I doubt it. The best looking 360 game runs terribly online, and KZ2 >>> Gears 2 in visuals. I have no clue how KZ2 looks so amazing on PS3 and is lag free.... and I have a **** internet connection too.
[QUOTE="frankberns"]I doubt it. The best looking 360 game runs terribly online, and KZ2 >>> Gears 2 in visuals. I have no clue how KZ2 looks so amazing on PS3 and is lag free.... and I have a **** internet connection too. TRUE, the online is terrible on gears
[QUOTE="frankberns"]I doubt it. The best looking 360 game runs terribly online, and KZ2 >>> Gears 2 in visuals. I have no clue how KZ2 looks so amazing on PS3 and is lag free.... and I have a **** internet connection too.StealthKnife
TRUE, the online is terrible on gears
Which has absolutely nothing to do with the visuals in the game.
[QUOTE="StealthKnife"][QUOTE="frankberns"]I doubt it. The best looking 360 game runs terribly online, and KZ2 >>> Gears 2 in visuals. I have no clue how KZ2 looks so amazing on PS3 and is lag free.... and I have a **** internet connection too.BigJerm1
TRUE, the online is terrible on gears
Which has absolutely nothing to do with the visuals in the game.
I doubt it after 3 a years extra effort by microsofts studios.
grr320
xbox360 can do better, sony/gg worked their ass off just to achieve what they did. they spent alot more time on Halo 3 than killzone 2 and that game looks like crap.
[QUOTE="StealthKnife"] TRUE, the online is terrible on gears Panther501
Which has absolutely nothing to do with the visuals in the game.
ever heard of graphics lag?
Yes, I've heard of graphics lag, but 90% of the performance issues in Gears 2 online occur before you even get into a match(IF you're able to get into one). On those occasions that I've gotten into games, it's run without a hitch. So, no, it doesn't have anything to do with the graphics in this case.
I doubt it after 3 a years extra effort by microsofts studios.
Ghosters67
xbox360 can do better, sony/gg worked their ass off just to achieve what they did. they spent alot more time on Halo 3 than killzone 2 and that game looks like crap.Actually Halo 3 was developed for less than three years (3), where Killzone was developed for over four years (4). And yet Halo 3 is a much better package overall.
I doubt it after 3 a years extra effort by microsofts studios.
Ghosters67
xbox360 can do better, sony/gg worked their ass off just to achieve what they did.Oh yeah. The almighty Godbox 360 wouldn't need nearly as much effort put in to make a game as good-looking as KZ2. :roll:
Considering both consoles are about equal in power (according to most devs) I would have to say YES. Some things might be a little different here and there but I'm sure a 360 version would look almost identical. I don't know why people think the PS3 is so much more powerful then the 360. That's like comparing a Corvette to a Dodge Viper. Both are pretty much on par with each other.
Considering both consoles are about equal in power (according to most devs) I would have to say YES. Some things might be a little different hear and there but I'm sure a 360 version would look almost identical. I don't know why people think the PS3 is so much more powerful then the 360. That's like comparing a Corvette to a Dodge Viper. Both are pretty much on par with each other.karasill
Because they have nothing better to do, and the idiotic reign supreme in SW.
I doubt it after 3 a years extra effort by microsofts studios.
Ghosters67
xbox360 can do better, sony/gg worked their ass off just to achieve what they did. they spent alot more time on Halo 3 than killzone 2 and that game looks like crap. Sure they did that's why halo 3 uses the halo 2 engine. and killzone2 uses engine built ground up for ps3.
[QUOTE="Ghosters67"][QUOTE="grr320"] xbox360 can do better, sony/gg worked their ass off just to achieve what they did.Avian005
they spent alot more time on Halo 3 than killzone 2 and that game looks like crap.Actually Halo 3 was developed for less than three years (3), where Killzone was developed for over four years (4). And yet Halo 3 is a much better package overall. halo 3 being a better package is a matter of opinion this topic is about the 360 pulling off a killzone 2 which cannot be done, believe me I been playing that game on and off this whole week and the graphics have to be seen to believed there's no way xbox can create even the first level of killzone 2.
Yes, I think it could. Just like Gears 1 and 2 could have easily been pulled off on the PS3 despite fanboy assertions.
But it's all pointless to argue because Killzone 2 won't be on 360 and the Gears games won't be on PS3 (for obvious reasons.) So...why bother arguing something that had zero chance of happening anyway? Just a waste of time.
[QUOTE="Ghosters67"] they spent alot more time on Halo 3 than killzone 2 and that game looks like crap.Ghosters67
Actually Halo 3 was developed for less than three years (3), where Killzone was developed for over four years (4). And yet Halo 3 is a much better package overall. halo 3 being a better package is a matter of opinion this topic is about the 360 pulling off a killzone 2 which cannot be done, believe me I been playing that game on and off this whole week and the graphics have to be seen to believed there's no way xbox can create even the first level of killzone 2. xbox360 can run killzone2 no problems if killzone2 was made for xbox360 game would of looked better.
[QUOTE="Ghosters67"] they spent alot more time on Halo 3 than killzone 2 and that game looks like crap.Ghosters67
Actually Halo 3 was developed for less than three years (3), where Killzone was developed for over four years (4). And yet Halo 3 is a much better package overall. halo 3 being a better package is a matter of opinion this topic is about the 360 pulling off a killzone 2 which cannot be done, believe me I been playing that game on and off this whole week and the graphics have to be seen to believed there's no way xbox can create even the first level of killzone 2.
Hilarious. Keep deluding yourself. Teh Killzone iz teh greatest!!!!!
I'll give it to you, the graphics are good. It's the most graphically stunning generic shooter to come along in years.
[QUOTE="Ghosters67"] they spent alot more time on Halo 3 than killzone 2 and that game looks like crap.Ghosters67
Actually Halo 3 was developed for less than three years (3), where Killzone was developed for over four years (4). And yet Halo 3 is a much better package overall. halo 3 being a better package is a matter of opinion this topic is about the 360 pulling off a killzone 2 which cannot be done, believe me I been playing that game on and off this whole week and the graphics have to be seen to believed there's no way xbox can create even the first level of killzone 2.Even considering the fact most devs have stated the Xbox 360 an PS3 are both equal in power? Get some facts in here.
[QUOTE="Ghosters67"] they spent alot more time on Halo 3 than killzone 2 and that game looks like crap.Ghosters67
Actually Halo 3 was developed for less than three years (3), where Killzone was developed for over four years (4). And yet Halo 3 is a much better package overall. halo 3 being a better package is a matter of opinion this topic is about the 360 pulling off a killzone 2 which cannot be done, believe me I been playing that game on and off this whole week and the graphics have to be seen to believed there's no way xbox can create even the first level of killzone 2.
Erm and the facts to back up your point? Manye devs see the PS3 and 360 as being equal, and being able to perform almost identically
If halo 3 on xbox360 had a option to disable aim assisting the game would be halfway decent atleast better than it is now, but the gunplay was never great, vehicles are fun though, but i seen halo 3/killzone2 on my friends hdtv the games textures do destroy killzone2s especially when comparing them upclose. killzone2's models win though.
[QUOTE="grr320"]halo 3's textures blow killzone2's away that's for damn sure.Ghosters67
:) heh I have to ask you when you try to convince yourself this how do you stop yourself from giggling or bursting out laughing ? lol if you went on a hunt to find most impressive environmental texture on a level halo 3 would win.
[QUOTE="grr320"]halo 3's textures blow killzone2's away that's for damn sure.Ghosters67
:) heh I have to ask you when you try to convince yourself this how do you stop yourself from giggling or bursting out laughing ?Actually, grr320 speaks facts. Halo 3's textures are a lot better than Killzone 2's, even though Killzone 2 is better looking than Halo 3.
[QUOTE="Toriko42"]Yes, I could see Halo ODST doing it I hopenervmeister
Isn't ODST simply going to use Halo 3's graphics engine? Yes but like I said I hope I hope they change it into a full fledged game, I hope it becomes a full retail title that MS has said they will announce and I hope it has a new engine with new online.
[QUOTE="Ghosters67"][QUOTE="grr320"]halo 3's textures blow killzone2's away that's for damn sure.Avian005
:) heh I have to ask you when you try to convince yourself this how do you stop yourself from giggling or bursting out laughing ?Actually, grr320 speaks facts. Halo 3's textures are a lot better than Killzone 2's, even though Killzone 2 is better looking than Halo 3. No, they aren't. Killzone 2 has a lot of incredible textures, the first level doesn't have the greatest ones, but the rest of the levels do.
Log in to comment