Analyst: PS3 games best rated

[QUOTE="Nerkcon"]You implied it.IronBass

Yeah, really. I don't think it's a coincidence we came to the same conclusion.

PS: Why do you defend so much? Either a user or a system, you always defend. And when defending the attacker is always Sony related. You don't seem like a fanboy but I'm suspicious.

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

The fact that it gets less shovelware probably makes it a great system.;)

Generalmojo

Yeah, really. I don't think it's a coincidence we came to the same conclusion.Nerkcon

I said "Number of good games > percentage of good games". What people think "I implied" with it when I didn't say it it's not my problem.

PS: Why do you defend so much? Either a user or a system, you always defend. And when defending the attacker is always Sony related. You don't seem like a fanboy but I'm suspicious.

Nerkcon

I defend because a lot of things in this forum are unfairly attacked.

[QUOTE="Nerkcon"]Yeah, really. I don't think it's a coincidence we came to the same conclusion.IronBass

I said "Number of good games > percentage of good games". What people think "I implied" with it when I didn't say it it's not my problem.

Then why say it at all? This was my thought process...

1. A quote, someone is either going to agree, comment, or try to counter attack

2. This person said numbers is better than percentage. What did he mean?

3. The Xbox as a lot larger amount of games.

4. We were talking about that the PS3 has a higher percentage of good games because it has less shovelware.

5. This person is applying that the 360 has a greater amount of good games while PS3 only has a higher percentage.

The best I could explain it. The thought came to me a lot faster than that. Meh.

[QUOTE="Generalmojo"]

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

The fact that it gets less shovelware probably makes it a great system.;)

bingbaocao

I guess that means the PS1 and the Ps2 suck

Then why say it at all? Nerkcon

[QUOTE="Nerkcon"]Then why say it at all? IronBass

[QUOTE="Gxgear"]

[QUOTE="Brawl578"]

I never said those were the ONLY good games on PS3, I'm saying that it's because of the games I listed that made PS3 have the highest percentage.

Brawl578

Yeah 3 whole games out of a library consisting of hundreds of titles is really going to help to "turn the tide". Have you done the math? It's not that hard.

And out of every library consisting of hundreds of titles, there's always crappy games. The PS3's line up is good, but not perfect.

Mystery solved. Thanks detective obvious!

So you did implied and you just flat out lied to say you didn't.Nerkcon

[QUOTE="Nerkcon"]So you did implied and you just flat out lied to say you didn't.IronBass

The Ps3 does have very good exclusives. My only gripe with it is that it still doesn't have enough for me to choose it over the Xbox. If I had the money I would buy it but unfortunately I'm broke. :(

So... you were saying it just to say something AKA spam?Nerkcon

[QUOTE="Nerkcon"] So... you were saying it just to say something AKA spam?IronBass

Maybe I'm misunderstanding you. I just implied that the 360 doesn't have more great games than the PS3 fighting this Debate. Why am I fighting this debate then? I don't know what it's called, but someone will say something indirectly, someone else will say "So you're saying 'X'", then the person who said 'X' would say "What? lol no I didn't! Don't assume fanboy/noob/scrub/whatever'.

Was used against me many times and I hate it.

] So you were supporting Nintendo, I see now.Nerkcon

This is conclusive proof that the PS3 is superior to the 360... less shovelware.

Though there is a reason for this: small companies that make these crappy games don't have enough money to code for the hard-to-develope-for cell processor.

Sony, making small companies fail.

EDIT: It seems that many of your are labouring under the impression that a higher mean rating means a superior library. This is not the case. As stated, the 360 simply has more crap on it, lowering the mean average. It could have way more high rated games, it just has just as much crappy games. Though does this include arcade titles as well? If so, then this is why: marketplace has WAY more content then the playstation store. The more content, the higher chance that some is crap.

Sony, making small companies fail.awsss

[QUOTE="2-10-08"] [QUOTE="BoloTheGreat"][QUOTE="metalgear-solid"]

It's a well-known fact PS3 gets the highest quality games.

GreyFoXX4

except they are junk, though i will highlight warhawk more.
why release a game that now after updates has totally made going on foot or in a land vehicle obsolete before the updates warhawks weren't nearly as overpowered you could infact take every thing out in the game while on foot, Now warhawks are so overpowered you are quite literally forced to be in a warhawk at all times just to survive, Most matches are hectic blast fests with no real strategy involved its get to the warhawk first and because there are so few in each map there are invaribly over half your team left to stay on foot or in a land based vehicle which sucks because your team is pretty much dead with run and bomb tactics of the warhawks.

Warhawk should have been a warhawk only game they should have never added on foot characters or land based vehicles it should have been like Crimson skies atleast you had a chance in that game you can pretty much die upon first spawn in warhawk because the enemy team has camped your based with warhawks and they kill you as soon as you appear.

P.S: yes i own the game, i've played it extensively and own all 3 addon packs because i geniunely enjoyed the game upon first release now after the udates the game is simply a warhawk orgy with no chance for tanks or people on foot to survive.

i don't like that we're forced to play every game on each system. :(

i don't like that we're forced to play every game on each system. :(

CaseyWegner

PS3 especially if you want the best new games. A good portion of the 360s highly rated games are launch titles before the PS3 existed when it was compared to PS2 or are just older games now.EmperorSupreme

why would they be compared to ps2 games? :?

[QUOTE="EmperorSupreme"]PS3 especially if you want the best new games. A good portion of the 360s highly rated games are launch titles before the PS3 existed when it was compared to PS2 or are just older games now.CaseyWegner

why would they be compared to ps2 games? :?

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

[QUOTE="EmperorSupreme"]PS3 especially if you want the best new games. A good portion of the 360s highly rated games are launch titles before the PS3 existed when it was compared to PS2 or are just older games now.mitu123

why would they be compared to ps2 games? :?

it might have more to do with the ps3 taking nearly a year to match the exclusives that the 360 launched with.

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

why would they be compared to ps2 games? :?

CaseyWegner

it might have more to do with the ps3 taking nearly a year to match the exclusives that the 360 launched with.

[QUOTE="EmperorSupreme"]PS3 especially if you want the best new games. A good portion of the 360s highly rated games are launch titles before the PS3 existed when it was compared to PS2 or are just older games now.CaseyWegner

why would they be compared to ps2 games? :?

[QUOTE="CaseyWegner"]

[QUOTE="EmperorSupreme"]PS3 especially if you want the best new games. A good portion of the 360s highly rated games are launch titles before the PS3 existed when it was compared to PS2 or are just older games now.EmperorSupreme

why would they be compared to ps2 games? :?

again, why would it be compared to the ps2? why not the original xbox? why not the gamecube that was graphically on par with the original xbox?

I paid $299 for mine when they had the $100 of sale, and I love it. I got rid of my 360.

PS3 especially if you want the best new games. A good portion of the 360s highly rated games are launch titles before the PS3 existed when it was compared to PS2 or are just older games now.EmperorSupreme