All people hating on MW2 and Activision do NOT understand.....

  • 75 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Ribnarak
Ribnarak

2299

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 Ribnarak
Member since 2008 • 2299 Posts

[QUOTE="10MP"]

4 hour linear campaign, small tweaks, new maps and weapons sounds like an expansion to me.

$60 on pc :lol:

Nedemis

where'd you hear 4 hour campaign? All those other things you mention are what ALL sequels include so why is MW2 an expansion and not games like Killzone2, HL2 and any other FPS you could even mention that has a sequel?

1) nice to see you have an opinion.

2) This is a forum. THus,tbh people arent gonnachangetheir mind about hating on MW2 or activision. Although, you could try.

3) Killzone 2 - new engine, new generation. Yes its a sequel, but priced perfectly for a Brand new game.

4) Who cares if people hate on activision, its pathetic how it bothers you that other people hate something that you like. Its life, get over it man.Even if it bugs you, just ignore people.

Avatar image for Ribnarak
Ribnarak

2299

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 Ribnarak
Member since 2008 • 2299 Posts

Hating it? I can't wait to get my night vision goggles...

MizFitAwesome

Lol its people like this that make companies rich. WHY Would they include night vision goggles? Obviously so they could make a profit out of selling plastic toys (that will not work as well as other goggles, which wont cost as much). Its just an advertisement gimmick.

BTW: I dont hate on any single game, unless it was actually bad. I bet MW2 will be good. but IMO*** battlefield bad company2 will be better

Avatar image for jessmaster13
jessmaster13

3170

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#53 jessmaster13
Member since 2009 • 3170 Posts

Aw man, I was pretty hyped for this game but i dont know anymore :cry:

Avatar image for 67gt500
67gt500

4627

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#54 67gt500
Member since 2003 • 4627 Posts
Even if there WAS day-one DLC what the hell would be wrong with that?
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#55 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

Even if there WAS day-one DLC what the hell would be wrong with that?67gt500

The fact that they purposefully took content that would have normally shipped with the game and are charging you more for a game you already paid $70 USD for? Charging for DLC to begin with is really unscrupulous, given that people have already paid for the game, but to take out game content, and then as soon as it ships, release that content for more money? That is despicable.

To get the "full" Call of Duty 6, you'll probably end up paying $85-90 USD on day one. Then there is all the "map packs" that come out later down the line. You're looking at upwards of $100 USD for a single game. That is TWICE as expensive as games were last generation.

Avatar image for Enosh88
Enosh88

1728

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 Enosh88
Member since 2008 • 1728 Posts

[QUOTE="Nedemis"]

that there is NO DLC on day one. They NEVER said this and this needs to be straightend out. Quit spreading rumors and learn the facts people. I find it quite pathetic when you have to start garbage like that in a weak attempt to keep the uninformed from buying a game you don't like.

SpinoRaptor24

The fact is that they've already planned DLC map packs, so I'm guessing they've taken content out of the disc to sell back to us.

good gues but you are wrong, look up on how a game and it's dlc is made, but hey, why listen to me?

"DLC is not developed until after the full game is polished, finished, and released.

Therefore, there is no way to include it in the main game because it doesn't exist. We have two years for our development cycle, in that two years we complete the main game (single player, spec ops, multiplayer).

Once we've finished and shipped the finished game off for certification and disc printing. While we're waiting for the game to be printed on discs and go to stores, then we sit down and start thinking about what we'd like to do for DLC.

We've agreed to at least Two map packs already, but we won't start development on them or thinking about whats included in them until AFTER we've finished the game. We've just agreed to do them.

We would never purposely hold anything back just so we can release it as DLC. I think we've proved that with Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare. The fact we only did 1 map pack because we felt it was important that Modern Warfare 2 got two full years of development and therefore as many maps as possible at LAUNCH."

http://forums.infinityward.com/viewtopic.php?p=1365446#p1365446

but ofcourse if "zomg they took content out" makes you sleep better at night...

Avatar image for masiisam
masiisam

5723

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#57 masiisam
Member since 2003 • 5723 Posts

My new games list will be staggering by the time this hits..So I will be picking it up used 6 months later…

Avatar image for KungfuKitten
KungfuKitten

27389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#58 KungfuKitten
Member since 2006 • 27389 Posts
[QUOTE="KungfuKitten"][QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Still 2 things of planned DLC announced already. W@W's online is nearly unplayable because of their rotation of the DLC maps into the playlists.

Nedemis
Lovely. Try defending that, TC.

simple....stop being cheap and purchase the map packs if you actually enjoy the game. It's not their fault if you're in the minority and don't buy the map packs.

Lol did You hear this? Just read it out loud to Yourself. It's ridiculous. They purposefully diminished the value of what people bought and are telling them what You are saying right now basically: "Pay up if You like this game so much." But i already paid? "We don't care. Pay up or we'll mess up Your games." There's no way to defend their crappy business tactics and that's the funny thing i was just messing with You. They're ba***rds and they love to show that off. I just don't understand why You make this thread in some hope that people will still buy it? There is WAY more to the activision hate than just the price, or just the DLC.
Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#59 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts

When they said they were going to charge £55 for the standard edition.

Avatar image for sexy_robot_man
sexy_robot_man

1002

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 sexy_robot_man
Member since 2009 • 1002 Posts

MW2 is a day one purchase for myself and millions and millions and millions of others, see ya online ;)

Avatar image for SanVanSkater
SanVanSkater

98

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 SanVanSkater
Member since 2009 • 98 Posts

Why would anyone ever want DLC? Especially on DAY ONE! Thats basically hating a developer for getting rid of contentrather thanplanning to sell it from the get go. Do you want to pay more money or something!? For stuff that can be free?!

Avatar image for FFXIII360
FFXIII360

988

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 FFXIII360
Member since 2008 • 988 Posts

MW2 kicks butt. If the nerds don't want to buy let them miss out.

Avatar image for Noverech
Noverech

1635

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 Noverech
Member since 2003 • 1635 Posts

MW2 kicks butt. If the nerds don't want to buy let them miss out.

FFXIII360

[Insert random PC shooter] says I'm not missing out on anything.

Modern Warfare is a console phenomenon. kinda like halo.

there's a reason most PC gamers aren't excited for this.

for CONSOLE only players however, i'm sure MW was the bees knees, and you think MW and MW2 are FPS king

we've been there, done that. the truth is this game offers nothing new.

Avatar image for kitty_katty
kitty_katty

93

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 kitty_katty
Member since 2009 • 93 Posts

[QUOTE="FFXIII360"]

MW2 kicks butt. If the nerds don't want to buy let them miss out.

Noverech

[Insert random PC shooter] says I'm not missing out on anything.

Modern Warfare is a console phenomenon. kinda like halo.

there's a reason most PC gamers aren't excited for this.

for CONSOLE only players however, i'm sure MW was the bees knees, and you think MW and MW2 are FPS king

we've been there, done that. the truth is this game offers nothing new.

IGN felt the PC version deserved a 9.5 I already knew you were misinformed about the game I just thought this would help.

Here is a closing quote from the PC review "When you look at the total package, Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 is hands-down one of the best first-person shooters out there, and a truly amazing offering across any system"

Avatar image for Thebettertwin
Thebettertwin

1051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 Thebettertwin
Member since 2005 • 1051 Posts
[QUOTE="kitty_katty"]

[QUOTE="Noverech"]

[QUOTE="FFXIII360"]

MW2 kicks butt. If the nerds don't want to buy let them miss out.

[Insert random PC shooter] says I'm not missing out on anything.

Modern Warfare is a console phenomenon. kinda like halo.

there's a reason most PC gamers aren't excited for this.

for CONSOLE only players however, i'm sure MW was the bees knees, and you think MW and MW2 are FPS king

we've been there, done that. the truth is this game offers nothing new.

IGN felt the PC version deserved a 9.5 I already knew you were misinformed about the game I just thought this would help.

Here is a closing quote from the PC review "When you look at the total package, Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 is hands-down one of the best first-person shooters out there, and a truly amazing offering across any system"

lol who trusts reviews anymore GTA4 is universally acclaimed but that game stinks. easily the most boring sandbox game there is. then there is halo 2 and 3, which were overated. the original MW is also universally acclaimed when in fact it blows as IW were still using the same gameplay mechanics from the 90's this is coming from a "consolite" who is a fan of halo. dont trust a single review personally, i tend not to act like a mindless drone and make up my own mind. i would suggest you try and do the same but youre probably too stupid
Avatar image for blue_hazy_basic
blue_hazy_basic

30854

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#66 blue_hazy_basic  Moderator
Member since 2002 • 30854 Posts
[QUOTE="Thebettertwin"][QUOTE="kitty_katty"]

[QUOTE="Noverech"]

[Insert random PC shooter] says I'm not missing out on anything.

Modern Warfare is a console phenomenon. kinda like halo.

there's a reason most PC gamers aren't excited for this.

for CONSOLE only players however, i'm sure MW was the bees knees, and you think MW and MW2 are FPS king

we've been there, done that. the truth is this game offers nothing new.

IGN felt the PC version deserved a 9.5 I already knew you were misinformed about the game I just thought this would help.

Here is a closing quote from the PC review "When you look at the total package, Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 is hands-down one of the best first-person shooters out there, and a truly amazing offering across any system"

lol who trusts reviews anymore GTA4 is universally acclaimed but that game stinks. easily the most boring sandbox game there is. then there is halo 2 and 3, which were overated. the original MW is also universally acclaimed when in fact it blows as IW were still using the same gameplay mechanics from the 90's this is coming from a "consolite" who is a fan of halo. dont trust a single review personally, i tend not to act like a mindless drone and make up my own mind. i would suggest you try and do the same but youre probably too stupid

Strange I thought GTA IV was a masterpiece. Your personal opinion isn't necessarily right you know. :roll:
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#67 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
[QUOTE="blue_hazy_basic"] Strange I thought GTA IV was a masterpiece. Your personal opinion isn't necessarily right you know. :roll:

GTA4 masterpiece? Maybe if you ignore the lack of money sinks which made the game easy, death not very punishing, the texture pop-ins and the blue hell jumps. It had room for improvement.
Avatar image for blue_hazy_basic
blue_hazy_basic

30854

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#68 blue_hazy_basic  Moderator
Member since 2002 • 30854 Posts
[QUOTE="blue_hazy_basic"] Strange I thought GTA IV was a masterpiece. Your personal opinion isn't necessarily right you know. :roll:Vandalvideo
GTA4 masterpiece? Maybe if you ignore the lack of money sinks which made the game easy, death not very punishing, the texture pop-ins and the blue hell jumps. It had room for improvement.

No game is without faults, I won't say it was perfect, but nothing is.
Avatar image for Thebettertwin
Thebettertwin

1051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 Thebettertwin
Member since 2005 • 1051 Posts

[QUOTE="Thebettertwin"][QUOTE="kitty_katty"]IGN felt the PC version deserved a 9.5 I already knew you were misinformed about the game I just thought this would help.

Here is a closing quote from the PC review "When you look at the total package, Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 is hands-down one of the best first-person shooters out there, and a truly amazing offering across any system"

blue_hazy_basic

lol who trusts reviews anymore GTA4 is universally acclaimed but that game stinks. easily the most boring sandbox game there is. then there is halo 2 and 3, which were overated. the original MW is also universally acclaimed when in fact it blows as IW were still using the same gameplay mechanics from the 90's this is coming from a "consolite" who is a fan of halo. dont trust a single review personally, i tend not to act like a mindless drone and make up my own mind. i would suggest you try and do the same but youre probably too stupid

Strange I thought GTA IV was a masterpiece. Your personal opinion isn't necessarily right you know. :roll:

neither is that of the reviewer! why should they be trusted over anyone else?

Avatar image for jerkface96
jerkface96

9189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 jerkface96
Member since 2005 • 9189 Posts
There's tons more to the hate on Activision than that. I can't say I hate MW2, MW was a good game, and if they fixed some of the balancing problems for MW2, it could definately be a superb game. But Activision sucks hard, dude, no questioning that. enterawesome
to be honest, what other FPS game on consoles is better than MW2? and the balancing seems to be fixed, but then again i dont whine and complain when i get killed and yell BALANCING issues (this isnt directed towards you)
Avatar image for InsaneBasura
InsaneBasura

12591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#71 InsaneBasura
Member since 2005 • 12591 Posts

[QUOTE="blue_hazy_basic"][QUOTE="Thebettertwin"] lol who trusts reviews anymore GTA4 is universally acclaimed but that game stinks. easily the most boring sandbox game there is. then there is halo 2 and 3, which were overated. the original MW is also universally acclaimed when in fact it blows as IW were still using the same gameplay mechanics from the 90's this is coming from a "consolite" who is a fan of halo. dont trust a single review personally, i tend not to act like a mindless drone and make up my own mind. i would suggest you try and do the same but youre probably too stupidThebettertwin

Strange I thought GTA IV was a masterpiece. Your personal opinion isn't necessarily right you know. :roll:

neither is that of the reviewer! why should they be trusted over anyone else?

Especially when it's in their best interest to maintain a good relationship with the publishers.

IGN's MW2 PC review is a copout. They made the transition between the removed featureset being considered standard and it being a bonus rather quickly and inexplicably.

Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38065

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#72 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38065 Posts
[QUOTE="SAGE_OF_FIRE"]They said timed exclusive dlc for the 360 day one :| atleast to my memory Nedemis
No...they said that Infinity Ward and MS would be releasing 2 map packs FIRST on XBL. Not day one. I just double checked this not even 5 minutes ago.

I'm on Live with MW2 right now and there are no DLC's.
Avatar image for kitty_katty
kitty_katty

93

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 kitty_katty
Member since 2009 • 93 Posts

[QUOTE="kitty_katty"]

[QUOTE="Noverech"]

[Insert random PC shooter] says I'm not missing out on anything.

Modern Warfare is a console phenomenon. kinda like halo.

there's a reason most PC gamers aren't excited for this.

for CONSOLE only players however, i'm sure MW was the bees knees, and you think MW and MW2 are FPS king

we've been there, done that. the truth is this game offers nothing new.

Thebettertwin

IGN felt the PC version deserved a 9.5 I already knew you were misinformed about the game I just thought this would help.

Here is a closing quote from the PC review "When you look at the total package, Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 is hands-down one of the best first-person shooters out there, and a truly amazing offering across any system"

lol who trusts reviews anymore GTA4 is universally acclaimed but that game stinks. easily the most boring sandbox game there is. then there is halo 2 and 3, which were overated. the original MW is also universally acclaimed when in fact it blows as IW were still using the same gameplay mechanics from the 90's this is coming from a "consolite" who is a fan of halo. dont trust a single review personally, i tend not to act like a mindless drone and make up my own mind. i would suggest you try and do the same but youre probably too stupid

So are you saying that all AAA or AAAAE or AA discussion ends now since that whole system is based on reviews?

Avatar image for UnknownSniper65
UnknownSniper65

9238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#74 UnknownSniper65
Member since 2004 • 9238 Posts

The game is a console port....I'm not paying an extra $10 dollars for a watered down experience.

Their reasoning behind taking away dedicated servers was stupid, they just want to make sure that we have to pay for DLC this time around.

Avatar image for Thebettertwin
Thebettertwin

1051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 Thebettertwin
Member since 2005 • 1051 Posts
[QUOTE="kitty_katty"]

[QUOTE="Thebettertwin"][QUOTE="kitty_katty"]IGN felt the PC version deserved a 9.5 I already knew you were misinformed about the game I just thought this would help.

Here is a closing quote from the PC review "When you look at the total package, Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 is hands-down one of the best first-person shooters out there, and a truly amazing offering across any system"

lol who trusts reviews anymore GTA4 is universally acclaimed but that game stinks. easily the most boring sandbox game there is. then there is halo 2 and 3, which were overated. the original MW is also universally acclaimed when in fact it blows as IW were still using the same gameplay mechanics from the 90's this is coming from a "consolite" who is a fan of halo. dont trust a single review personally, i tend not to act like a mindless drone and make up my own mind. i would suggest you try and do the same but youre probably too stupid

So are you saying that all AAA or AAAAE or AA discussion ends now since that whole system is based on reviews?

who cares about that system anyway apart from fanboys? everyone should just make up their own minds instead of relying upon other peoples opinions