And again no game on the Wii looks better than Doom 3 on the XBOX....lolAtariKidX
Just how stupid are you?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
And again no game on the Wii looks better than Doom 3 on the XBOX....lolAtariKidX
Just how stupid are you?
yet consoles fanboys ignore the same kind of comments made by PC gamers when they bring up PC powerful hardware...but now because is the Wii U doesn't matter n is only 6 years...:roll:wow , wiiU is more powerful than 6 years old consoles , mind blown
AmnesiaHaze
Too much talk, not enough action. Which is typical of 3rd parties babling on behalf of a Nintendo console.
Still not convinced.
And again no game on the Wii looks better than Doom 3 on the XBOX....lol[QUOTE="AtariKidX"][QUOTE="super600"]
Wii was more powerful, but did not show it.The Wii had more ram,a slightly lowered clocked CPU and a better GPU.The Wii could also produce cleaner SD games then the xbox even though it couldn't support 720P and programmable shaders.
super600
It's because the Xbox had a resolution advantage while the Wii didn't.The xbox wasted more power when it ran a game at 720P.And i heard doom 3 ran below 480P.:lol:
I dunno bout throwing numbers around, we might as well be comparing 64 bits to 32 bits back in the PS1 era :P[QUOTE="AmnesiaHaze"]yet consoles fanboys ignore the same kind of comments made by PC gamers when they bring up PC powerful hardware...but now because is the Wii U doesn't matter n is only 6 years...:roll: Everyone apart from fakeboys knows that hardware from later years will be more powerful then 2005/2006 hardware of consoles.wow , wiiU is more powerful than 6 years old consoles , mind blown
Tessellation
I think that once you get into hd graphics, the differences between stonger and weaker graphical capabilites become less pronounced, while the best pc graphics are better than x360 graphics I dont think it is as big of a leap as jumping to 16 bit gaming from 8 bit was
Agreed.I think that once you get into hd graphics, the differences between stonger and weaker graphical capabilites become less pronounced, while the best pc graphics are better than x360 graphics I dont think it is as big of a leap as jumping to 16 bit gaming from 8 bit was
the9thinning
[QUOTE="AtariKidX"]And again no game on the Wii looks better than Doom 3 on the XBOX....lolChubbyGuy40
Just how stupid are you?
I don't believe there is a sufficient word to describe how stupid he is.
I think that once you get into hd graphics, the differences between stonger and weaker graphical capabilites become less pronounced, while the best pc graphics are better than x360 graphics I dont think it is as big of a leap as jumping to 16 bit gaming from 8 bit was
the9thinning
Same when moving from 16bit to 32/64bit and to the PS2/NGC/Xbox era. Each gen, the graphical jump can be seen with the naked eye even if you are a casual......However, next gen, even if 720 and PS4 comes out costing $600 and is 400x more powerful, unless you are a huge technicalfile and can descern the differences btween 500 million polys to 1000 million polys, the differences between 1x AA to 4x AA etc, etc, most casuals and mainstream, like the PS3, will take one look at the price, faint, and say ,"No...FARKING....WAY my friend" and once again, go buy the Wii U instead! Sorry, by this time and gen, graphical leap just can not be seen with the naked eye, at least the 90% of the mainstream and casual public that make up the majority of the market anyways. These harda corda gamags may scream like they are the majority, but they arn't and all three's hardware will be very close to each other this time around. The days of "razor to the razor blade" business model is long gone.
That's great and all, and I support Nintendo's decision not to push hardware like the other two in favor of trying new things, but I still think it's funny this is even a topic worth discussing. Current gen consoles are so out dated this should be a given.
>having to "confirm" that a next gen console is more powerful than 7 year-old consoles
Tikeio
What he said.
That's great and all, and I support Nintendo's decision not to push hardware like the other two in favor of trying new things, but I still think it's funny this is even a topic worth discussing. Current gen consoles are so out dated this should be a given.
WithoutGraceXII
That's just the stupidity of System Wars, and hell even half of the internet in general.
When the ps4 release an everyone says its way more powerful then Ps3 I have my doubts people will say " Oh wow its more powerful then 10 year old hardware woppy do"...
Why people even say this boggles my mind. Conflicting reports also say 0, the console will proove to be more powerful when someone takes it apart in 4 months.
When the ps4 release an everyone says its way more powerful then Ps3 I have my doubts people will say " Oh wow its more powerful then 10 year old hardware woppy do"...
Valknut4
Because its common knowledge that a console's successor will be more powerful than its predecessor.
The only reason why the Wii-U is getting dumped on is because Nintendo is playing "catch up".
And a whole list of devs that say otherwise. This proved nothing
reach3
List them with links then to actual developers openly stating that. No "rumors" or "Inside sources".
And don't give me that Tekken CPU bull****. A newer CPU at a lower clock is better than the CPU in 360/PS3.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment