60 fps is a must for games

  • 66 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for deadlyabdus123
deadlyabdus123

120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 deadlyabdus123
Member since 2011 • 120 Posts
It disgusts me how I play a game on consoles at 30fps and see the glory of how it feels at 60fps. I cant describe it much but the feel is much better, it seems more realistic. Try going from Bad company 2 to Call of duty on ur ps3, the feel is much better even if BF is a better game in some senses. anyone who says 30 fps is ok or prefers to play at 30 fps is just trying to justify his inferior console. At one point, infamous 2 in a less intense and increased to 60fps (im guessing there is no V-lock) and the movements just felt so smooth. Why do you think these pc dudes spend a ton of money on gtx580s when games dont even use them well this gen, to get that 60fps. I better not be playing 30fps next gen. Do you guys think 30fps is enough? I dont.
Avatar image for Randoggy
Randoggy

3497

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Randoggy
Member since 2003 • 3497 Posts
Not a must.
Avatar image for MobilechicaneX
MobilechicaneX

2863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 MobilechicaneX
Member since 2009 • 2863 Posts

But it's not a "must".

Avatar image for madsnakehhh
madsnakehhh

18368

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#4 madsnakehhh
Member since 2007 • 18368 Posts

Meh, never really cared for FPS (not the genre :P) in fact, i don't even noticed it, i played and loved Bayonetta on the PS3 and allegedly it only ran at 30FPS, honestly, never cared and the game was my 2010 GOTY.

Avatar image for bobbetybob
bobbetybob

19370

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#5 bobbetybob
Member since 2005 • 19370 Posts
Lol ok, have fun upgrading your hardware every time a new powerhouse game comes out just because you can't play at 60FPS.
Avatar image for NanoMan88
NanoMan88

1220

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 NanoMan88
Member since 2006 • 1220 Posts

This is all relative, if all consoles could render was 15fps they would say 30fps is not a must, they are only saying its not necessary because they havent seen it.

Avatar image for Inconsistancy
Inconsistancy

8094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Inconsistancy
Member since 2004 • 8094 Posts
Depends on the genre, even then it's arguable. Most games are perfectly fine sub 60fps, most games I play are that way anyway, since I favor graphics over fps ('cept in multiplayer)
Avatar image for Randoggy
Randoggy

3497

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Randoggy
Member since 2003 • 3497 Posts

This is all relative, if all consoles could render was 15fps they would say 30fps is not a must, they are only saying its not necessary because they havent seen it.

NanoMan88
Pretty sure anyone who has played a handful of video games will know the difference between 30FPS and 60FPS. It's not needed, would it be nice to have? Hells yes, but it's not needed. People complaining about this are just picky and retarded if you ask me.
Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#9 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62030 Posts

You seem to like the word disgust a lot.

60FPS is not a necessity... It may be for you, but you =/= everybody.

Avatar image for razgriz_101
razgriz_101

16875

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#10 razgriz_101
Member since 2007 • 16875 Posts

not a necessity for me.Most games look fine and servicable with 30fps.

only genre to really bother bout FPS imo is fighters.

Avatar image for NaveedLife
NaveedLife

17179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 NaveedLife
Member since 2010 • 17179 Posts

framerate/resolution > detail

I love all aspects of graphics, but yeah a game locked at 60 FPS with high resolution and AA cranked looks great even for old games (Counterstrike 1.6).

Avatar image for TheMoreYouOwn
TheMoreYouOwn

3927

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 TheMoreYouOwn
Member since 2010 • 3927 Posts
Nah, all of the greatest games have no problem playing lower than 60 fps...and the greatest games are on consoles.
Avatar image for NanoMan88
NanoMan88

1220

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 NanoMan88
Member since 2006 • 1220 Posts

[QUOTE="NanoMan88"]

This is all relative, if all consoles could render was 15fps they would say 30fps is not a must, they are only saying its not necessary because they havent seen it.

Randoggy

Pretty sure anyone who has played a handful of video games will know the difference between 30FPS and 60FPS. It's not needed, would it be nice to have? Hells yes, but it's not needed. People complaining about this are just picky and retarded if you ask me.

Actually no they wouldnt cause most console games run at 30fps, so they wouldnt know the difference. For consoles its all right because their games run at 30fps and everyone runs at 30fps, however once you see games in the longterm at 60fps, you will not be able to downgrade to 30fps. Just as how you wouldnt want to play a 15fps, please do not comment on something you have never experienced.

Avatar image for Pug-Nasty
Pug-Nasty

8508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#14 Pug-Nasty
Member since 2009 • 8508 Posts

I don't know what FPS my games run at on my PC, but I don't notice a difference between them and my console games other than slight visual upgrades.

Avatar image for deactivated-5e9357e99ffb8
deactivated-5e9357e99ffb8

1255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 deactivated-5e9357e99ffb8
Member since 2007 • 1255 Posts

Our eyes can't tell the difference between 30 and 60 Frames per second. They are not a must. They are just a bragging point.

Avatar image for rasengan2552
rasengan2552

5071

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 rasengan2552
Member since 2009 • 5071 Posts

What is it with PC gamers and graphics ? all I ever hear them talk about is framerate, visuals and modding the game to make it more polished.

its as if they don't actual care about the game itself ... just how it performs.

Avatar image for Inconsistancy
Inconsistancy

8094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Inconsistancy
Member since 2004 • 8094 Posts

Our eyes can't tell the difference between 30 and 60 Frames per second. They are not a must. They are just a bragging point.

Hobbsey07

Yes they can :roll:

Edit: ---searching for the evidence!---

http://www.boallen.com/fps-compare.html

Edit:2 ---found---

Avatar image for NanoMan88
NanoMan88

1220

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 NanoMan88
Member since 2006 • 1220 Posts

Our eyes can't tell the difference between 30 and 60 Frames per second. They are not a must. They are just a bragging point.

Hobbsey07

Your statement is completely untrue, many peopel can tell the difference between 30 and 60fps, there was was some cube gif on here a while ago which displayed 15, 30 and 60fps and tons of the people in the thread could see the difference between 30 and 60.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#19 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62030 Posts

What is it with PC gamers and graphics ? all I ever hear them talk about is framerate, visuals and modding the game to make it more polished.

its as if they don't actual care about the game itself ... just how it performs.

rasengan2552

Yes, because console gamers never compare minute differences between multiplats and exclusives. A lot of gamers are obsessed with graphics... It's not endemic to a particular fanboy group.

Avatar image for chewy130
chewy130

643

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 chewy130
Member since 2006 • 643 Posts

i seen your post activity and u seem to have a penchant for pushing your own opinions aggressively. and you like to say "sicken" and "disgust" a lot lol. take a chill pill its jus gaming

Avatar image for NanoMan88
NanoMan88

1220

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 NanoMan88
Member since 2006 • 1220 Posts

What is it with PC gamers and graphics ? all I ever hear them talk about is framerate, visuals and modding the game to make it more polished.

its as if they don't actual care about the game itself ... just how it performs.

rasengan2552

Funny you said that since every thread in system wars is does x game look better on 360 or ps3, or console gfx king. Also I dont know why you would think mods are only gfx mods but they also deal with adding extra content such as quests, weapons or equipment to games.

Avatar image for rasengan2552
rasengan2552

5071

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 rasengan2552
Member since 2009 • 5071 Posts

[QUOTE="rasengan2552"]

What is it with PC gamers and graphics ? all I ever hear them talk about is framerate, visuals and modding the game to make it more polished.

its as if they don't actual care about the game itself ... just how it performs.

lundy86_4

Yes, because console gamers never compare minute differences between multiplats and exclusives. A lot of gamers are obsessed with graphics... It's not endemic to a particular fanboy group.

I partially agree with you, mainly because consolites don't really care about the graphics, they just like to bash the other console's version of the game.
Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

um its not a must for games its a nice option in some games but others its not needed at all RTS don't need 60 fps.

Avatar image for Seiki_sands
Seiki_sands

1973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#25 Seiki_sands
Member since 2003 • 1973 Posts

I agree with you TC, I can forgive it pretty easily so long as its a playable 30, but it should be a must. I would rather see a game look like crap in terms of detail with tearing all over the place and run at 60 then look glorious and run at 30. Every year that passes seems like it bugs me more and more actually.

At least give people the option to let them reach that threshold in all games. That means both options for framerate unlocking on consoles and enough options to get it there while playing a PC game at the minimum specs on the label. I don't know of a console game other than Bioshock that let's you make that choice though (in that case its unlocking from 30), and half the time a minimum spec PC label indicates the level you need in order to watch a slideshow.

I don't understand how people can not notice. With 60 everything moves smoothly, with 30 it simply doesn't, not in shooters, not in racing games, not in fighters, not in RPGs. Other than puzzle games I think its highly noticable in every genre.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#26 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62030 Posts

I partially agree with you, mainly because consolites don't really care about the graphics, they just like to bash the other console's version of the game.rasengan2552

So they're only doing it to spite the other fanbase, rather than having an actual interest in the graphics? I doubt it.

Avatar image for lespaul1919
lespaul1919

7074

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 lespaul1919
Member since 2003 • 7074 Posts

after playing at over 100 for years, 30 isa total slideshow.

but, BUT. that's not the best advantage. it's the responsiveness of the controls and game. 30 feels bogged down and chugging.

Avatar image for James161324
James161324

8315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 James161324
Member since 2009 • 8315 Posts

Shooters need it

Avatar image for deactivated-5e9357e99ffb8
deactivated-5e9357e99ffb8

1255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#29 deactivated-5e9357e99ffb8
Member since 2007 • 1255 Posts

[QUOTE="Hobbsey07"]

Our eyes can't tell the difference between 30 and 60 Frames per second. They are not a must. They are just a bragging point.

Inconsistancy

Yes they can :roll:

Edit: ---searching for the evidence!---

http://www.boallen.com/fps-compare.html

Edit:2 ---found---

I stand corrected. Sorry for being ignorant. I probably should have done research on it, considering I only heard about this from a buddy and went with it.

Avatar image for rasengan2552
rasengan2552

5071

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 rasengan2552
Member since 2009 • 5071 Posts

im just glad nobody posted a Youtube comparison this time lol.

Avatar image for The__Havoc
The__Havoc

2350

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 The__Havoc
Member since 2009 • 2350 Posts

Lol ok, have fun upgrading your hardware every time a new powerhouse game comes out just because you can't play at 60FPS.bobbetybob

Or just decrease the detail because we all know gameplay > graphics and performance is much more benificial

Avatar image for NanoMan88
NanoMan88

1220

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 NanoMan88
Member since 2006 • 1220 Posts

[QUOTE="bobbetybob"]Lol ok, have fun upgrading your hardware every time a new powerhouse game comes out just because you can't play at 60FPS.The__Havoc

Or just decrease the detail because we all know gameplay > graphics and performance is much more benificial

This

People treat fps as a graphics feature when it actually has more to do with gameplay.

Avatar image for rasengan2552
rasengan2552

5071

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 rasengan2552
Member since 2009 • 5071 Posts

[QUOTE="The__Havoc"]

[QUOTE="bobbetybob"]Lol ok, have fun upgrading your hardware every time a new powerhouse game comes out just because you can't play at 60FPS.NanoMan88

Or just decrease the detail because we all know gameplay > graphics and performance is much more benificial

This

People treat fps as a graphics feature when it actually has more to do with gameplay.

true, but 60 FPS is only useful in FPS or any game were sensitivity level effects movement, as well viewing things in distance.
Avatar image for TheGrudge13
TheGrudge13

1198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#34 TheGrudge13
Member since 2009 • 1198 Posts
i think it's better to get 1080p in the next consoles instead of 60fps
Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

51583

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 Chutebox
Member since 2007 • 51583 Posts

No....not even close.

Avatar image for Firebird-5
Firebird-5

2848

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 Firebird-5
Member since 2007 • 2848 Posts

Our eyes can't tell the difference between 30 and 60 Frames per second. They are not a must. They are just a bragging point.

Hobbsey07

call an optometrist bro

Avatar image for SaltyMeatballs
SaltyMeatballs

25165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#37 SaltyMeatballs
Member since 2009 • 25165 Posts
That's funny, because a lot of my favourite games of all time are 30fps.
Avatar image for Dr_Snood
Dr_Snood

2547

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#38 Dr_Snood
Member since 2008 • 2547 Posts
It's not needed for all types of games. I feel a Ninja Gaiden game should play at 60FPS because it just the experience all the better. However, a game like Halo doesn't really need it and plays fine at 30FPS.
Avatar image for 15strong
15strong

2806

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 15strong
Member since 2007 • 2806 Posts

[QUOTE="Randoggy"][QUOTE="NanoMan88"]

This is all relative, if all consoles could render was 15fps they would say 30fps is not a must, they are only saying its not necessary because they havent seen it.

NanoMan88

Pretty sure anyone who has played a handful of video games will know the difference between 30FPS and 60FPS. It's not needed, would it be nice to have? Hells yes, but it's not needed. People complaining about this are just picky and retarded if you ask me.

Actually no they wouldnt cause most console games run at 30fps, so they wouldnt know the difference. For consoles its all right because their games run at 30fps and everyone runs at 30fps, however once you see games in the longterm at 60fps, you will not be able to downgrade to 30fps. Just as how you wouldnt want to play a 15fps, please do not comment on something you have never experienced.

You do know that their are console games that run at 60 fps, right?

Avatar image for glez13
glez13

10314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 glez13
Member since 2006 • 10314 Posts

In a day and age were games can be played at 120FPS I don't understand why people continue to be obsessed with 60FPS, and not only that, also pick on people who use 30FPS because it is inferior.:roll:

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#41 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62030 Posts

[QUOTE="NanoMan88"]

[QUOTE="Randoggy"] Pretty sure anyone who has played a handful of video games will know the difference between 30FPS and 60FPS. It's not needed, would it be nice to have? Hells yes, but it's not needed. People complaining about this are just picky and retarded if you ask me.15strong

Actually no they wouldnt cause most console games run at 30fps, so they wouldnt know the difference. For consoles its all right because their games run at 30fps and everyone runs at 30fps, however once you see games in the longterm at 60fps, you will not be able to downgrade to 30fps. Just as how you wouldnt want to play a 15fps, please do not comment on something you have never experienced.

You do know that their are console games that run at 60 fps, right?

Nanoman said "most console games" :P

Avatar image for Remmib
Remmib

2250

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 Remmib
Member since 2010 • 2250 Posts

Our eyes can't tell the difference between 30 and 60 Frames per second. They are not a must. They are just a bragging point.

Hobbsey07

:roll:

Another person who doesn't know what they are talking about.

Educate yourself please.

Avatar image for Nintendo_Ownes7
Nintendo_Ownes7

30973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#43 Nintendo_Ownes7
Member since 2005 • 30973 Posts

Nah, all of the greatest games have no problem playing lower than 60 fps...and the greatest games are on consoles.TheMoreYouOwn
Super Mario Galaxy, Super Mario Galaxy 2, and Metroid Prime Trilogy those are some of the greatest games and they are all 60 FPS.

Avatar image for Remmib
Remmib

2250

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 Remmib
Member since 2010 • 2250 Posts
For consoles I'd say 40+ FPS is a must. The framerate drops to the 20's in Red Dead Redemption on 360 and it's just awful sometimes.
Avatar image for Inconsistancy
Inconsistancy

8094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 Inconsistancy
Member since 2004 • 8094 Posts

[QUOTE="Hobbsey07"]

Our eyes can't tell the difference between 30 and 60 Frames per second. They are not a must. They are just a bragging point.

Remmib

:roll:

Another person who doesn't know what they are talking about.

Educate yourself please.

He corrected himself, way to read the whole thread, what a mean person!
Avatar image for ZEYAAM898
ZEYAAM898

1921

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#46 ZEYAAM898
Member since 2009 • 1921 Posts

I play at 30 FPS and i dont think so thats its mantadory for a video game to run at 60 FPS.

Avatar image for SaltyMeatballs
SaltyMeatballs

25165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#47 SaltyMeatballs
Member since 2009 • 25165 Posts
For consoles I'd say 40+ FPS is a must.Remmib
No it's not.
Avatar image for Remmib
Remmib

2250

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 Remmib
Member since 2010 • 2250 Posts

[QUOTE="Remmib"]

[QUOTE="Hobbsey07"]

Our eyes can't tell the difference between 30 and 60 Frames per second. They are not a must. They are just a bragging point.

Inconsistancy

:roll:

Another person who doesn't know what they are talking about.

Educate yourself please.

He corrected himself, way to read the whole thread, what a mean person!

Ah...sorry, just get annoyed by the epic amounts of ignorant drivel that gets spouted on SW.

Avatar image for dzimm
dzimm

6615

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#50 dzimm
Member since 2006 • 6615 Posts
I've played and enjoyed games at 20 frames per second, so 60 is certainly not a must.