Archery in WSR and the wand were identical...

... how can cows say the wand is better? :?

I don't know. The guy at the PS3 conference was aiming all over the place. He couldn't keep his bow still for a second.

At least he was shooting the undead...more interesting than targets.

Because the Sony one has little purple thingos as the top.

I don't know. The guy at the PS3 conference was aiming all over the place. He couldn't keep his bow still for a second.

At least he was shooting the undead...more interesting than targets.

goblaa

Because the Sony one has little purple thingos as the top.

RadBooley

[QUOTE="goblaa"]

I don't know. The guy at the PS3 conference was aiming all over the place. He couldn't keep his bow still for a second.

At least he was shooting the undead...more interesting than targets.

Vandalvideo

Yes. I used to compete. Hitting at full tension is hard as ****. But your bow doesn't fly all over the the place.

Yes. I used to compete.goblaa

[QUOTE="RadBooley"]

Because the Sony one has little purple thingos as the top.

nintendo-4life

Even better! There's no reason not to like it, then.

[QUOTE="goblaa"]Yes. I used to compete.Vandalvideo

Couldn't tell that from the conference. The bow in WSR at least pointed in the right direction. The sony motion controller had him almost shooting at the ceiling.

Couldn't tell that from the conference. The bow in WSR at least pointed in the right direction. The sony motion controller had him almost shooting at the ceiling.goblaa

[QUOTE="goblaa"]Couldn't tell that from the conference. The bow in WSR at least pointed in the right direction. The sony motion controller had him almost shooting at the ceiling.Vandalvideo

The archery was not the only thing shown of the PS3 Wiimo....um, glowing thingy. It was derivative, but looked more impressive than what we have been shown of Wii M+ so far.SpruceCaboose

take a better look at the surroundings of WSR, everything was shaking according to the guy's movement. Don't focus on the circle.nintendo-4life

[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"]The archery was not the only thing shown of the PS3 Wiimo....um, glowing thingy. It was derivative, but looked more impressive than what we have been shown of Wii M+ so far.nintendo-4life

the playstation motion controller looked more responsive and precise judging by the demonstrations. The wiimote still relies on a sensor bar which limits your playing field unlike the playstation motion controller where you can move around in the room your in while moving around in the game world, simply because its using similar technology to what they use for motion capture in hollywood. ReaperV7

[QUOTE="nintendo-4life"][QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"]The archery was not the only thing shown of the PS3 Wiimo....um, glowing thingy. It was derivative, but looked more impressive than what we have been shown of Wii M+ so far.SpruceCaboose

[QUOTE="ReaperV7"]the playstation motion controller looked more responsive and precise judging by the demonstrations. The wiimote still relies on a sensor bar which limits your playing field unlike the playstation motion controller where you can move around in the room your in while moving around in the game world, simply because its using similar technology to what they use for motion capture in hollywood. OreoMilkshake

[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"][QUOTE="nintendo-4life"] such as?nintendo-4life

EDIT: In the video you linked me to, if M+ does that, then yeah they seem really similar.

[QUOTE="ReaperV7"]the playstation motion controller looked more responsive and precise judging by the demonstrations. The wiimote still relies on a sensor bar which limits your playing field unlike the playstation motion controller where you can move around in the room your in while moving around in the game world, simply because its using similar technology to what they use for motion capture in hollywood. OreoMilkshake

the playstation motion controller looked more responsive and precise judging by the demonstrations. The wiimote still relies on a sensor bar which limits your playing field unlike the playstation motion controller where you can move around in the room your in while moving around in the game world, simply because its using similar technology to what they use for motion capture in hollywood. ReaperV7

the playstation motion controller looked more responsive and precise judging by the demonstrations. The wiimote still relies on a sensor bar which limits your playing field unlike the playstation motion controller where you can move around in the room your in while moving around in the game world, simply because its using similar technology to what they use for motion capture in hollywood. ReaperV7

No it doesn't. Waggle uses no part of the sensor bar.

I don't know whay people complain about the wiimote when they have no idea how it works...

[QUOTE="ReaperV7"]the playstation motion controller looked more responsive and precise judging by the demonstrations. The wiimote still relies on a sensor bar which limits your playing field unlike the playstation motion controller where you can move around in the room your in while moving around in the game world, simply because its using similar technology to what they use for motion capture in hollywood. goblaa

No it doesn't. Waggle uses no part of the sensor bar.

I don't know whay people complain about the wiimote when they have no idea how it works...

[QUOTE="ReaperV7"]the playstation motion controller looked more responsive and precise judging by the demonstrations. The wiimote still relies on a sensor bar which limits your playing field unlike the playstation motion controller where you can move around in the room your in while moving around in the game world, simply because its using similar technology to what they use for motion capture in hollywood. goblaa

No it doesn't. Waggle uses no part of the sensor bar.

I don't know whay people complain about the wiimote when they have no idea how it works...

[QUOTE="goblaa"]

[QUOTE="ReaperV7"]the playstation motion controller looked more responsive and precise judging by the demonstrations. The wiimote still relies on a sensor bar which limits your playing field unlike the playstation motion controller where you can move around in the room your in while moving around in the game world, simply because its using similar technology to what they use for motion capture in hollywood. SpruceCaboose

No it doesn't. Waggle uses no part of the sensor bar.

I don't know whay people complain about the wiimote when they have no idea how it works...

That is true, and that's where the sony ball-on-a-stick is better. But not for archery.

[QUOTE="OreoMilkshake"][QUOTE="ReaperV7"]the playstation motion controller looked more responsive and precise judging by the demonstrations. The wiimote still relies on a sensor bar which limits your playing field unlike the playstation motion controller where you can move around in the room your in while moving around in the game world, simply because its using similar technology to what they use for motion capture in hollywood. ReaperV7

[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"][QUOTE="goblaa"]

No it doesn't. Waggle uses no part of the sensor bar.

I don't know whay people complain about the wiimote when they have no idea how it works...

goblaa

That is true, and that's where the sony ball-on-a-stick is better. But not for archery.

Because you can hold your bow anyway you like??

horizontal,vertical diagonal etc.

Because you can hold your bow anyway you like??

horizontal,vertical diagonal etc.

tontontam0

[QUOTE="nintendo-4life"] take a better look at the surroundings of WSR, everything was shaking according to the guy's movement. Don't focus on the circle.Vandalvideo

If you payed attention to the conference, the guy said that the longer you help the bow, the smaller the reticle got.

If you payed attention to the conference, the guy said that the longer you help the bow, the smaller the reticle got.MrDziekuje

[QUOTE="MrDziekuje"]If you payed attention to the conference, the guy said that the longer you help the bow, the smaller the reticle got.Vandalvideo

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="MrDziekuje"]If you payed attention to the conference, the guy said that the longer you help the bow, the smaller the reticle got.nintendo-4life

I treat everyone like an intelligent poster until I am shown otherwise. A better question is how are Sony and MS going to make standard motion controls, since peripherals don't always do well, and how is Ninty going to get Motion+ to all the current Wii owners and make them care.SpruceCaboose

I would say Sony is going to have the hardest sell. Since they need to convince the consumer to by not one, but TWO accessories. The 'eye and the wand. Microsoft might, and I stress might, be at an advantage since even if the developers don't support Natal they could sell it on integrated features alone. I don't know about Nintendo.

In any event, I don't see any of these technologies getting major support until the next console generation at the earliest.

[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"]I treat everyone like an intelligent poster until I am shown otherwise. A better question is how are Sony and MS going to make standard motion controls, since peripherals don't always do well, and how is Ninty going to get Motion+ to all the current Wii owners and make them care.ThePlothole

I would say Sony is going to have the hardest sell. Since they need to convince the consumer to by not one, but TWO accessories. The 'eye and the wand. Microsoft might, and I stress might, be at an advantage since even if the developers don't support Natal they could sell it on integrated features alone. I don't know about Nintendo.

In any event, I don't see any of these technologies getting major support until the next console generation at the earliest.

[QUOTE="goblaa"]

I don't know. The guy at the PS3 conference was aiming all over the place. He couldn't keep his bow still for a second.

At least he was shooting the undead...more interesting than targets.

Vandalvideo

[QUOTE="RadBooley"]

Because the Sony one has little purple thingos as the top.

nintendo-4life

Heres an important point no one has even mentioned in regards to the xbox and PS3 motion (more so to natal). Actually i think the PS3 will have it.

This is Forcefeedback/rumble. I mean i think Natal is a great idea but imagine playing a racing game and when you crash, the control wont rumble since you dont have one. And for fighting games, although your hitting something on the screen, it will feel weird in real life since you will be just going through air.

The Wii kind of compensates for this with slight rumble, where on impact, the controller will shake. I think because of this it will make Natal and maybe the sony wand very very limited in the amount of genres it can do.

Anyway i do agree with you, i too thought they were pretty much identical. I dont know where Cows got the notion that their motion was far superior to Wii+.

Because the Sony one has little purple thingos as the top.

RadBooley

Exactly what I was thinking. I thought it was quite cool how you can hold ridiculously big swords in game using the camera with the Sony one... But as you said, the core 'motion' technology is pretty much the same. The PS3 is just using a different method to do it. I'm sticking with Wii for now. It seems both Sony and Microsoft's motion solutions still have their problems.