Bad Company Vs Bad Company 2 ''Poll''

  • 56 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Makari
Makari

15250

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 Makari
Member since 2003 • 15250 Posts

[QUOTE="Makari"][QUOTE="InsaneBasura"]And the heelacopters need a nerf already. Or they need to supply the attackers with some proper offensive capabilities. The mobile AA is basically the only real offensive you have against an attack chopper. Even if you do manage to nail it with a dart and send a rocket after it, that's not a guaranteed kill. After all that ****ing work to dart that mother****er and we finally do, and I lock on and fire and he just flies away to repair. God damn it.InsaneBasura

Is this on the console version? I'm playing the PC, and helicopters generally get swatted out of the sky moments showing themselves, dart or no dart. The tracer dart buff from a few weeks ago just accelerated their demise to seconds after liftoff.

Yeah I've heard the choppers are more timid on PC. On consoles they spin around you like a hurricane while throwing rockets and 30mm at you. Nearly impossible to hit with rockets and tracers if the pilot's decent. The mobile AA has a chance against it if it's placed strategically so the pilot can't circle, otherwise you might hurt it but you'll eventually get blown up. You kind of have to ambush it, but of course you can't hide since you get that big orange target box around you. I really don't understand why pilots get that visual aid/cheat.

But what really needs to be changed is the speed/maneuverability. Or add more AA weapons. I know there are flak cannons in the game but in Rush they don't exist for some reason. I guess because the attackers aren't supposed to sit and defend their base(?) Well, since the defenders get a friggin attack helicopter you kind of have to. You can't just ignore it. And on Port Valdez it doesn't help that it happens at that ridiculous bottleneck. Has got to be the most easily defendable spot in the entire game. A Bradley with an engineer gunner by itself is almost enough to hold back the entire enemy team.

Yeah, this is a super late reply, but it is completely and totally different on the PC. Helicopters are generally a death trap, and pilots only use them to get from point A to point B - everybody takes off, makes a beeline for the objective, and everybody bails out - if the pilot even makes it that far, it's about a 50/50 chance. Even without the tracer, it's pretty easy to hit a moving heli with a CG. Ditto for the AA guns - I think it takes 3 solid bursts to take down an Apache, and it's just point-and-click when you're on the turret; pretty hard to miss if the pilot circles by your way. By the time they've figure out where you are, they're already shot down. Also, the UAV makes a great anti-helo platform.. it's a tiny target, and you can just follow the helo around plugging it with your little unlockable machine gun. They can't hit you back without getting incredibly lucky because you're so tiny, and even doing so means they're taking their attention *completely* off the ground and probably will get knocked out by a stray CG. It's hilarious fun if you ever get to try it. The Bradleys do much, much better, but still don't last long on Valdez if they're out in the open - as soon as they show themselves they get tracered, then it's 2-3 engineers sitting back and lobbing RPG's and CG's onto their roof for the next 45 seconds. I guess DICE would need to completely separate the balancing more than they already have on the platforms. :\
Avatar image for 93soccer
93soccer

4602

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#52 93soccer
Member since 2009 • 4602 Posts
I'm basically split in the middle. BC1 had a great SP BC2 has a great MP although I do with some of the maps would come back and be more vehicle based
Avatar image for the_wet_mop
the_wet_mop

7518

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 the_wet_mop
Member since 2006 • 7518 Posts

BC:2 is such a step up from the original, i can't believe this is even a poll

Avatar image for firefluff3
firefluff3

2073

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 firefluff3
Member since 2010 • 2073 Posts

That HORRIBLE grain effect was awful in some maps, so bad you could hardly see anything. WAY too much life and hated the campaign.but better, bigger maps. Thats it really..

Avatar image for N7v1K0
N7v1K0

5755

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#55 N7v1K0
Member since 2009 • 5755 Posts

BC1 has a better campaign, better maps, and let's not forget the awesome soundtrack!

BC2 is better in every other way.

Avatar image for walbeb
walbeb

616

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#56 walbeb
Member since 2007 • 616 Posts

It's weird for me, while i know that BC2 was a better game it seemed i had a lot more fun with BC1. I played BC2 for maybe a week and nowI play it once in awhile butI never put BC1 down for a minute.