Another supbar PS3 multiplatform game. Where is the power of the Cell???

[QUOTE="Pimpshigity21"]

These are the opinions the professionals that are creating your games. I'll take their word over yours.

You can cry foul from now until the new generation of consoles are released, but the only way you will change opinions is by:

1) studying computer science

2) getting a job in a major gaming studio

3) making incredible PS3 games that will prove all those lazy devs wrong

Otherwise: Devs assessments>>>>Your opinionThe_Crucible

I'm sorry, this is such a norm and crap argument used in SW in every thread. Instead of just focusing on the facts at hand, you decide to focus on the one who posted. Am I a dev, no? Is 99.99999999% of the users in SW? NO! So, quoting one dev and then telling me I'm wrong when i quote another is not "teh pwnage." There have been devs that have talked very highly of the PS3 just as there have been those that bash it. Thus far, a lot of the PS3 games have been very impressive for first year titles, especially considering the 360 grasp. It's year one, homes.

Development for CoD4 started a long time ago. Did you hear how Sony is begging developers (lazy or not) not to abbandon their struggling platform? Maybe you didn't. Check it out...and prepare to have your heart broken.Pimpshigity21

Yeah, I saw that ONE article from that ONE writer who didn't even have direct quotes from devs or Sony. To think that Sony, the maker of the PS1 and PS2 needs to beg developers is just ludicrous. Yes, the PS3 is in third and in a position that Sony has had before, but that doesn't mean all power in the industry is lost.

How is having a technology that people are familiar with bad for business? How is having a technology that devs are threatening to abandon good for Sony? Lazy or not, they don't like the technology...and that technology is not proving to be very lucrative for them. Criticize them all you want, but you better start buying their lazy games or all the begging in the world is not going to help Sony very much.

That new technology of yours is not producing anything amazing right now. All the time that could be spent creating something wonderful (Sony's 4D, lol) is being used just to create something that looks just as good as it does on the 360. When you tie that technology to a crappy GPU and a horrible memory allocation it is understandable why developers are having such a hard time with the PS3. Pimpshigity21

Did I say having easier technology was bad? NO! I said devs have gravitated towards it because of it and the install base. But that doesn't mean it not going to get easier for PS3. Last gen the PS2 was a pain for quite a while before devs showed some comfort. As more games are made on the PS3, the knowledge is increased on how to get the most out of it. Plain and simple. Not to mention, to think the install base isn't going to increase dramatically from this year on, you are not paying much attention.

And, then, at the end, you show just how ignorant you can be. You're going to laugh about 4D? Do you even know what 4D means in video games? I'm sure you don't. You think it relates to wearing red and green lenses and 3D. Its living enviroments. Its being on a map, in a sandbox game, and having things change like they do in life, night and day, seasons, growth, etc. If you think that's an impossibility, again, you are not paying attention.

Keep grind'n that axe man!

Man, I just saw that comparison shot and that's complete laziness. I can't believe how bad it looks opposed to the 360 version. We have Assassins Creed and COD4 doing fine for PS3 and then Lost Planet looks borderline Xbox 1 on PS3? That's ridiculous.

Though I could care less about the game coming to PS3, theres no excuse for it looking that bad. I refuse to hear that the PS3 is inferior with all of it's great looking games we've seen for it already.

Yawn.

Another subpar PS3 bashing thread by the guy with the RIP PS3 avatar.

The last time I checked this game isn't out yet. When it the release date exactly. You can never compare a finished game to one that is still in development. Doing so makes you look stupid. Kotaku is the most sensationalist site ever. Its like the World Weekly News for videogames. Everything they do is for site hits. Quit feeding the troll.

4D_RROD_GC1_5

So let me get this straight. Its ok to praise screenshots that are considered good (Lair, R@C, KZ2) as revolutionary and that particular game will pwn. But when the SS's look like **** its "Teh trolls are teh bashz0rs, its teh bash tread 4 j0o or the game is not released yet!!" Why does that not apply to the ss's that look good/nice Chuck? Bias? Oh the irony from the cows and Sony fanboys.... :shock:

Buh buh teh second-gen 360 title versuz 1st gen PS3:cry:

Guess that isnt an excuse anymore, considering they got a whole year EXTRA just to port without the worries of developing the game to make it for PS3 '3nd gen':lol:

WuTangG

I agree with your logic. Unfourtunately, YOUR logic just owned you. Any particular reason why PS3 Oblivion (which had an extra year of dev time btw) didnt score = to or higher than the 360 version. Can you answer that for me Chuck? Let me guess, bu bu bu teh PS3 version is teh best!! :shock:

[QUOTE="FonkeyMunky7"][QUOTE="Apathetic-Irony"][QUOTE="btnheazy03"]

:lol:

BUT BUT TEH CELL CAN REVERSE TIEM

- Krazy Ken

Polaris_choice

PS3 version is superior. Notice the explosion and novelty red lights in the PS3 pic? You phail!

"Better to remain silent and be presumed an idiot, rather than to speak and remove all doubt."

I would take your own advice right now if I were you.

Edit: Wait, was this a joke post? Just noticed it didn't really make sense with some of your other posts.

And you should take your own advice as well. Go look up the other PS3 shots and they look about as good as the 360 version already even better in some ways. I wouldnt use a forum post from Kotaku as a reliable source. Regardless the game isnt out yet and and considering DMC4 according to Gamespot looks slighly better on PS3 a game that looks much better then Lost Planet dont be surprised if the PS3 version looks superior.

Funny, I heard the 360 version was superior graphically, yet the PS3's controller better suited the game.

[QUOTE="Polaris_choice"][QUOTE="FonkeyMunky7"][QUOTE="Apathetic-Irony"][QUOTE="btnheazy03"]

:lol:

BUT BUT TEH CELL CAN REVERSE TIEM

- Krazy Ken

Apathetic-Irony

PS3 version is superior. Notice the explosion and novelty red lights in the PS3 pic? You phail!

"Better to remain silent and be presumed an idiot, rather than to speak and remove all doubt."

I would take your own advice right now if I were you.

Edit: Wait, was this a joke post? Just noticed it didn't really make sense with some of your other posts.

And you should take your own advice as well. Go look up the other PS3 shots and they look about as good as the 360 version already even better in some ways. I wouldnt use a forum post from Kotaku as a reliable source. Regardless the game isnt out yet and and considering DMC4 according to Gamespot looks slighly better on PS3 a game that looks much better then Lost Planet dont be surprised if the PS3 version looks superior.

Funny, I heard the 360 version was superior graphically, yet the PS3's controller better suited the game.

Yeah, i heard that also. Not to mention how the RE5-video was recorded from the 360.

Lazy port, and the 360 always loses out in multiplats compared to PC.Slurms_M

doesnt every console always loose to the PC when it comes to multiplats?