Battlefield 1 graphics is amazing

@Wasdie: Set the graphics quality to custom and it will allow you to change the individual settings. I run Ultra with AA off and motion blur off. I hate blurry image.

Everyone in chat, from both sides siad, "spawn in desert, away from action", well that didnt work either. Then other were station hit 1,2,3,4..and im like....

.....

Still no weapon, I'll try again tonight, although I did get to try a plane, tank and cannon.

tbh, I didnt take note, I just tried the instant action button. It wasnt just me that had the issue, others from both sides were mentioning it in chat.

I disabled the motion blur. I will go in and disable the post-processing AA. I think it's dulling the image a bit.

I don't get anyone who wants to play fps on a console. Controls and fps suck on consoles

Other than the font and the way the 3rd person camera works while mounted on a horse; the game has nothing at all in common with Battlefront.

FROSTBITE3 really is something

I'm looking forward for Mass Effect Andromeda i.e. FB3 with a proper story plot.

I tried it today, but the graphics aren't mind blowing. The game image doesn't look as good/sharp as my other games.

At least it runs amazingly well. Getting 90-100 fps at ultra settings (1080P)

It runs great, plays great and looks great.

Decent job, DICE. My only complaint is the lost connection to EA servers issue.

We'll see how it plays out come launch.

The game is visually stunning. Anybody know the state of SLI support in this game? Not getting 60+ at 4k unfortunately. I would test it out myself but it seems the servers are down. :(

Down again? I was playing last night.

This game looks amazing on my TV.

You're wrong and imagine getting butthurt over a video game. What even is your life?

i'm running an OC'd 4820k i-7, 32 gigs of ram in quad channel, and a 980 ti, what do you think I can run this at in 1080p, 1440p and if possible 4k?

I have a 5820k (4.2 GHz), 16 GB ram, and a 980ti. I play at 3440x1440 and get around 70 fps average. All settings max including AA. You could probably get around or close to 100 fps at 1440p, and well over 100 at 1080p (140 - 150?).

Very little interesting, shallow franchise in which the sole reason of interest is for pc gamers to boast about there graphics technology, which no one cares about.

Well... Given that PCs are 11TF for Titan X users or 8.9TF for GTX1080 users, and the ps4 is less than 2TF...you'd expect that wouldn't you?

I get between 85-90 fps at 1080p on my 1.4ghz GTX 970, so you should expect around 110-120 fps at 1080p, around the 80's at 1440p. and 4k under 40 fps

Sounds about right. Thanks!

Cows are stupid confirmed.

durr wuts a beta

@Sweetbackhair said:

I think after the beta, I might hop back on BF3 and BF4.

BF3 is dead on PC.. I got a new video card and went back to play it, only a handful of servers, with under 32 players

do you even play games? *inb4 mentions of a bunch of random titles from the 90's and early 2000*

uhhhh, the TC is stupid saying the game works "fine" during beta, when it wasn't. I didn't care, just pointing out facts, like I do around here.

I played last night and it was fine, although some lag issues that everyone on both sides was dealing with,

Also the horse, is neat in concept but worthless and it also seems the pistol is too..at this time. Maybe they will work on those things.

@FLOPPAGE_50: Did you try BF4 on PC? Because if that's a lot more active, I'll just play that instead.

@Heil68: Ah I was really enjoying the pistol in the beta so far. Was it the accuracy for you that you didn't like, or damage?

Damage for me, did you find it different?

@Heil68: the accuracy for me, but I was probably trying to shoot it too fast and the kick was making it worse.

So because it looks slightly better on PC you try and claim it as PC exclusive? What a bell end...

Playing it on high settings on my new 4K monitor... Gorgeous game.

This lie bait got old near the end of last gen. Why are you still using it?