http://n4g.com/xbox360/News-185489.aspx
ouch.. :shock:
This topic is locked from further discussion.
reviews are meeting the hype A-AApro-nathan-07
One review you mean, the other 2 gave it 6.75 and a 4.5-5 (have we figured out 1up's scale yet?)
They have it a 7.9 out of 10. If you had a 79% of beating cancer, you'd be in your glory. I don't understand why anyon e would write "ouch" for something that is 79% good.
farrell2k
Unfortunately for cancer patients, cancer survival rates and videogame scores are not based on the same scale.
Generally game scores range from 7-10, with only the absolute worst games ever being below that. With that in mind, a 7.9 is certainly not "great" score, rather it is on the lower end of the spectrum.
Of course, personal enjoyment cannot be reflected by a review score, so this has little impact on the people who have already, or will enjoy Too Human. I just thought I'd point out that the review scores thus far have not been great by any stretch of the imgination.
They have it a 7.9 out of 10. If you had a 79% of beating cancer, you'd be in your glory. I don't understand why anyon e would write "ouch" for something that is 79% good.
There are plenty of people who enjoyed Lair, Tenchuz, superman returns, star trek legack, and most others thatr were not scored well. Do yourselves a favor by not paying much attention to "professional" reviewers.
farrell2k
dude this is not about cancer, you can't compare a game to cancer. I worry about the comparsion people use sometimes. 8.5 would have been good, but 7.9 is not to good for a game. Keep medical things out. my god.
1/100th away from "meeting the hype" isn't good for a game? :?dude this is not about cancer, you can't compare a game to cancer. I worry about the comparsion people use sometimes. 8.5 would have been good, but 7.9 is not to good for a game. Keep medical things out. my god.
SiKh22
What do you mean ouch? That's actually quite decent keeping in mind that this is clearly a love it or hate it game.ToScA-
7-8: Good if you enjoy these types of games.
8-9: Mostly good to everyone but still has some flaws any annoys people that don't really like htese types of games.
9-10: Good for everyone. Period. These games are perfect.
That's how I view game reviews and it works pretty well. I always end up getting games I at least moderately like. :)
So this is an OK game in my opinion. Nowhere near what the hype suggested.
They have it a 7.9 out of 10. If you had a 79% of beating cancer, you'd be in your glory. I don't understand why anyon e would write "ouch" for something that is 79% good.
farrell2k
Videogame scores =/= chance of surviving cancer.
That being said, 7.9 isn't that bad at all. It's not great, but it's not horrible either.
7.9 is not ouch......6 or below is ouchchikenfriedrice
Agreed.
reviews are meeting the hype A-AApro-nathan-07Agreed.
perhaps he was under the false imperssion that people were hyping this game better than 7.5-8.5.They have it a 7.9 out of 10. If you had a 79% of beating cancer, you'd be in your glory. I don't understand why anyon e would write "ouch" for something that is 79% good.
There are plenty of people who enjoyed Lair, Tenchuz, superman returns, star trek legack, and most others thatr were not scored well. Do yourselves a favor by not paying much attention to "professional" reviewers.
farrell2k
They were not.
Ouch.... like lemmings were hyping this game to be any better than that :roll:TheRealMC01
Yeah, I saw more negetive topics about this game than positive.
It's not like 360 owners were relying on this game as heavily as PS3 fans were relying on Haze and Lair, nor did it score near as bad.
[QUOTE="TheRealMC01"]Ouch.... like lemmings were hyping this game to be any better than that :roll:vashkey
Yeah, I saw more negetive topics about this game than positive.
It's not like 360 owners were relying on this game as heavily as PS3 fans were relying on Haze and Lair, nor did it score near as bad.
sure keep telling yourself that
[QUOTE="vashkey"][QUOTE="TheRealMC01"]Ouch.... like lemmings were hyping this game to be any better than that :roll:edo-tensei
Yeah, I saw more negetive topics about this game than positive.
It's not like 360 owners were relying on this game as heavily as PS3 fans were relying on Haze and Lair, nor did it score near as bad.
sure keep telling yourself that
What are you talking about? I didn't even care about the game until the demo came out. And after the demo I only expected score of around 8. I might get the game after reading the reviews, although it's not high on my priority list.
Face it, the cows are desperate to find the 360's Lair, which will never happen.
Too Human kinda turned me off after seeing those Norwegian expedition or whatever in the game videos. Also I would've like it better if it was a button masher, I didn't really like the combat controls. Even if Too Human get good scores, I still won't purchase this $60 game. However I'll give it a rent.
Also I wouldn't be surprise if another person calls Too Human a "system savior" again. You can't be series.
[QUOTE="edo-tensei"][QUOTE="vashkey"][QUOTE="TheRealMC01"]Ouch.... like lemmings were hyping this game to be any better than that :roll:vashkey
Yeah, I saw more negetive topics about this game than positive.
It's not like 360 owners were relying on this game as heavily as PS3 fans were relying on Haze and Lair, nor did it score near as bad.
sure keep telling yourself that
What are you talking about? I didn't even care about the game until the demo came out. And after the demo I only expected score of around 8. I might get the game after reading the reviews, although it's not high on my priority list.
Face it, the cows are desperate to find the 360's Lair, which will never happen.
you does not equall the lemming community, oh and I'm not a cow I'm a manticore
http://n4g.com/xbox360/News-185489.aspx
ouch.. :shock:
SiKh22
7.9 is almost AA . It would be AA on gamespot then.
If anything the game gets very very different reviews ...
[QUOTE="vashkey"][QUOTE="edo-tensei"][QUOTE="vashkey"][QUOTE="TheRealMC01"]Ouch.... like lemmings were hyping this game to be any better than that :roll:edo-tensei
Yeah, I saw more negetive topics about this game than positive.
It's not like 360 owners were relying on this game as heavily as PS3 fans were relying on Haze and Lair, nor did it score near as bad.
sure keep telling yourself that
What are you talking about? I didn't even care about the game until the demo came out. And after the demo I only expected score of around 8. I might get the game after reading the reviews, although it's not high on my priority list.
Face it, the cows are desperate to find the 360's Lair, which will never happen.
you does not equall the lemming community, oh and I'm not a cow I'm a manticore
Like I said in an earlier post, there have been more negetive topic on the game than postivie leading up to release.
[QUOTE="farrell2k"]They have it a 7.9 out of 10. If you had a 79% of beating cancer, you'd be in your glory. I don't understand why anyon e would write "ouch" for something that is 79% good.
There are plenty of people who enjoyed Lair, Tenchuz, superman returns, star trek legack, and most others thatr were not scored well. Do yourselves a favor by not paying much attention to "professional" reviewers.
SiKh22
dude this is not about cancer, you can't compare a game to cancer. I worry about the comparsion people use sometimes. 8.5 would have been good, but 7.9 is not to good for a game. Keep medical things out. my god.
how is 7.9 no bueno?
As Yhatzee would say, Too Human is: Average, Boaring, Bland, Run of the Mill, Drab, Nothing Special.
7.9 isnt bad but its not good either. Im a big fan of these types of games but sadly the 360 hasnt got a decent one yet.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment