Anyone else prefers UC2 graphics over crysis

9600GSOdeniiiii21

[QUOTE="deniiiii21"]9600GSOdont-read-this

Crysis. And I don't get the "art style" argument for UC2, I'd say both games are equally (generally) uninspired on that front.

The problem for me is the low res of UC2 on a big screen. You can add all of the detail you like but when it has to be upscaled you lose that and it looks..meh!

Great looking game on a smaller screen but if you are used to 1080p anything below that looks frankly quite poor (Including Halo 3, MGS4, KZ2, Forza etc). Not trying to be funny but its like the upgrade from a PS2 to a PS3, very very noticable.

another thread like this? my two cents:

1. UC2 is a fantastic game. i'm on the train sequence right now, and all i can say is wow. I love the tongue in cheek humor, the vibrant color, and, IMO, very tight control and gameplay.

2. UC2 is a very, very pretty game. One of the best on consoles for sure.

however:

1. UC2 is very, very linear. its also built around some fantastic setpieces. i admire what ND was able to squeeze out of the PS3, but this makes it easier to pretty up the graphics when not working in such an open space.

2. Crysis wins in technical graphics, hands down.

now, someone can have the opinion that the graphics are better on UC2, but i think that's more of a homage to art direction than graphics.

I like better how Muramassa looks over both.loco145

UC 2 looks phenomal, a benchmark for consoles.

But when I played Crysis, it was like looking in a mirror. It was just so damn gorgeous!