@pc_rocks: Last I checked, most of the world's biggest tech companies are in Asia... Unless you were specifically talking about just gaming tech companies?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
@pc_rocks: Last I checked, most of the world's biggest tech companies are in Asia... Unless you were specifically talking about just gaming tech companies?
Gaming, since that's the topic. However even in terms of overall technology, West is also leading apart from telecommunications and consumer electronics. The most complex technologies are still western owned.
@pc_rocks: That's what "tech companies" usually means, companies specialising in electronics and/or IT. In terms of non-IT/electronic technologies, it varies greatly from industry to industry, with the West leading some industries and Asia leading some other industries.
@pc_rocks: That's what "tech companies" usually means, companies specialising in electronics and/or IT. In terms of non-IT/electronic technologies, it varies greatly from industry to industry, with the West leading some industries and Asia leading some other industries.
I know that and even here West has a lead. They don't manufacture most of it yet they own the most complex parts like the actual design.
@pc_rocks: You're being too vague and making broad generalizations. What do you mean by designs? Last I checked, Asia produces more annual patents than the West. And what non-electronic technology industries do you mean? Last I checked, Asian companies dominate the automobile industry.
@pc_rocks: You're being too vague and making broad generalizations. What do you mean by designs? Last I checked, Asia produces more annual patents than the West. And what non-electronic technology industries do you mean? Last I checked, Asian companies dominate the automobile industry.
I'm talking about semiconductor designs, processor designs, GPU designs etc. West has a clear edge there. Intel, AMD, Qualcomm, ARM, Nvidia, Apple, IBM. Semiconductor fabrication - Intel. Inter processor/electrnoc buses etc - again mostly western. Satellites/Jet Propulsion/Rockets/Outer Space - west, automobiles - Germany is better or just as good (I know Toyotta sells the most but that wasn't the point), Electric cars - Tesla has the lead there, jets/airplanes/flight control systems/jet engines - US is a clear winner there, Google/MS/Amazon/Apple/Uber/Facebook/Oracle/IBM/SAP/Savion are far superior to whatever counterpart Asia has if any, weapon technology - I shouldn't even need to say anything here, hell many multimedia formats/codec/remaster technology - west.
The only thing Asia has over west is telecommunications technology/infrastructure, manufacturing but you know that's more to do with how high you're on the food chain as compare to lacking the actual capability and consumer electronics like TVs, Phones, Appliances etc.
@pc_rocks:
Yikes this can’t be a serious question!
Sega
Nintendo
Sony
Capcom
Square
Enix
FromSoftware
Just to name a few all day hello.
Western companies having significant technical prowess in game design and engineering is a very recent phenomenon. Probably only within the past 15 years.
MH World and FF15 are actually pretty good looking games. Even though MH World is using a pretty meh engine (MT Framework Engine). While FF15 is actually using a pretty good engine which is a modified engine that is being used by FF14 ARR.
Then you have RE2 remake, which is using the RE Engine which is supposedly a modified/sister engine to the MT Framework Engine.
But you have games like Y's VIII which looks like dog ****
I don't know how that relates to what I said. Most of what you listed is manufacturing and capacity, it's hardly the same as cutting edge or having a lead. I already mentioned the actual design and how manufacturing has mostly to do with food chain economics rather than the capability. Same is the case with patents; number of patents alone don't mean anything if they aren't worth anything. Let's go one by one:
Also let me tell you from my experience in the software industry and across different verticals. Many Asian countries for their cutting edge IT projects and digital transformation projects almost always get a western company to undertake them. Have seen it like clockwork. They get the western consultants, license western software and get western hardware. Just recently I'm part of a $100M+ project and you know what all the leading software companies that have implemented such solutions or have a product are all western and the funny things is all these companies built their solution/product by outsourcing it to cheap labor countries like Pakistan, India, Bangladesh etc however the actual architecture and solution design was still oversee by themselves.
A bit off topic here, do you know what happens when world bodies like World Bank, IMF and ICF fund projects or give grants to developing countries? It looks really cool in terms of PR that World Bank is bankrolling a $100-500M project for advancing a third world country but what actually happens is they mandate a western company's software/hardware be bought/licensed/implemented like IBM/MS etc. Even when a country or relevant department possess the capability and wanted to go with Open Source software they don't allow it. So you get their software license, their hardware, their consultants and at best they will allow you to do is implement the solution via their local business partner. What's worse is they don't even give the money to local/country's branch of that western company, it always goes to their western accounts like IBM UK, US etc. The country will be lucky to see 20% amount invested in their own country when all is said and done.
@pc_rocks:
Are we going off-topic here? This thread is supposed to be on the Japanese and gaming technology, but it has drifting to a non-System Wars "East vs. West" technology discussion.
By the way, the question could have been worded better as it implies that the Japanese are incompetent in terms of gaming technology which some examples on this thread show is untrue.
@Jag85:
I wouldn’t say so no. Just different priorities. Japan’s studios do better on things like hitboxes/hurt box centric gameplay. It’s why things like Devil May Cry feel fantastic and the west’s action games, welllllllllllll the proof is in the pudding on that one.
They get more out of their games when aiming for 60faps, than western console games ever do.
A lot of big expensive looking western games tend to have poor controls, mad input lag, rigid or sluggish movement, or shallow systems. It’s very easy to look good when all your goals are just that, look good. Major difference when you have to make your game play well and look pleasant.
Plus I can’t think of too many Japanese devs who release games as fundamentally broken the way Dice has, or Bethesda has, or Obsidian has.
Not to say the West isn’t capable of good games. Hitman and Doom exist. Notice how those aren’t the lookers either.
This. OP's question would be like asking: "Are Western developers bad with gameplay?" Most Western and Japanese developers just have different priorities. With some exceptions, of course (there are a few gameplay-centric Western devs and a few tech-centric Japanese devs).
I would want to go down that path. Can the west at least, AT LEAST learn hitboxes n hurtboxes again. Ubisoft made that effort with the recent ass creed games, i mean the game is still trash, it says Assassin's Creed right in the title, but you know, baby steps.
I wouldn’t say so no. Just different priorities. Japan’s studios do better on things like hitboxes/hurt box centric gameplay. It’s why things like Devil May Cry feel fantastic and the west’s action games, welllllllllllll the proof is in the pudding on that one.
They get more out of their games when aiming for 60faps, than western console games ever do.
A lot of big expensive looking western games tend to have poor controls, mad input lag, rigid or sluggish movement, or shallow systems. It’s very easy to look good when all your goals are just that, look good. Major difference when you have to make your game play well and look pleasant.
Plus I can’t think of too many Japanese devs who release games as fundamentally broken the way Dice has, or Bethesda has, or Obsidian has.
Not to say the West isn’t capable of good games. Hitman and Doom exist. Notice how those aren’t the lookers either.
This. OP's question would be like asking: "Are Western developers bad with gameplay?" Most Western and Japanese developers just have different priorities. With some exceptions, of course (there are a few gameplay-centric Western devs and a few tech-centric Japanese devs).
I would want to go down that path. Can the west at least, AT LEAST learn hitboxes n hurtboxes again. Ubisoft made that effort with the recent ass creed games, i mean the game is still trash, it says Assassin's Creed right in the title, but you know, baby steps.
The last time I remember Ubisoft making a good melee combat system was the Prince of Persia: Sands of Time trilogy well over a decade ago... But then Assassin's Creed happened.
@pc_rocks:
https://www.techcenturion.com/7nm-10nm-14nm-fabrication
You're wrong. Different companies markets their silicon density differently.
Intel's 10 nm is effectively TSMC's 7nm+ on apples to apples density comparison.
@Jag85 said:
GPU chips - Fair enough. Nvidia and AMD clearly lead in this category. Although both the Nvidia and AMD GPU divisions are founded and led by Asian immigrants.
US is a nation of migrants. US is consistent with helping/protecting Republic of China (located in Taiwan) since pre-WW2 to this day with a special defence agreement between US and Taiwan. US trade blockaded Imperial Japan to support Republic of China before WW2.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nvidia#Founders_and_initial_investment
2 of 3 NVIDIA's co-founders are "white". NVIDIA's founding was banked rolled by https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sequoia_Capital Sequoia was founded by "white" Don Valentine
Three people co-founded Nvidia in April 1993:[11][12]
Chris Malachowsky worked with HP and Sun.
In the early 1990s, Commodore was working with HP on PA-RISC based 3D chipset. HP fabricated Commodore's Amiga chipsets like AGA's Lisa chip (display chip).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amiga_Hombre_chipset
According to Dr. Ed Hepler, Hombre was to be fabricated in 0.6 µm 3-level metal CMOS with the help of Hewlett-Packard. HP had fabricated the AGA Lisa chip and collaborated in the design of the AAA chipset.
Amiga Hombre was early 1990s "Xbox" which can run MS's Windows NT 3.1 with OpenGL (licensed from SGI).
The original plan for the Hombre-based computer system was to have Windows NT compatibility, with native AmigaOS recompiled for the new big-endian CPU to run legacy 68k Amiga software through emulation. Commodore chose the PA-7150 microprocessor over the MIPSR3000 microprocessor and first generation embedded PowerPC microprocessors, mainly because these low-cost microprocessors were unqualified to run Windows NT. This wasn't the case for the 64-bitMIPSR4200, but it was rejected for its high price at the time.
Microsoft developed their Xbox when it run out of game console hardware partners.
US EPA killed Commodore.
------
@Jag85 said:
Space industry - 4 out of the top 5 countries with the highest space research & exploration funding are Asian.
https://www.alphr.com/space/1005737/how-much-do-governments-spend-on-space-science
US located Space X leads the rocket tech innovation which has beaten every government run rocket programs.
@Jag85 said:
Most of Russia's land is in Asia, and its space launch facilities are in Asia. Russia is never called "Western" but has always been "the East". Still not relevant, US has a clear lead here. Anyone thinking the rest of the world isn't following their lead is just disingenuous.
Russia's current civilisation is based on Eastern "Holy" Roman empire's Christian Orthodox branch.
US and majority of EU civilisation is based on Western "Holy" Roman empire's Catholic/Protestant Christian branch.
Read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East%E2%80%93West_Schism
@Jag85 said:
Fact is both Russia's and US space program were kickstarted by German/Nazi talent.
Reminder, English and German languages are part of Germanic family. Read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Germanic_languages
@Jag85 said:
Automobile industry - 7 out of the top 10 best-ranked quality car brands are Asian, including #1 (Lexus). Again volume.
There are multiple Toyota factories in the US. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Toyota_manufacturing_facilities#United_States including very popular Camry and Corolla models.
For Lexus, https://lexus2.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/8025/~/where-are-lexus-vehicles-assembled-for-the-u.s.-market%3F
@Jag85 said:
German automobiles are more luxurious, have better quality and more sought after.
German automobiles like VW was caught cheating against US EPA's rules.
Tesla is leading the EV race and Giga-Factory is create near a Nevada Lithium mine. Unlike EU, North American continent is rich with raw metals and oil.
nVIDIA for the win with AI vehicle driving which has beaten both Japanese and German AI software/hardware developments.
@Jag85 said:
Multimedia formats - The current AVC and AAC standards were set by Japanese companies, when they created the Blu-ray format.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Audio_Coding
Developed by | Bell Labs, Fraunhofer Institute, Dolby Labs, Sony and Nokia |
---|
US: Bell Labs
EU(germany): Fraunhofer Institute
US: Dolby Labs
JP: Sony
EU(Finland): Nokia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H.264/MPEG-4_AVC
H.264 was developed by the ITU-TVideo Coding Experts Group (VCEG) together with the ISO/IEC JTC1Moving Picture Experts Group (MPEG)
H.264 is protected by patents owned by various parties. A license covering most (but not all) patents essential to H.264 is administered by patent poolMPEG LA
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MPEG_LA
That ultimately led to a group of eight MPEG-2 patent owners—Fujitsu, Panasonic, Sony, Mitsubishi, Scientific Atlanta, Columbia University, Philips and General Instrument—along with CableLabs and certain individuals, to form MPEG LA, which in turn created the first modern-day patent pool as a solution.
4 companies: Japan
4 companies (including Columbia University): US
1 company: EU
Military hardware... start a debate in general forum.
Come at me. You got my attention, I'll debate you on one on one.
PS; I don't agree with bashing the Japanese since they are security and defence partner with the US e.g. Six Eyes https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_Eyes
@br0kenrabbit:
The opposite is true, having methods/variables based on loanwords of your own native language would actually be more of a hindrance from a programming standpoint (which itself much like doing mathematical proofs is based on rigorous logic). One of the biggest difficulties of language is having to deal with ambiguity, so having the same words with multiple different meanings makes it harder, being an English/arts major would actually be more difficult than your stereotypical engineer who could barely speak/write coherently in English.
Although various programming languages do have an alternative version (with equivalent methods based on "foreign" loanwords), a lot of non-English speaking programmers although they use your generic programming language in English letters/words (such as Java or C++ for instance) still comment in their own native language (or English with other devs). However with that being said, the English/native meaning of the loanword is irrelevant, it is only the logical meaning of the variable/method in the respective programming language that matters.
i.e. English definition of word =/= Programming definition of the word
Theory in common tongue =/= Theory in Science
Ruby was written by a native Japanese speaker who wasn't too fluent in communicating in normal English (much like a lot of Engineering/Programmer types), wrote the entire documentation of the programming language in English.
Not sure, but I will say that I have noticed that Western games tend to launch 1/2 finished and need a million patches. Eastern games tend to come out in more of a finished state.
My point is that the West does not seem that amazing with tech when they release so many glitchy messes day one.
Japanese culture dictates that they focus on quality rather than features. Their development processes are setup for consensus so that large risks are almost always minimized. this is good from a quality perspective, but it also means that they are slow to implement change.
The East Asian devs makes great games with great controls and mechanics. Everybody else makes 30fps movie games with poor controls/input lag, QTE's and silly RPG mechanics. I'll take a slightly less pretty East Asian game any day.
Not sure, but I will say that I have noticed that Western games tend to launch 1/2 finished and need a million patches. Eastern games tend to come out in more of a finished state.
My point is that the West does not seem that amazing with tech when they release so many glitchy messes day one.
The East Asian devs makes great games with great controls and mechanics. Everybody else makes 30fps movie games with poor controls/input lag, QTE's and silly RPG mechanics. I'll take a slightly less pretty East Asian game any day.
These men speak truth.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment