[QUOTE="TheSterls"][QUOTE="AAllxxjjnn"] It is simple. Arma II's scale makes it graphically beyond anything on consoles. It's not hard to grasp this concept. Also all this forum talks about is graphics, so what should i be bringing up in graphical threads? Super Mario Galaxy?AAllxxjjnn
Lol but its average textures, lvl design and character models dont count heh?As far as graphics go yes that argument is always escalatd by the hermits . Whenever someone talks about how great a game looks ( evnen if there saying its not the best looking game out) you get a flood of Crysis pics and how bad all consoles game look yet they totally ignore the fact that Crysis decimates anything on pc.
Another reason why people talk about visuals is although they are not everything usually games with great visuals happen to be great games.
What's wrong with the textures and level design? The only thing that isn't that great are the character models and animations. Everything else looks better than what you can find on consoles, while also being in an open world with more than 100 miles of land to freely explore.Its textures are not far beyond anything on consoles by any means and its levle design is open and bland lots of wide open fields and a few trees , it gets murdered by Crysis in every conceviable way. Hell even the cryengine 3 demo shown on conosles blows it away in pretty much every area. Now compare the Gun Models, lighting effects, animations and charcter models to KZ2 and how is it far beyond anything on consoles? All it has on them is scale at the expense of bland level design.
Log in to comment