I do, then it went to .5 and no whole numbers.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
I like the original scoring system as well games like Metroid prime and Halo getting a 9.7 or Perfect dark getting a 9.9 those were epic scores.
PLEASE GAME SPOT BACK ON 0.5 type like 8 8.5 9 9.5
and i remmember old times GS was score BASED on : GRAPHIC, GAMEPLAY, STORY instead of value. SOUND
I think STORY WAS VERY BETTER THAN VALUE BACK TO THAT GS
I prefer the 0.5 increments system. What happens with the current scoring system is you get a game like Journey which scores 10, clearly it is something between 9 to 10 but this integer system is essentially placing it in the same league as The Witcher 3 and to that I say BULLSHIT. Then you have games like Rise of the Tomb Raider which is clearly inferior to something like Bloodborne yet they both get 9. A true 0.5 increment system would place RotTR at an 8.5 instead.
@GhostHawk196:
how do you even know that when reviews are opinions? How do you know that 2 completely different reviewers will both think that Journey doesn't deserves a 10 as much as The Witcher? How is Tomb Raider inferior to Bloodborne? Maybe to you it is but that's in no way a fact, it's only your opinion.
Remember when they reviewed individual aspects within the reviews? (Graphic, Story, Value, Gameplay and Audio)
It wasn't story, it was "reviewer's tilt".
You guys, this thread is 11 months old.
The discussion about the black dicks made me look at the dates.
Oh Sniper...
You guys, this thread is 11 months old.
The discussion about the black dicks made me look at the dates.
Oh Sniper...
LOL I remember that. I was on mobile on that day and I thought my phone had been infected with a virus at first with all those dicks, but then, I relies it was all of Sniper's doing.
i remember , that was better
four factors: Graphic, sound, story and value i think right? i liked that
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment