Apparently Xbox Live's New Terms of Service MUST be accepted; no opting out

  • 102 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for DrTrafalgarLaw
DrTrafalgarLaw

4487

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 DrTrafalgarLaw
Member since 2011 • 4487 Posts

Turns out that option doesn't exist, according to a statement released to Kotaku. Users must agree to the new Terms of Service, and the ability to opt-out only relates future Terms of Service agreements.

That's a huge difference.

"Users must agree to the new clause to the Terms of Use in order to continue using Xbox LIVE," said the company. "Changes to the Terms of Use are designed to ensure that our customers have an easy way to file a dispute without requiring formal legal action."

As previously discussed, there was supposed to be a way for US consumers to opt-out by writing a letter to Microsoft.
That no longer is possible since that clause references to future updates and not this one.
You waiver all your legal rights goodbye or be forced to stop using XBL at all. ****c ####move by Microsoft, as usual.

Source: Kotaku, GiantBomb
http://kotaku.com/5865797/now-microsoft-wants-to-stop-you-taking-them-to-court

Avatar image for DerekLoffin
DerekLoffin

9095

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 47

User Lists: 0

#2 DerekLoffin
Member since 2002 • 9095 Posts
That is marginally worst that Sony's agreement (marginally in that you do have an opt out for Sony but seriously, how many do you expect to use it).
Avatar image for Hexagon_777
Hexagon_777

20348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Hexagon_777
Member since 2007 • 20348 Posts
So what's so bad about the new terms of service? Or is it that you just can't opt out of them unless you no longer wish to use Xbox Live?
Avatar image for SaltyMeatballs
SaltyMeatballs

25165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#4 SaltyMeatballs
Member since 2009 • 25165 Posts
That is marginally worst that Sony's agreement (marginally in that you do have an opt out for Sony but seriously, how many do you expect to use it). DerekLoffin
I don't know what you mean, but you could decline the agreement, and if you agree you have 30 days to opt out. Similar to what Sony did I believe, maybe MS looked at that and decided to do the same.
Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#5 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

Well if you don't agree to use their product on their terms, they don't want you useing it.

What's the issue here?

Avatar image for balfe1990
balfe1990

6747

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 balfe1990
Member since 2009 • 6747 Posts

I'm not really seeing any problem.

They not making you give up your first born here, they just don't want you modding or tampering with their products etc.

OH TEH EVILS MICROSFTZ ANDS SONEYS!!!

Avatar image for DrTrafalgarLaw
DrTrafalgarLaw

4487

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 DrTrafalgarLaw
Member since 2011 • 4487 Posts

So what's so bad about the new terms of service? Or is it that you just can't opt out of them unless you no longer wish to use Xbox Live?Hexagon_777
Exactly this. If you hit accept, you waiver all your rights goodbye for a legal disputes with Microsoft that doesn't involve injury, death or a house fire. And if you win a legal dispute, you also accept that you will be reimbursed/funded with 1 month of FREE XBL as penal damage. If you choose to have your basic civil rights, you must stop using XBL and lose access to your downloaded library of games and the online functionality of your games.

Essentially, Microsoft is telling that they can do the #### they want while holding your console for ransom. You can't opt out meaning you give up your rights to keep your rights to online gameplay et cetera.

Avatar image for Dark_Knight6
Dark_Knight6

16619

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Dark_Knight6
Member since 2006 • 16619 Posts

I'm still unconvinced of the legality of a move like this, really.

edit: the move being the agreement about the whole lawsuit thing.

Avatar image for DrTrafalgarLaw
DrTrafalgarLaw

4487

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 DrTrafalgarLaw
Member since 2011 • 4487 Posts
[QUOTE="DerekLoffin"]That is marginally worst that Sony's agreement (marginally in that you do have an opt out for Sony but seriously, how many do you expect to use it). SaltyMeatballs
I don't know what you mean, but you could decline the agreement, and if you agree you have 30 days to opt out. Similar to what Sony did I believe, maybe MS looked at that and decided to do the same.

Except you CAN'T opt out by writing a letter here, it's accept or goodbye.
Avatar image for Hexagon_777
Hexagon_777

20348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Hexagon_777
Member since 2007 • 20348 Posts

[QUOTE="Hexagon_777"]So what's so bad about the new terms of service? Or is it that you just can't opt out of them unless you no longer wish to use Xbox Live?DrTrafalgarLaw

Exactly this. If you hit accept, you waiver all your rights goodbye for a legal disputes with Microsoft that doesn't involve injury, death or a house fire. And if you win a legal dispute, you also accept that you will be reimbursed/funded with 1 month of FREE XBL as penal damage. If you choose to have your basic civil rights, you must stop using XBL and lose access to your downloaded library of games and the online functionality of your games.

Essentially, Microsoft is telling that they can do the #### they want while holding your console for ransom. You can't opt out meaning you give up your rights to keep your rights to online gameplay et cetera.

Is it really possible to agree to something that can remove your basic civil rights? I mean, are such things even allowed in terms of services?

Avatar image for lunatic0495
lunatic0495

134

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 lunatic0495
Member since 2005 • 134 Posts

What's the issue here? I simply don't see any. Even forums such as this place have an agreement (that nobody reads) before you can complete signing up. Everything nowadays has a "Terms of Agreement" that everyone just skims through if at all, checks a box and clicks ACCEPT.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#12 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
Terms of USE. If you don't like what they say, then tough sh!t for you.
Avatar image for DrTrafalgarLaw
DrTrafalgarLaw

4487

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 DrTrafalgarLaw
Member since 2011 • 4487 Posts

What's the issue here? I simply don't see any. Even forums such as this place have an agreement (that nobody reads) before you can complete signing up. Everything nowadays has a "Terms of Agreement" that everyone just skims through if at all, checks a box and clicks ACCEPT.

lunatic0495

I read all ToA/ToS UELA etc. etc. I come across I need to accept. For example, I don't play Facebook games because you agree that fb can use your information anyway they want. I already know I accepted a agreement when signing up for fb pertaining my social info, and I made sure I didn't have much identifyable info about me on there. But that's a different issue. I read also agreements on consoles, yes I scroll all the way down and read cause I have 2 eyes and a brain to do so. They are all more or less structured the same way into the same paragraphs, it's not that hard to do.

Avatar image for SaltyMeatballs
SaltyMeatballs

25165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#14 SaltyMeatballs
Member since 2009 • 25165 Posts
[QUOTE="SaltyMeatballs"][QUOTE="DerekLoffin"]That is marginally worst that Sony's agreement (marginally in that you do have an opt out for Sony but seriously, how many do you expect to use it). DrTrafalgarLaw
I don't know what you mean, but you could decline the agreement, and if you agree you have 30 days to opt out. Similar to what Sony did I believe, maybe MS looked at that and decided to do the same.

Except you CAN'T opt out by writing a letter here, it's accept or goodbye.

Hmm... yeah I thought I read/heard somewhere that you could opt-out before 30 days, but I can't find the info anywhere.
Avatar image for abusedbunny
abusedbunny

1196

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 abusedbunny
Member since 2007 • 1196 Posts
What is in the Terms of Service that makes this a big deal?
Avatar image for DrTrafalgarLaw
DrTrafalgarLaw

4487

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 DrTrafalgarLaw
Member since 2011 • 4487 Posts
Terms of USE. If you don't like what they say, then tough sh!t for you.foxhound_fox
So you think it's right for them to create a totaliarian control mechanism over their own closed platform, that takes away basic civil rights that we fought hundreds of years for, recorded in the consititution? Do you think it's fine for companies to stand above the law?
Avatar image for DrTrafalgarLaw
DrTrafalgarLaw

4487

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 DrTrafalgarLaw
Member since 2011 • 4487 Posts
What is in the Terms of Service that makes this a big deal?abusedbunny
You can't sue us at all, but we can sue you. If you don't like it, forfeit all your downloaded/XBL(A) games library and online gaming.
Avatar image for amaneuvering
amaneuvering

4816

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#18 amaneuvering
Member since 2009 • 4816 Posts

I think this is a bit of serious underhanded legal manipulation on Microsoft's part.

I just watched Erin Brockovich the other day and this reminds me of how the evil corporation actually sent people out telling the townsfolk about the chemicals in the water, lying and actually saying it was good for them, just so they could create a legal situation where those people wouldn't be able to sue for any illness if they didn't do so within a year of being told because in law after being told they only have a year to file a suit. That part however was never made clear to the townsfolk, nor the part about them actually lying about the poisonous affects of the chemicals in the water.

This kind of legal manipulation needs to be dealt with very severely in my opinion indeed because these lawyers are taking advantage of their privileged position and detailed knowledge of the law system to trick people into giving away rights they would never actually give away if they fully understood what they were doing when signing these contracts and accepting these conditions.

The same basic thing is happening here imo albeit in a slightly less life threatening way.

I absolutely abhor this kind of abuse of power.

Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

tos's tend to collapse under any real legal challenge anyway so why worry about it?

this hardly changes anything.

if you are harmed in some way a judge won't even consider that you clicked a button as grounds for dismissal of a case.

crying over this is as senseless as crying over the ps3 one was.

Avatar image for musicalmac
musicalmac

25101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 1

#20 musicalmac  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25101 Posts
Are you serious?
Avatar image for Hexagon_777
Hexagon_777

20348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Hexagon_777
Member since 2007 • 20348 Posts

Guess you're screwed if you stick to closed systems like consoles where mostly everything belongs to the console manufacturer. It's almost like a monopoly.

Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]Terms of USE. If you don't like what they say, then tough sh!t for you.DrTrafalgarLaw
So you think it's right for them to create a totaliarian control mechanism over their own closed platform, that takes away basic civil rights that we fought hundreds of years for, recorded in the consititution? Do you think it's fine for companies to stand above the law?

oh dear god...

yes... this is the outcome, you have no rights ever again for the rest of your life.

bill gates is going to show up at your honeymoon and declare primae noctis.

Avatar image for DrTrafalgarLaw
DrTrafalgarLaw

4487

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 DrTrafalgarLaw
Member since 2011 • 4487 Posts

tos's tend to collapse under any real legal challenge anyway so why worry about it?

this hardly changes anything.

if you are harmed in some way a judge won't even consider that you clicked a button as grounds for dismissal of a case.

crying over this is as senseless as crying over the ps3 one was.

Riverwolf007
You're acknowledging you can't take them to court to begin with...you won't even stand before a jury after this agreement.
Avatar image for DrTrafalgarLaw
DrTrafalgarLaw

4487

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 DrTrafalgarLaw
Member since 2011 • 4487 Posts

[QUOTE="DrTrafalgarLaw"][QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]Terms of USE. If you don't like what they say, then tough sh!t for you.Riverwolf007

So you think it's right for them to create a totaliarian control mechanism over their own closed platform, that takes away basic civil rights that we fought hundreds of years for, recorded in the consititution? Do you think it's fine for companies to stand above the law?

oh dear god, yes... this is the outcome you have no rights ever again for the rest of your life.

bill gates is going to show up at your honeymoon and declare primae noctis.

I'm talking about rights to pertaining consoles. Consumer laws exist for a reason and Microsoft is now circumventing them to the extreme. In the end, you won't die or be enslaved after agreeing but you say it's okay for coorporations like this to have this kind of freedom taken away from you. Look at Origin for example, or the horrid horde of DRM...it's damaging your consumer rights because no one stands up against it. So it's okay if it's a console, but before you know it we'll have to sign agreements for commercial airliners that in case of (fatal) injury or death, and it's been scientifically proven it's a mechanical neglect or error, you can't sue the company any way. I'm moving away from consoles fortunately.
Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

[QUOTE="Riverwolf007"]

[QUOTE="DrTrafalgarLaw"] So you think it's right for them to create a totaliarian control mechanism over their own closed platform, that takes away basic civil rights that we fought hundreds of years for, recorded in the consititution? Do you think it's fine for companies to stand above the law?DrTrafalgarLaw

oh dear god, yes... this is the outcome you have no rights ever again for the rest of your life.

bill gates is going to show up at your honeymoon and declare primae noctis.

I'm talking about rights to pertaining consoles. Consumer laws exist for a reason and Microsoft is now circumventing them to the extreme. In the end, you won't die or be enslaved after agreeing but you say it's okay for coorporations like this to have this kind of freedom taken away from you. Look at Origin for example, or the horrid horde of DRM...it's damaging your consumer rights because no one stands up against it. So it's okay if it's a console, but before you know it we'll have to sign agreements for commercial airliners that in case of (fatal) injury or death, and it's been scientifically proven it's a mechanical neglect or error, you can't sue the company any way. I'm moving away from consoles fortunately.

it's an arbitration agreement. all you lose is the right to go to court.

arbitration agreements still have to be entered into court records and are subject to judicial review.

you can also reject the settlement of an arbitrition agreement within 3 months of the award.

Avatar image for TheEroica
TheEroica

24790

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 TheEroica  Moderator
Member since 2009 • 24790 Posts

aside from the overtones of "MS iz da eeevil empire" that the OP is riddled with, I'd like to go on record in saying that if you TRULY have an issue with signing the ToS for XBL, please don't sign it at all and play the ps3... I like my xbl to be un hacked and problem free... thanks.

Avatar image for DrTrafalgarLaw
DrTrafalgarLaw

4487

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 DrTrafalgarLaw
Member since 2011 • 4487 Posts

aside from the overtones of "MS iz da eeevil empire" that the OP is riddled with, I'd like to go on record in saying that if you TRULY have an issue with signing the ToS for XBL, please don't sign it at all and play the ps3... I like my xbl to be un hacked and problem free... thanks.

TheEroica

How naive to think that agreements like these keep hackers at bay? If hackers wanted, they could hack Microsoft to high heaven and hell.
No agreement is going to stop that.

Avatar image for Hexagon_777
Hexagon_777

20348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Hexagon_777
Member since 2007 • 20348 Posts

[QUOTE="Riverwolf007"]

[QUOTE="DrTrafalgarLaw"] So you think it's right for them to create a totaliarian control mechanism over their own closed platform, that takes away basic civil rights that we fought hundreds of years for, recorded in the consititution? Do you think it's fine for companies to stand above the law?DrTrafalgarLaw

oh dear god, yes... this is the outcome you have no rights ever again for the rest of your life.

bill gates is going to show up at your honeymoon and declare primae noctis.

I'm talking about rights to pertaining consoles. Consumer laws exist for a reason and Microsoft is now circumventing them to the extreme. In the end, you won't die or be enslaved after agreeing but you say it's okay for coorporations like this to have this kind of freedom taken away from you. Look at Origin for example, or the horrid horde of DRM...it's damaging your consumer rights because no one stands up against it. So it's okay if it's a console, but before you know it we'll have to sign agreements for commercial airliners that in case of (fatal) injury or death, and it's been scientifically proven it's a mechanical neglect or error, you can't sue the company any way. I'm moving away from consoles fortunately.

GOG is standing up against DRM. :oops:

Avatar image for lamprey263
lamprey263

45622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#29 lamprey263
Member since 2006 • 45622 Posts
well, if my Xbox 360 comes to life and eats my cat and dog, maybe then I'll be pissed about signing my terms of service
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
I always wonder what if someone devises a way to click on the "I don't agree" button and make it work like the "I agree" one. Someone should try that since I don't think there's anything illegal about it and then MS or Sony would have no grounds to complain :)
Avatar image for DrTrafalgarLaw
DrTrafalgarLaw

4487

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 DrTrafalgarLaw
Member since 2011 • 4487 Posts
well, if my Xbox 360 comes to life and eats my cat and dog, maybe then I'll be pissed about signing my terms of servicelamprey263
How ridicilous that may sound, that's covered. :P
Avatar image for Inconsistancy
Inconsistancy

8094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 Inconsistancy
Member since 2004 • 8094 Posts
Okay? ToS' are usually like that, either agree or don't use it. Or, is there no ability to say 'no'? Even then, just don't connect to the internet again, it's still "agree or go away".
Avatar image for MLBknights58
MLBknights58

5016

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 MLBknights58
Member since 2006 • 5016 Posts

Well if you don't agree to use their product on their terms, they don't want you useing it.

What's the issue here?

Wasdie

^^ This.

Avatar image for Nega3
Nega3

1069

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Nega3
Member since 2010 • 1069 Posts

While I agree that Microsoft as draconian and evil as EA, it's a ToS for gosh sake.

It's your fault you succumbed to registering to a terrible service where you have to pay to connect and play with others.

I know I did. :|

Avatar image for gamer-adam1
gamer-adam1

4188

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 gamer-adam1
Member since 2008 • 4188 Posts

isn't every single online thing has this, like alll MMOs have this, good luck playing WoW without accepting the ToS

Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

isn't every single online thing has this, like alll MMOs have this, good luck playing WoW without accepting the ToS

gamer-adam1

good luck holding a job. almost all of them demand arbitration agreements too,

Avatar image for DrTrafalgarLaw
DrTrafalgarLaw

4487

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 DrTrafalgarLaw
Member since 2011 • 4487 Posts

[QUOTE="gamer-adam1"]

isn't every single online thing has this, like alll MMOs have this, good luck playing WoW without accepting the ToS

Riverwolf007

good luck holding a job. almost all of them demand arbitration agreements too,

Maybe in America, but we take kindly of our civil rights in the rest of the world.
Avatar image for gamer-adam1
gamer-adam1

4188

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 gamer-adam1
Member since 2008 • 4188 Posts

[QUOTE="DrTrafalgarLaw"][QUOTE="Riverwolf007"]oh dear god, yes... this is the outcome you have no rights ever again for the rest of your life.

bill gates is going to show up at your honeymoon and declare primae noctis.

Riverwolf007

I'm talking about rights to pertaining consoles. Consumer laws exist for a reason and Microsoft is now circumventing them to the extreme. In the end, you won't die or be enslaved after agreeing but you say it's okay for coorporations like this to have this kind of freedom taken away from you. Look at Origin for example, or the horrid horde of DRM...it's damaging your consumer rights because no one stands up against it. So it's okay if it's a console, but before you know it we'll have to sign agreements for commercial airliners that in case of (fatal) injury or death, and it's been scientifically proven it's a mechanical neglect or error, you can't sue the company any way. I'm moving away from consoles fortunately.

it's an arbitration agreement. all you lose is the right to go to court.

arbitration agreements still have to be entered into court records and are subject to judicial review.

you can also reject the settlement of an arbitrition agreement within 3 months of the award.

I think all copmanies are doing this, because they people who use the product can sometimes have the iq of rock. and suing the company because the person did something stupid, and the company didn't tell them not to do it.

Avatar image for Inconsistancy
Inconsistancy

8094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 Inconsistancy
Member since 2004 • 8094 Posts

[QUOTE="Riverwolf007"]

[QUOTE="DrTrafalgarLaw"] I'm talking about rights to pertaining consoles. Consumer laws exist for a reason and Microsoft is now circumventing them to the extreme. In the end, you won't die or be enslaved after agreeing but you say it's okay for coorporations like this to have this kind of freedom taken away from you. Look at Origin for example, or the horrid horde of DRM...it's damaging your consumer rights because no one stands up against it. So it's okay if it's a console, but before you know it we'll have to sign agreements for commercial airliners that in case of (fatal) injury or death, and it's been scientifically proven it's a mechanical neglect or error, you can't sue the company any way. I'm moving away from consoles fortunately.gamer-adam1

it's an arbitration agreement. all you lose is the right to go to court.

arbitration agreements still have to be entered into court records and are subject to judicial review.

you can also reject the settlement of an arbitrition agreement within 3 months of the award.

I think all copmanies are doing this, because they people who use the product can sometimes have the iq of rock. and suing the company because the person did something stupid, and the company didn't tell them not to do it.

Basically, it's too easy to sue.
Avatar image for gamer-adam1
gamer-adam1

4188

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 gamer-adam1
Member since 2008 • 4188 Posts

[QUOTE="gamer-adam1"]

isn't every single online thing has this, like alll MMOs have this, good luck playing WoW without accepting the ToS

Riverwolf007

good luck holding a job. almost all of them demand arbitration agreements too,

if the place you work at, does do something that you couldn't prevent, than you would still be able to go to court. this is just stopping people from getting easy money.

Avatar image for WithoutGraceXII
WithoutGraceXII

1797

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#41 WithoutGraceXII
Member since 2007 • 1797 Posts
Since I'm not a self entitled little **** I don't plan on suing MS or anyone else over some BS looking for a handout.
Avatar image for Phazevariance
Phazevariance

12356

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 Phazevariance
Member since 2003 • 12356 Posts
So what's so bad about the new terms of service? Or is it that you just can't opt out of them unless you no longer wish to use Xbox Live?Hexagon_777
It's that you must waive your legal rights to sue the company should anything go wrong... including class action lawsuits should they be hacked and ally our personal ddata spills onto the internet. Also, if you sue them privately, you are entitled to a maximum award of the cost of xbox live's rate, be it $5/month or $50/year.
Avatar image for Hexagon_777
Hexagon_777

20348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 Hexagon_777
Member since 2007 • 20348 Posts

[QUOTE="Hexagon_777"]So what's so bad about the new terms of service? Or is it that you just can't opt out of them unless you no longer wish to use Xbox Live?Phazevariance
It's that you must waive your legal rights to sue the company should anything go wrong... including class action lawsuits should they be hacked and ally our personal ddata spills onto the internet. Also, if you sue them privately, you are entitled to a maximum award of the cost of xbox live's rate, be it $5/month or $50/year.

Well, that doesn't sound great at all. So this renders the online component of all your Xbox 360 games obsolete if you don't agree to these terms, hm?

Avatar image for Krelian-co
Krelian-co

13274

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#44 Krelian-co
Member since 2006 • 13274 Posts

its kiinda sick seeing all these fanboys just accepting it, i think is bs a company makes a move ike that.

Avatar image for gamer-adam1
gamer-adam1

4188

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 gamer-adam1
Member since 2008 • 4188 Posts

[QUOTE="Phazevariance"][QUOTE="Hexagon_777"]So what's so bad about the new terms of service? Or is it that you just can't opt out of them unless you no longer wish to use Xbox Live?Hexagon_777

It's that you must waive your legal rights to sue the company should anything go wrong... including class action lawsuits should they be hacked and ally our personal ddata spills onto the internet. Also, if you sue them privately, you are entitled to a maximum award of the cost of xbox live's rate, be it $5/month or $50/year.

Well, that doesn't sound great at all. So this renders the online component of all your Xbox 360 games obsolete if you don't agree to these terms, hm?

it doesn't sound right, but take time to think about it, already in the past company's have given back to consumers when something out of there hands happen. without being sued. suing a company over them getting hacked, when it is not a company that specializes in it, than it is kinda like, suing the company you worked for because someone drove into the store, and the store didn't do anything to stop it.

but since when can you opt out of a tos, and still play online?

Avatar image for gamer-adam1
gamer-adam1

4188

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 gamer-adam1
Member since 2008 • 4188 Posts

its kiinda sick seeing all these fanboys just accepting it, i think is bs a company makes a move ike that.

Krelian-co

they do it because it is way too easy to sue, and people DO go around just to sue companys for money, blame the customer not the company

Avatar image for Nega3
Nega3

1069

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 Nega3
Member since 2010 • 1069 Posts

its kiinda sick seeing all these fanboys just accepting it, i think is bs a company makes a move ike that.

Krelian-co

Then don't play any MMO or download programs then. :lol:

Avatar image for campzor
campzor

34932

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 campzor
Member since 2004 • 34932 Posts
typical System wars... when sony does it... T3H Ev1LLLLLLzZZZ!! MS gets free pass yet again
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#49 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
[QUOTE="DrTrafalgarLaw"] So you think it's right for them to create a totaliarian control mechanism over their own closed platform, that takes away basic civil rights that we fought hundreds of years for, recorded in the consititution? Do you think it's fine for companies to stand above the law?

You said it yourself: "closed platform" They have every right to do whatever the fvck they want with their service. Don't like it? Suck it up or stop using it. This isn't a public service they are offering that implies basic rights.
Avatar image for DireOwl
DireOwl

3352

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 DireOwl
Member since 2007 • 3352 Posts

I hear in their next up-date you'll sign in blood.