Apart from MMO and FPS, All Other Genres on PC are DEAD

  • 125 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for jasonharris48
jasonharris48

21441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#101 jasonharris48
Member since 2006 • 21441 Posts

its too much pricey to play on PC....you need upgrade on it every 2 years or 4 years its hardware to play it.....full graphics

Problematic Install Games......if you are guy who doesnt know to install new maps etc..

Lag Issues...

Deadly Virus...

Format issues

majestix1988

You can build a good gaming computer around $300-500 bucks. Also it sounds like you have a hard time attaining and using a computer lol.

Avatar image for GunSmith1_basic
GunSmith1_basic

10548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#102 GunSmith1_basic
Member since 2002 • 10548 Posts
[QUOTE="Mazoch"]

Wierd.. my first post disapeared. My point still stand. Consider that WoW is the largest single game in terms of revenue generated. It's a 'hardcore' PC game, it's highly constumizable... and this one game is most likely generating more revenue than all of the games on the X360. Considering this how can you not consider the PC past of the 'mass market'?

Yes there are mass market games on pc like WoW and the Sims. Almost everybody has a computer because they need one and so there is a massive potential market there for a dev who is willing to aim broadly. It's a thin definition but it's like those aren't "gamers". It's like those people who play a lot of minesweeper, solitare, or flash games on newgrounds or wherever. It's time filler. I've never played WoW, but I understand it is a grind with attainable goals but no sense of real progress, just like the Sims, and just like minesweeper. For games on PC to be mass market, they have to decend to this level, where it is hardly even a game at all
Avatar image for psn8214
psn8214

14930

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#103 psn8214
Member since 2009 • 14930 Posts

Not particularly TC.

Avatar image for Arach666
Arach666

23285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#104 Arach666
Member since 2009 • 23285 Posts

Oh my word,I don´t even know where to start...

...and come to think of it,I won´t even try.

Avatar image for Mazoch
Mazoch

2473

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#105 Mazoch
Member since 2004 • 2473 Posts

[QUOTE="Mazoch"]

Wierd.. my first post disapeared. My point still stand. Consider that WoW is the largest single game in terms of revenue generated. It's a 'hardcore' PC game, it's highly constumizable... and this one game is most likely generating more revenue than all of the games on the X360. Considering this how can you not consider the PC past of the 'mass market'?

GunSmith1_basic

Yes there are mass market games on pc like WoW and the Sims. Almost everybody has a computer because they need one and so there is a massive potential market there for a dev who is willing to aim broadly. It's a thin definition but it's like those aren't "gamers". It's like those people who play a lot of minesweeper, solitare, or flash games on newgrounds or wherever. It's time filler. I've never played WoW, but I understand it is a grind with attainable goals but no sense of real progress, just like the Sims, and just like minesweeper. For games on PC to be mass market, they have to decend to this level, where it is hardly even a game at all

Whoa.. hold on a second here. You're dismissing WoW as a Mass Market game. You're comparing WoW to Minesweeper and Solitaire? You're not a real gamer if you're playing WoW.... And you've never actually played the game? WoW is a helluva lot more complex, involved and 'hardcore' and 95% of the console games out there. Some people dislike the game (I'm not a big fan myself), but to claim that it's not a legitimate game is silly.

It seems you're saying that the PC isent part of the mass market.. except for a few games. However apparently those games are not real PC games... apparently because they are part of the mass market?

Avatar image for psn8214
psn8214

14930

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#106 psn8214
Member since 2009 • 14930 Posts

...and come to think of it,I won´t even try.

Arach666

This is my attitude.

Avatar image for Arach666
Arach666

23285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#107 Arach666
Member since 2009 • 23285 Posts

[QUOTE="Arach666"]

...and come to think of it,I won´t even try.

psn8214

This is my attitude.

Indeed,I´m starting to reckon that it´s the smartest thing to do.
Avatar image for GunSmith1_basic
GunSmith1_basic

10548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#108 GunSmith1_basic
Member since 2002 • 10548 Posts
[QUOTE="Mazoch"]

[QUOTE="GunSmith1_basic"][QUOTE="Mazoch"]

Wierd.. my first post disapeared. My point still stand. Consider that WoW is the largest single game in terms of revenue generated. It's a 'hardcore' PC game, it's highly constumizable... and this one game is most likely generating more revenue than all of the games on the X360. Considering this how can you not consider the PC past of the 'mass market'?

Yes there are mass market games on pc like WoW and the Sims. Almost everybody has a computer because they need one and so there is a massive potential market there for a dev who is willing to aim broadly. It's a thin definition but it's like those aren't "gamers". It's like those people who play a lot of minesweeper, solitare, or flash games on newgrounds or wherever. It's time filler. I've never played WoW, but I understand it is a grind with attainable goals but no sense of real progress, just like the Sims, and just like minesweeper. For games on PC to be mass market, they have to decend to this level, where it is hardly even a game at all

Whoa.. hold on a second here. You're dismissing WoW as a Mass Market game. You're comparing WoW to Minesweeper and Solitaire? You're not a real gamer if you're playing WoW.... And you've never actually played the game? WoW is a helluva lot more complex, involved and 'hardcore' and 95% of the console games out there. Some people dislike the game (I'm not a big fan myself), but to claim that it's not a legitimate game is silly.

It seems you're saying that the PC isent part of the mass market.. except for a few games that are not real PC games because they are part of the mass market.

i'm sorry but if this is such an issue then I can't really comment. I never played the game, so I read up on it just now to stay in this argument and I have to say that this is a game but only in the same way that the Sims is. It is time filler with no real point and brainless. Hardly a game, but still a game. If it were a real meaty game experience then it wouldn't be as popular as it
Avatar image for Mazoch
Mazoch

2473

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#109 Mazoch
Member since 2004 • 2473 Posts

[QUOTE="Mazoch"]

[QUOTE="GunSmith1_basic"] Yes there are mass market games on pc like WoW and the Sims. Almost everybody has a computer because they need one and so there is a massive potential market there for a dev who is willing to aim broadly. It's a thin definition but it's like those aren't "gamers". It's like those people who play a lot of minesweeper, solitare, or flash games on newgrounds or wherever. It's time filler. I've never played WoW, but I understand it is a grind with attainable goals but no sense of real progress, just like the Sims, and just like minesweeper. For games on PC to be mass market, they have to decend to this level, where it is hardly even a game at allGunSmith1_basic

Whoa.. hold on a second here. You're dismissing WoW as a Mass Market game. You're comparing WoW to Minesweeper and Solitaire? You're not a real gamer if you're playing WoW.... And you've never actually played the game? WoW is a helluva lot more complex, involved and 'hardcore' and 95% of the console games out there. Some people dislike the game (I'm not a big fan myself), but to claim that it's not a legitimate game is silly.

It seems you're saying that the PC isent part of the mass market.. except for a few games that are not real PC games because they are part of the mass market.

i'm sorry but if this is such an issue then I can't really comment. I never played the game, so I read up on it just now to stay in this argument and I have to say that this is a game but only in the same way that the Sims is. It is time filler with no real point and brainless. Hardly a game, but still a game. If it were a real meaty game experience then it wouldn't be as popular as it

Well.. you are right, it's a time filler .. that's true of all video games. But beyond that you're flat out incorrect. WoW is pretty damn complicated when compared to the vast majority of games out there. What's the point of Multiplayer Halo? Or The point of Demon Souls? Is Super Mario a 'real' game?

There is no point aside from amusement and passing time. By your logic 'real' games dosent exist at all. But again. You seem to discount WoW as a 'real' game simply because if it was your theory would not work. Now you're claiming that wow is not a 'real' game.. please.. by your definition.. what are some examples of real games and why are they 'real' if WoW is not 'real'?

Avatar image for GunSmith1_basic
GunSmith1_basic

10548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#110 GunSmith1_basic
Member since 2002 • 10548 Posts

Well.. you are right, it's a time filler .. that's true of all video games. But beyond that you're flat out incorrect. WoW is pretty damn complicated when compared to the vast majority of games out there. What's the point of Multiplayer Halo? Or The point of Demon Souls? Is Super Mario a 'real' game?

There is no point aside from amusement and passing time. By your logic 'real' games dosent exist at all. But again. You seem to discount WoW as a 'real' game simply because if it was your theory would not work. Now you're claiming that wow is not a 'real' game.. please.. by your definition.. what are some examples of real games and why are they 'real' if WoW is not 'real'?

Mazoch

I haven't even played the game! The game does seem very complex yes, in every way other than strategy, skill, or story. Unlike Super Mario brothers or Demon's Souls. There are more kinds of appeal to games other than passing time. They can be mentally stimulating. I wouldn't be surprised if WoW's entire appeal was in its social interaction

Avatar image for Mazoch
Mazoch

2473

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#111 Mazoch
Member since 2004 • 2473 Posts

[QUOTE="Mazoch"]Well.. you are right, it's a time filler .. that's true of all video games. But beyond that you're flat out incorrect. WoW is pretty damn complicated when compared to the vast majority of games out there. What's the point of Multiplayer Halo? Or The point of Demon Souls? Is Super Mario a 'real' game?

There is no point aside from amusement and passing time. By your logic 'real' games dosent exist at all. But again. You seem to discount WoW as a 'real' game simply because if it was your theory would not work. Now you're claiming that wow is not a 'real' game.. please.. by your definition.. what are some examples of real games and why are they 'real' if WoW is not 'real'?

GunSmith1_basic

I haven't even played the game! The game does seem very complex yes, in every way other than strategy, skill, or story. Unlike Super Mario brothers or Demon's Souls. There are more kinds of appeal to games other than passing time. They can be mentally stimulating. I wouldn't be surprised if WoW's entire appeal was in its social interaction

It's kinda pointless to argue about a game you obviously know nothing about. Nothing wrong in not having played a game. But to claim that it lacks skills, story or strategy when you haven't played it? I could make similar baseless claims about Super Mario Brothers.. that it's simple minded, requires no thought.. it's obvious that anyone who plays it are not real gamers but rather just kids. Given the colors and simple graphics I wouldn't be surprised if it was just played by children who likes cartoons. WoW does require quite a lot of strategy, it has a HUGE amount of story and playing the game can require a lot of skill. That you're actually holding Super Mario Brothers up as an example of a game that has a lot of story... when compared to WoW... is kinda bizarre
Avatar image for KalDurenik
KalDurenik

3736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#112 KalDurenik
Member since 2004 • 3736 Posts

Its just trolling

Avatar image for Heartagram_03
Heartagram_03

3697

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#113 Heartagram_03
Member since 2005 • 3697 Posts

PC has better RTS, RPG's and FPS over consoles. Those genre's are pretty much what this generation is.

Avatar image for wooooode
wooooode

16666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#114 wooooode
Member since 2002 • 16666 Posts
[QUOTE="Disturbed123"]

[QUOTE="HenriH-42"]

I suggest you buy a console and move on.

I own all consoles, but people big up PC as if its the ultimate gaming experiance, and quite frankly, it aint.

I enjoy all platforms and prefer consoles to be honest, but PC is not dead. It is still dominant in RTS, RPG, Adventure and of course MMO's.
Avatar image for CZVA
CZVA

1166

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#115 CZVA
Member since 2009 • 1166 Posts

I think PC gaming has become an exclusive thing. You want the best experience, you pay for it. Consoles are so readily available and everyone knows about them.

It would be nice if AMD, Intel, ATI, and Nvidia did a collaboration and started a "build your own gaming PC" marketing plan.

Avatar image for shawnyboy95
shawnyboy95

554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#116 shawnyboy95
Member since 2010 • 554 Posts

There's The Sim's 3..and that's a Simulator ..there is alsosome other genres that are doing good, but some other people probably already said that..

Avatar image for gamer620
gamer620

3367

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#117 gamer620
Member since 2004 • 3367 Posts

My last computer cost me $300 with a $100 GPU back in 2004. It can still play almost any game (with the exception of Crysis and FC2) and close to max settings (No AA). It isnt that difficult to install updates and maps and such. You get more lag on consoles because they use P2P for their games. You get that on your home computer anyway. Again thats just regular problems with any computer.Iantheone
you either work for a computer retailer or you are lying out of your teeth. You aren't getting a CPU, GPU, Mobo, Memory, tower and PSU for 400 dollars. Not one that will play most of todays games well at least. I am a self professed advocate for PC gaming and the idea that it is not expensive, but under 500 dollars is NOT getting you a good system. I doubt your PC would even be able to run Portal at 30 FPS on medium settings.

Or you went to a flea market? :P

Avatar image for Iantheone
Iantheone

8242

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#118 Iantheone
Member since 2007 • 8242 Posts

[QUOTE="Iantheone"] My last computer cost me $300 with a $100 GPU back in 2004. It can still play almost any game (with the exception of Crysis and FC2) and close to max settings (No AA). It isnt that difficult to install updates and maps and such. You get more lag on consoles because they use P2P for their games. You get that on your home computer anyway. Again thats just regular problems with any computer.gamer620

you either work for a computer retailer or you are lying out of your teeth. You aren't getting a CPU, GPU, Mobo, Memory, tower and PSU for 400 dollars. Not one that will play most of todays games well at least. I am a self professed advocate for PC gaming and the idea that it is not expensive, but under 500 dollars is NOT getting you a good system. I doubt your PC would even be able to run Portal at 30 FPS on medium settings.

Or you went to a flea market? :P

I just got a really good deal. I didnt build the computer, i got it from EMachines. Psu didnt really matter because i got an 8600 gt which does not need any extra power cables. I ran portal max settings (again no AA) at 1024x768 with about 40-50 fps. It isnt the best system, but it does the job.
Avatar image for gamer620
gamer620

3367

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#119 gamer620
Member since 2004 • 3367 Posts

[QUOTE="gamer620"]

[QUOTE="Iantheone"] My last computer cost me $300 with a $100 GPU back in 2004. It can still play almost any game (with the exception of Crysis and FC2) and close to max settings (No AA). It isnt that difficult to install updates and maps and such. You get more lag on consoles because they use P2P for their games. You get that on your home computer anyway. Again thats just regular problems with any computer.Iantheone

you either work for a computer retailer or you are lying out of your teeth. You aren't getting a CPU, GPU, Mobo, Memory, tower and PSU for 400 dollars. Not one that will play most of todays games well at least. I am a self professed advocate for PC gaming and the idea that it is not expensive, but under 500 dollars is NOT getting you a good system. I doubt your PC would even be able to run Portal at 30 FPS on medium settings.

Or you went to a flea market? :P

I just got a really good deal. I didnt build the computer, i got it from EMachines. Psu didnt really matter because i got an 8600 gt which does not need any extra power cables. I ran portal max settings (again no AA) at 1024x768 with about 40-50 fps. It isnt the best system, but it does the job.

I find it hard to believe that an Emachine runs ANYTHING good. But then again, I haven't run anything at 1024x768 in years... I guess if you only have like 19 in 4x3 sized monitor thats doable.

If you are only getting 40-50 fps in Portal, how are you running UE3 engine games? Doom 3? Rome: total war? DoW2? You claim you can run almost any game close to max settings. Clearly Source engine games (at least portal) work (try TF2 on near max settings), i would be curious to hear your benchmarks on a game like Vampire: The masquerade - Bloodlines (another Source engine game) or even HL2: Episode 2. I don't think you play enough games to truly gauge your system well. I would love to hear your benchmarks. I would personally love to hear actual games you have plaed on that system because I doubt it was anything from beyond 2008.

Avatar image for WithoutGraceXII
WithoutGraceXII

1797

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#120 WithoutGraceXII
Member since 2007 • 1797 Posts
Dragon Age says no. I don't care you find it boring, it scored highest on PC because it pwns the other versions.
Avatar image for oajlu
oajlu

2652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#121 oajlu
Member since 2006 • 2652 Posts

i disagreed. yes MMO is health, but FPS is not doing good unless they start to charge ppl monthly fee.

This is the only way they could make money on pc games now.

Avatar image for musicalmac
musicalmac

25101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#122 musicalmac  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25101 Posts
Starcraft 2 and Diablo 3 are about to prove you very, very, very wrong. :P
Avatar image for trollop_scat
trollop_scat

2656

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#123 trollop_scat
Member since 2006 • 2656 Posts

Warcraft 3 is still alive and well. And Starcraft 2 is coming out soonish. So the RTS community is still going strong...

Avatar image for Arach666
Arach666

23285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#124 Arach666
Member since 2009 • 23285 Posts
Starcraft 2 and Diablo 3 are about to prove you very, very, very wrong. :Pmusicalmac
This is accurate.
Avatar image for Iantheone
Iantheone

8242

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#125 Iantheone
Member since 2007 • 8242 Posts

[QUOTE="Iantheone"][QUOTE="gamer620"] you either work for a computer retailer or you are lying out of your teeth. You aren't getting a CPU, GPU, Mobo, Memory, tower and PSU for 400 dollars. Not one that will play most of todays games well at least. I am a self professed advocate for PC gaming and the idea that it is not expensive, but under 500 dollars is NOT getting you a good system. I doubt your PC would even be able to run Portal at 30 FPS on medium settings.

Or you went to a flea market? :P

gamer620

I just got a really good deal. I didnt build the computer, i got it from EMachines. Psu didnt really matter because i got an 8600 gt which does not need any extra power cables. I ran portal max settings (again no AA) at 1024x768 with about 40-50 fps. It isnt the best system, but it does the job.

I find it hard to believe that an Emachine runs ANYTHING good. But then again, I haven't run anything at 1024x768 in years... I guess if you only have like 19 in 4x3 sized monitor thats doable.

If you are only getting 40-50 fps in Portal, how are you running UE3 engine games? Doom 3? Rome: total war? DoW2? You claim you can run almost any game close to max settings. Clearly Source engine games (at least portal) work (try TF2 on near max settings), i would be curious to hear your benchmarks on a game like Vampire: The masquerade - Bloodlines (another Source engine game) or even HL2: Episode 2. I don't think you play enough games to truly gauge your system well. I would love to hear your benchmarks. I would personally love to hear actual games you have plaed on that system because I doubt it was anything from beyond 2008.

My brother is playing GOW behind me at max settings no AA. Same with UT3. Runs smooth as silk =/ As for source games Its able to play L4D2 at mostly high settings at a playable fps. Borderlands at max no aa also at playable (dont have fraps on that computer so i dont really know the exact fps.) E:TW i can have most stuff at high, ultra if i take off some of the volumetric effects, shadows, and AA The point im trying to make is that it doesnt take a lot to have a system that can play games at decent settings