After Playing Uncharted I Think Crysis Could Be Done On PS3

[QUOTE="Polaris_choice"][QUOTE="True_Gamer_"][QUOTE="Polaris_choice"][QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="Polaris_choice"][QUOTE="KittyKatB"]

PS3 isn't powerful enough for Crysis.

Any decent PC could rape Uncharted.

True_Gamer_

LOL no it couldnt you have no clue what your talking about. Agame built ground up for a completely differnt processor would most likely tax any pc. The sheer amount of animations and physics alone would rape most pc's.

NO this is the part that I thought was funny and a very stupid thing to say. Yes. I know that a game built from the ground up with cell would probably not run as well on PC since the cell has a completely different architect than a C2D or quad core. In reality though C2D and quad cores are better than the cell for gaming. Cell only does out of order calculations well while C2D and quad cores do in order calculations better which is pretty essential for gaming.

If you are going to regurgitate stuff you here on the internet and then say I dont know what im talking about be sure you know what your saying. Out of order processors are simply harder to program they are not any less powerful and are actually better for graphic renderning. The Cell renders visuals better then any pc processor on the market it is not used like a traditonal cpu . Is it harder to program for thena quad core or duel core? Yes it is but its visual capablites go far beyond both hence the reason why even a decent rig would have trouble running PS3 excluisves. As for my animation comment the reason why a pc would struggle is its done all on the SPU's that means if ported they would have to port that task between the GPU and CPU which would be a pain in the ass.

Then how do you explain Crysis running on a 150 euros CPU? WIth all the insane animations and graphics?

C2D6550 with 1333mhz FSB and 4mb of cache...And please Crysis on Very high has insane animations...

Crysis has the best animations of any FPS currently out by no they are not as good as Uncharteds. The guy wences as bullets whis by him and rolls on the ground and reloads his gun all in just a few frames. The amount of animations shown each frame is stunning.

[QUOTE="Hikaru-119"]

Bioshock = Higher system specs than crysis...

Xbox 360 = Crysis @ 30 fps.

/THREAD.

True_Gamer_

Hmm whats the word? Hmm ah yea CRAPPY PORT...

[QUOTE="True_Gamer_"][QUOTE="Polaris_choice"][QUOTE="True_Gamer_"][QUOTE="Polaris_choice"][QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="Polaris_choice"][QUOTE="KittyKatB"]

PS3 isn't powerful enough for Crysis.

Any decent PC could rape Uncharted.

Polaris_choice

LOL no it couldnt you have no clue what your talking about. Agame built ground up for a completely differnt processor would most likely tax any pc. The sheer amount of animations and physics alone would rape most pc's.

NO this is the part that I thought was funny and a very stupid thing to say. Yes. I know that a game built from the ground up with cell would probably not run as well on PC since the cell has a completely different architect than a C2D or quad core. In reality though C2D and quad cores are better than the cell for gaming. Cell only does out of order calculations well while C2D and quad cores do in order calculations better which is pretty essential for gaming.

If you are going to regurgitate stuff you here on the internet and then say I dont know what im talking about be sure you know what your saying. Out of order processors are simply harder to program they are not any less powerful and are actually better for graphic renderning. The Cell renders visuals better then any pc processor on the market it is not used like a traditonal cpu . Is it harder to program for thena quad core or duel core? Yes it is but its visual capablites go far beyond both hence the reason why even a decent rig would have trouble running PS3 excluisves. As for my animation comment the reason why a pc would struggle is its done all on the SPU's that means if ported they would have to port that task between the GPU and CPU which would be a pain in the ass.

Then how do you explain Crysis running on a 150 euros CPU? WIth all the insane animations and graphics?

C2D6550 with 1333mhz FSB and 4mb of cache...And please Crysis on Very high has insane animations...

Crysis has the best animations of any FPS currently out by no they are not as good as Uncharteds. The guy wences as bullets whis by him and rolls on the ground and reloads his gun all in just a few frames. The amount of animations shown each frame is stunning.

ANyway each to his opinion...Crysis is FPS so it doesnt have 3rd person view however the facial detail and animation of that black guy is the best IMO...

You cant argue with the fact that things have changed upside down since 2000 PC hardware apart from GPUs (evenGPUs you can say look at 8800GT) has plummited in price/power relation...

Its more likely to be able to be run on the 360, due to the felxible memory

256mb is not nearly enough memory to run the huge vast and very very detailed environments on Crysis

PS3 owners, please deal with the fact your "supercomputer" is alot less powerful than a modern PC, and about the same power as a 360, thats a fact

i also think so.

[QUOTE="Hikaru-119"]

Bioshock = Higher system specs than crysis...

Xbox 360 = Crysis @ 30 fps.

/THREAD.

True_Gamer_

Hmm whats the word? Hmm ah yea CRAPPY PORT...

GS did a comparison 360 vs PC....the 360 held its own against a high end PC where the difference was a a minor case of lighting...

Crysis is nothing special.

Its more likely to be able to be run on the 360, due to the felxible memory

256mb is not nearly enough memory to run the huge vast and very very detailed environments on Crysis

PS3 owners, please deal with the fact your "supercomputer" is alot less powerful than a modern PC, and about the same power as a 360, thats a fact

crispytheone88

But ram wise PS3's ram can be harnessed to about 1 gig...keep in mind that PS3 need about 1/4 of the ram a PC needs to play the same game. (PC's hog more ram)

[QUOTE="True_Gamer_"][QUOTE="Hikaru-119"]

Bioshock = Higher system specs than crysis...

Xbox 360 = Crysis @ 30 fps.

/THREAD.

Hikaru-119

Hmm whats the word? Hmm ah yea CRAPPY PORT...

GS did a comparison 360 vs PC....the 360 held its own against a high end PC where the difference was a a minor case of lighting...

Crysis is nothing special.

[QUOTE="crispytheone88"]

Its more likely to be able to be run on the 360, due to the felxible memory

256mb is not nearly enough memory to run the huge vast and very very detailed environments on Crysis

PS3 owners, please deal with the fact your "supercomputer" is alot less powerful than a modern PC, and about the same power as a 360, thats a fact

Hikaru-119

But ram wise PS3's ram can be harnessed to about 1 gig...keep in mind that PS3 need about 1/4 of the ram a PC needs to play the same game. (PC's hog more ram)

Keep talking rubbish, anyone who has a clue knows otherwise.

[QUOTE="True_Gamer_"][QUOTE="Hikaru-119"]

Bioshock = Higher system specs than crysis...

Xbox 360 = Crysis @ 30 fps.

/THREAD.

Hikaru-119

Hmm whats the word? Hmm ah yea CRAPPY PORT...

GS did a comparison 360 vs PC....the 360 held its own against a high end PC where the difference was a a minor case of lighting...

Crysis is nothing special.

Bioshock barely taxes high/med-high end GPU's, it's nothing to get excited about.Look at these benchmarks. Now understand that Crysis cripples the same GPU's that can play Bioshock @ more then 4x the res of the 360 version in DX10 mode and still get higher average framerates. Now stop typing rubbish.

I've always said Renegade would be popular.

Now, to make you stand out from the "monthly fakeboy" demographic you're in now, you need a gimmick, or a "legendary quote".

bling bling

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/27393.html

After wathing this video you willl agree that cant be done.

Well I have played the demo and I must say this game is beautiful. I didn't think any game on PS3 this year would top Heavenly Sword in the graphics department but man was I wrong. Some of the little bushes on the ground actually move when you walk past them like in Crysis. TheAI is some of the best I have ever seenin a game theymove in such wide areas.I don't need to read any reviews for this game this game will be a day one purchase for me. Damn I'm glad I own a PS3. :D Back to CoD 4 now. 8)-Renegade

Sorry i've seen crysis on its highest settings and i've played the uncharted demo. NO WAY IN HELL IS CRYSIS POSSIBLE ON THE PS3!!!!! Its not even possible on the 360 either. Its leagues ahead of other games. I might even think its a year ahead of its time.

I've always said Renegade would be popular.

Now, to make you stand out from the "monthly fakeboy" demographic you're in now, you need a gimmick, or a "legendary quote".

gingerdivid

Sorry to break it to you Mr. Cow

http://forum.beyond3d.com/showthread.php?t=43330&page=30

It's confirmed that CoD4 on both X360 and PS3 are running at 1024x600p at 2x AA. The framerate is not even constant 60, dipping right down in gunfire

Cod4 is not even true HD

end of thread

Sorry to break it to you Mr. Cow

http://forum.beyond3d.com/showthread.php?t=43330&page=30

It's confirmed that CoD4 on both X360 and PS3 are running at 1024x600p at 2x AA. The framerate is not even constant 60, dipping right down in gunfire

Cod4 is not even true HD

end of thread

So-emo

Well no matter what COD4 still looks good at 720p on my HDTV.

[QUOTE="So-emo"]

Sorry to break it to you Mr. Cow

http://forum.beyond3d.com/showthread.php?t=43330&page=30

It's confirmed that CoD4 on both X360 and PS3 are running at 1024x600p at 2x AA. The framerate is not even constant 60, dipping right down in gunfire

Cod4 is not even true HD

end of thread

sirk1264

Well no matter what COD4 still looks good at 720p on my HDTV.

The point is, CoD4 is not even 720p (It's 600p) - A budget gaming PC for under $700 can easily run the game at the resolution with 2x AA AND with good frame-rate

[QUOTE="sirk1264"][QUOTE="So-emo"]

Sorry to break it to you Mr. Cow

http://forum.beyond3d.com/showthread.php?t=43330&page=30

It's confirmed that CoD4 on both X360 and PS3 are running at 1024x600p at 2x AA. The framerate is not even constant 60, dipping right down in gunfire

Cod4 is not even true HD

end of thread

So-emo

Well no matter what COD4 still looks good at 720p on my HDTV.

The point is, CoD4 is not even 720p (It's 600p) - A budget gaming PC for under $700 can easily run the game at the resolution with 2x AA AND with good frame-rate

Oh i know. Resolution doesn't matter to me. You can't really tell the difference to be honest. The game could look like a ps1 game and still be fun as hell (well maybe exaggerating on it looking like a ps1 game).

Well I have played the demo and I must say this game is beautiful. I didn't think any game on PS3 this year would top Heavenly Sword in the graphics department but man was I wrong. Some of the little bushes on the ground actually move when you walk past them like in Crysis. TheAI is some of the best I have ever seenin a game theymove in such wide areas.I don't need to read any reviews for this game this game will be a day one purchase for me. Damn I'm glad I own a PS3. :D Back to CoD 4 now. 8)-Renegade

Plants move in Halo 3 when you walk past them.

[QUOTE="-Renegade"]Well I have played the demo and I must say this game is beautiful. I didn't think any game on PS3 this year would top Heavenly Sword in the graphics department but man was I wrong. Some of the little bushes on the ground actually move when you walk past them like in Crysis. TheAI is some of the best I have ever seenin a game theymove in such wide areas.I don't need to read any reviews for this game this game will be a day one purchase for me. Damn I'm glad I own a PS3. :D Back to CoD 4 now. 8)Apathetic-Irony

Plants move in Halo 3 when you walk past them.

crysis could be done on consoles but not without a pretty big graphical downgrade.ItalStallion777

[QUOTE="So-emo"][QUOTE="sirk1264"][QUOTE="So-emo"]

Sorry to break it to you Mr. Cow

http://forum.beyond3d.com/showthread.php?t=43330&page=30

It's confirmed that CoD4 on both X360 and PS3 are running at 1024x600p at 2x AA. The framerate is not even constant 60, dipping right down in gunfire

Cod4 is not even true HD

end of thread

sirk1264

Well no matter what COD4 still looks good at 720p on my HDTV.

The point is, CoD4 is not even 720p (It's 600p) - A budget gaming PC for under $700 can easily run the game at the resolution with 2x AA AND with good frame-rate

Oh i know. Resolution doesn't matter to me. You can't really tell the difference to be honest. The game could look like a ps1 game and still be fun as hell (well maybe exaggerating on it looking like a ps1 game).

As for the Cell CPU, remember this: resources allocated to one task cannot be simultaneously allocated to a separate task. Cell SPE's dedicated to graphics assistance cannot be employed in more basic game-related tasks. Also, the Cell cannot render directly (otherwise, it'd have its own video output pipe)--the final rendering still has to be done on the RSX regardless of who does the grunt work, and the RSX possesses a few fundamental limitations.

[QUOTE="sirk1264"][QUOTE="So-emo"][QUOTE="sirk1264"][QUOTE="So-emo"]

Sorry to break it to you Mr. Cow

http://forum.beyond3d.com/showthread.php?t=43330&page=30

It's confirmed that CoD4 on both X360 and PS3 are running at 1024x600p at 2x AA. The framerate is not even constant 60, dipping right down in gunfire

Cod4 is not even true HD

end of thread

HuusAsking

Well no matter what COD4 still looks good at 720p on my HDTV.

The point is, CoD4 is not even 720p (It's 600p) - A budget gaming PC for under $700 can easily run the game at the resolution with 2x AA AND with good frame-rate

Oh i know. Resolution doesn't matter to me. You can't really tell the difference to be honest. The game could look like a ps1 game and still be fun as hell (well maybe exaggerating on it looking like a ps1 game).

As for the Cell CPU, remember this: resources allocated to one task cannot be simultaneously allocated to a separate task. Cell SPE's dedicated to graphics assistance cannot be employed in more basic game-related tasks. Also, the Cell cannot render directly (otherwise, it'd have its own video output pipe)--the final rendering still has to be done on the RSX regardless of who does the grunt work, and the RSX possesses a few fundamental limitations.

Exactly, TV-OUT on a budget-gaming PC with a wireless keyboard + mouse > PS3/X360.