Are cows the new master race? Yes they are!!!!111

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for idill23
idill23

1135

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#251 idill23
Member since 2004 • 1135 Posts

[QUOTE="themajormayor"][QUOTE="PAL360"]

Do you have a link to support that claim?

Because last i heard (from DF and LoT), 360 used to look and run better under any circumstances.

KarateeeChop

Using the facts from LoT and DF I came to the conclusion that the PS3 version was better cause I don't like jaggies, screen tear, unbearable loading, bad sound etc. I can take some unnoticeable blur.

that's funny, according to DF the ps3 version suffers from much worse jaggies and loading than the 360 version.

oh and it looks like this.

360_aa.bmp.jpg (1280×720)

ps3_aa.bmp.jpg (1280×720)

must be tearing you up inside eh? :lol:

Sh*t just got real.
Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#252 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts

[QUOTE="themajormayor"][QUOTE="PAL360"]

Do you have a link to support that claim?

Because last i heard (from DF and LoT), 360 used to look and run better under any circumstances.

KarateeeChop

Using the facts from LoT and DF I came to the conclusion that the PS3 version was better cause I don't like jaggies, screen tear, unbearable loading, bad sound etc. I can take some unnoticeable blur.

that's funny, according to DF the ps3 version suffers from much worse jaggies and loading than the 360 version.

oh and it looks like this.

360_aa.bmp.jpg (1280×720)

ps3_aa.bmp.jpg (1280×720)

must be tearing you up inside eh? :lol:

Prove it. And a picture doesn't prove anything as you can't see the annoying flickering when not in motion. Still I easily take the PS3 version based on the other pictures and the 360 exclusive jagged sword lol
Avatar image for idill23
idill23

1135

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#253 idill23
Member since 2004 • 1135 Posts
^ there are videos that show this also.
Avatar image for dracolich55
dracolich55

2343

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#254 dracolich55
Member since 2010 • 2343 Posts
[QUOTE="KarateeeChop"]

[QUOTE="themajormayor"] Using the facts from LoT and DF I came to the conclusion that the PS3 version was better cause I don't like jaggies, screen tear, unbearable loading, bad sound etc. I can take some unnoticeable blur.themajormayor

that's funny, according to DF the ps3 version suffers from much worse jaggies and loading than the 360 version.

oh and it looks like this.

360_aa.bmp.jpg (1280×720)

ps3_aa.bmp.jpg (1280×720)

must be tearing you up inside eh? :lol:

Prove it. And a picture doesn't prove anything as you can't see the annoying flickering when not in motion. Still I easily take the PS3 version based on the other pictures and the 360 exclusive jagged sword lol

I take the PC version, you know. Just cause its on the PC.
Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#255 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts
[QUOTE="PAL360"][QUOTE="badtaker"]360 exclusive has yet to win GOTY :lol:themajormayor
Well, 360 got the HD version of GOTY 2010 and the playable version of GOTY 2011. Standards are changing, games are getting bigger and more complex. At least 360 seems to be dealing well with this natural evolution :twisted:

This was the most fanboyish & untrue comment I have ever seen. Yes RDR 360 got a few more pixels but at the cost of much longer loading times! Also Skyrim is more playable on the PS3. So PS3 is definitely dominating.

RDR does not have much longer loading times on the 360, it's a couple of seconds longer, and a few more pixels? RDR on 360 is HD on ps3 it's SUB-HD "This entails a full 720p resolution on Xbox 360 along with 2x multi-sampling anti-aliasing. PlayStation 3 on the other hand renders at a significantly lower resolution: 1152x640, with a very selective implementation of the blur-inducing quincunx anti-aliasing." "It's fairly obvious from the screenshots shown to date that there has been some significant paring back of detail on the PS3 version of the game, so what's going on? Well, the foliage is generated from transparent alpha textures and these are more expensive for the host hardware to draw. Cutting back on them saves on performance in terms of fill-rate and bandwidth. It's also interesting to note that the alpha-to-coverage transparency type is used on both systems, but looks considerably worse on PS3 owing to the reduced resolution." "We also see that the view distance on PS3 has been pulled back (or rather forward), although it's more accurate to say that view detail has been reduced. Xbox 360 gives you more detail further away, not just in terms of raw resolution but with actual object placement too. There are some stunning vista shots in Red Dead Redemption that demonstrate this quite nicely." "Just about the only area where PS3 commands an advantage is in terms of loading: the 515MB mandatory install shaves off a few seconds," http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-red-dead-redemption-face-off?page=1 you don't ever do any research before opening you trap do you,lol
Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38071

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#256 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38071 Posts
[QUOTE="PAL360"][QUOTE="badtaker"]360 exclusive has yet to win GOTY :lol:kuraimen
Well, 360 got the HD version of GOTY 2010 and the playable version of GOTY 2011. Standards are changing, games are getting bigger and more complex. At least 360 seems to be dealing well with this natural evolution :twisted:

Dragon Age Origins say hi! And Skyrim on PS3 is playable only dumb lems keep repeating it's not.

then why did one of my buddies return his PS3 copy 3 days ago? There is some validity to the problems with the PS3 version. But keep "doing the evolution" bro.
Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#257 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts
[QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="themajormayor"][QUOTE="PAL360"] Well, 360 got the HD version of GOTY 2010 and the playable version of GOTY 2011. Standards are changing, games are getting bigger and more complex. At least 360 seems to be dealing well with this natural evolution :twisted:

This was the most fanboyish & untrue comment I have ever seen. Yes RDR 360 got a few more pixels but at the cost of much longer loading times! Also Skyrim is more playable on the PS3. So PS3 is definitely dominating.

RDR does not have much longer loading times on the 360, it's a couple of seconds longer, and a few more pixels? RDR on 360 is HD on ps3 it's SUB-HD "This entails a full 720p resolution on Xbox 360 along with 2x multi-sampling anti-aliasing. PlayStation 3 on the other hand renders at a significantly lower resolution: 1152x640, with a very selective implementation of the blur-inducing quincunx anti-aliasing." "It's fairly obvious from the screenshots shown to date that there has been some significant paring back of detail on the PS3 version of the game, so what's going on? Well, the foliage is generated from transparent alpha textures and these are more expensive for the host hardware to draw. Cutting back on them saves on performance in terms of fill-rate and bandwidth. It's also interesting to note that the alpha-to-coverage transparency type is used on both systems, but looks considerably worse on PS3 owing to the reduced resolution." "We also see that the view distance on PS3 has been pulled back (or rather forward), although it's more accurate to say that view detail has been reduced. Xbox 360 gives you more detail further away, not just in terms of raw resolution but with actual object placement too. There are some stunning vista shots in Red Dead Redemption that demonstrate this quite nicely." "Just about the only area where PS3 commands an advantage is in terms of loading: the 515MB mandatory install shaves off a few seconds," http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-red-dead-redemption-face-off?page=1 you don't ever do any research before opening you trap do you,lol

Yeah yeah whatever point is the differences are very small. And it's not like PS3 owners was missing out on something because of these insignificant differences. It's not like Assassin's Creed or anything. In any case a really crappy game. And I had no complaints about the graphics.
Avatar image for glez13
glez13

10314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#258 glez13
Member since 2006 • 10314 Posts

[QUOTE="HavocV3"]

http://www.gamespot.com/forums/topic/28976801/gs-is-a-dumbass-that-hates-sw-skyrim-wins-goty

c'mon guys.

HavocV3

:?

lots of wasted energy in this thread.

TC is victorious.

VICTORY!!!!!!!11111 :cool:

Avatar image for DireOwl
DireOwl

3352

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#259 DireOwl
Member since 2007 • 3352 Posts

[QUOTE="DireOwl"]

[QUOTE="meetroid8"] Denial can only get you so far. But I understand, if my system of choice was in its last legs I would be disappointed too. Sooner or later you will have to move on to better things though. coughps3coughmeetroid8

PS3 over PC? The only word that can describe that is... ew.

You have fun over there with your dead system then.

I'd be willing to bet you teh PS triple will be extinct FAR before the PC.

Avatar image for vtoshkatur
vtoshkatur

1962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#260 vtoshkatur
Member since 2011 • 1962 Posts

[QUOTE="themajormayor"][QUOTE="PAL360"]

Do you have a link to support that claim?

Because last i heard (from DF and LoT), 360 used to look and run better under any circumstances.

KarateeeChop

Using the facts from LoT and DF I came to the conclusion that the PS3 version was better cause I don't like jaggies, screen tear, unbearable loading, bad sound etc. I can take some unnoticeable blur.

that's funny, according to DF the ps3 version suffers from much worse jaggies and loading than the 360 version.

oh and it looks like this.

360_aa.bmp.jpg (1280×720)

ps3_aa.bmp.jpg (1280×720)

must be tearing you up inside eh? :lol:

Both look awful.

Avatar image for vtoshkatur
vtoshkatur

1962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#261 vtoshkatur
Member since 2011 • 1962 Posts

[QUOTE="KarateeeChop"]

[QUOTE="themajormayor"] Using the facts from LoT and DF I came to the conclusion that the PS3 version was better cause I don't like jaggies, screen tear, unbearable loading, bad sound etc. I can take some unnoticeable blur.themajormayor

that's funny, according to DF the ps3 version suffers from much worse jaggies and loading than the 360 version.

oh and it looks like this.

360_aa.bmp.jpg (1280×720)

ps3_aa.bmp.jpg (1280×720)

must be tearing you up inside eh? :lol:

Prove it. And a picture doesn't prove anything as you can't see the annoying flickering when not in motion. Still I easily take the PS3 version based on the other pictures and the 360 exclusive jagged sword lol

It's ok bro. You just mad because the PS3 version is still broken. Should of got it for PC.

Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#262 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts
[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="PAL360"] Well, 360 got the HD version of GOTY 2010 and the playable version of GOTY 2011. Standards are changing, games are getting bigger and more complex. At least 360 seems to be dealing well with this natural evolution :twisted:cainetao11
Dragon Age Origins say hi! And Skyrim on PS3 is playable only dumb lems keep repeating it's not.

then why did one of my buddies return his PS3 copy 3 days ago? There is some validity to the problems with the PS3 version. But keep "doing the evolution" bro.

There may be some validity but there are also claims of problems with all versions. And there are many PS3 owners that haven't traded the game and are actually playing it. If the BS unplayable claims were true then every PS3 owner would be returning the game. The fact is Bethesda don't polish their games enough. Hell even a big game like DAO was able to look better on the PS3 than on the 360. The claim that the PS3 can't handle large games is one done by dumb fanboys who ignore all this.
Avatar image for RickTophen
RickTophen

487

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#263 RickTophen
Member since 2011 • 487 Posts
Skyrim PS3 shouldn't count.MonsieurX
Why not? It is what it is. You can take the console away from the game but not the game away from the console.
Avatar image for loosingENDS
loosingENDS

11793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#264 loosingENDS
Member since 2011 • 11793 Posts

[QUOTE="themajormayor"][QUOTE="KarateeeChop"]

that's funny, according to DF the ps3 version suffers from much worse jaggies and loading than the 360 version.

oh and it looks like this.

must be tearing you up inside eh? :lol:

vtoshkatur

Prove it. And a picture doesn't prove anything as you can't see the annoying flickering when not in motion. Still I easily take the PS3 version based on the other pictures and the 360 exclusive jagged sword lol

It's ok bro. You just mad because the PS3 version is still broken. Should of got it for PC.

Xbox 360 version looks like one generation ahead visually, PS3 one is one of the most blurry games i have ever seen, all detail is lost

Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#265 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

[QUOTE="themajormayor"] No then it runs better than the 360. Keep in mind if you don't format the HDD the chance that you'll get the lag bug is extremely small. 360 & PC version also has game breaking bugs. Too bad the jaggies, unbearable load times and unbearable screen tearing in the 360 version isn't something that you can fix with a patch or fix :(themajormayor

Do you have a link to support that claim?

Because last i heard (from DF and LoT), 360 used to look and run better under any circumstances.

Using the facts from LoT and DF I came to the conclusion that the PS3 version was better cause I don't like jaggies, screen tear, unbearable loading, bad sound etc. I can take some unnoticeable blur.

Those are some odd priorities, buddy, but it´s ok! I would put a stable framerate and more clear image quality over anything else.

Avatar image for waltefmoney
waltefmoney

18030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#266 waltefmoney
Member since 2010 • 18030 Posts

There may be some validity but there are also claims of problems with all versions. And there are many PS3 owners that haven't traded the game and are actually playing it. If the BS unplayable claims were true then every PS3 owner would be returning the game. The fact is Bethesda don't polish their games enough. Hell even a big game like DAO was able to look better on the PS3 than on the 360. The claim that the PS3 can't handle large games is one done by dumb fanboys who ignore all this.kuraimen

Dragon Age Origins isn't open world, kuraimen. The claim has always been that PS3 sucks at open world games, not "large games."

Avatar image for loosingENDS
loosingENDS

11793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#267 loosingENDS
Member since 2011 • 11793 Posts

PS3 has

- the worst version of Bioshock 1-2

- the worst version of Mass Effect 2 (no mass effect 1, worst visuals)

- the worst by miles version of Skyrim (360 gets exclusive DLC and vastly better visuals/performance)

- the worst version of RDR (far worst visuals)

- the worst version of Crysis 1-2 (worst visuals)

- the worst version of FF13-2 (360 gets exclusive DLC)

- the worst version of Dark souls (better visuals and performance no 360)

- the worst JRPGs (nothing like Lost Odyssey, 4/10 games like Neptunia)

.

Master race indeed

Avatar image for waltefmoney
waltefmoney

18030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#268 waltefmoney
Member since 2010 • 18030 Posts

PS3 has

- the worst version of Bioshock 1-2

- the worst version of Mass Effect 2 (no mass effect 1, worst visuals)

- the worst by miles version of Skyrim (360 gets exclusive DLC and vastly better visuals/performance)

- the worst version of RDR (far worst visuals)

- the worst version of Crysis 1-2 (worst visuals)

.

Master race indeed

loosingENDS

You don't even know why some of those games are better on 360, you're just talking out of your ass like always.

- the worst version of FF13-2 (360 gets exclusive DLC)loosingENDS

It's one weapon.

Avatar image for kraken2109
kraken2109

13271

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#269 kraken2109
Member since 2009 • 13271 Posts

Stop feeding the troll.

Avatar image for NotAFanboy7
NotAFanboy7

89

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#270 NotAFanboy7
Member since 2011 • 89 Posts

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

PS3 has

- the worst version of Bioshock 1-2

- the worst version of Mass Effect 2 (no mass effect 1, worst visuals)

- the worst by miles version of Skyrim (360 gets exclusive DLC and vastly better visuals/performance)

- the worst version of RDR (far worst visuals)

- the worst version of Crysis 1-2 (worst visuals)

.

Master race indeed

waltefmoney

You don't even know why some of those games are better on 360, you're just talking out of your ass like always.

- the worst version of FF13-2 (360 gets exclusive DLC)loosingENDS

It's one weapon.

He doesn't need to know why. The games are indeed better on the 360. He also forgot bayonetta.

Avatar image for loosingENDS
loosingENDS

11793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#271 loosingENDS
Member since 2011 • 11793 Posts

[QUOTE="waltefmoney"]

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

You don't even know why some of those games are better on 360, you're just talking out of your ass like always.

[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]- the worst version of FF13-2 (360 gets exclusive DLC)NotAFanboy7

It's one weapon.

He doesn't need to know why. The games are indeed better on the 360. He also forgot bayonetta.

Indeed, Bayonetta was much better on 360

Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#273 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts

[QUOTE="themajormayor"][QUOTE="PAL360"]

Do you have a link to support that claim?

Because last i heard (from DF and LoT), 360 used to look and run better under any circumstances.

PAL360

Using the facts from LoT and DF I came to the conclusion that the PS3 version was better cause I don't like jaggies, screen tear, unbearable loading, bad sound etc. I can take some unnoticeable blur.

Those are some odd priorities, buddy, but it´s ok! I would put a stable framerate and more clear image quality over anything else.

So you want 2.5 extra fps on average in exchange for 8% screen tearing on average?
Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#274 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts

PS3 has

- the worst version of Bioshock 1-2

- the worst version of Mass Effect 2 (no mass effect 1, worst visuals)

- the worst by miles version of Skyrim (360 gets exclusive DLC and vastly better visuals/performance)

- the worst version of RDR (far worst visuals)

- the worst version of Crysis 1-2 (worst visuals)

- the worst version of FF13-2 (360 gets exclusive DLC)

- the worst version of Dark souls (better visuals and performance no 360)

- the worst JRPGs (nothing like Lost Odyssey, 4/10 games like Neptunia)

.

Master race indeed

loosingENDS
Now as we all know most of this is just bullcrap but I'd really like to see you prove Dark Souls is better on the 360. Really plz.
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#275 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts

[QUOTE="kuraimen"]There may be some validity but there are also claims of problems with all versions. And there are many PS3 owners that haven't traded the game and are actually playing it. If the BS unplayable claims were true then every PS3 owner would be returning the game. The fact is Bethesda don't polish their games enough. Hell even a big game like DAO was able to look better on the PS3 than on the 360. The claim that the PS3 can't handle large games is one done by dumb fanboys who ignore all this.waltefmoney

Dragon Age Origins isn't open world, kuraimen. The claim has always been that PS3 sucks at open world games, not "large games."

Ok so what makes an open world game so different from a large game that the 360 sucks at those but not at open world games? this is the most ridiculous thing I've heard. So the PS3 waits for a game to be classified as open world to decide if it's going to suck. Dumb fanboys indeed...
Avatar image for waltefmoney
waltefmoney

18030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#277 waltefmoney
Member since 2010 • 18030 Posts

Ok so what makes an open world game so different from a large game that the 360 sucks at those but not at open world games? this is the most ridiculous thing I've heard. So the PS3 waits for a game to be classified as open world to decide if it's going to suck. Dumb fanboys indeed...kuraimen

Did YOU of all people seriously just call someone else a dumb fanboy? :lol:

And the difference, shockingly, is that one game is more linear, while the other is set in an open world where you can explore most, if not all of it, immediately or almost immediately. You don't need someone to classify it for you, it's actually pretty simple. But most of the time the developers themselves tell you the game's genre :o

Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#278 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts

[QUOTE="kuraimen"]Ok so what makes an open world game so different from a large game that the 360 sucks at those but not at open world games? this is the most ridiculous thing I've heard. So the PS3 waits for a game to be classified as open world to decide if it's going to suck. Dumb fanboys indeed...waltefmoney

Did YOU of all people seriously just call someone else a dumb fanboy? :lol:

And the difference, shockingly, is that one game is more linear, while the other is set in an open world where you can explore most, if not all of it, immediately or almost immediately. You don't need someone to classify it for you, it's actually pretty simple. But most of the time the developers themselves tell you the game's genre :o

Ok so the 360 sucks at large linear games?? but not at open world games. Again such a ridiculous argument...
Avatar image for waltefmoney
waltefmoney

18030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#279 waltefmoney
Member since 2010 • 18030 Posts

Ok so the 360 sucks at large linear games?? but not at open world games. Again such a ridiculous argument...kuraimen

No, I'm pretty sure you just made that up. But yeah I exagurated a bit by saying it sucks at open world games, it's just not as good as 360.

Avatar image for parkurtommo
parkurtommo

28295

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#280 parkurtommo
Member since 2009 • 28295 Posts

[QUOTE="themajormayor"][QUOTE="KarateeeChop"]

that's funny, according to DF the ps3 version suffers from much worse jaggies and loading than the 360 version.

oh and it looks like this.

360_aa.bmp.jpg (1280×720)

ps3_aa.bmp.jpg (1280×720)

must be tearing you up inside eh? :lol:

vtoshkatur

Prove it. And a picture doesn't prove anything as you can't see the annoying flickering when not in motion. Still I easily take the PS3 version based on the other pictures and the 360 exclusive jagged sword lol

It's ok bro. You just mad because the PS3 version is still broken. Should of got it for PC.

My god you are such an idiot ARGH
Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#281 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts

[QUOTE="kuraimen"]Ok so the 360 sucks at large linear games?? but not at open world games. Again such a ridiculous argument...waltefmoney

No, I'm pretty sure you just made that up. But yeah I exagurated a bit by saying it sucks at open world games, it's just not as good as 360.

That's the conclusion people are reaching for Skyrim having a couple of more problems on the PS3. I can reach the same stupid conclusion for the 360 by looking at Dragon Age Origins (oh and FFXIII).
Avatar image for waltefmoney
waltefmoney

18030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#282 waltefmoney
Member since 2010 • 18030 Posts

That's the conclusion people are reaching for Skyrim having a couple of more problems on the PS3. I can reach the same stupid conclusion for the 360 by looking at Dragon Age Origins (oh and FFXIII).kuraimen

I'm pretty sure neithe Dragon Age or FFXIII have a problem where they become unplayble on 360 due to massive framerate drops.

Avatar image for kuraimen
kuraimen

28078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#284 kuraimen
Member since 2010 • 28078 Posts

[QUOTE="kuraimen"]That's the conclusion people are reaching for Skyrim having a couple of more problems on the PS3. I can reach the same stupid conclusion for the 360 by looking at Dragon Age Origins (oh and FFXIII).waltefmoney

I'm pretty sure neithe Dragon Age or FFXIII have a problem where they become unplayble on 360 due to massive framerate drops.

Yet they look worse. And the PS3 version is not unplayable since many people play it. The big games that have more problems on the PS3 are mostly Bethesda games which hints that the problem is Bethesda developers not the PS3. There have been several open world games doing just fine on the PS3 including GTA4 (which some sources say it even plays better on the PS3).
Avatar image for waltefmoney
waltefmoney

18030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#285 waltefmoney
Member since 2010 • 18030 Posts

(which some sources say it even plays better on the PS3).kuraimen

Those must be some terrible sources to say a game that runs at a sub hd resolution on PS3 while 720p on 360, performs worse overall and has no anti-aliasing on PS3 plays better on it.

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#286 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="vtoshkatur"]

[QUOTE="themajormayor"] Prove it. And a picture doesn't prove anything as you can't see the annoying flickering when not in motion. Still I easily take the PS3 version based on the other pictures and the 360 exclusive jagged sword lolloosingENDS

It's ok bro. You just mad because the PS3 version is still broken. Should of got it for PC.

Xbox 360 version looks like one generation ahead visually, PS3 one is one of the most blurry games i have ever seen, all detail is lost

No it's not.

Avatar image for vtoshkatur
vtoshkatur

1962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#287 vtoshkatur
Member since 2011 • 1962 Posts

[QUOTE="vtoshkatur"]

[QUOTE="themajormayor"] Prove it. And a picture doesn't prove anything as you can't see the annoying flickering when not in motion. Still I easily take the PS3 version based on the other pictures and the 360 exclusive jagged sword lolparkurtommo

It's ok bro. You just mad because the PS3 version is still broken. Should of got it for PC.

My god you are such an idiot ARGH

LOL sounds like that makes you angry:lol:

Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38071

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#288 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38071 Posts
[QUOTE="cainetao11"][QUOTE="kuraimen"] Dragon Age Origins say hi! And Skyrim on PS3 is playable only dumb lems keep repeating it's not.kuraimen
then why did one of my buddies return his PS3 copy 3 days ago? There is some validity to the problems with the PS3 version. But keep "doing the evolution" bro.

There may be some validity but there are also claims of problems with all versions. And there are many PS3 owners that haven't traded the game and are actually playing it. If the BS unplayable claims were true then every PS3 owner would be returning the game. The fact is Bethesda don't polish their games enough. Hell even a big game like DAO was able to look better on the PS3 than on the 360. The claim that the PS3 can't handle large games is one done by dumb fanboys who ignore all this.

No doubt the ps3 can handle these games, but imo, Sony effed up a bit this gen. Why make your console so much different to program for? I know, it's lazy devs, all their fault. I believe Sony has to shoulder some blame in the fact that more often than not, multi's perform better on the 360.
Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#289 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts

[QUOTE="vtoshkatur"]

[QUOTE="themajormayor"] Prove it. And a picture doesn't prove anything as you can't see the annoying flickering when not in motion. Still I easily take the PS3 version based on the other pictures and the 360 exclusive jagged sword lolloosingENDS

It's ok bro. You just mad because the PS3 version is still broken. Should of got it for PC.

Xbox 360 version looks like one generation ahead visually, PS3 one is one of the most blurry games i have ever seen, all detail is lost

you are just being stupid dude, it's not a generation ahead at all, it's better, yes, but not by a generation, you are just as bad as majormayor and actionjunkie
Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#290 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts
[QUOTE="loosingENDS"]

[QUOTE="vtoshkatur"]

It's ok bro. You just mad because the PS3 version is still broken. Should of got it for PC.

delta3074

Xbox 360 version looks like one generation ahead visually, PS3 one is one of the most blurry games i have ever seen, all detail is lost

you are just being stupid dude, it's not a generation ahead at all, it's better, yes, but not by a generation, you are just as bad as majormayor and actionjunkie

lol!
Avatar image for meetroid8
meetroid8

21152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#291 meetroid8
Member since 2005 • 21152 Posts
[QUOTE="kuraimen"][QUOTE="cainetao11"] then why did one of my buddies return his PS3 copy 3 days ago? There is some validity to the problems with the PS3 version. But keep "doing the evolution" bro.cainetao11
There may be some validity but there are also claims of problems with all versions. And there are many PS3 owners that haven't traded the game and are actually playing it. If the BS unplayable claims were true then every PS3 owner would be returning the game. The fact is Bethesda don't polish their games enough. Hell even a big game like DAO was able to look better on the PS3 than on the 360. The claim that the PS3 can't handle large games is one done by dumb fanboys who ignore all this.

No doubt the ps3 can handle these games, but imo, Sony effed up a bit this gen. Why make your console so much different to program for? I know, it's lazy devs, all their fault. I believe Sony has to shoulder some blame in the fact that more often than not, multi's perform better on the 360.

So it is Sony's job to make their hardware as similar as possible to Microsoft's? How does that make any sense?
Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#292 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts
[QUOTE="cainetao11"][QUOTE="kuraimen"] There may be some validity but there are also claims of problems with all versions. And there are many PS3 owners that haven't traded the game and are actually playing it. If the BS unplayable claims were true then every PS3 owner would be returning the game. The fact is Bethesda don't polish their games enough. Hell even a big game like DAO was able to look better on the PS3 than on the 360. The claim that the PS3 can't handle large games is one done by dumb fanboys who ignore all this.meetroid8
No doubt the ps3 can handle these games, but imo, Sony effed up a bit this gen. Why make your console so much different to program for? I know, it's lazy devs, all their fault. I believe Sony has to shoulder some blame in the fact that more often than not, multi's perform better on the 360.

So it is Sony's job to make their hardware as similar as possible to Microsoft's? How does that make any sense?

it makes sense to make your hardware developer friendly, it makes sense to make your hardware close to the system that is used to create the game and engines in the first place which is the PC, MS where not stupid, by making the 360 with similar architecture to the Pc means that porting games from the PC to the 360 is cheap as chips and publishers get more return on there investment, making your hardware a pig to develope on costs developers more time and money which means they get less return on there investment,as a developer which console would you rather develope on, the console that gives you the bigger return on your investment or the one that gives you the least return on your investment, common sense really, the worst part about it is that SONY deliberately mad it hard to develope on.
Avatar image for KiZZo1
KiZZo1

3989

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#293 KiZZo1
Member since 2007 • 3989 Posts

I'd say trolls are the new master race ...

Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29844

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#294 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29844 Posts

I'd say trolls are the new master race ...

KiZZo1

Only if you feed them ;P

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#295 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="MonsieurX"]Skyrim PS3 shouldn't count.RickTophen
Why not? It is what it is. You can take the console away from the game but not the game away from the console.

Oh yes, lets nominate a game that has serious flaws even though it wasn't nominated on that platform in the 1st place...