Anyone think their ruining the bioshock franchise

the originalbisoshock to me felt ;like a game that didnt even need a sequel, well they made one, and now theyjust announced a third one butthis one is looking completely different with a city in the sky and wat not, i think the whole bioshock unibverse is justgetting to much done to it but i dunoo, i really think this will just be a AA series when they finally finish screwing aroundwith it. i mean i will still most likely play this but it just feels like they just keep makin this series more than it needs to be(if that makes sensse to hya) . well wat yu guys think, agree? or do u tghink this is the right thing for the franchise?

I liked the first one but I skipped the 2nd game. But I'm really interested in the new one.

nah, i disagree. the new direction they're taking the series in looks amazing.

If it only had 1 game could it even be considered a franchise?

there milking the franchise a bit, but with the huge success of the first it was expected

I really like the direction they are going in, but I don't see where the BIOshock comes into play just yet.

the Second game doesn't look that bad.

Looks great so far. A new change of scene, especially a Steam-Punk theme FPS is unheard of.

It definitely has the same vibe (style/fashion) but this time its in the skies. I imagine the developers will go great lengths to make this game great. Hence, the risk they took to go out side of rapture

I absolutely loved the first bioshock. The second one was pretty good, but this new one looks absolutely amazing. I hope it can match up against the first bioshock.

Bioshock Infinite doesn't have anything to do with the other two games. It just has Bioshock in the name.

I really like the direction they are going in, but I don't see where the BIOshock comes into play just yet.

Sky-

Bioshock 2 was way too similar to the first one. It just didn't have the same impact. For me, Bioshock is a one game series.khoofia_pika

You seem more hung up on the name than the actual content.

I thought Bioshock didn't really need a sequel, but I enjoyed Bioshock 2 a lot. Bioshock Infinite may inject some new life into the series. Sure, it will probably all be familiar but it will most likely include a decent story and the twisted morals of the original.

[QUOTE="khoofia_pika"]Bioshock 2 was way too similar to the first one. It just didn't have the same impact. For me, Bioshock is a one game series.Vinegar_Strokes

i disagree. the original bioshock was much more fun to play IMO.

there milking the franchise a bit, but with the huge success of the first it was expected

linkin_guy109

[QUOTE="Vinegar_Strokes"][QUOTE="khoofia_pika"]Bioshock 2 was way too similar to the first one. It just didn't have the same impact. For me, Bioshock is a one game series.lazerface216

i disagree. the original bioshock was much more fun to play IMO.

If you have only played the first one are you in any position to judge? I wouldn't say they have hurt the franchise at all, they are infact building one (one game with no sequel isn't a franchise).

Honestly? They ruined the series at Bioshock 2. So no, considering its already been done.DeanG642

Well that's what happens when a game sells millions of copies. They make more of them. If it means expanding upon the universe as Bioshock is doing then so be it.

Both so far are great games, so I'm not sure they're ruining the franchise.

[QUOTE="lazerface216"]

[QUOTE="Vinegar_Strokes"] the second was a better game than the first. the first had the better story and the impact. but the second was the better 'game'Vinegar_Strokes

i disagree. the original bioshock was much more fun to play IMO.

Hell yeah. Bioshock 1 was a more memorable experience by seeing Rapture up close for the first time. The return trip as a game played MUCH better. Bio1 had better locations and story but the gameplay was amped up much for the better in two. Loved both whole heartedly. Rapture is my favorite setting this gen.