lol none of the bullets hit directly where you point the crosshair that's what made it realistic.lineargames
yes, its called deviation...bulets dont travel in straight lines.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
lol none of the bullets hit directly where you point the crosshair that's what made it realistic.lineargamesBad net coding =/= realistic.
I meant call of duty bullets do hit like where you point the crosshair in real life. but you move around like you do in real life when aiming with crosshair because nobody can stand directly 100% still. you shoot unaccurate if you move and shoot without iron sight if you stand still and shoot 1 shot at a time it's more accurate that's kinda realistic. overall call of duty is more realistic than operation flashpoint or ama2 id like for you to explain how those crap games are more realistic.lineargames
well for starters your health doesnt recharge.
[QUOTE="cobrax75"][QUOTE="lineargames"]call of duty 2 would be the most realistic if by default it had a sprint button, but there's sprint mods, but one thing that sucks you cant time hand grenades like real ones, they fixed that in call of duty 4 tho you can cook them now. but stupid ass Xp xtra points logo takes away from immersion of you shooting someone lol.lineargames
are you seriously suggesting that COD is as realistic as Arma?
Way more realistic By far, arma is ripping off call of duty by having iron sight. Dude thats quote worthy[QUOTE="lineargames"]I meant call of duty bullets do hit like where you point the crosshair in real life. but you move around like you do in real life when aiming with crosshair because nobody can stand directly 100% still. you shoot unaccurate if you move and shoot without iron sight if you stand still and shoot 1 shot at a time it's more accurate that's kinda realistic. overall call of duty is more realistic than operation flashpoint or ama2 id like for you to explain how those crap games are more realistic.cobrax75
well for starters your health doesnt recharge.
first call of duty had healthbar. also ur health doesnt recharge on call of duty it's just if you arent wounded enough you still live, would kinda make gameplay suck if you got slower and slower if you got hitDude thats quote worthylineargamescall of duty 2003 first game to model iron sight accurately in a game. operation flashpoint iron sight doesnt even move how call of duty's does. call of duty iron sight when you aim ur crosshair will move around like player is actually trying to hold the guns sight still infront of his face lol. Like I believe any word you are saying. You think Call of duty is more realistic then Arma??? You lost all your credibilty like along time ago dude. Right now you are just spewing out random thoughts. I personally don't think you are an adult or have shot any guns at all.
[QUOTE="clembo1990"][QUOTE="lineargames"]I meant call of duty bullets do hit like where you point the crosshair in real life. but you move around like you do in real life when aiming with crosshair because nobody can stand directly 100% still. you shoot unaccurate if you move and shoot without iron sight if you stand still and shoot 1 shot at a time it's more accurate that's kinda realistic. overall call of duty is more realistic than operation flashpoint or ama2 id like for you to explain how those crap games are more realistic.lineargames1) in war you don't respawn into the middle of a fight 2) in war you have vehicles supporting the infantry 3) in war the maps aren't arena style it is open ended 4) in war you have objectives 5) in war grenades aren't the best weapon they are used tactically not blindly 6) in war your health doesn't recharge stop trying to change the subject i have been shooting guns 20 goddamn years stop trying to tell me this crap game is more realistic. when it's a true call of duty's player abilities is more true to real life.
No they aren't your just a kid posting on a forum trying to say you shot guns in real life. You did not shoot any guns in real life and have no idea what you are talking about.
[QUOTE="cobrax75"][QUOTE="lineargames"]I meant call of duty bullets do hit like where you point the crosshair in real life. but you move around like you do in real life when aiming with crosshair because nobody can stand directly 100% still. you shoot unaccurate if you move and shoot without iron sight if you stand still and shoot 1 shot at a time it's more accurate that's kinda realistic. overall call of duty is more realistic than operation flashpoint or ama2 id like for you to explain how those crap games are more realistic.lineargames
well for starters your health doesnt recharge.
first call of duty had healthbar. also ur health doesnt recharge on call of duty it's just if you arent wounded enough you still live, would kinda make gameplay suck if you got slower and slower if you got hit You dont have a healthbar to indicate how alive you are in real life :|lol none of the bullets hit directly where you point the crosshair that's what made it realistic.lineargames
So you're saying that Call of Duty was the first game to use Iron sights and also the first game to model bullet deviation/cone of fire effects? That is just blatantly false.
And don't even get me started on how many bullets you can take before dying in Call of Duty. And the crosshair, and the pinpoint accuracy, and the linear levels. It is an immersive shooter, sure, but not even remotely a realistic one. Call of Duty is a high-budget WW2 FPS. OFP is a low-budget military sim. Two completely different things.
[QUOTE="lineargames"]lol none of the bullets hit directly where you point the crosshair that's what made it realistic.Brendissimo35
So you're saying that Call of Duty was the first game to use Iron sights and also the first game to model bullet deviation/cone of fire effects? That is just blatantly false.
And don't even get me started on how many bullets you can take before dying in Call of Duty. And the crosshair, and the pinpoint accuracy, and the linear levels. It is an immersive shooter, sure, but not even remotely a realistic one. Call of Duty is a high-budget WW2 FPS. OFP is a low-budget military sim. Two completely different things.
Here's a picture of a real revolver 22. caliber rossi notice my names writen on piece of paper it's laying on lol i can take picture of ak-47 if you want http://i40.tinypic.com/2rm3441.jpg SORRY KIDS just because you played guitar hero metallica doesnt make you kirk hammett on the guitar. just because you played some first person shooters, doesnt means you know anything about guns either. call of duty is more realistic. ACCEPT CALL OF DUTY IS MORE REALISTIC AND MOVE ON.[QUOTE="Brendissimo35"][QUOTE="lineargames"]lol none of the bullets hit directly where you point the crosshair that's what made it realistic.lineargames
So you're saying that Call of Duty was the first game to use Iron sights and also the first game to model bullet deviation/cone of fire effects? That is just blatantly false.
And don't even get me started on how many bullets you can take before dying in Call of Duty. And the crosshair, and the pinpoint accuracy, and the linear levels. It is an immersive shooter, sure, but not even remotely a realistic one. Call of Duty is a high-budget WW2 FPS. OFP is a low-budget military sim. Two completely different things.
Here's a picture of a real revolver 22. caliber rossi notice my names writen on piece of paper it's laying on lol i can take picture of ak-47 if you want http://i40.tinypic.com/2rm3441.jpg SORRY KIDS just because you played guitar hero metallica doesnt make you kirk hammett on the guitar. just because you played some first person shooters, doesnt means you know anything about guns either. call of duty is more realistic. ACCEPT CALL OF DUTY IS MORE REALISTIC AND MOVE ON.great response. You've graduated from trolling into spamming.
Here's a picture of a real revolver 22. caliber rossi notice my names writen on piece of paper it's laying on lol i can take picture of ak-47 if you want http://i40.tinypic.com/2rm3441.jpg SORRY KIDS just because you played guitar hero metallica doesnt make you kirk hammett on the guitar. just because you played some first person shooters, doesnt means you know anything about guns either. call of duty is more realistic. ACCEPT CALL OF DUTY IS MORE REALISTIC AND MOVE ON.[QUOTE="lineargames"][QUOTE="Brendissimo35"]
So you're saying that Call of Duty was the first game to use Iron sights and also the first game to model bullet deviation/cone of fire effects? That is just blatantly false.
And don't even get me started on how many bullets you can take before dying in Call of Duty. And the crosshair, and the pinpoint accuracy, and the linear levels. It is an immersive shooter, sure, but not even remotely a realistic one. Call of Duty is a high-budget WW2 FPS. OFP is a low-budget military sim. Two completely different things.
Brendissimo35
great response. You've graduated from trolling into spamming.
you dont even have a arguement nobody here has explain how arma2 is more realistic. just stop posting if you cant make a arguement.[QUOTE="Brendissimo35"][QUOTE="lineargames"] Here's a picture of a real revolver 22. caliber rossi notice my names writen on piece of paper it's laying on lol i can take picture of ak-47 if you want http://i40.tinypic.com/2rm3441.jpg SORRY KIDS just because you played guitar hero metallica doesnt make you kirk hammett on the guitar. just because you played some first person shooters, doesnt means you know anything about guns either. call of duty is more realistic. ACCEPT CALL OF DUTY IS MORE REALISTIC AND MOVE ON.lineargames
great response. You've graduated from trolling into spamming.
you dont even have a arguement nobody here has explain how arma2 is more realistic. just stop posting if you cant make a arguement.Alot of people have given you reasons why other games are more realistic or why cod games are not realistic, and you just seem to ignore there posts.
[QUOTE="Brendissimo35"][QUOTE="lineargames"] Here's a picture of a real revolver 22. caliber rossi notice my names writen on piece of paper it's laying on lol i can take picture of ak-47 if you want http://i40.tinypic.com/2rm3441.jpg SORRY KIDS just because you played guitar hero metallica doesnt make you kirk hammett on the guitar. just because you played some first person shooters, doesnt means you know anything about guns either. call of duty is more realistic. ACCEPT CALL OF DUTY IS MORE REALISTIC AND MOVE ON.lineargames
great response. You've graduated from trolling into spamming.
you dont even have a arguement nobody here has explain how arma2 is more realistic. just stop posting if you cant make a arguement. I just did. The things I listed trumps CoD in realism. And to that list I add the ability to go prone and snipe more realistically.crysis is pretty realistic also in how the guns will move when ur trying to aim with the iron sight. crysis would of been perfect fps. you can prone crawl in crysis,lean left or right around corners,crouch,jump like 8 ft high, pick up stuff physics based and throw it at enemys. crysis is like realism mixed with twitch shooter. crysis would of been so badass if you could of still leaned left or right around corners online and picked up physics based stuff and throw it at people in the multiplayer like the single player.lineargames
What the heck does Crysis have to do with this thread? Why are you so off-topic? If you are an adult why do you type like such a child? Why do you post here on gamespot when you have been banned 20 times?!
[QUOTE="lineargames"]crysis is pretty realistic also in how the guns will move when ur trying to aim with the iron sight. crysis would of been perfect fps. you can prone crawl in crysis,lean left or right around corners,crouch,jump like 8 ft high, pick up stuff physics based and throw it at enemys. crysis is like realism mixed with twitch shooter. crysis would of been so badass if you could of still leaned left or right around corners online and picked up physics based stuff and throw it at people in the multiplayer like the single player.JangoWuzHere
What the heck does Crysis have to do with this thread? Why are you so off-topic? If you are an adult why do you type like such a child? Why do you post here on gamespot when you have been banned 20 times?!
Why do you act like a child?[QUOTE="JangoWuzHere"][QUOTE="lineargames"]crysis is pretty realistic also in how the guns will move when ur trying to aim with the iron sight. crysis would of been perfect fps. you can prone crawl in crysis,lean left or right around corners,crouch,jump like 8 ft high, pick up stuff physics based and throw it at enemys. crysis is like realism mixed with twitch shooter. crysis would of been so badass if you could of still leaned left or right around corners online and picked up physics based stuff and throw it at people in the multiplayer like the single player.lineargames
What the heck does Crysis have to do with this thread? Why are you so off-topic? If you are an adult why do you type like such a child? Why do you post here on gamespot when you have been banned 20 times?!
Why do you act like a child?I like how you avoided my questions. Really have you ever played Arma? Im assuming your young because you think running/jumping and shooting is realistic.
Why do you act like a child?[QUOTE="lineargames"][QUOTE="JangoWuzHere"]
What the heck does Crysis have to do with this thread? Why are you so off-topic? If you are an adult why do you type like such a child? Why do you post here on gamespot when you have been banned 20 times?!
JangoWuzHere
I like how you avoided my questions. Really have you ever played Arma? Im assuming your young because you think running/jumping and shooting is realistic.
shooting/jumping is realistic because i have shot this gun real one in pic lol running and jumping and reloading and hit my target fine http://i43.tinypic.com/35kn1u9.jpg[QUOTE="JangoWuzHere"][QUOTE="lineargames"] Why do you act like a child?lineargames
I like how you avoided my questions. Really have you ever played Arma? Im assuming your young because you think running/jumping and shooting is realistic.
shooting/jumping is realistic because i have shot this gun real one in pic lol running and jumping and reloading and hit my target fine http://i43.tinypic.com/35kn1u9.jpgNo its not realistic especially when your a soilder in war when you have heavey amount of gear on your self. Shooting and jumping or running and jumping would be stupid in a warzone.
shooting/jumping is realistic because i have shot this gun real one in pic lol running and jumping and reloading and hit my target fine http://i43.tinypic.com/35kn1u9.jpg[QUOTE="lineargames"][QUOTE="JangoWuzHere"]
I like how you avoided my questions. Really have you ever played Arma? Im assuming your young because you think running/jumping and shooting is realistic.
JangoWuzHere
No its not realistic especially when your a soilder in war when you have heavey amount of gear on your self. Shooting and jumping or running and jumping would be stupid in a warzone.
nope it is realistic see this gun in the picture with my name on it? http://i43.tinypic.com/35kn1u9.jpg that proves it is realistic because i have done it, usa army is poorly trained. they walk right out in the open like 1800's soldier fools who got slaughtered by the indians hiding in foliage.[QUOTE="JangoWuzHere"][QUOTE="lineargames"] shooting/jumping is realistic because i have shot this gun real one in pic lol running and jumping and reloading and hit my target fine http://i43.tinypic.com/35kn1u9.jpglineargames
No its not realistic especially when your a soilder in war when you have heavey amount of gear on your self. Shooting and jumping or running and jumping would be stupid in a warzone.
nope it is realistic see this gun in the picture with my name on it? http://i43.tinypic.com/35kn1u9.jpg that proves it is realistic because i have done it, usa army is poorly trained. they walk right out in the open like 1800 soldier fools who got slaughtered by the indians hiding in foliage.Im done with you. Why don't you go join the army then seeing as you know everything:roll:
nope it is realistic see this gun in the picture with my name on it? http://i43.tinypic.com/35kn1u9.jpg that proves it is realistic because i have done it, usa army is poorly trained. they walk right out in the open like 1800 soldier fools who got slaughtered by the indians hiding in foliage.[QUOTE="lineargames"][QUOTE="JangoWuzHere"]
No its not realistic especially when your a soilder in war when you have heavey amount of gear on your self. Shooting and jumping or running and jumping would be stupid in a warzone.
JangoWuzHere
Im done with you. Why don't ypu go join the army then seeing as you know everything:roll:
i dont claim to know everything i dont know how to make maps like that one dragonfirex dude who post here who made crysis map, but i could of designed a better layout for him to use. i been shooting since i was a kid before i played first person shooters, i know the limits of reality lol.[QUOTE="Salt_The_Fries"]It wouldn't be possible without massive downgrading anyway. Plus console gaming is no market for such games.cobrax75
yeah, I always found it incredibly strange that people though a game like this could work on consoles.
OpF works quite well on Xbox. It's the same game as on PC, I have both versions, so it is possible to make them work. Though, I don't know how many console gamers would buy a game like that.
[QUOTE="JangoWuzHere"][QUOTE="lineargames"] nope it is realistic see this gun in the picture with my name on it? http://i43.tinypic.com/35kn1u9.jpg that proves it is realistic because i have done it, usa army is poorly trained. they walk right out in the open like 1800 soldier fools who got slaughtered by the indians hiding in foliage.lineargames
Im done with you. Why don't ypu go join the army then seeing as you know everything:roll:
i dont claim to know everything i dont know how to make maps like that one dragonfirex dude who post here who made crysis map, but i could of designed a better layout for him to use. i been shooting since i was a kid before i played first person shooters, i know the limits of reality lol.Even if you could jump and shoot accurately at a moving, camouflaged, smart human being WHICH YOU CANNOT, do you not think that the enemy would still be able to spot, bead down on and shoot somebody flying through the air while firing wildly? I know I could, in fact if I did see my enemy doing that I would blow his knees out mid flight and leave him there to bleed out as punishment. I had enough of that crap in battlefield 2.
You should really try and grasp that in reality, warfare is an art-form, and jumping while shooting is not feasible in any way. It makes you a bigger target, it makes it impossible to aim (as in, you probably wouldn't be able to shoulder a weapon in mid air) and it gives your position away. It's basically all negatives and no positives to do that, and tbh I can't believe it would need explaining.
Here's a picture of a real revolver 22. caliber rossi notice my names writen on piece of paper it's laying on lol i can take picture of ak-47 if you want http://i40.tinypic.com/2rm3441.jpg SORRY KIDS just because you played guitar hero metallica doesnt make you kirk hammett on the guitar. just because you played some first person shooters, doesnt means you know anything about guns either. call of duty is more realistic. ACCEPT CALL OF DUTY IS MORE REALISTIC AND MOVE ON.lineargamesThe real point of this thread is: They actually let people like him own guns! No wonder the worlds in turmoil.
Seriously i should just give up, im talking to some ignorant people here never shot a gun in real life and they acting like they know what's realistic or unrealistic in a first person shooter. LOL I GIVE UP kids never shot guns trying to tell someone who grew up shooting guns what's more realistic or unrealistic lmfao peace lineargamesWell i'm an ex Royal Marine and i can tell you, you have no idea what your talking about. If you have used real assault rifles in your life then you know nothing can replicate it.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment