Anyone else agree with me on Killzone?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for O_Lineman17
O_Lineman17

1128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 O_Lineman17
Member since 2005 • 1128 Posts

I think the graphics looked amazing for the game(I know most people are going to agree with me on this). I went in ready to be a bit nit-picky, but, to tell you the truth, I thought it looked just simply amazing. There were a few things that bugged me, like the ships going down, and the "flames" comming from them as they fell...those looked...ehhhh, not so good. Otherwise, graphically, the game looks amazing. But I'm iffy on the gameplay. This where I want to know if people agree. It looked lackluster, I liked a lot of the animations, but it really didn't look like it was bringing anything new. I'm being completely honest, it didn't look like anything new was being added to this game gameplay wise. I was dissapointed on that part. Overall, I thought the game looks like it's comming along nicely, I'd like to see some more gameplay though, because I really hope they do something more than what they've shown....

Avatar image for darthogre
darthogre

5082

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 darthogre
Member since 2006 • 5082 Posts

I honestly think the gameplay will be explained later, this first trailer looked like they wanted to prove that graphically they were able to almost duplicate the target render they had two years ago. They came VERY close, I mean I never thought they would have animations.

Did you also notice that there seemed to be a destructible environment. That is something new in gameplay as far as I'm concerned, if that is what they are going to have. Either way this looked way more impressive than Halo3, that's for sure.

Avatar image for piemister
piemister

604

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#3 piemister
Member since 2006 • 604 Posts
yea that is exactly what I'm thinking. I'm hoping they will sort the lack of anything new. well see.
Avatar image for Killer2401
Killer2401

3431

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 Killer2401
Member since 2006 • 3431 Posts

I honestly think the gameplay will be explained later, this first trailer looked like they wanted to prove that graphically they were able to almost duplicate the target render they had two years ago. They came VERY close, I mean I never thought they would have animations.

Did you also notice that there seemed to be a destructible environment. That is something new in gameplay as far as I'm concerned, if that is what they are going to have. Either way this looked way more impressive than Halo3, that's for sure.

darthogre

Don't compare Halo to KZ, their entirely different.

Avatar image for rocklegacy2
rocklegacy2

8428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#5 rocklegacy2
Member since 2005 • 8428 Posts
[QUOTE="darthogre"]

I honestly think the gameplay will be explained later, this first trailer looked like they wanted to prove that graphically they were able to almost duplicate the target render they had two years ago. They came VERY close, I mean I never thought they would have animations.

Did you also notice that there seemed to be a destructible environment. That is something new in gameplay as far as I'm concerned, if that is what they are going to have. Either way this looked way more impressive than Halo3, that's for sure.

Killer2401

Don't compare Halo to KZ, their entirely different.

Not really...

Avatar image for darthogre
darthogre

5082

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 darthogre
Member since 2006 • 5082 Posts
[QUOTE="darthogre"]

I honestly think the gameplay will be explained later, this first trailer looked like they wanted to prove that graphically they were able to almost duplicate the target render they had two years ago. They came VERY close, I mean I never thought they would have animations.

Did you also notice that there seemed to be a destructible environment. That is something new in gameplay as far as I'm concerned, if that is what they are going to have. Either way this looked way more impressive than Halo3, that's for sure.

Killer2401

Don't compare Halo to KZ, their entirely different.

Why, every Lem and Cow compare them......they are both FPS. What do you want me to compare KZ2 with, an RPG?

Avatar image for coakroach
coakroach

1356

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#7 coakroach
Member since 2005 • 1356 Posts

I think the graphics looked amazing for the game(I know most people are going to agree with me on this). I went in ready to be a bit nit-picky, but, to tell you the truth, I thought it looked just simply amazing. There were a few things that bugged me, like the ships going down, and the "flames" comming from them as they fell...those looked...ehhhh, not so good. Otherwise, graphically, the game looks amazing. But I'm iffy on the gameplay. This where I want to know if people agree. It looked lackluster, I liked a lot of the animations, but it really didn't look like it was bringing anything new. I'm being completely honest, it didn't look like anything new was being added to this game gameplay wise. I was dissapointed on that part. Overall, I thought the game looks like it's comming along nicely, I'd like to see some more gameplay though, because I really hope they do something more than what they've shown....

O_Lineman17

I agree

Avatar image for def_mode
def_mode

4237

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 def_mode
Member since 2005 • 4237 Posts
the first trailer was good and i think this new one is better. im no ps3/sony fanboy, that was just good.