And oboewan9999 magically makes cow arguments vanish! Shazam!
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Me: NES won. SNES won. N64 LOST. GCN LOST.
Cow: "ZOMG! THE PS3 WILL WIN BECAUSE IT HAS THE BEST GRAPHICS!"
Me: Nintendo 64 had better graphics and LOST. Xbox and Gamecube had better graphics and LOST.
Cow: "ZOMG! THE PS3 WILL WIN BECAUSE IT HAS BLU-RAY!"
Me: The PS2 had an AFFORDABLE DVD player. The PS3 is anything but affordable. Plus if you don't have an HDTV (which most people don't) you don't notice between DVD and BD.
Cow: "ZOMG! THE PS3 WILL WIN BECAUSE THE PS1 AND PS2 DID!"Me: no company has been more dominent in the gaming industry then sony. There fanbase is well over 100 million, all they need is half of that and theyll most likely win. thread/over
Me: NES won. SNES won. N64 LOST. GCN LOST.
Cow: "ZOMG! THE PS3 WILL WIN BECAUSE IT HAS THE BEST GRAPHICS!"
Me: Nintendo 64 had better graphics and LOST. Xbox and Gamecube had better graphics and LOST.
Cow: "ZOMG! THE PS3 WILL WIN BECAUSE IT HAS BLU-RAY!"
Me: The PS2 had an AFFORDABLE DVD player. The PS3 is anything but affordable. Plus if you don't have an HDTV (which most people don't) you don't notice between DVD and BD.
oboewan9999
[QUOTE="oboewan9999"]Cow: "ZOMG! THE PS3 WILL WIN BECAUSE THE PS1 AND PS2 DID!"Me: no company has been more dominent in the gaming industry then sony. There fanbase is well over 100 million, all they need is half of that and theyll most likely win. thread/over Me: before sony, no company had ever been more dominant in the gaming industry than Nintendo. Then they made some obvious mistakes with the nintendo 64 and lost.
Me: NES won. SNES won. N64 LOST. GCN LOST.
Cow: "ZOMG! THE PS3 WILL WIN BECAUSE IT HAS THE BEST GRAPHICS!"
Me: Nintendo 64 had better graphics and LOST. Xbox and Gamecube had better graphics and LOST.
Cow: "ZOMG! THE PS3 WILL WIN BECAUSE IT HAS BLU-RAY!"
Me: The PS2 had an AFFORDABLE DVD player. The PS3 is anything but affordable. Plus if you don't have an HDTV (which most people don't) you don't notice between DVD and BD.
Bren128
Cow: "ZOMG! THE PS3 WILL WIN BECAUSE THE PS1 AND PS2 DID!"
Me: NES won. SNES won. N64 LOST. GCN LOST.
Cow: "ZOMG! THE PS3 WILL WIN BECAUSE IT HAS THE BEST GRAPHICS!"
Me: Nintendo 64 had better graphics and LOST. Xbox and Gamecube had better graphics and LOST.
Cow: "ZOMG! THE PS3 WILL WIN BECAUSE IT HAS BLU-RAY!"
Me: The PS2 had an AFFORDABLE DVD player. The PS3 is anything but affordable. Plus if you don't have an HDTV (which most people don't) you don't notice between DVD and BD.
oboewan9999
agreed but the PS3 will still sell loads but not as much as the PS2 did. And i have 360 and pc so dont call me a ps3 fanboy
[QUOTE="oboewan9999"]Cow: "ZOMG! THE PS3 WILL WIN BECAUSE THE PS1 AND PS2 DID!"Me: no company has been more dominent in the gaming industry then sony. There fanbase is well over 100 million, all they need is half of that and theyll most likely win. thread/over Me: 100 million casuals will not shell out $599 plus $ in games for a PS3. 100 million casuals do not own HDTVs meaning that the PS3 is basically a blue-ray player, which will also fail as a media format (at least this generation) thread/over based on cold-hard economics.
Me: NES won. SNES won. N64 LOST. GCN LOST.
Cow: "ZOMG! THE PS3 WILL WIN BECAUSE IT HAS THE BEST GRAPHICS!"
Me: Nintendo 64 had better graphics and LOST. Xbox and Gamecube had better graphics and LOST.
Cow: "ZOMG! THE PS3 WILL WIN BECAUSE IT HAS BLU-RAY!"
Me: The PS2 had an AFFORDABLE DVD player. The PS3 is anything but affordable. Plus if you don't have an HDTV (which most people don't) you don't notice between DVD and BD.
Bren128
[QUOTE="Bren128"][QUOTE="oboewan9999"]Cow: "ZOMG! THE PS3 WILL WIN BECAUSE THE PS1 AND PS2 DID!"Me: no company has been more dominent in the gaming industry then sony. There fanbase is well over 100 million, all they need is half of that and theyll most likely win. thread/over Me: before sony, no company had ever been more dominant in the gaming industry than Nintendo. Then they made some obvious mistakes with the nintendo 64 and lost. me: wrong, the genesis while not outselling the super nintendo still gave it ample competition, however ps completely DOMINATED the n64 and the PS2 destroyed all 3 of its competitors. Once again nobody has dominated like sony has.
Me: NES won. SNES won. N64 LOST. GCN LOST.
Cow: "ZOMG! THE PS3 WILL WIN BECAUSE IT HAS THE BEST GRAPHICS!"
Me: Nintendo 64 had better graphics and LOST. Xbox and Gamecube had better graphics and LOST.
Cow: "ZOMG! THE PS3 WILL WIN BECAUSE IT HAS BLU-RAY!"
Me: The PS2 had an AFFORDABLE DVD player. The PS3 is anything but affordable. Plus if you don't have an HDTV (which most people don't) you don't notice between DVD and BD.
oboewan9999
[QUOTE="Bren128"][QUOTE="oboewan9999"]Cow: "ZOMG! THE PS3 WILL WIN BECAUSE THE PS1 AND PS2 DID!"Me: no company has been more dominent in the gaming industry then sony. There fanbase is well over 100 million, all they need is half of that and theyll most likely win. thread/over Me: 100 million casuals will not shell out $599 plus $ in games for a PS3. 100 million casuals do not own HDTVs meaning that the PS3 is basically a blue-ray player, which will also fail as a media format (at least this generation) thread/over based on cold-hard economics. Me: i never said 100 million will buy a ps3, if a little less then half of the people who bought ps2s buy a ps3, the ps3 will win most likely.
Me: NES won. SNES won. N64 LOST. GCN LOST.
Cow: "ZOMG! THE PS3 WILL WIN BECAUSE IT HAS THE BEST GRAPHICS!"
Me: Nintendo 64 had better graphics and LOST. Xbox and Gamecube had better graphics and LOST.
Cow: "ZOMG! THE PS3 WILL WIN BECAUSE IT HAS BLU-RAY!"
Me: The PS2 had an AFFORDABLE DVD player. The PS3 is anything but affordable. Plus if you don't have an HDTV (which most people don't) you don't notice between DVD and BD.
Strider212
[QUOTE="Strider212"][QUOTE="Bren128"][QUOTE="oboewan9999"]Cow: "ZOMG! THE PS3 WILL WIN BECAUSE THE PS1 AND PS2 DID!"Me: no company has been more dominent in the gaming industry then sony. There fanbase is well over 100 million, all they need is half of that and theyll most likely win. thread/over Me: 100 million casuals will not shell out $599 plus $ in games for a PS3. 100 million casuals do not own HDTVs meaning that the PS3 is basically a blue-ray player, which will also fail as a media format (at least this generation) thread/over based on cold-hard economics. Me: i never said 100 million will buy a ps3, if a little less then half of the people who bought ps2s buy a ps3, the ps3 will win most likely. Then don't use 100 million as a valid number. The PS3 has only sold a little over 2 mil whereas the Wii has already sold over 4 million, and I know people personally that are still looking for one. I don't know a single person that owns a PS3. And I knew a lot of people that owned PS2s. Most them now either own a 360 a Wii or both. Bottom-line, $599 is a ridiculous price that pushes casuals away. Until they lower the price, it is going to have a rough time.
Me: NES won. SNES won. N64 LOST. GCN LOST.
Cow: "ZOMG! THE PS3 WILL WIN BECAUSE IT HAS THE BEST GRAPHICS!"
Me: Nintendo 64 had better graphics and LOST. Xbox and Gamecube had better graphics and LOST.
Cow: "ZOMG! THE PS3 WILL WIN BECAUSE IT HAS BLU-RAY!"
Me: The PS2 had an AFFORDABLE DVD player. The PS3 is anything but affordable. Plus if you don't have an HDTV (which most people don't) you don't notice between DVD and BD.
Bren128
[QUOTE="Bren128"][QUOTE="Strider212"][QUOTE="Bren128"][QUOTE="oboewan9999"]Cow: "ZOMG! THE PS3 WILL WIN BECAUSE THE PS1 AND PS2 DID!"Me: no company has been more dominent in the gaming industry then sony. There fanbase is well over 100 million, all they need is half of that and theyll most likely win. thread/over Me: 100 million casuals will not shell out $599 plus $ in games for a PS3. 100 million casuals do not own HDTVs meaning that the PS3 is basically a blue-ray player, which will also fail as a media format (at least this generation) thread/over based on cold-hard economics. Me: i never said 100 million will buy a ps3, if a little less then half of the people who bought ps2s buy a ps3, the ps3 will win most likely. Then don't use 100 million as a valid number. The PS3 has only sold a little over 2 mil whereas the Wii has already sold over 4 million, and I know people personally that are still looking for one. I don't know a single person that owns a PS3. And I knew a lot of people that owned PS2s. Most them now either own a 360 a Wii or both. Bottom-line, $599 is a ridiculous price that pushes casuals away. Until they lower the price, it is going to have a rough time.
Me: NES won. SNES won. N64 LOST. GCN LOST.
Cow: "ZOMG! THE PS3 WILL WIN BECAUSE IT HAS THE BEST GRAPHICS!"
Me: Nintendo 64 had better graphics and LOST. Xbox and Gamecube had better graphics and LOST.
Cow: "ZOMG! THE PS3 WILL WIN BECAUSE IT HAS BLU-RAY!"
Me: The PS2 had an AFFORDABLE DVD player. The PS3 is anything but affordable. Plus if you don't have an HDTV (which most people don't) you don't notice between DVD and BD.
Strider212
agreed !
Everyone else: Buh, the graphics. Buh, the innovation, Buh the online.
[QUOTE="Bren128"][QUOTE="Strider212"][QUOTE="Bren128"][QUOTE="oboewan9999"]Cow: "ZOMG! THE PS3 WILL WIN BECAUSE THE PS1 AND PS2 DID!"Me: no company has been more dominent in the gaming industry then sony. There fanbase is well over 100 million, all they need is half of that and theyll most likely win. thread/over Me: 100 million casuals will not shell out $599 plus $ in games for a PS3. 100 million casuals do not own HDTVs meaning that the PS3 is basically a blue-ray player, which will also fail as a media format (at least this generation) thread/over based on cold-hard economics. Me: i never said 100 million will buy a ps3, if a little less then half of the people who bought ps2s buy a ps3, the ps3 will win most likely. Then don't use 100 million as a valid number. The PS3 has only sold a little over 2 mil whereas the Wii has already sold over 4 million, and I know people personally that are still looking for one. I don't know a single person that owns a PS3. And I knew a lot of people that owned PS2s. Most them now either own a 360 a Wii or both. Bottom-line, $599 is a ridiculous price that pushes casuals away. Until they lower the price, it is going to have a rough time. i can use 100 millions a valid number because its likely that a good % of those people want a ps3. And the ps3 is doing much better then the 360 was at this point in the 360's lifetime without europe. Europe is very large, and yes it matters alot, i agree that 600 is ridiculous. But i believe the ps3 will have no problem outselling the 360 at least, and thus far im not wrong. And i think when the npd numbers are released for january we will see that the ps3 has outsoled the 360. And as for the wii, which still doesnt have much more 3rd party support then the gaemcube had, casuals are eating it up now. But will that continue ? Nobody knows, but if anyone has the right to talk about future predictions, its sony people , because the last 10 years sony has lead.
Me: NES won. SNES won. N64 LOST. GCN LOST.
Cow: "ZOMG! THE PS3 WILL WIN BECAUSE IT HAS THE BEST GRAPHICS!"
Me: Nintendo 64 had better graphics and LOST. Xbox and Gamecube had better graphics and LOST.
Cow: "ZOMG! THE PS3 WILL WIN BECAUSE IT HAS BLU-RAY!"
Me: The PS2 had an AFFORDABLE DVD player. The PS3 is anything but affordable. Plus if you don't have an HDTV (which most people don't) you don't notice between DVD and BD.
Strider212
Cow: "ZOMG! THE PS3 WILL WIN BECAUSE THE PS1 AND PS2 DID!"
Me: NES won. SNES won. N64 LOST. GCN LOST.
Cow: "ZOMG! THE PS3 WILL WIN BECAUSE IT HAS THE BEST GRAPHICS!"
Me: Nintendo 64 had better graphics and LOST. Xbox and Gamecube had better graphics and LOST.
Cow: "ZOMG! THE PS3 WILL WIN BECAUSE IT HAS BLU-RAY!"
Me: The PS2 had an AFFORDABLE DVD player. The PS3 is anything but affordable. Plus if you don't have an HDTV (which most people don't) you don't notice between DVD and BD.
oboewan9999
Like most cows are saying, it's gonna win because of it's games ;)
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment