All Killzone1.5 is is Killzone in HD with better lighting....

TC, the only reason you created this thread is because you're in denial.

seriously, what's so impressive about Killzone1.5? It looks just like a sequel to Killzone, but this time around they're using HD graphics and have better lighting. Still won't save them from the FACT that the AI is obviously the dumbest AI in a series and that the gameplay looks extremely clunky and annoying. Let us also not forget just how horrible the story was in Killzone. I don't care if I can use 3-4 different characters (it's been a while since I last tried this garbage), it still didn't add one bit of replay value to the game seeing how the story did VERY LITTLE to draw me in.

You cows are forgetting one important tid bit here. HALO3 is made by an extremely talented group (Bungie) and is the third game in the VERY SUCCESSFUL series (Halo = 9.7, Halo2 = 9.4). Halo2 has probably been played more online then the whole PSN lineup for the PS2 and the PS3 combined. There's actually a following for Halo, where as Killzone killed it's possible following by being extremely over hyped only to under deliver.

Guerilla on the other hand, has yet to make a game worth gamers time. Killzone flopped due to it's lack luster story and gameplay (not graphics seeing how that was the ONLY decent thing about it.....well....for being a PS2 game :lol: ). Killzone1.5 will suffer the exact same fate no doubt seeing how Sony was foolish enough to keep Guerilla solely on the project. They should've at least hired a good writer to write the story for this one.

I just can't believe that you cows are hyping up a title that will obviously flopped. Guerilla isn't a talented developer and for you all to put your faith in them is foolish. After all, Killzone1.5 is nothing more than a HD version of Killzone with better lighting. :lol:

Nedemis

biggest fanboy ever

1. KILLZONE AI IS EXREMELY SMART, listen to the video btw aobut what the AI does, also in every video you see you are playing in GOD-MODE (get your facts right)

2.the gameplay is said to be amazing (by everyone who has played it), almost revolustionary, and looks extremely smooth (why did you make up annoying nad cunky??)

3. guerilla made an amazing game, Killzone liberation (wait ur a fnaboy whos misinformed)

4.ok if you thought Killzone 1 devs have no talent considering they had a low budget, were 3rd party, and were trained for PC when the game was rushed to PS2, then what about the fact guerilla has 135 devs now??? what about the fact they are all trained for PS3??? what about the fact that they are now owwned by sony, who wouldnt buy them out if they thought they had no talent???, and what about he fact they have millions of dollars and 3 years to make this game????

this is the biggest (full of BS btw) fanboy attack ever, bcz ur s***y halo 2.5 sucks (ya its the same game as halo 2, i playe dthe beta nothign new in gameplay, this game is more like an expansion pack onto the halo series if nething) dosnt mean you need to bash somehtign that is actually great

[QUOTE="Nedemis"]

seriously, what's so impressive about Killzone1.5? It looks just like a sequel to Killzone, but this time around they're using HD graphics and have better lighting. Still won't save them from the FACT that the AI is obviously the dumbest AI in a series and that the gameplay looks extremely clunky and annoying. Let us also not forget just how horrible the story was in Killzone. I don't care if I can use 3-4 different characters (it's been a while since I last tried this garbage), it still didn't add one bit of replay value to the game seeing how the story did VERY LITTLE to draw me in.

You cows are forgetting one important tid bit here. HALO3 is made by an extremely talented group (Bungie) and is the third game in the VERY SUCCESSFUL series (Halo = 9.7, Halo2 = 9.4). Halo2 has probably been played more online then the whole PSN lineup for the PS2 and the PS3 combined. There's actually a following for Halo, where as Killzone killed it's possible following by being extremely over hyped only to under deliver.

Guerilla on the other hand, has yet to make a game worth gamers time. Killzone flopped due to it's lack luster story and gameplay (not graphics seeing how that was the ONLY decent thing about it.....well....for being a PS2 game :lol: ). Killzone1.5 will suffer the exact same fate no doubt seeing how Sony was foolish enough to keep Guerilla solely on the project. They should've at least hired a good writer to write the story for this one.

I just can't believe that you cows are hyping up a title that will obviously flopped. Guerilla isn't a talented developer and for you all to put your faith in them is foolish. After all, Killzone1.5 is nothing more than a HD version of Killzone with better lighting. :lol:

AskForDetails

biggest fanboy ever

1. KILLZONE AI IS EXREMELY SMART, listen to the video btw aobut what the AI does, also in every video you see you are playing in GOD-MODE (get your facts right)

2.the gameplay is said to be amazing (by everyone who has played it), almost revolustionary, and looks extremely smooth (why did you make up annoying nad cunky??)

3. guerilla made an amazing game, Killzone liberation (wait ur a fnaboy whos misinformed)

4.ok if you thought Killzone 1 devs have no talent considering they had a low budget, were 3rd party, and were trained for PC when the game was rushed to PS2, then what about the fact guerilla has 135 devs now??? what about the fact they are all trained for PS3??? what about the fact that they are now owwned by sony, who wouldnt buy them out if they thought they had no talent???, and what about he fact they have millions of dollars and 3 years to make this game????

this is the biggest (full of BS btw) fanboy attack ever, bcz ur s***y halo 2.5 sucks (ya its the same game as halo 2, i playe dthe beta nothign new in gameplay, this game is more like an expansion pack onto the halo series if nething) dosnt mean you need to bash somehtign that is actually great

See what i mean TC...round in circles.

Dude i do agree that killzone will be amazing, but saying halo is s***y based on a multiplayer beta is kinda weak.

Halo excels VERy well in it's SP. i've never ever played another game that made co-op so fun and immersive. This doesn't mean halo's winningformulaisn't flawed. For instance there's no characterization, the plot is mighty weak(in spite of the awe-inspiringly epic battles), the moddable online features of other games utterly owns (UT3 half-life2).

Killzone 1.5 is killzone 1 with better lighting, textures, character models, a cover system, sixaxis controlls, better AI, more realistic facial animations, enviroment damage, more stuff happening in the back ground(lightning and stuff), better blood effects, (i think there is ragdoll physics), better particle effects better frame rate, everying is in HD, (theres probley going to be 5.1 surround sound or maybe 7.1)and so much more.

But still you call it Killzone 1.5. in HD with better lighting. I think its safe to say it Killzone 2.1

[QUOTE="AskForDetails"][QUOTE="Nedemis"]

seriously, what's so impressive about Killzone1.5? It looks just like a sequel to Killzone, but this time around they're using HD graphics and have better lighting. Still won't save them from the FACT that the AI is obviously the dumbest AI in a series and that the gameplay looks extremely clunky and annoying. Let us also not forget just how horrible the story was in Killzone. I don't care if I can use 3-4 different characters (it's been a while since I last tried this garbage), it still didn't add one bit of replay value to the game seeing how the story did VERY LITTLE to draw me in.

You cows are forgetting one important tid bit here. HALO3 is made by an extremely talented group (Bungie) and is the third game in the VERY SUCCESSFUL series (Halo = 9.7, Halo2 = 9.4). Halo2 has probably been played more online then the whole PSN lineup for the PS2 and the PS3 combined. There's actually a following for Halo, where as Killzone killed it's possible following by being extremely over hyped only to under deliver.

Guerilla on the other hand, has yet to make a game worth gamers time. Killzone flopped due to it's lack luster story and gameplay (not graphics seeing how that was the ONLY decent thing about it.....well....for being a PS2 game :lol: ). Killzone1.5 will suffer the exact same fate no doubt seeing how Sony was foolish enough to keep Guerilla solely on the project. They should've at least hired a good writer to write the story for this one.

I just can't believe that you cows are hyping up a title that will obviously flopped. Guerilla isn't a talented developer and for you all to put your faith in them is foolish. After all, Killzone1.5 is nothing more than a HD version of Killzone with better lighting. :lol:

Korrigan777

biggest fanboy ever

1. KILLZONE AI IS EXREMELY SMART, listen to the video btw aobut what the AI does, also in every video you see you are playing in GOD-MODE (get your facts right)

2.the gameplay is said to be amazing (by everyone who has played it), almost revolustionary, and looks extremely smooth (why did you make up annoying nad cunky??)

3. guerilla made an amazing game, Killzone liberation (wait ur a fnaboy whos misinformed)

4.ok if you thought Killzone 1 devs have no talent considering they had a low budget, were 3rd party, and were trained for PC when the game was rushed to PS2, then what about the fact guerilla has 135 devs now??? what about the fact they are all trained for PS3??? what about the fact that they are now owwned by sony, who wouldnt buy them out if they thought they had no talent???, and what about he fact they have millions of dollars and 3 years to make this game????

this is the biggest (full of BS btw) fanboy attack ever, bcz ur s***y halo 2.5 sucks (ya its the same game as halo 2, i playe dthe beta nothign new in gameplay, this game is more like an expansion pack onto the halo series if nething) dosnt mean you need to bash somehtign that is actually great

See what i mean TC...round in circles.

Dude i do agree that killzone will be amazing, but saying halo is s***y based on a multiplayer beta is kinda weak.

Halo excels VERy well in it's SP. i've never ever played another game that made co-op so fun and immersive. This doesn't mean halo's winningformulaisn't flawed. For instance there's no characterization, the plot is mighty weak(in spite of the awe-inspiringly epic battles), the moddable online features of other games utterly owns (UT3 half-life2).

dude the only thing that kept halo 2 alive was the online, if it wasnt for that the game would be dead, SP is bad lol, i not holding ne grudgeds or nehting on halo, i loved 1 and 2, but halo 3 is really not that new and amazing, it meets the minimum requirements old PC games had lol, so stop hyping it into another galaxay your olny in for disapointment

im sorry but this is just my op.

atleast to me it seems that halo main selling point is the whole end of the trilogy. While it is a very good FPS for the xbox, its not a great FPS. And there are mant great FPS out there which i am sure you know. I will be buying halo3 but if it is anything like 2 then maybe it should end. And the MP is very goodso thats a high point.

Now with COD4 and KZ2 all i keep hearing is amazing from many media outlets. On KZ2 the AI seems to be brillant (what they said not i) and graphics are stunning. No words yet on MP but it should atleast it should be good if the game right now is anyindications. And the same can be said for COD4. I cant wait for them but for now i have bioshock.

cant wait for these games:

MGS4

COD4

GT5

Smb3 on wii

street figter 2 remix for live or network

FF13

Double post.... sorry.

You know, it isn't really satire when you bash the title in such an obvious manner.

Your post doesn't even sound sarcastic. Perhaps that's why you aren't getting the response you wanted.

inertk

Agreed i know what your tryin to imply here but most people dont get it because your post doesnt sound sarcastic and with so many lemmings on SW, you cant really know which are and arent.

seriously, what's so impressive about Killzone1.5? It looks just like a sequel to Killzone, but this time around they're using HD graphics and have better lighting. Still won't save them from the FACT that the AI is obviously the dumbest AI in a series and that the gameplay looks extremely clunky and annoying. Let us also not forget just how horrible the story was in Killzone. I don't care if I can use 3-4 different characters (it's been a while since I last tried this garbage), it still didn't add one bit of replay value to the game seeing how the story did VERY LITTLE to draw me in.

You cows are forgetting one important tid bit here. HALO3 is made by an extremely talented group (Bungie) and is the third game in the VERY SUCCESSFUL series (Halo = 9.7, Halo2 = 9.4). Halo2 has probably been played more online then the whole PSN lineup for the PS2 and the PS3 combined. There's actually a following for Halo, where as Killzone killed it's possible following by being extremely over hyped only to under deliver.

Guerilla on the other hand, has yet to make a game worth gamers time. Killzone flopped due to it's lack luster story and gameplay (not graphics seeing how that was the ONLY decent thing about it.....well....for being a PS2 game :lol: ). Killzone1.5 will suffer the exact same fate no doubt seeing how Sony was foolish enough to keep Guerilla solely on the project. They should've at least hired a good writer to write the story for this one.

I just can't believe that you cows are hyping up a title that will obviously flopped. Guerilla isn't a talented developer and for you all to put your faith in them is foolish. After all, Killzone1.5 is nothing more than a HD version of Killzone with better lighting. :lol:

Nedemis

I personally have had to look at Halo 3 pics with a keen eye to really realize what thy actually did...seriously...this is dumb...

seriously, what's so impressive about Killzone1.5? It looks just like a sequel to Killzone, but this time around they're using HD graphics and have better lighting. Still won't save them from the FACT that the AI is obviously the dumbest AI in a series and that the gameplay looks extremely clunky and annoying. Let us also not forget just how horrible the story was in Killzone. I don't care if I can use 3-4 different characters (it's been a while since I last tried this garbage), it still didn't add one bit of replay value to the game seeing how the story did VERY LITTLE to draw me in.

You cows are forgetting one important tid bit here. HALO3 is made by an extremely talented group (Bungie) and is the third game in the VERY SUCCESSFUL series (Halo = 9.7, Halo2 = 9.4). Halo2 has probably been played more online then the whole PSN lineup for the PS2 and the PS3 combined. There's actually a following for Halo, where as Killzone killed it's possible following by being extremely over hyped only to under deliver.

Guerilla on the other hand, has yet to make a game worth gamers time. Killzone flopped due to it's lack luster story and gameplay (not graphics seeing how that was the ONLY decent thing about it.....well....for being a PS2 game :lol: ). Killzone1.5 will suffer the exact same fate no doubt seeing how Sony was foolish enough to keep Guerilla solely on the project. They should've at least hired a good writer to write the story for this one.

I just can't believe that you cows are hyping up a title that will obviously flopped. Guerilla isn't a talented developer and for you all to put your faith in them is foolish. After all, Killzone1.5 is nothing more than a HD version of Killzone with better lighting. :lol:

Nedemis

LOL, well actully guriella games is owned by sony, so killzone 2 will be very diffrent becasue sony is helping gureilla.

seriously, what's so impressive about Killzone1.5? It looks just like a sequel to Killzone, but this time around they're using HD graphics and have better lighting. Still won't save them from the FACT that the AI is obviously the dumbest AI in a series and that the gameplay looks extremely clunky and annoying. Let us also not forget just how horrible the story was in Killzone. I don't care if I can use 3-4 different characters (it's been a while since I last tried this garbage), it still didn't add one bit of replay value to the game seeing how the story did VERY LITTLE to draw me in.

You cows are forgetting one important tid bit here. HALO3 is made by an extremely talented group (Bungie) and is the third game in the VERY SUCCESSFUL series (Halo = 9.7, Halo2 = 9.4). Halo2 has probably been played more online then the whole PSN lineup for the PS2 and the PS3 combined. There's actually a following for Halo, where as Killzone killed it's possible following by being extremely over hyped only to under deliver.

Guerilla on the other hand, has yet to make a game worth gamers time. Killzone flopped due to it's lack luster story and gameplay (not graphics seeing how that was the ONLY decent thing about it.....well....for being a PS2 game :lol: ). Killzone1.5 will suffer the exact same fate no doubt seeing how Sony was foolish enough to keep Guerilla solely on the project. They should've at least hired a good writer to write the story for this one.

I just can't believe that you cows are hyping up a title that will obviously flopped. Guerilla isn't a talented developer and for you all to put your faith in them is foolish. After all, Killzone1.5 is nothing more than a HD version of Killzone with better lighting. :lol:

Nedemis

[QUOTE="Nedemis"][QUOTE="Korrigan777"][QUOTE="Nedemis"]

seriously, what's so impressive about Killzone1.5? It looks just like a sequel to Killzone, but this time around they're using HD graphics and have better lighting. Still won't save them from the FACT that the AI is obviously the dumbest AI in a series and that the gameplay looks extremely clunky and annoying. Let us also not forget just how horrible the story was in Killzone. I don't care if I can use 3-4 different characters (it's been a while since I last tried this garbage), it still didn't add one bit of replay value to the game seeing how the story did VERY LITTLE to draw me in.

You cows are forgetting one important tid bit here. HALO3 is made by an extremely talented group (Bungie) and is the third game in the VERY SUCCESSFUL series (Halo = 9.7, Halo2 = 9.4). Halo2 has probably been played more online then the whole PSN lineup for the PS2 and the PS3 combined. There's actually a following for Halo, where as Killzone killed it's possible following by being extremely over hyped only to under deliver.

Guerilla on the other hand, has yet to make a game worth gamers time. Killzone flopped due to it's lack luster story and gameplay (not graphics seeing how that was the ONLY decent thing about it.....well....for being a PS2 game :lol: ). Killzone1.5 will suffer the exact same fate no doubt seeing how Sony was foolish enough to keep Guerilla solely on the project. They should've at least hired a good writer to write the story for this one.

I just can't believe that you cows are hyping up a title that will obviously flopped. Guerilla isn't a talented developer and for you all to put your faith in them is foolish. After all, Killzone1.5 is nothing more than a HD version of Killzone with better lighting. :lol:

Korrigan777

oMFG The SATYRE!!!!

i'm laughing so much TC 111119llozzaragatorrazer

so this is what you have to resort to now because the truth is too much to take? sad....really, really sad...:lol:

there is no "truth" in what you're saying.

someone cited Killzone Liberation as an example of a good game 8.3 score on GS.

that wasn't good enough for you. What's actually ironic is that i really really love halo. iJust think people like you are the reason why these arguments go round and round in circles.

There would be "truth" in what you're saying/insinuating/predicting if you had played killzone and new geurilla had failed.

you bringing up killzone 1 is ridiculously weak.

I have played Killzone and in fact it's still on my HDloader.