@ermacness:
Stop it!
You're too emotionally attached to Sony.
And easy to catch
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
What was Sony's excuse for charging $600 for the PS3 back in the day? Lol
Um, the BD drive lol.
Sony took huge losses on every PS3 sold.
And at that time, $600 for PS3 was actually worth it. That was a different time giving the fact it was Blu-Ray Player which a single Blu-Ray Player was really expensive compare to PS3. The first Blu-Ray player that came out in the summer of 2006 was over $1000 US dollars. The drives were expensive back then but Sony was able to get away with it by not overpricing the PS3 to a grand and it's why it got price at $600. PS3 (mainly the fatties) came with BC for PS2 and a few BC for PS1 games. Internet access was a nice feature and online was free. They clearly meant "It does everything"
Considerably more people were buying a PS3 vs a standalone Blu-Ray player so that meant cheaper overall production costs for PS3 vs standalone Blu-Ray players since a greater quantity of PS3 were being manufactured. And as Chutebox pointed out, the consoles were still sold at a loss regardless till Kaze came and fixed that. (I could be wrong but I think Sony lost $200 per unit sold which was absolutely insane. They dropped BC and other features after they realized that software sales were not making up for it like they originally envisioned)
Log in to comment