XXXXXX

Apparently Xbox Live's New Terms of Service MUST be accepted; no opting out

DrTrafalgarLaw · 2011-12-08 01:15:50

Turns out that option doesn't exist, according to a statement released to Kotaku. Users must agree to the new Terms of Service, and the ability to opt-out only relates future Terms of Service agreements.That's a huge difference.'Users must agree to the new clause to the Terms of Use in order to continue using Xbox LIVE,' said the company. 'Changes to the Terms of Use are designed to ensure that our customers have an easy way to file a dispute without requiring formal legal action.'As previously discussed, there was supposed to be a way for US consumers to opt-out by writing a letter to Microsoft.That no longer is possible since that clause references to future updates and not this one.You waiver all your legal rights goodbye or be forced to stop using XBL at all. ****c ####move by Microsoft, as usual.Source: Kotaku, GiantBomb http://kotaku.com/5865797/now-microsoft-wants-to-stop-you-taking-them-to-court

102 results
1
2
3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

deactivated-5c79c3cfce222

4715

Forum Posts

Wiki Points

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#101 deactivated-5c79c3cfce222

Member since 2009 • 4715 Posts

[QUOTE="McStrongfast"]
TwoFace-BS

Simple,Im 100% in agreement with you on EA,They should not be able to get away with that

I know what abritration is,and I personally think its a better solution for all parties then Class Actions

What incentive is there for EA to change their policies when an individual arbitration case will cost them peanuts and it's not public?
And it seems unlikely the legal costs for the plaintiff would be less than the value of their EA games. Is there a point?

The clause doesn't add the option of entering arbitration, it removes the option of filing a lawsuit. How is that a better solution for us?

13 years ago