level design but its gunplay is basically unmatched, so it was fine. And then Half-Life 2, which has weak gunplay but generally excellent and memorable level design. Halo 3 doesn't do either well.
Halo 3 is just boring to play, and that's honestly how I feel. It doesn't offer anything that other FPSs don't do a lot better, except co-op. I literally had a lot more fun going back through saved films and watching recorded videos in various angles and speeds than actually playing the game. That's the truth. And Halo 3 multiplayer with friends is fun, but multiplayer with pretty much anyone else isn't. I miss the R6V community. That had some mature gamers.
Log in to comment