it's priced as a full game because it IS a full game. sequels are NOT expansion packs. grabbing an old example, there's a difference between diablo 2 lord of destruction and diablo 3.
BrunoBRS
I lol'd. Lord of Destruction is a game released in 2000. Diablo 3 is possibly coming 2011. Not only that, but they are built on entirely different engines and will be addressing completely different stories. This is an addition to Ezio's tale. If anything, its a spinoff. I wanted a full ACIII, not a spinoff expansion pack. I want to see the conclusion of the story with Desmond, not more of Ezio.
The definition of expansion pack is fluid. It isn't a set idea. DLC can technically be defined as an expansion pack. If I define this as an expansion pack, then it is a legitimate proposal. I don't see why this could be anything else. It should be no more than $30. Hell, ACII shouldn't have been more than $40 in my opinion.
Log in to comment