after just beating KZ2 it's safe to say.....

[QUOTE="W1NGMAN-"]

[QUOTE="Luigi_The_Pimp"]Killzone 2 being PS3's top FPS :lol: Resistance 2>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Killzone 2 Halo3 >>> both thoughLuigi_The_Pimp

Oh God you actually enjoyed R2s single player?!

R2's singleplayer was a joke...i mean my god, it was so AVERAGE

i tried replaying it for the trophy's, but i just couldn't, one playthrough was enough

while R2's multiplayer rides off the funfactor alot more then KZ's, KZ's is better in just about every concevable way

resistance 2 was a solid game

killzone 2 is amazing

thats a very nice opinion you have there.

[QUOTE="Luigi_The_Pimp"][QUOTE="W1NGMAN-"]

Oh God you actually enjoyed R2s single player?!

Mr_Apple_Soup

R2's singleplayer was a joke...i mean my god, it was so AVERAGE

i tried replaying it for the trophy's, but i just couldn't, one playthrough was enough

while R2's multiplayer rides off the funfactor alot more then KZ's, KZ's is better in just about every concevable way

resistance 2 was a solid game

killzone 2 is amazing

as stated Killzone 2 had bad boss fights, the weapon balance was basically non existent as so many weapons especially like the electric gun were only in the game for a quick second. The ending in R2 was also better and the weapons altogether.Luigi_The_Pimp

and R2 had good boss fights? like resistance 2's singleplayer, they were predictable. and the last boss in R2 was a joke, i mean i cannot believe how easy it was...run this way, shoot glowy thing, run other way, shoot glowy thing again...at least radec was challenging...

R2 did have better weapons, which made the multiplayer more enjoyable, but killzone's multiplayer doesn't really lack in weapon variety either, it doesnt need a gun like the splicer or the auger. there's a decent amount of variety in the weapons in KZ's mulitplayer, they just are more realistic as opposed to resistance's over the top weapons

R2's multiplayer actually made up for its bad single player

KZ2 had a good single player, nothing legendary, but it also had a good multiplayer...it's a much more complete package. that's just my opinion though, i'd thought i'd share because i have a helluva alot of playtime on both games...

I like 'em both but Halo 3 does have the edge in MP, which is more fun and addictive. While KZ2 excels in other areas. Like the final boss fight with Radec, which is overwhelmingly intense, the perfect end to an FPS. Whereas in Halo 3, the final boss is a floating ****ing ball. A floating ****ing ball. The end of the final game in one of the greatest trilogies in videogame history and you have to fight....... a floating ****ing ball.

Floppy_Jim

[QUOTE="Floppy_Jim"]

I like 'em both but Halo 3 does have the edge in MP, which is more fun and addictive. While KZ2 excels in other areas. Like the final boss fight with Radec, which is overwhelmingly intense, the perfect end to an FPS. Whereas in Halo 3, the final boss is a floating ****ing ball. A floating ****ing ball. The end of the final game in one of the greatest trilogies in videogame history and you have to fight....... a floating ****ing ball.

NAPK1NS

PS3 gamers will toss aside KZ2 like trash when Modern Warfare releases.Its beautiful, but pretty graphics doesnt equate to replayability. Just seems like just another shooter in a generation flodded with shooters. Halo 3 will at least be #2 when it lands on 360. Lem-Risen

just like W@W took all the players away from Resistance 2 right?

well enough of a character to make a movie...I don't think we will see a KZ2 movie starring Sev

chikenfriedrice

To be fair, the Halo movie wasn't going to star Master Chief, it was going to feature a new character and have the Chief as a side character.

[QUOTE="Luigi_The_Pimp"]

as stated Killzone 2 had bad boss fights, the weapon balance was basically non existent as so many weapons especially like the electric gun were only in the game for a quick second. The ending in R2 was also better and the weapons altogether.Mr_Apple_Soup

and R2 had good boss fights? like resistance 2's singleplayer, they were predictable. and the last boss in R2 was a joke, i mean i cannot believe how easy it was...run this way, shoot glowy thing, run other way, shoot glowy thing again...at least radec was challenging...

R2 did have better weapons, which made the multiplayer more enjoyable, but killzone's multiplayer doesn't really lack in weapon variety either, it doesnt need a gun like the splicer or the auger. there's a decent amount of variety in the weapons in KZ's mulitplayer, they just are more realistic as opposed to resistance's over the top weapons

R2's multiplayer actually made up for its bad single player

KZ2 had a good single player, nothing legendary, but it also had a good multiplayer...it's a much more complete package. that's just my opinion though, i'd thought i'd share because i have a helluva alot of playtime on both games...

[QUOTE="chikenfriedrice"]

well enough of a character to make a movie...I don't think we will see a KZ2 movie starring Sev

TreyoftheDead

To be fair, the Halo movie wasn't going to star Master Chief, it was going to feature a new character and have the Chief as a side character.

lol I knew it was a lame arguement anyway lol

[QUOTE="Lem-Risen"]PS3 gamers will toss aside KZ2 like trash when Modern Warfare releases.Its beautiful, but pretty graphics doesnt equate to replayability. Just seems like just another shooter in a generation flodded with shooters. Halo 3 will at least be #2 when it lands on 360. Mr_Apple_Soup

just like W@W took all the players away from Resistance 2 right?

[QUOTE="Trinners"]

[QUOTE="itzagir"] Lmao, coolface? you must be from /v/.itzagir

i take it that you're new? original term is trollface.

exactly that's why I said the original term is trollface :|. only new**** use the term coolface.

In other words, you made this up and didn't play it. good to know.GodofBigMacs

like I said I beat both which is more than I can say for you I'm sure

Halo 3 pwns it in every way except visuals

there were no epic single player moments in KZ2 as compared to many in Halo 3

lead character isn't even close MC>>>>>>sev

MP speaks for itself no need to go there since Halo 3 is still dominating XBL

not bashing KZ2 it was fun and a good game and nice to look at but compared to the 360's top FPS it doesn't stand up

chikenfriedrice

i really dont know why people like Halo. Halo1 SP was OK, Halo2 SP sucked but the Mp was OK for a console game. Halo3 i didnt play it since i dont own x360 yet for obvious reasons. my friend big halo fan dosent like H3 at all he thinks KZ2 is better both SP and MP.all i know kz2 is a great game and i have a lot of fun playing it so far the best fps this year i played

[QUOTE="Mr_Apple_Soup"]

[QUOTE="Luigi_The_Pimp"]

as stated Killzone 2 had bad boss fights, the weapon balance was basically non existent as so many weapons especially like the electric gun were only in the game for a quick second. The ending in R2 was also better and the weapons altogether.Luigi_The_Pimp

and R2 had good boss fights? like resistance 2's singleplayer, they were predictable. and the last boss in R2 was a joke, i mean i cannot believe how easy it was...run this way, shoot glowy thing, run other way, shoot glowy thing again...at least radec was challenging...

R2 did have better weapons, which made the multiplayer more enjoyable, but killzone's multiplayer doesn't really lack in weapon variety either, it doesnt need a gun like the splicer or the auger. there's a decent amount of variety in the weapons in KZ's mulitplayer, they just are more realistic as opposed to resistance's over the top weapons

R2's multiplayer actually made up for its bad single player

KZ2 had a good single player, nothing legendary, but it also had a good multiplayer...it's a much more complete package. that's just my opinion though, i'd thought i'd share because i have a helluva alot of playtime on both games...

if you dont want grenade spam, play in bigger maps, play with less people, its not like you dont have options

as for reaching general, that only took me a couple days (then again, i have gotten top 1% so im pretty good at the game :P )but im not saying R2 was bad, its probably something i'll eventually go back too at sometime because it had so much variety, i just dont find it on the same level as KZ2, although they are both vastly different FPS's

i get it, you like R2 better, i like KZ2 better, but as i R2 junkie before i got KZ, i'd think a fan of the game would like KZ2 as well, i mean i wasnt even hyping the game but i picked it up anyway and loved it

oh well, opinions

[QUOTE="Mr_Apple_Soup"]

[QUOTE="Lem-Risen"]PS3 gamers will toss aside KZ2 like trash when Modern Warfare releases.Its beautiful, but pretty graphics doesnt equate to replayability. Just seems like just another shooter in a generation flodded with shooters. Halo 3 will at least be #2 when it lands on 360. Lem-Risen

just like W@W took all the players away from Resistance 2 right?

and you have proof? resistance still has plenty of players, plenty of clans, and it just got a mappack

the community is far from dead, if anything, it was barely affected

fear 2 engine jupiter ex engine made by touchdown entertainment pwns the killzone2 engine, no fake lightsources and forward rendering engines are better than defferred. killzone2's engine water effects suck compared to even fear 1 still using jupiter ex engine.LOLDFRTGERGDMIK

oh boy! and unreal tourney 3 had better textures then crysis right!? :roll:

Opinions, opinions....bla bla bla. Thanks for sharing yours anyway but it proves nothing. For the sake of the comparison, Halo is a well known franchise but KZ2 is still at its beginning, we can't compare a master and slave now can we? give the slave some more time to practice and someday he will shine specially when people support him. Bungie also has more experience developing FPS than GG does, KZ2 is the first major release for GG (as far as I can see it compared to KZ1 or KZ Liberation). They'll need more time to get to the level of experience that Bungie has but nevertheless they did quite a great work for baring the weight of a heavy game like KZ2. Yeah, that was an opinion too and mine is >>>>>>> yours :P abuabed

sounds like u agree with me

Btw, TC, have you reached the rank of general in KZ2? if not then I'd suggest spending more time online until you reach that level since most enjoyment shows up as you go on and on, just to make your comparison fairer unless your head is made of rock to either side ;)abuabed

I like the online to be good when i put the game in not wait till I get to a certain ranking

[QUOTE="abuabed"]Opinions, opinions....bla bla bla. Thanks for sharing yours anyway but it proves nothing. For the sake of the comparison, Halo is a well known franchise but KZ2 is still at its beginning, we can't compare a master and slave now can we? give the slave some more time to practice and someday he will shine specially when people support him. Bungie also has more experience developing FPS than GG does, KZ2 is the first major release for GG (as far as I can see it compared to KZ1 or KZ Liberation). They'll need more time to get to the level of experience that Bungie has but nevertheless they did quite a great work for baring the weight of a heavy game like KZ2. Yeah, that was an opinion too and mine is >>>>>>> yours :P chikenfriedrice

sounds like u agree with me

Both have no chance against Bioshock and Dead Space.

aroxx_ab

[QUOTE="abuabed"]Btw, TC, have you reached the rank of general in KZ2? if not then I'd suggest spending more time online until you reach that level since most enjoyment shows up as you go on and on, just to make your comparison fairer unless your head is made of rock to either side ;)chikenfriedrice

I like the online to be good when i put the game in not wait till I get to a certain ranking

[QUOTE="chikenfriedrice"]

[QUOTE="abuabed"]Btw, TC, have you reached the rank of general in KZ2? if not then I'd suggest spending more time online until you reach that level since most enjoyment shows up as you go on and on, just to make your comparison fairer unless your head is made of rock to either side ;)abuabed

I like the online to be good when i put the game in not wait till I get to a certain ranking

i'll check it out...thanks

The MC is indeed a better protagonist. Personalities aside, he's still more distincitve, and has a better reason for being the main character and being at the front lines of battle. Sev is not detailed in any way, nothing about his training is made important, or his history in the game. He looks like every other Gears-ish gruff soldier that doesn't wear a helmet and was arbitrarily given regenerating health. His buddies are so similar in mannerisms and appearance they are just about interchangable, which was quite different from Killzone 1. The characters and the handling of them in KZ2 is the rotten cherry on top of what is otherwise a tasty sundae.

The MC is indeed a better protagonist. Personalities aside, he's still more distincitve, and has a better reason for being the main character and being at the front lines of battle. Sev is not detailed in any way, nothing about his training is made important, or his history in the game. He looks like every other Gears-ish gruff soldier that doesn't wear a helmet and was arbitrarily given regenerating health. His buddies are so similar in mannerisms and appearance they are just about interchangable, which was quite different from Killzone 1. The characters and the handling of them in KZ2 is the rotten cherry on top of what is otherwise a tasty sundae.

Mordred19

well put

[QUOTE="chikenfriedrice"]

Halo 3 pwns it in every way except visuals

there were no epic single player moments in KZ2 as compared to many in Halo 3

lead character isn't even close MC>>>>>>sev

MP speaks for itself no need to go there since Halo 3 is still dominating XBL

not bashing KZ2 it was fun and a good game and nice to look at but compared to the 360's top FPS it doesn't stand up

DontBeHatin1983

i really dont know why people like Halo. Halo1 SP was OK, Halo2 SP sucked but the Mp was OK for a console game. Halo3 i didnt play it since i dont own x360 yet for obvious reasons. my friend big halo fan dosent like H3 at all he thinks KZ2 is better both SP and MP.all i know kz2 is a great game and i have a lot of fun playing it so far the best fps this year i played

You made it further then I did. I gave up after the 1st levelAlphaGamer469

LOL yeah, you probably just played the demo and don't even have the game or a PS3 for that matter. Besides, the 1st level was the worst in the game... it's all looking up from there.

I enjoyed both the same. Halo 3 had a better soundtrack, story (story still wasn't much though) and had way more features than Killzone 2. Killzone 2 was just an intense badass thrill ride from start to finish. Both had equally awesome multiplayers, Killzone 2 had a great class system and Halo 3 simply had solid gameplay.

This is just imo but i think KZ2 requires more skill than Halo 3 due to the hybrid between CS and TF2 that's probably why I prefer it.

Trinners

I like 'em both but Halo 3 does have the edge in MP, which is more fun and addictive. While KZ2 excels in other areas. Like the final boss fight with Radec, which is overwhelmingly intense, the perfect end to an FPS. Whereas in Halo 3, the final boss is a floating ****ing ball. A floating ****ing ball. The end of the final game in one of the greatest trilogies in videogame history and you have to fight....... a floating ****ing ball.

Floppy_Jim

This is just imo but i think KZ2 requires more skill than Halo 3 due to the hybrid between CS and TF2 that's probably why I prefer it.

Halo 3's SP sucked imo, MP rocked. I loved the final fight in KZ 2.

Eddie-Vedder

I like 'em both but Halo 3 does have the edge in MP, which is more fun and addictive. While KZ2 excels in other areas. Like the final boss fight with Radec, which is overwhelmingly intense, the perfect end to an FPS. Whereas in Halo 3, the final boss is a floating ****ing ball. A floating ****ing ball. The end of the final game in one of the greatest trilogies in videogame history and you have to fight....... a floating ****ing ball.

[QUOTE="-SAMCRO"][QUOTE="Trinners"]

This is just imo but i think KZ2 requires more skill than Halo 3 due to the hybrid between CS and TF2 that's probably why I prefer it.

TheGrat1

[QUOTE="-SAMCRO"][QUOTE="Floppy_Jim"]

I like 'em both but Halo 3 does have the edge in MP, which is more fun and addictive. While KZ2 excels in other areas. Like the final boss fight with Radec, which is overwhelmingly intense, the perfect end to an FPS. Whereas in Halo 3, the final boss is a floating ****ing ball. A floating ****ing ball. The end of the final game in one of the greatest trilogies in videogame history and you have to fight....... a floating ****ing ball.

TheGrat1

[QUOTE="Floppy_Jim"]

I like 'em both but Halo 3 does have the edge in MP, which is more fun and addictive. While KZ2 excels in other areas. Like the final boss fight with Radec, which is overwhelmingly intense, the perfect end to an FPS. Whereas in Halo 3, the final boss is a floating ****ing ball. A floating ****ing ball. The end of the final game in one of the greatest trilogies in videogame history and you have to fight....... a floating ****ing ball.

chikenfriedrice

lol yeah the ball wasn't great but everything up to that point was great IMO and I had a lot more wow moments in Halo 3's SP