Why are you questioning me? You're coming off like a bit of a numpty, sunshine.
Alright guv, easy now, 'e didn't mean no 'arm! No need to nut him!
This topic is locked from further discussion.
@SecretPolice: the first one was pretty good, maybe it'll come true for the gwg 360 offers.
Unfortunately, neither Batman game released yet on GWG, but PS+ did get both (Asylum and City) back in 2014.
It's also possible that WB won't authorize their games now for GWG since WB are now selling the remaster.
Also, the 360 was discontinued, so I fear that 360 GWG isn't far behind.
@acp_45: Yeah sandbox is a good term, but regardless I felt it empty, it was just kinda boring to me, Arkham Asylum had a lot of magic I feel city lost. Arkham City is a good game mechanically and technically speaking, but it wasn't my cup of tea.
Got it.
That's too bad.
Well, I played both games way too much to be replaying them again so this remaster is completely off my radar.
@acp_45: Yeah sandbox is a good term, but regardless I felt it empty, it was just kinda boring to me, Arkham Asylum had a lot of magic I feel city lost. Arkham City is a good game mechanically and technically speaking, but it wasn't my cup of tea.
Game Maker's Toolkit had a pretty interesting video on the subject that I happened to agree with. Asylum had the better pacing of the two games.
@SolidTy: well then it seems I will have to get the remastered edition since I only played the first one and they are using unreal engine 4.
I don't spend my own money on remasters. Maybe for Christmas from family. I am a huge fan of these games.
I don't see how souping up the graphics on these will mean all that much. They were HD to begin with. What is this going to do? Make them more detailed and that's it. I've played them already. I can buy them for next to nothing on a steam sale. Can't see myself buying these.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment