Arma 2 not coming to consoles.

  • 168 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for cobrax75
cobrax75

8389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 cobrax75
Member since 2007 • 8389 Posts

lol none of the bullets hit directly where you point the crosshair that's what made it realistic.lineargames

yes, its called deviation...bulets dont travel in straight lines.

Avatar image for clembo1990
clembo1990

9976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 clembo1990
Member since 2005 • 9976 Posts
lol none of the bullets hit directly where you point the crosshair that's what made it realistic.lineargames
Bad net coding =/= realistic.
Avatar image for cobrax75
cobrax75

8389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 cobrax75
Member since 2007 • 8389 Posts

I meant call of duty bullets do hit like where you point the crosshair in real life. but you move around like you do in real life when aiming with crosshair because nobody can stand directly 100% still. you shoot unaccurate if you move and shoot without iron sight if you stand still and shoot 1 shot at a time it's more accurate that's kinda realistic. overall call of duty is more realistic than operation flashpoint or ama2 id like for you to explain how those crap games are more realistic.lineargames

well for starters your health doesnt recharge.

Avatar image for JangoWuzHere
JangoWuzHere

19032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#55 JangoWuzHere
Member since 2007 • 19032 Posts
[QUOTE="cobrax75"]

[QUOTE="lineargames"]call of duty 2 would be the most realistic if by default it had a sprint button, but there's sprint mods, but one thing that sucks you cant time hand grenades like real ones, they fixed that in call of duty 4 tho you can cook them now. but stupid ass Xp xtra points logo takes away from immersion of you shooting someone lol.lineargames

are you seriously suggesting that COD is as realistic as Arma?

Way more realistic By far, arma is ripping off call of duty by having iron sight.

Dude thats quote worthy
Avatar image for lineargames
lineargames

251

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 lineargames
Member since 2009 • 251 Posts

[QUOTE="lineargames"]I meant call of duty bullets do hit like where you point the crosshair in real life. but you move around like you do in real life when aiming with crosshair because nobody can stand directly 100% still. you shoot unaccurate if you move and shoot without iron sight if you stand still and shoot 1 shot at a time it's more accurate that's kinda realistic. overall call of duty is more realistic than operation flashpoint or ama2 id like for you to explain how those crap games are more realistic.cobrax75

well for starters your health doesnt recharge.

first call of duty had healthbar. also ur health doesnt recharge on call of duty it's just if you arent wounded enough you still live, would kinda make gameplay suck if you got slower and slower if you got hit
Avatar image for clembo1990
clembo1990

9976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 clembo1990
Member since 2005 • 9976 Posts
[QUOTE="lineargames"]I meant call of duty bullets do hit like where you point the crosshair in real life. but you move around like you do in real life when aiming with crosshair because nobody can stand directly 100% still. you shoot unaccurate if you move and shoot without iron sight if you stand still and shoot 1 shot at a time it's more accurate that's kinda realistic. overall call of duty is more realistic than operation flashpoint or ama2 id like for you to explain how those crap games are more realistic.

1) in war you don't respawn into the middle of a fight 2) in war you have vehicles supporting the infantry 3) in war the maps aren't arena style it is open ended 4) in war you have objectives 5) in war grenades aren't the best weapon they are used tactically not blindly 6) in war your health doesn't recharge
Avatar image for lineargames
lineargames

251

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 lineargames
Member since 2009 • 251 Posts
Dude thats quote worthy

call of duty 2003 first game to model iron sight accurately in a game. operation flashpoint iron sight doesnt even move how call of duty's does. call of duty iron sight when you aim ur crosshair will move around like player is actually trying to hold the guns sight still infront of his face lol.
Avatar image for lineargames
lineargames

251

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 lineargames
Member since 2009 • 251 Posts
[QUOTE="clembo1990"][QUOTE="lineargames"]I meant call of duty bullets do hit like where you point the crosshair in real life. but you move around like you do in real life when aiming with crosshair because nobody can stand directly 100% still. you shoot unaccurate if you move and shoot without iron sight if you stand still and shoot 1 shot at a time it's more accurate that's kinda realistic. overall call of duty is more realistic than operation flashpoint or ama2 id like for you to explain how those crap games are more realistic.

1) in war you don't respawn into the middle of a fight 2) in war you have vehicles supporting the infantry 3) in war the maps aren't arena style it is open ended 4) in war you have objectives 5) in war grenades aren't the best weapon they are used tactically not blindly 6) in war your health doesn't recharge

stop trying to change the subject i have been shooting guns 20 goddamn years stop trying to tell me this crap game is more realistic. when it's a true call of duty's player abilities is more true to real life.
Avatar image for clembo1990
clembo1990

9976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 clembo1990
Member since 2005 • 9976 Posts
[QUOTE="lineargames"][QUOTE="clembo1990"][QUOTE="lineargames"]I meant call of duty bullets do hit like where you point the crosshair in real life. but you move around like you do in real life when aiming with crosshair because nobody can stand directly 100% still. you shoot unaccurate if you move and shoot without iron sight if you stand still and shoot 1 shot at a time it's more accurate that's kinda realistic. overall call of duty is more realistic than operation flashpoint or ama2 id like for you to explain how those crap games are more realistic.

1) in war you don't respawn into the middle of a fight 2) in war you have vehicles supporting the infantry 3) in war the maps aren't arena style it is open ended 4) in war you have objectives 5) in war grenades aren't the best weapon they are used tactically not blindly 6) in war your health doesn't recharge

stop trying to change the subject i have been shooting guns 20 goddamn years stop trying to tell me this crap game is more realistic. when it's a true call of duty's player abilities is more true to real life.

Out of interest did you serve in an armed conflict?
Avatar image for JangoWuzHere
JangoWuzHere

19032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#61 JangoWuzHere
Member since 2007 • 19032 Posts
Dude thats quote worthylineargames
call of duty 2003 first game to model iron sight accurately in a game. operation flashpoint iron sight doesnt even move how call of duty's does. call of duty iron sight when you aim ur crosshair will move around like player is actually trying to hold the guns sight still infront of his face lol.

Like I believe any word you are saying. You think Call of duty is more realistic then Arma??? You lost all your credibilty like along time ago dude. Right now you are just spewing out random thoughts. I personally don't think you are an adult or have shot any guns at all.
Avatar image for JangoWuzHere
JangoWuzHere

19032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#62 JangoWuzHere
Member since 2007 • 19032 Posts

[QUOTE="clembo1990"][QUOTE="lineargames"]I meant call of duty bullets do hit like where you point the crosshair in real life. but you move around like you do in real life when aiming with crosshair because nobody can stand directly 100% still. you shoot unaccurate if you move and shoot without iron sight if you stand still and shoot 1 shot at a time it's more accurate that's kinda realistic. overall call of duty is more realistic than operation flashpoint or ama2 id like for you to explain how those crap games are more realistic.lineargames
1) in war you don't respawn into the middle of a fight 2) in war you have vehicles supporting the infantry 3) in war the maps aren't arena style it is open ended 4) in war you have objectives 5) in war grenades aren't the best weapon they are used tactically not blindly 6) in war your health doesn't recharge

stop trying to change the subject i have been shooting guns 20 goddamn years stop trying to tell me this crap game is more realistic. when it's a true call of duty's player abilities is more true to real life.

No they aren't your just a kid posting on a forum trying to say you shot guns in real life. You did not shoot any guns in real life and have no idea what you are talking about.

Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
[QUOTE="lineargames"]the fact you cant jump makes it unrealistic. I shoot guns in real life, no jump ultra fake quake or doom has different jumping than real life jumping, a game with real life type jumping is call of duty kinda.

Its not there for a reason. Soldiers dont go about jumping around the battlefield. It attracts unecessary attention, and its just stupid with so much weight being carried. [QUOTE="lineargames"] Way more realistic By far, arma is ripping off call of duty by having iron sight.

OFP had irons in 2001 :|
Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
[QUOTE="cobrax75"]

[QUOTE="lineargames"]I meant call of duty bullets do hit like where you point the crosshair in real life. but you move around like you do in real life when aiming with crosshair because nobody can stand directly 100% still. you shoot unaccurate if you move and shoot without iron sight if you stand still and shoot 1 shot at a time it's more accurate that's kinda realistic. overall call of duty is more realistic than operation flashpoint or ama2 id like for you to explain how those crap games are more realistic.lineargames

well for starters your health doesnt recharge.

first call of duty had healthbar. also ur health doesnt recharge on call of duty it's just if you arent wounded enough you still live, would kinda make gameplay suck if you got slower and slower if you got hit

You dont have a healthbar to indicate how alive you are in real life :|
Avatar image for AAllxxjjnn
AAllxxjjnn

19992

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 AAllxxjjnn
Member since 2008 • 19992 Posts
Why do you guys argue with linear games?
Avatar image for lineargames
lineargames

251

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 lineargames
Member since 2009 • 251 Posts
Here's a picture of a real revolver 22. caliber rossi notice my names writen on piece of paper it's laying on lol i can take picture of ak-47 if you want http://i40.tinypic.com/2rm3441.jpg SORRY KIDS just because you played guitar hero metallica doesnt make you kirk hammett on the guitar. just because you played some first person shooters, doesnt means you know anything about guns either. call of duty is more realistic. ACCEPT CALL OF DUTY IS MORE REALISTIC AND MOVE ON.
Avatar image for Brendissimo35
Brendissimo35

1934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 54

User Lists: 1

#67 Brendissimo35
Member since 2005 • 1934 Posts

lol none of the bullets hit directly where you point the crosshair that's what made it realistic.lineargames

So you're saying that Call of Duty was the first game to use Iron sights and also the first game to model bullet deviation/cone of fire effects? That is just blatantly false.

And don't even get me started on how many bullets you can take before dying in Call of Duty. And the crosshair, and the pinpoint accuracy, and the linear levels. It is an immersive shooter, sure, but not even remotely a realistic one. Call of Duty is a high-budget WW2 FPS. OFP is a low-budget military sim. Two completely different things.

Avatar image for lineargames
lineargames

251

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 lineargames
Member since 2009 • 251 Posts

[QUOTE="lineargames"]lol none of the bullets hit directly where you point the crosshair that's what made it realistic.Brendissimo35

So you're saying that Call of Duty was the first game to use Iron sights and also the first game to model bullet deviation/cone of fire effects? That is just blatantly false.

And don't even get me started on how many bullets you can take before dying in Call of Duty. And the crosshair, and the pinpoint accuracy, and the linear levels. It is an immersive shooter, sure, but not even remotely a realistic one. Call of Duty is a high-budget WW2 FPS. OFP is a low-budget military sim. Two completely different things.

Here's a picture of a real revolver 22. caliber rossi notice my names writen on piece of paper it's laying on lol i can take picture of ak-47 if you want http://i40.tinypic.com/2rm3441.jpg SORRY KIDS just because you played guitar hero metallica doesnt make you kirk hammett on the guitar. just because you played some first person shooters, doesnt means you know anything about guns either. call of duty is more realistic. ACCEPT CALL OF DUTY IS MORE REALISTIC AND MOVE ON.
Avatar image for Brendissimo35
Brendissimo35

1934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 54

User Lists: 1

#69 Brendissimo35
Member since 2005 • 1934 Posts

[QUOTE="Brendissimo35"]

[QUOTE="lineargames"]lol none of the bullets hit directly where you point the crosshair that's what made it realistic.lineargames

So you're saying that Call of Duty was the first game to use Iron sights and also the first game to model bullet deviation/cone of fire effects? That is just blatantly false.

And don't even get me started on how many bullets you can take before dying in Call of Duty. And the crosshair, and the pinpoint accuracy, and the linear levels. It is an immersive shooter, sure, but not even remotely a realistic one. Call of Duty is a high-budget WW2 FPS. OFP is a low-budget military sim. Two completely different things.

Here's a picture of a real revolver 22. caliber rossi notice my names writen on piece of paper it's laying on lol i can take picture of ak-47 if you want http://i40.tinypic.com/2rm3441.jpg SORRY KIDS just because you played guitar hero metallica doesnt make you kirk hammett on the guitar. just because you played some first person shooters, doesnt means you know anything about guns either. call of duty is more realistic. ACCEPT CALL OF DUTY IS MORE REALISTIC AND MOVE ON.

great response. You've graduated from trolling into spamming.

Avatar image for lineargames
lineargames

251

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 lineargames
Member since 2009 • 251 Posts
Seriously i should just give up, im talking to some ignorant people here never shot a gun in real life and they acting like they know what's realistic or unrealistic in a first person shooter. LOL I GIVE UP kids never shot guns trying to tell someone who grew up shooting guns what's more realistic or unrealistic lmfao peace
Avatar image for lineargames
lineargames

251

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 lineargames
Member since 2009 • 251 Posts

[QUOTE="lineargames"][QUOTE="Brendissimo35"]

So you're saying that Call of Duty was the first game to use Iron sights and also the first game to model bullet deviation/cone of fire effects? That is just blatantly false.

And don't even get me started on how many bullets you can take before dying in Call of Duty. And the crosshair, and the pinpoint accuracy, and the linear levels. It is an immersive shooter, sure, but not even remotely a realistic one. Call of Duty is a high-budget WW2 FPS. OFP is a low-budget military sim. Two completely different things.

Brendissimo35

Here's a picture of a real revolver 22. caliber rossi notice my names writen on piece of paper it's laying on lol i can take picture of ak-47 if you want http://i40.tinypic.com/2rm3441.jpg SORRY KIDS just because you played guitar hero metallica doesnt make you kirk hammett on the guitar. just because you played some first person shooters, doesnt means you know anything about guns either. call of duty is more realistic. ACCEPT CALL OF DUTY IS MORE REALISTIC AND MOVE ON.

great response. You've graduated from trolling into spamming.

you dont even have a arguement nobody here has explain how arma2 is more realistic. just stop posting if you cant make a arguement.
Avatar image for kozzy1234
kozzy1234

35966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 0

#72 kozzy1234
Member since 2005 • 35966 Posts

[QUOTE="Brendissimo35"]

[QUOTE="lineargames"] Here's a picture of a real revolver 22. caliber rossi notice my names writen on piece of paper it's laying on lol i can take picture of ak-47 if you want http://i40.tinypic.com/2rm3441.jpg SORRY KIDS just because you played guitar hero metallica doesnt make you kirk hammett on the guitar. just because you played some first person shooters, doesnt means you know anything about guns either. call of duty is more realistic. ACCEPT CALL OF DUTY IS MORE REALISTIC AND MOVE ON.lineargames

great response. You've graduated from trolling into spamming.

you dont even have a arguement nobody here has explain how arma2 is more realistic. just stop posting if you cant make a arguement.

Alot of people have given you reasons why other games are more realistic or why cod games are not realistic, and you just seem to ignore there posts.

Avatar image for clembo1990
clembo1990

9976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 clembo1990
Member since 2005 • 9976 Posts
[QUOTE="Brendissimo35"]

[QUOTE="lineargames"] Here's a picture of a real revolver 22. caliber rossi notice my names writen on piece of paper it's laying on lol i can take picture of ak-47 if you want http://i40.tinypic.com/2rm3441.jpg SORRY KIDS just because you played guitar hero metallica doesnt make you kirk hammett on the guitar. just because you played some first person shooters, doesnt means you know anything about guns either. call of duty is more realistic. ACCEPT CALL OF DUTY IS MORE REALISTIC AND MOVE ON.lineargames

great response. You've graduated from trolling into spamming.

you dont even have a arguement nobody here has explain how arma2 is more realistic. just stop posting if you cant make a arguement.

I just did. The things I listed trumps CoD in realism. And to that list I add the ability to go prone and snipe more realistically.
Avatar image for lineargames
lineargames

251

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 lineargames
Member since 2009 • 251 Posts
so ur gonna tell me you cant climb over a car in real life like how call of duty lets you? you can run/jump on top on the car or upclose just grab onto it and climb over that's realistic. http://i39.tinypic.com/2en6rlh.jpg ^^ see lol option to climb over or i could of ran and tried to make it on top on the hood. the iron sight' will move around like how you do when ur trying to hold gun in real life and aim overall call of duty's gameplay is more realistic than arma2 core gameplay. but that's cool arma has vehicles and stuff. one kinda fake aspect of call of duty not being able to sprint and shoot or reload tho
Avatar image for lineargames
lineargames

251

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 lineargames
Member since 2009 • 251 Posts
core gameplay call of duty overall has everything beat when it comes to realism pretty much, only part i wouldnt call realistic in call of duty is the lack of ability to run and shoot or run and reload.
Avatar image for lineargames
lineargames

251

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 lineargames
Member since 2009 • 251 Posts
crysis is pretty realistic also in how the guns will move when ur trying to aim with the iron sight. crysis would of been perfect fps. you can prone crawl in crysis,lean left or right around corners,crouch,jump like 8 ft high, pick up stuff physics based and throw it at enemys. crysis is like realism mixed with twitch shooter. crysis would of been so badass if you could of still leaned left or right around corners online and picked up physics based stuff and throw it at people in the multiplayer like the single player.
Avatar image for JangoWuzHere
JangoWuzHere

19032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#78 JangoWuzHere
Member since 2007 • 19032 Posts

crysis is pretty realistic also in how the guns will move when ur trying to aim with the iron sight. crysis would of been perfect fps. you can prone crawl in crysis,lean left or right around corners,crouch,jump like 8 ft high, pick up stuff physics based and throw it at enemys. crysis is like realism mixed with twitch shooter. crysis would of been so badass if you could of still leaned left or right around corners online and picked up physics based stuff and throw it at people in the multiplayer like the single player.lineargames

What the heck does Crysis have to do with this thread? Why are you so off-topic? If you are an adult why do you type like such a child? Why do you post here on gamespot when you have been banned 20 times?!

Avatar image for lineargames
lineargames

251

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 lineargames
Member since 2009 • 251 Posts
^^ oops my whole point of the above posted i forgot to add crysis let's you reload shoot while sprinting so that's one aspect more realistic than call of duty. even though crysis isnt totally trying to be realistic it's more realistic in some aspects.
Avatar image for lineargames
lineargames

251

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 lineargames
Member since 2009 • 251 Posts

[QUOTE="lineargames"]crysis is pretty realistic also in how the guns will move when ur trying to aim with the iron sight. crysis would of been perfect fps. you can prone crawl in crysis,lean left or right around corners,crouch,jump like 8 ft high, pick up stuff physics based and throw it at enemys. crysis is like realism mixed with twitch shooter. crysis would of been so badass if you could of still leaned left or right around corners online and picked up physics based stuff and throw it at people in the multiplayer like the single player.JangoWuzHere

What the heck does Crysis have to do with this thread? Why are you so off-topic? If you are an adult why do you type like such a child? Why do you post here on gamespot when you have been banned 20 times?!

Why do you act like a child?
Avatar image for JangoWuzHere
JangoWuzHere

19032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#81 JangoWuzHere
Member since 2007 • 19032 Posts

[QUOTE="JangoWuzHere"]

[QUOTE="lineargames"]crysis is pretty realistic also in how the guns will move when ur trying to aim with the iron sight. crysis would of been perfect fps. you can prone crawl in crysis,lean left or right around corners,crouch,jump like 8 ft high, pick up stuff physics based and throw it at enemys. crysis is like realism mixed with twitch shooter. crysis would of been so badass if you could of still leaned left or right around corners online and picked up physics based stuff and throw it at people in the multiplayer like the single player.lineargames

What the heck does Crysis have to do with this thread? Why are you so off-topic? If you are an adult why do you type like such a child? Why do you post here on gamespot when you have been banned 20 times?!

Why do you act like a child?

I like how you avoided my questions. Really have you ever played Arma? Im assuming your young because you think running/jumping and shooting is realistic.

Avatar image for lineargames
lineargames

251

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 lineargames
Member since 2009 • 251 Posts
Everyone always fails in some aspect when they try to make a game totally based on realism though. crysis for the win twitch/quake shooter mixed with call of duty shooter/realism based. crysis almost did the game the best, crysis actually would of been superior to call of duty in almost everyway if you could of leaned around corners online, or cooked hand grenades.
Avatar image for lineargames
lineargames

251

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 lineargames
Member since 2009 • 251 Posts

[QUOTE="lineargames"][QUOTE="JangoWuzHere"]

What the heck does Crysis have to do with this thread? Why are you so off-topic? If you are an adult why do you type like such a child? Why do you post here on gamespot when you have been banned 20 times?!

JangoWuzHere

Why do you act like a child?

I like how you avoided my questions. Really have you ever played Arma? Im assuming your young because you think running/jumping and shooting is realistic.

shooting/jumping is realistic because i have shot this gun real one in pic lol running and jumping and reloading and hit my target fine http://i43.tinypic.com/35kn1u9.jpg
Avatar image for JangoWuzHere
JangoWuzHere

19032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#84 JangoWuzHere
Member since 2007 • 19032 Posts

[QUOTE="JangoWuzHere"]

[QUOTE="lineargames"] Why do you act like a child?lineargames

I like how you avoided my questions. Really have you ever played Arma? Im assuming your young because you think running/jumping and shooting is realistic.

shooting/jumping is realistic because i have shot this gun real one in pic lol running and jumping and reloading and hit my target fine http://i43.tinypic.com/35kn1u9.jpg

No its not realistic especially when your a soilder in war when you have heavey amount of gear on your self. Shooting and jumping or running and jumping would be stupid in a warzone.

Avatar image for lineargames
lineargames

251

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 lineargames
Member since 2009 • 251 Posts

[QUOTE="lineargames"][QUOTE="JangoWuzHere"]

I like how you avoided my questions. Really have you ever played Arma? Im assuming your young because you think running/jumping and shooting is realistic.

JangoWuzHere

shooting/jumping is realistic because i have shot this gun real one in pic lol running and jumping and reloading and hit my target fine http://i43.tinypic.com/35kn1u9.jpg

No its not realistic especially when your a soilder in war when you have heavey amount of gear on your self. Shooting and jumping or running and jumping would be stupid in a warzone.

nope it is realistic see this gun in the picture with my name on it? http://i43.tinypic.com/35kn1u9.jpg that proves it is realistic because i have done it, usa army is poorly trained. they walk right out in the open like 1800's soldier fools who got slaughtered by the indians hiding in foliage.
Avatar image for JangoWuzHere
JangoWuzHere

19032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#86 JangoWuzHere
Member since 2007 • 19032 Posts

[QUOTE="JangoWuzHere"]

[QUOTE="lineargames"] shooting/jumping is realistic because i have shot this gun real one in pic lol running and jumping and reloading and hit my target fine http://i43.tinypic.com/35kn1u9.jpglineargames

No its not realistic especially when your a soilder in war when you have heavey amount of gear on your self. Shooting and jumping or running and jumping would be stupid in a warzone.

nope it is realistic see this gun in the picture with my name on it? http://i43.tinypic.com/35kn1u9.jpg that proves it is realistic because i have done it, usa army is poorly trained. they walk right out in the open like 1800 soldier fools who got slaughtered by the indians hiding in foliage.

Im done with you. Why don't you go join the army then seeing as you know everything:roll:

Avatar image for lineargames
lineargames

251

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 lineargames
Member since 2009 • 251 Posts

[QUOTE="lineargames"][QUOTE="JangoWuzHere"]

No its not realistic especially when your a soilder in war when you have heavey amount of gear on your self. Shooting and jumping or running and jumping would be stupid in a warzone.

JangoWuzHere

nope it is realistic see this gun in the picture with my name on it? http://i43.tinypic.com/35kn1u9.jpg that proves it is realistic because i have done it, usa army is poorly trained. they walk right out in the open like 1800 soldier fools who got slaughtered by the indians hiding in foliage.

Im done with you. Why don't ypu go join the army then seeing as you know everything:roll:

i dont claim to know everything i dont know how to make maps like that one dragonfirex dude who post here who made crysis map, but i could of designed a better layout for him to use. i been shooting since i was a kid before i played first person shooters, i know the limits of reality lol.
Avatar image for lineargames
lineargames

251

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 lineargames
Member since 2009 • 251 Posts
i know i could make a map, but i havent looked into how to work the editors or whatever, i know how to build some simple rooms lol well i havent really even tried just too lazy to spend months working on some map. or figuring out what does what in the editor how it all works.
Avatar image for Archang3l_666
Archang3l_666

113

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 Archang3l_666
Member since 2005 • 113 Posts

If you want to talk about realism do you know what VBS1 is?

Avatar image for Juggernaut140
Juggernaut140

36011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#90 Juggernaut140
Member since 2007 • 36011 Posts
Why would anyone want to play it on consoles anyways? :|
Avatar image for deactivated-660c2894dc19c
deactivated-660c2894dc19c

2190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#91 deactivated-660c2894dc19c
Member since 2004 • 2190 Posts

[QUOTE="Salt_The_Fries"]It wouldn't be possible without massive downgrading anyway. Plus console gaming is no market for such games.cobrax75

yeah, I always found it incredibly strange that people though a game like this could work on consoles.

OpF works quite well on Xbox. It's the same game as on PC, I have both versions, so it is possible to make them work. Though, I don't know how many console gamers would buy a game like that.

Avatar image for shawn7324
shawn7324

8690

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#92 shawn7324
Member since 2006 • 8690 Posts
Why would anyone want to play it on consoles anyways? :|Juggernaut140
That's what I say, did anyone actually plan on buying this on PS3 or Xbox 360?
Avatar image for PS3_3DO
PS3_3DO

10976

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 PS3_3DO
Member since 2006 • 10976 Posts

[QUOTE="Juggernaut140"]Why would anyone want to play it on consoles anyways? :|shawn7324
That's what I say, did anyone actually plan on buying this on PS3 or Xbox 360?

Nope going to buy OP for the 360

Avatar image for IgGy621985
IgGy621985

5922

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 IgGy621985
Member since 2004 • 5922 Posts

Gonna get both ArmA 2 and Operation Flashpoint 2 for PC.

Avatar image for Leejjohno
Leejjohno

13897

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#95 Leejjohno
Member since 2005 • 13897 Posts

[QUOTE="JangoWuzHere"]

[QUOTE="lineargames"] nope it is realistic see this gun in the picture with my name on it? http://i43.tinypic.com/35kn1u9.jpg that proves it is realistic because i have done it, usa army is poorly trained. they walk right out in the open like 1800 soldier fools who got slaughtered by the indians hiding in foliage.lineargames

Im done with you. Why don't ypu go join the army then seeing as you know everything:roll:

i dont claim to know everything i dont know how to make maps like that one dragonfirex dude who post here who made crysis map, but i could of designed a better layout for him to use. i been shooting since i was a kid before i played first person shooters, i know the limits of reality lol.

Even if you could jump and shoot accurately at a moving, camouflaged, smart human being WHICH YOU CANNOT, do you not think that the enemy would still be able to spot, bead down on and shoot somebody flying through the air while firing wildly? I know I could, in fact if I did see my enemy doing that I would blow his knees out mid flight and leave him there to bleed out as punishment. I had enough of that crap in battlefield 2.

You should really try and grasp that in reality, warfare is an art-form, and jumping while shooting is not feasible in any way. It makes you a bigger target, it makes it impossible to aim (as in, you probably wouldn't be able to shoulder a weapon in mid air) and it gives your position away. It's basically all negatives and no positives to do that, and tbh I can't believe it would need explaining.

Avatar image for ducati101
ducati101

1741

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 ducati101
Member since 2004 • 1741 Posts
Here's a picture of a real revolver 22. caliber rossi notice my names writen on piece of paper it's laying on lol i can take picture of ak-47 if you want http://i40.tinypic.com/2rm3441.jpg SORRY KIDS just because you played guitar hero metallica doesnt make you kirk hammett on the guitar. just because you played some first person shooters, doesnt means you know anything about guns either. call of duty is more realistic. ACCEPT CALL OF DUTY IS MORE REALISTIC AND MOVE ON.lineargames
The real point of this thread is: They actually let people like him own guns! No wonder the worlds in turmoil.
Avatar image for ducati101
ducati101

1741

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 ducati101
Member since 2004 • 1741 Posts
Seriously i should just give up, im talking to some ignorant people here never shot a gun in real life and they acting like they know what's realistic or unrealistic in a first person shooter. LOL I GIVE UP kids never shot guns trying to tell someone who grew up shooting guns what's more realistic or unrealistic lmfao peace lineargames
Well i'm an ex Royal Marine and i can tell you, you have no idea what your talking about. If you have used real assault rifles in your life then you know nothing can replicate it.
Avatar image for bethwo
bethwo

1718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#98 bethwo
Member since 2008 • 1718 Posts

Who cares? It looks rubbish.

Avatar image for ducati101
ducati101

1741

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 ducati101
Member since 2004 • 1741 Posts
You do realise that a modified version of the ArmA engine is used to train troops in some countries! Not bad for an unrealistic shooter!
Avatar image for lineargames
lineargames

251

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 lineargames
Member since 2009 • 251 Posts

You do realise that a modified version of the ArmA engine is used to train troops in some countries! Not bad for an unrealistic shooter!ducati101

no wonder they are poorly trained