Another Too Human review

  • 54 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for SiKh22
SiKh22

4661

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 SiKh22
Member since 2006 • 4661 Posts

http://n4g.com/xbox360/News-185489.aspx

ouch.. :shock:

Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29845

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29845 Posts

http://n4g.com/xbox360/News-185489.aspx

ouch.. :shock:

SiKh22

meh...that still doesn't bother me...7.9 is about what i expected, and is still considered a good score in my opinion.

Avatar image for pro-nathan-07
pro-nathan-07

1591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 pro-nathan-07
Member since 2007 • 1591 Posts
reviews are meeting the hype A-AA
Avatar image for chikenfriedrice
chikenfriedrice

13561

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 chikenfriedrice
Member since 2006 • 13561 Posts
7.9 is not ouch......6 or below is ouch
Avatar image for ToScA-
ToScA-

5783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 ToScA-
Member since 2006 • 5783 Posts
What do you mean ouch? That's actually quite decent keeping in mind that this is clearly a love it or hate it game.
Avatar image for PC360Wii
PC360Wii

4658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 PC360Wii
Member since 2007 • 4658 Posts
Heh, I might bump Blitzkid's "Diablo III should be worried about Too Human" Thread :lol:
Avatar image for bobbetybob
bobbetybob

19370

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#8 bobbetybob
Member since 2005 • 19370 Posts

reviews are meeting the hype A-AApro-nathan-07

One review you mean, the other 2 gave it 6.75 and a 4.5-5 (have we figured out 1up's scale yet?)

Avatar image for agentfred
agentfred

5666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 agentfred
Member since 2003 • 5666 Posts

They have it a 7.9 out of 10. If you had a 79% of beating cancer, you'd be in your glory. I don't understand why anyon e would write "ouch" for something that is 79% good.

farrell2k

Unfortunately for cancer patients, cancer survival rates and videogame scores are not based on the same scale.

Generally game scores range from 7-10, with only the absolute worst games ever being below that. With that in mind, a 7.9 is certainly not "great" score, rather it is on the lower end of the spectrum.

Of course, personal enjoyment cannot be reflected by a review score, so this has little impact on the people who have already, or will enjoy Too Human. I just thought I'd point out that the review scores thus far have not been great by any stretch of the imgination.

Avatar image for PBSnipes
PBSnipes

14621

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 PBSnipes
Member since 2007 • 14621 Posts

"The face buttons never come into play unless to evade by either jumping or rolling away from danger."

Sigh...

Avatar image for SiKh22
SiKh22

4661

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 SiKh22
Member since 2006 • 4661 Posts

They have it a 7.9 out of 10. If you had a 79% of beating cancer, you'd be in your glory. I don't understand why anyon e would write "ouch" for something that is 79% good.

There are plenty of people who enjoyed Lair, Tenchuz, superman returns, star trek legack, and most others thatr were not scored well. Do yourselves a favor by not paying much attention to "professional" reviewers.

farrell2k

dude this is not about cancer, you can't compare a game to cancer. I worry about the comparsion people use sometimes. 8.5 would have been good, but 7.9 is not to good for a game. Keep medical things out. my god.

Avatar image for EVOLV3
EVOLV3

12210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 EVOLV3
Member since 2008 • 12210 Posts
reviews are meeting the hype A-AApro-nathan-07


Guess you didnt see the 1up review...
Avatar image for VendettaRed07
VendettaRed07

14012

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#13 VendettaRed07
Member since 2007 • 14012 Posts

7.9 is not ouch......6 or below is ouchchikenfriedrice

yeah its more of an...... oh... i see

Avatar image for PBSnipes
PBSnipes

14621

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 PBSnipes
Member since 2007 • 14621 Posts

dude this is not about cancer, you can't compare a game to cancer. I worry about the comparsion people use sometimes. 8.5 would have been good, but 7.9 is not to good for a game. Keep medical things out. my god.

SiKh22
1/100th away from "meeting the hype" isn't good for a game? :?
Avatar image for cosmostein77
cosmostein77

7043

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 102

User Lists: 0

#15 cosmostein77
Member since 2004 • 7043 Posts

7.9 is ok,

A lot better then some of the others.

Avatar image for st1ka
st1ka

8179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 st1ka
Member since 2008 • 8179 Posts

7.9 is ok,

A lot better then some of the others.

cosmostein77

worse then some of the others as well

Avatar image for angelkimne
angelkimne

14037

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 angelkimne
Member since 2006 • 14037 Posts
Ouch ???
Avatar image for teuf_
Teuf_

30805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Teuf_
Member since 2004 • 30805 Posts
What do you mean ouch? That's actually quite decent keeping in mind that this is clearly a love it or hate it game.ToScA-


When just about every high-profie game receives a score in the 7-10 range, it's easy for a 7.9 to seem more like 3/10.

(I'm not saying this game is a 3/10, just trying to explain why many people whould consider such a score to be disappointing)
Avatar image for FirstDiscovery
FirstDiscovery

5508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 FirstDiscovery
Member since 2008 • 5508 Posts
A 7.9 is good, nearly AA, i think even Lemmings will be happy with a 7
Avatar image for deactivated-5b19214ec908b
deactivated-5b19214ec908b

25072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#20 deactivated-5b19214ec908b
Member since 2007 • 25072 Posts
7.9 is bad?:?
Avatar image for DJCUEBALL
DJCUEBALL

2562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 DJCUEBALL
Member since 2008 • 2562 Posts
As soon as I played the demo, I knew it was going to suck... and it does.
Avatar image for shadowlusterx
shadowlusterx

295

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#22 shadowlusterx
Member since 2008 • 295 Posts

7-8: Good if you enjoy these types of games.

8-9: Mostly good to everyone but still has some flaws any annoys people that don't really like htese types of games.

9-10: Good for everyone. Period. These games are perfect.

That's how I view game reviews and it works pretty well. I always end up getting games I at least moderately like. :)

So this is an OK game in my opinion. Nowhere near what the hype suggested.

Avatar image for Funkyhamster
Funkyhamster

17366

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 Funkyhamster
Member since 2005 • 17366 Posts

They have it a 7.9 out of 10. If you had a 79% of beating cancer, you'd be in your glory. I don't understand why anyon e would write "ouch" for something that is 79% good.

farrell2k

Videogame scores =/= chance of surviving cancer.

That being said, 7.9 isn't that bad at all. It's not great, but it's not horrible either.

Avatar image for Furbyballistik
Furbyballistik

2056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#25 Furbyballistik
Member since 2005 • 2056 Posts
i find it hilarious that you lemmings are now saying that a 7.9 isnt a bad score! if you now believe that, then why did you say the PS3s good ranked games were garbage? bcuz your all hypocrites
Avatar image for vashkey
vashkey

33781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 135

User Lists: 25

#27 vashkey
Member since 2005 • 33781 Posts

Not bad.

I still don't understand why people treat high seens and things in the eight range as bad score. People must be missing out on some really good games.

Avatar image for edo-tensei
edo-tensei

4581

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 edo-tensei
Member since 2007 • 4581 Posts

7.9 is not ouch......6 or below is ouchchikenfriedrice

right :roll:

Avatar image for TheRealMC01
TheRealMC01

995

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 TheRealMC01
Member since 2007 • 995 Posts
Ouch.... like lemmings were hyping this game to be any better than that :roll:
Avatar image for Dreams-Visions
Dreams-Visions

26578

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Dreams-Visions
Member since 2006 • 26578 Posts

7.9 is not ouch......6 or below is ouchchikenfriedrice

Agreed.

reviews are meeting the hype A-AApro-nathan-07
Agreed.

They have it a 7.9 out of 10. If you had a 79% of beating cancer, you'd be in your glory. I don't understand why anyon e would write "ouch" for something that is 79% good.

There are plenty of people who enjoyed Lair, Tenchuz, superman returns, star trek legack, and most others thatr were not scored well. Do yourselves a favor by not paying much attention to "professional" reviewers.

farrell2k

perhaps he was under the false imperssion that people were hyping this game better than 7.5-8.5.

They were not.

Avatar image for vashkey
vashkey

33781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 135

User Lists: 25

#31 vashkey
Member since 2005 • 33781 Posts

Ouch.... like lemmings were hyping this game to be any better than that :roll:TheRealMC01

Yeah, I saw more negetive topics about this game than positive.

It's not like 360 owners were relying on this game as heavily as PS3 fans were relying on Haze and Lair, nor did it score near as bad.

Avatar image for edo-tensei
edo-tensei

4581

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 edo-tensei
Member since 2007 • 4581 Posts

[QUOTE="TheRealMC01"]Ouch.... like lemmings were hyping this game to be any better than that :roll:vashkey

Yeah, I saw more negetive topics about this game than positive.

It's not like 360 owners were relying on this game as heavily as PS3 fans were relying on Haze and Lair, nor did it score near as bad.

sure keep telling yourself that

Avatar image for johnnyblazed88
johnnyblazed88

4240

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 johnnyblazed88
Member since 2008 • 4240 Posts

http://n4g.com/xbox360/News-185489.aspx

ouch.. :shock:

SiKh22

7.9 does isnt too bad

Avatar image for loco145
loco145

12226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 loco145
Member since 2006 • 12226 Posts
[QUOTE="SiKh22"]

http://n4g.com/xbox360/News-185489.aspx

ouch.. :shock:

johnnyblazed88

7.9 does isnt too bad

It is depending the site. In GS a 7.5 is good. But other sites give 8+ to anything that isn't fundamentally broken.

Avatar image for vashkey
vashkey

33781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 135

User Lists: 25

#35 vashkey
Member since 2005 • 33781 Posts
[QUOTE="vashkey"]

[QUOTE="TheRealMC01"]Ouch.... like lemmings were hyping this game to be any better than that :roll:edo-tensei

Yeah, I saw more negetive topics about this game than positive.

It's not like 360 owners were relying on this game as heavily as PS3 fans were relying on Haze and Lair, nor did it score near as bad.

sure keep telling yourself that

What are you talking about? I didn't even care about the game until the demo came out. And after the demo I only expected score of around 8. I might get the game after reading the reviews, although it's not high on my priority list.


Face it, the cows are desperate to find the 360's Lair, which will never happen.

Avatar image for Kez1984
Kez1984

4548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#36 Kez1984
Member since 2007 • 4548 Posts

http://kotaku.com/5038265/dyack-canadian-towns-future-riding-on-too-human

Oh Dear.

Avatar image for Locke562
Locke562

7673

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Locke562
Member since 2004 • 7673 Posts

Heh, I might bump Blitzkid's "Diablo III should be worried about Too Human" Thread :lol:PC360Wii

Do it! :D

Avatar image for ReverseCycology
ReverseCycology

9717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 ReverseCycology
Member since 2006 • 9717 Posts

Too Human kinda turned me off after seeing those Norwegian expedition or whatever in the game videos. Also I would've like it better if it was a button masher, I didn't really like the combat controls. Even if Too Human get good scores, I still won't purchase this $60 game. However I'll give it a rent.

Also I wouldn't be surprise if another person calls Too Human a "system savior" again. You can't be series.

Avatar image for edo-tensei
edo-tensei

4581

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 edo-tensei
Member since 2007 • 4581 Posts
[QUOTE="edo-tensei"][QUOTE="vashkey"]

[QUOTE="TheRealMC01"]Ouch.... like lemmings were hyping this game to be any better than that :roll:vashkey

Yeah, I saw more negetive topics about this game than positive.

It's not like 360 owners were relying on this game as heavily as PS3 fans were relying on Haze and Lair, nor did it score near as bad.

sure keep telling yourself that

What are you talking about? I didn't even care about the game until the demo came out. And after the demo I only expected score of around 8. I might get the game after reading the reviews, although it's not high on my priority list.


Face it, the cows are desperate to find the 360's Lair, which will never happen.

you does not equall the lemming community, oh and I'm not a cow I'm a manticore

Avatar image for Saturos3091
Saturos3091

14937

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#40 Saturos3091
Member since 2005 • 14937 Posts

http://n4g.com/xbox360/News-185489.aspx

ouch.. :shock:

SiKh22


Is that a bad score or something? :?

I won't be picking it up because I couldn't enjoy the demo and was expecting a more DMC or NG-esque action-RPG.
Avatar image for AtrumRegina
AtrumRegina

1584

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 AtrumRegina
Member since 2008 • 1584 Posts

7.9 is almost AA . It would be AA on gamespot then.

If anything the game gets very very different reviews ...

Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#42 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts
i don't give a stuff, i liked the demo and i'm buying the game
Avatar image for vashkey
vashkey

33781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 135

User Lists: 25

#43 vashkey
Member since 2005 • 33781 Posts
[QUOTE="vashkey"][QUOTE="edo-tensei"][QUOTE="vashkey"]

[QUOTE="TheRealMC01"]Ouch.... like lemmings were hyping this game to be any better than that :roll:edo-tensei

Yeah, I saw more negetive topics about this game than positive.

It's not like 360 owners were relying on this game as heavily as PS3 fans were relying on Haze and Lair, nor did it score near as bad.

sure keep telling yourself that

What are you talking about? I didn't even care about the game until the demo came out. And after the demo I only expected score of around 8. I might get the game after reading the reviews, although it's not high on my priority list.


Face it, the cows are desperate to find the 360's Lair, which will never happen.

you does not equall the lemming community, oh and I'm not a cow I'm a manticore

Like I said in an earlier post, there have been more negetive topic on the game than postivie leading up to release.

Avatar image for Cicatraz_ESP
Cicatraz_ESP

1993

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 Cicatraz_ESP
Member since 2006 • 1993 Posts
[QUOTE="farrell2k"]

They have it a 7.9 out of 10. If you had a 79% of beating cancer, you'd be in your glory. I don't understand why anyon e would write "ouch" for something that is 79% good.

There are plenty of people who enjoyed Lair, Tenchuz, superman returns, star trek legack, and most others thatr were not scored well. Do yourselves a favor by not paying much attention to "professional" reviewers.

SiKh22

dude this is not about cancer, you can't compare a game to cancer. I worry about the comparsion people use sometimes. 8.5 would have been good, but 7.9 is not to good for a game. Keep medical things out. my god.

how is 7.9 no bueno?

Avatar image for BioShockOwnz
BioShockOwnz

52901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#45 BioShockOwnz
Member since 2006 • 52901 Posts
7.9? Where's the "ouch"?
Avatar image for SiKh22
SiKh22

4661

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 SiKh22
Member since 2006 • 4661 Posts
no, the ouch, i was scratching my butt while posting this. the :shock: cause it felt good. lol just kidding, and as for the cancer comparing guy, give it up. its not the same, good or bad. its sad to even compare cancer to a game, even if a 7.9 is good for cancer and a game. pathetic.
Avatar image for Oni_Ookami
Oni_Ookami

2765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#47 Oni_Ookami
Member since 2005 • 2765 Posts

As Yhatzee would say, Too Human is: Average, Boaring, Bland, Run of the Mill, Drab, Nothing Special.

7.9 isnt bad but its not good either. Im a big fan of these types of games but sadly the 360 hasnt got a decent one yet.

Avatar image for ironcreed
ironcreed

14195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 46

User Lists: 0

#48 ironcreed
Member since 2005 • 14195 Posts

"The face buttons never come into play unless to evade by either jumping or rolling away from danger."

Sigh...

PBSnipes

LOL, indeed. Did they not ever realize they had battle cries or spider skills?:lol:

Avatar image for PC_X360
PC_X360

1074

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 PC_X360
Member since 2008 • 1074 Posts
79 bad? ouch!:roll:
Avatar image for sargentbotk
sargentbotk

4224

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#50 sargentbotk
Member since 2007 • 4224 Posts

http://n4g.com/xbox360/News-185489.aspx

ouch.. :shock:

SiKh22

Ouch? That's close to the hype radar...

Good review for it. Keep em coming :D