A very nice NGB vs NGS comparison

I won't say anything but if this game would be only for Xbox 360 lemmings would say it looks awesome and post the pictures for PS3 bashing and cow would say Xbox 1.5 almost no improvments, but not that it's a PS3 game it's exactly the opposide, lemmings are saying it's almost the same as NGB and cows are praising the graphics, how ironic isn't it.

Upper pictures are NGB followed by NGS 

The game looks great and most definately looks better than NG:B only its not as much of an improvement as people were expecting.

NG:S Hayabusa looks exactly like DoA4 Hayabusa :shock: 

like I've been saying since this morning

the only difference is better textures and lighting

I too think it will be excellent. It needs to start looking better though. I've been waiting for NGS for too long!

Dualshockin' = stop quoting pictures.

like I've been saying since this morning

 

the only difference is better textures and lighting

 

 

XboxUnderground

uhh....there are pretty substantial degrees of difference in the textures and lighting.

[QUOTE="XboxUnderground"]

like I've been saying since this morning

 

the only difference is better textures and lighting

 

 

fuzzysquash

uhh....there are pretty substantial degrees of difference in the textures and lighting.

[QUOTE="XboxUnderground"]

like I've been saying since this morning

 

the only difference is better textures and lighting

 

 

fuzzysquash

uhh....there are pretty substantial degrees of difference in the textures and lighting.

it's smaller than Halo 2 to Halo 3 beta 

[QUOTE="fuzzysquash"][QUOTE="XboxUnderground"]

like I've been saying since this morning

 

the only difference is better textures and lighting

 

 

XboxUnderground

uhh....there are pretty substantial degrees of difference in the textures and lighting.

it's smaller than Halo 2 to Halo 3 beta 

[QUOTE="fuzzysquash"][QUOTE="XboxUnderground"]

like I've been saying since this morning

 

the only difference is better textures and lighting

 

 

XboxUnderground

uhh....there are pretty substantial degrees of difference in the textures and lighting.

it's smaller than Halo 2 to Halo 3 beta 

No it isn't

NG:S looks awesome, everyone who hasn't played NG:B or NG should go out and buy this game, it's amazing. Forget DMC, the combat system in NG is the best you will ever play.

One minor comment, what the heck did they do to the wall jump and flying swallow animations? They looks really weak now.  

[QUOTE="XboxUnderground"][QUOTE="fuzzysquash"][QUOTE="XboxUnderground"]

like I've been saying since this morning

 

the only difference is better textures and lighting

 

 

Mass_Effect

uhh....there are pretty substantial degrees of difference in the textures and lighting.

it's smaller than Halo 2 to Halo 3 beta

No it isn't

Yes it is, Halo 3 is pushing way more polys then Halo 2 with about 20 fps more, with lot better textures, lightning next gen fx.

Yes it is, Halo 3 is pushing way more polys then Halo 2 with about 20 fps more, with lot better textures, lightning next gen fx.

skyform

Even the Halo 3 Beta?

[QUOTE="fuzzysquash"][QUOTE="XboxUnderground"]

like I've been saying since this morning

 

the only difference is better textures and lighting

 

 

XboxUnderground

uhh....there are pretty substantial degrees of difference in the textures and lighting.

it's smaller than Halo 2 to Halo 3 beta

I'd have to disagree on that one. 

[QUOTE="skyform"]

Yes it is, Halo 3 is pushing way more polys then Halo 2 with about 20 fps more, with lot better textures, lightning next gen fx.

Mass_Effect

Even the Halo 3 Beta?

Exactly im talking about beat, but i can't help you if your eyes are damaged, there is only a bad video of H3 beat and it already looks way better then H2, just wait for some hd mp or sp footage you you will see that Halo 3 graphics will be impressive. 

[QUOTE="Mass_Effect"][QUOTE="skyform"]

Yes it is, Halo 3 is pushing way more polys then Halo 2 with about 20 fps more, with lot better textures, lightning next gen fx.

skyform

Even the Halo 3 Beta?

Exactly im talking about beat, but i can't help you if your eyes are damaged, there is only a bad video of H3 beat and it already looks way better then H2, just wait for some hd mp or sp footage you you will see that Halo 3 graphics will be impressive. 

Whoah, why are you insulting me now? We have yet to see a good quality video of Halo 3 Beta, and I know it looks better than Halo 2

[QUOTE="XboxUnderground"][QUOTE="fuzzysquash"][QUOTE="XboxUnderground"]

like I've been saying since this morning

 

the only difference is better textures and lighting

 

 

Mass_Effect

uhh....there are pretty substantial degrees of difference in the textures and lighting.

it's smaller than Halo 2 to Halo 3 beta

No it isn't

yes it is

H3 beta already has much improved geometry, textures, and lighting

NGS has better textures, lighting..........and some extra trees 

did ps3 fanboys expect heavenly sword graphix from this?a port from last gen

[QUOTE="skyform"]

Yes it is, Halo 3 is pushing way more polys then Halo 2 with about 20 fps more, with lot better textures, lightning next gen fx.

Mass_Effect

Even the Halo 3 Beta?

Yeah if you look at the low res video leaked you can definatly tell the textures are a lot better especially when he gets close to the sea wall the textures looks great and it has ivy plants hanging down off the cieling and stuff. 

yes it is

H3 beta already has much improved geometry, textures, and lighting

 

NGS has better textures, lighting..........and some extra trees

XboxUnderground

Watch this video. Halo 2 and Halo 3 beta do not have this degree of difference.

http://www.gamevideos.com/video/id/10182

[QUOTE="XboxUnderground"]yes it is

H3 beta already has much improved geometry, textures, and lighting

 

NGS has better textures, lighting..........and some extra trees

fuzzysquash

Watch this video. Halo 2 and Halo 3 beta do not have this degree of difference.

http://www.gamevideos.com/video/id/10182

that video is a ton of crap

NGB looks 5x better on my tv than it does in that video

[QUOTE="fuzzysquash"][QUOTE="XboxUnderground"]yes it is

H3 beta already has much improved geometry, textures, and lighting

 

NGS has better textures, lighting..........and some extra trees

XboxUnderground

Watch this video. Halo 2 and Halo 3 beta do not have this degree of difference.

http://www.gamevideos.com/video/id/10182

that video is a ton of crap

NGB looks 5x better on my tv than it does in that video

Uh huh.

I've played NG:B on an HDTV. I know what it looks like. That video is in no way "misrepresenting" the game.

The fact that you're telling me a direct-feed capture of the game is "a ton of crap" indicates that your denial of the obvious has gone off the deep end, my friend.

that video is a ton of crap

NGB looks 5x better on my tv than it does in that video

XboxUnderground

And I'm sure NGS will look 10x better on a 1080p tv

[QUOTE="XboxUnderground"]

that video is a ton of crap

NGB looks 5x better on my tv than it does in that video

Mass_Effect

And I'm sure NGS will look 10x better on a 1080p tv

Well so does Halo 3 and Forza 2 but cows are still juddging by some crapy videos :roll: 

[QUOTE="XboxUnderground"]

that video is a ton of crap

NGB looks 5x better on my tv than it does in that video

Mass_Effect

And I'm sure NGS will look 10x better on a 1080p tv

on a nice 1080p tv like the one posted in the original post here it's clear to see the difference is very small

PC games from medium to high settings something have bigger jumps in graphics 

[QUOTE="Mass_Effect"][QUOTE="XboxUnderground"]

that video is a ton of crap

NGB looks 5x better on my tv than it does in that video

skyform

And I'm sure NGS will look 10x better on a 1080p tv

Well so does Halo 3 and Forza 2 but cows are still juddging by some crapy videos :roll:

he's pointing out the self-contradiction in XboxUnderground's post.

If NGB's graphics are supposedly "5x" underrepresented in that comparison video (as XboxUnderground claims), then it logically follows that Sigma's graphics are at least "5x" underrepresented in the video as well. What the video demonstrates is that there is a great disparity in the quality of graphics between NG:B and Sigma.

Of course, I don't think XboxUnderground realizes the logical implications of his post.

dear owner of the first post; 

Why did you change the costume in the original Xbox version of Ninja Gaiden?

I'am sure it has a shiny costume like that too

[QUOTE="skyform"][QUOTE="Mass_Effect"][QUOTE="XboxUnderground"]

that video is a ton of crap

NGB looks 5x better on my tv than it does in that video

fuzzysquash

And I'm sure NGS will look 10x better on a 1080p tv

Well so does Halo 3 and Forza 2 but cows are still juddging by some crapy videos :roll:

he's pointing out the self-contradiction in XboxUnderground's post.

If NGB's graphics are supposedly "5x" underrepresented in that comparison video (as XboxUnderground claims), then it logically follows that Sigma's graphics are at least "5x" underrepresented in the video as well. What the video demonstrates is that there is a great disparity in the quality of graphics between NG:B and Sigma.

Of course, I don't think XboxUnderground realizes the logical implications of his post.

actually that's completely not true

the reason NGB looks bad is because of how they recorded it

it was obviously done in low res through mediocre analog capture device

dear owner of the first post;

Why did you change the costume in the original Xbox version of Ninja Gaiden?

I'am sure it has a shiny costume like that too

007ybse04

because you can't use that costume at the start of the game on xbox

it's liek that in the xbox demo but I don't think you can use that on 360

quadruple post...GS is glitching 

atually that's completely not true

 

the reason NGB looks bad is because of how they recorded it

it was obviously done in low res through mediocre analog capture device

 

XboxUnderground

Right....they did a low-res capture of NGB and a high-res capture of Sigma just to make it "appear" like there was a difference...

...it's all a conspiracy...those crop circles weren't made by tractors...:wink:

The difference certainly isnt worth $500!!!!!Nintega91

No game is worth $500.

Then again, who buys a console for one game? :?

The difference certainly isnt worth $500!!!!!Nintega91

you mean $600 

good thread.

as with any remake you wont see anything earth shattering different but the improvements are there and im sure it will be a good game on the ps3 as it was with the xbox.

[QUOTE="Nintega91"]The difference certainly isnt worth $500!!!!!XboxUnderground

you mean $600

Don't listen to him...he's probably from Sony PR trying to mislead you. He might be allied with the gamevideos.com crew that made that bogus NG:B and Sigma comparison video too.

$600 and 4 years later - you guys get to play Ninja Gaiden. /slow_mocking_clapDemetri_OS

$600 and 4 years later - you guys get to play Ninja Gaiden. /slow_mocking_clapDemetri_OS

Ninja Gaiden was a great Xbox game. But in terms of sheer quantity of top-notch quality titles, the PS2 had many more than the Xbox.