In the same article you linked, it says that this may be due to a refund clause, where the hefty fee to Denuvo may be refunded to the publisher, if the game is cracked within the first three months. However, part of the condition for the refund is removal of Denuvo.
And so as a result of relatively competent piracy, publishers will now have even more incentive to use Denuvo. If pirates consistently crack their games within the first couple months, then they will essentially be using Denuvo for free, protect their early sales without paying any fees later on. Of course, this will only continue until Denuvo tightens up their security with newer iterations of protection, but it will be a cat and mouse game designed to always incentivise publishers to use Denuvo whether the cat is in the lead or the mouse is in the lead at any given time.
At the end of the day, publishers will be happy with Denuvo if it protects either its early sales and requires no fee due to refund, or remains uncracked for well beyond 3 months. If the pirates are crafty then they would start releasing all their cracks just after the expiration of the refund clause, but that in itself is providing Denuvo their 3 month guarantee.
@speedfog said:
Devs could've spended the money better tbh.
And now they got it all back and still benefited from the release date protection.
Log in to comment