all of this killzone vs halo mess

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for youngmurk911
youngmurk911

3895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#1 youngmurk911
Member since 2004 • 3895 Posts

i've had reach, 3, 2, & 1.....[halo that is]....halo is a cool shooter. as a fan of the halo series, i find that the people seem to overate the game, its not bad.....but its not jaw dropping amazing. at all. killzone, well......that game has jaw dropping amazing graphics....[i don't pc game, so to me...it looks good k?] the game is nothing like halo, but i find killzone to be a better single player experience than halo is, all of halo's single player campaigns is boring. both of the storys are awful, but who cares? i think people choose halo over killzone because of the multiplayer situation. but i guess, since i really don't like to rely on multiplayer for me to enjoy a game, i prefer killzone....i dunno

Avatar image for _SWAG_
_SWAG_

2674

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 _SWAG_
Member since 2009 • 2674 Posts

agreed 10. killzone3 is the bestest because it has the bestest graphics imho

Avatar image for dotWithShoes
dotWithShoes

5596

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#3 dotWithShoes
Member since 2006 • 5596 Posts

agreed 10. killzone3 is the bestest because it has the bestest graphics imho

_SWAG_
Ppl played Halo CE for the amazing online multiplayer ... I know I .. wait.. no.
Avatar image for kelkimble2k4
kelkimble2k4

2089

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#4 kelkimble2k4
Member since 2004 • 2089 Posts

Killzone is better then halo in many ways. It's just people who like's halo want to look the other way.

Avatar image for Basinboy
Basinboy

14559

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#5 Basinboy
Member since 2003 • 14559 Posts

agreed 10. killzone3 is the bestest because it has the bestest graphics imho

_SWAG_

Ha, this time I lol'd. :)

Anyway, yeah, KZ is great, can't wait to spin it up tomorrow. But, regardless, it still isn't as consistent or engaging as the Halo series has been (though KZ2's plot > Halo 3's).

Avatar image for percech
percech

5237

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 percech
Member since 2011 • 5237 Posts
You are not a fan of Halo and you probably never played the single player. If you have, you would know that KZ's single player campaigns are either as mediocre or worse.
Avatar image for tutt3r
tutt3r

2865

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#8 tutt3r
Member since 2005 • 2865 Posts

halo is a cool shooter. as a fan of the halo series, i find that the people seem to overate the game, its not bad.....but its not jaw dropping amazing. at all. killzone, well......that game has jaw dropping amazing graphics....

youngmurk911

we wouldnt want to understate how amazing the graphics are would we?

Avatar image for youngmurk911
youngmurk911

3895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#9 youngmurk911
Member since 2004 • 3895 Posts
You are not a fan of Halo and you probably never played the single player. If you have, you would know that KZ's single player campaigns are either as mediocre or worse. percech
im not a fan because what? i say tha campaign is boring? because i prefer killzone's single player over halo's? imma piston fan, theyre terrible, but i guess since i point out the truth im not a fan of them either right? back down....
Avatar image for IndianaPwns39
IndianaPwns39

5037

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 73

User Lists: 0

#10 IndianaPwns39
Member since 2008 • 5037 Posts

Still don't see the reason KZ and Halo are so often compared. I get that one is Sony's primary shotoer and the other is Microsoft's but outside of that they're very different games. I blame the press labelling the original KZ as the "Halo killer". Otherwise these comparisons would have died long ago.

Avatar image for Doolz2024
Doolz2024

9623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#11 Doolz2024
Member since 2007 • 9623 Posts

Still don't see the reason KZ and Halo are so often compared. I get that one is Sony's primary shotoer and the other is Microsoft's but outside of that they're very different games. I blame the press labelling the original KZ as the "Halo killer". Otherwise these comparisons would have died long ago.

IndianaPwns39

No, they're being compared because cows continue to insist Killzone is superior. Even though it never outscores Halo and never sells as much as Halo.

And I'm not saying TC is a cow, I'm talking about past threads here... like last year and earlier this year.

Avatar image for percech
percech

5237

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 percech
Member since 2011 • 5237 Posts
[QUOTE="percech"]You are not a fan of Halo and you probably never played the single player. If you have, you would know that KZ's single player campaigns are either as mediocre or worse. youngmurk911
im not a fan because what? i say tha campaign is boring? because i prefer killzone's single player over halo's? imma piston fan, theyre terrible, but i guess since i point out the truth im not a fan of them either right? back down....

No, you're not a fan. I can tell when someone is sprouting bs. You made this thread because of the recent KZ3 criticism and how Halo is actually better and will always be.
Avatar image for soulitane
soulitane

15091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 soulitane
Member since 2010 • 15091 Posts

Killzone is better then halo in many ways. It's just people who like's halo want to look the other way.

kelkimble2k4

Or they just think differently to you.

Avatar image for sinpkr
sinpkr

1255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 sinpkr
Member since 2010 • 1255 Posts

halo is a better game there is no denying it. Comparing the games is reasonable for ppl to do. they r both sci-fi fps games and thats why they r compared. meh they r both big games for their respective systems . really u can tell which is better merly by looking at how many ppl r online in multiplayer. halo 3 still has much more ppl then killzonee 2 online and probally more then killzone 3. there is a reason why ppl keep playing halo .

Avatar image for kevin11896
kevin11896

212

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 kevin11896
Member since 2007 • 212 Posts
[QUOTE="youngmurk911"][QUOTE="percech"]You are not a fan of Halo and you probably never played the single player. If you have, you would know that KZ's single player campaigns are either as mediocre or worse. percech
im not a fan because what? i say tha campaign is boring? because i prefer killzone's single player over halo's? imma piston fan, theyre terrible, but i guess since i point out the truth im not a fan of them either right? back down....

No, you're not a fan. I can tell when someone is sprouting bs. You made this thread because of the recent KZ3 criticism and how Halo is actually better and will always be.

So you're saying because he is criticizing something he can't like it?
Avatar image for walkingdream
walkingdream

4883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 walkingdream
Member since 2009 • 4883 Posts
lol honestly cows bring the Halo comparison on themselves. Reach is infinitely better than KZ2 IMO (haven't bought KZ3). Halo Series 9.7, 9.4, 9.5, 9.0, 9.5 vs Killzone Series 6.9,9.0,8.5 I can use Meta Critic if you like? but whatever way you look at it's pretty clear cut that the majority of the gaming community think halo is a much better series.
Avatar image for youngmurk911
youngmurk911

3895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#17 youngmurk911
Member since 2004 • 3895 Posts
[QUOTE="youngmurk911"][QUOTE="percech"]You are not a fan of Halo and you probably never played the single player. If you have, you would know that KZ's single player campaigns are either as mediocre or worse. percech
im not a fan because what? i say tha campaign is boring? because i prefer killzone's single player over halo's? imma piston fan, theyre terrible, but i guess since i point out the truth im not a fan of them either right? back down....

No, you're not a fan. I can tell when someone is sprouting bs. You made this thread because of the recent KZ3 criticism and how Halo is actually better and will always be.

do u have some sort of crystal ball? nah.....and who said i made the thread off of kz3 criticism? o yea...u, the one looking through the crystal ball.....[forgot who i was talking to].......i made this thread purely to speak my mind, spark up a lil convo......somethin u do on a forum. i'm glad u think halo is better, *toast to u* and i will always feel killzone has the better single player experience..*toast to me*
Avatar image for IndianaPwns39
IndianaPwns39

5037

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 73

User Lists: 0

#18 IndianaPwns39
Member since 2008 • 5037 Posts

[QUOTE="IndianaPwns39"]

Still don't see the reason KZ and Halo are so often compared. I get that one is Sony's primary shotoer and the other is Microsoft's but outside of that they're very different games. I blame the press labelling the original KZ as the "Halo killer". Otherwise these comparisons would have died long ago.

Doolz2024

No, they're being compared because cows continue to insist Killzone is superior. Even though it never outscores Halo and never sells as much as Halo.

And I'm not saying TC is a cow, I'm talking about past threads here... like last year and earlier this year.

True, but then again you get games being compared that are nothing alike simply because of sales wars. Oh Cow and Lemming logic.

Still, there are people that compare Halo and KZ outside of SW and they play too differently to me to care.

Avatar image for rybe1025
rybe1025

6362

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 rybe1025
Member since 2004 • 6362 Posts
That is cool and everyone is allowed to have an opinion. You opinion is clearly the minority though since Halo scores better from the critics and more people enjoy Halo more hence the far greater sales.
Avatar image for Avian005
Avian005

4112

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 51

User Lists: 0

#20 Avian005
Member since 2009 • 4112 Posts

Based off you Xbox Live Card, I don't see how you can criticize Halo 3/Reach's campaignsif you have only played the first level of 3 and the first two levels of Reach. Both games get better throughout the campaigns (except for the Cortana mission in Halo 3). I also don't see how you can say people overrate the Halo games if they have actually played and beat them when you have only played the first couple missions of Halo 3 & Reach.

EDIT: And based off you PSN card, you have not played Killzone 2 (and of course, 3).

Avatar image for campzor
campzor

34932

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 campzor
Member since 2004 • 34932 Posts
only the first halo is good... the rest are pretty boring, even the multiplayer which is basically the same but have awful map and abilities. Also the campaign in the first is great. Guess bungie peaked with the first and its been downhill since then (waits for sales/ratings to flood the thread) I much prefer killzone 2s campaign and kz1+2s multiplayer over halos
Avatar image for dovberg
dovberg

3348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#22 dovberg
Member since 2009 • 3348 Posts

I honestly couldn't stomach the campagn of KZ2 and I enjoyed multiplayer on it though . Halo has so many more features and I've personally enjoyed single and multiplayer with it but I do like both and agree Halo is over hyped but I do think it is a clear cut above KZ.

When graphics always end up being the high point it means that is the only high point. Uncharted 2 has amazing graphics but basically I like it because it's a FUN game.

Avatar image for Pug-Nasty
Pug-Nasty

8508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#23 Pug-Nasty
Member since 2009 • 8508 Posts

They really don't need to be compared. They are too different for one game to absorb the fans of the other, nevermind that they are on different consoles.

A much better comparison is Halo and Resistance. They are very similar in mechanics, damage model, and weapon variety. The mechanics of the games are pretty much identical.

Gears is more comparable to Killzone than Halo, even with the difference in perspective.

Avatar image for NeonNinja
NeonNinja

17318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 115

User Lists: 0

#24 NeonNinja
Member since 2005 • 17318 Posts

Still don't see the reason KZ and Halo are so often compared. I get that one is Sony's primary shotoer and the other is Microsoft's but outside of that they're very different games. I blame the press labelling the original KZ as the "Halo killer". Otherwise these comparisons would have died long ago.

IndianaPwns39

This'll be the one. KZ and Halo are only really compared because of how the press built up KZ as a Halo killer. Sony didn't even care for that comparison. From the start they said that wasn't their intention. But it's stuck now and people compare them.