Battlefield 3 MP maps shrunk for consoles

  • 71 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for killzonexbox
killzonexbox

3019

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 killzonexbox
Member since 2010 • 3019 Posts

Anyone looking to enjoy Battlefield 3 multiplayer on a console will have smaller maps to play with than their PC counterparts, developer DICE has revealed.

A DICE spokesperson reportedly told CERFY that, seeing as console versions only permit 24 players in a match compared to 64 on PC, it had made the decision to scale the maps down for the PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360 releases.

Avatar image for fabz_95
fabz_95

15425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#2 fabz_95
Member since 2006 • 15425 Posts
Considering there's forty less players, it makes sense to scale the maps down.
Avatar image for eboyishere
eboyishere

12681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 eboyishere
Member since 2011 • 12681 Posts
heres the fun part: the jets will be be dominated on smaller maps unless there enough is protection in buildings
Avatar image for Sp4rtan_3
Sp4rtan_3

3495

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Sp4rtan_3
Member since 2010 • 3495 Posts
BFBC2 had 24 players and the matches were epic so I dont see how its a problem with BF3.
Avatar image for deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab

17476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 deactivated-5cf4b2c19c4ab
Member since 2008 • 17476 Posts
BFBC2 had 24 players and the matches were epic so I dont see how its a problem with BF3.Sp4rtan_3
Cause 64 players matches in bf games are much more epic. :P
Avatar image for arbitor365
arbitor365

2726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#6 arbitor365
Member since 2009 • 2726 Posts

I prefer smaller maps. it usually means less cheap*** snipers and campers.

Avatar image for haberman13
haberman13

2414

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 haberman13
Member since 2003 • 2414 Posts

No surprise. Only way to do it really.

Jets ... I'm doubting jets will be in the console version, but we'll see.

Avatar image for glez13
glez13

10314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 glez13
Member since 2006 • 10314 Posts

Anyone looking to enjoy Battlefield 3 multiplayer on a console will have smaller maps to play with than their PC counterparts, developer DICE has revealed.

A DICE spokesperson reportedly told CERFY that, seeing as console versions only permit 24 players in a match compared to 64 on PC, it had made the decision to scale the maps down for the PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360 releases.

killzonexbox

How is this even news. That is the most obvious thing since they announced the 24 player limit on consoles.

Avatar image for deactivated-63f6895020e66
deactivated-63f6895020e66

21177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 deactivated-63f6895020e66
Member since 2004 • 21177 Posts
They could make the biggest maps ever and it would still be crushed by CoD.
Avatar image for glez13
glez13

10314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 glez13
Member since 2006 • 10314 Posts

heres the fun part: the jets will be be dominated on smaller maps unless there enough is protection in buildingseboyishere

Will there even be jets on consoles? Have they mentioned something about this? In BF2 just like two maneuvers and you were already being warned for being outside the gamespace.

Avatar image for Ravensmash
Ravensmash

13862

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Ravensmash
Member since 2010 • 13862 Posts
Jets were confirmed in another topic - they just get a larger play space than ground troops.
Avatar image for Sp4rtan_3
Sp4rtan_3

3495

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Sp4rtan_3
Member since 2010 • 3495 Posts
[QUOTE="Sp4rtan_3"]BFBC2 had 24 players and the matches were epic so I dont see how its a problem with BF3.ferret-gamer
Cause 64 players matches in bf games are much more epic. :P

24 did me fine. While it sucks we're not getting 64 I'll still have a blast with the MP. Either way PC and Console players both win :D
Avatar image for Ravensmash
Ravensmash

13862

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Ravensmash
Member since 2010 • 13862 Posts

This game will be vastly superior to CoD, and yet CoD will crush it.

Sad, but in another light, let the masses have their swag and keep them off the servers I play on!

Nerds are awesome, I connect with them, they like information/technology ... CoD-brahs (the so called 'cool people') are so dull and obnoxious that I see CoD as a blessing for trapping them.

haberman13
That's incredibly harsh and a massive generalisation...
Avatar image for -Tretiak
-Tretiak

2416

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 -Tretiak
Member since 2007 • 2416 Posts

Edit: Read it wrong, nothing to see here.

Avatar image for Ravensmash
Ravensmash

13862

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Ravensmash
Member since 2010 • 13862 Posts

[QUOTE="Ravensmash"][QUOTE="haberman13"]

This game will be vastly superior to CoD, and yet CoD will crush it.

Sad, but in another light, let the masses have their swag and keep them off the servers I play on!

Nerds are awesome, I connect with them, they like information/technology ... CoD-brahs (the so called 'cool people') are so dull and obnoxious that I see CoD as a blessing for trapping them.

haberman13

That's incredibly harsh and a massive generalisation...

Is it though? And even if its a 'generalization', statistically its probably true ... so ... whats the problem?

You just called a fanbase dull and obnoxious - of course it's harsh. I don't know how long you've been gaming, but it's perfectly acceptable for people to like different styles of game.
Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts
It will probably do it the exact same way BF2 did. Consoles will get a much smaller map with more focus on infantry combat and less vehicles. There will be one (maybe two if there's lots of maps) that have a single jet per side and maybe 1/3 of the maps will have helicopters. If they do do it like BF2 though I think the 64 player maps will probably be larger than Heavy Metal.
Avatar image for haberman13
haberman13

2414

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 haberman13
Member since 2003 • 2414 Posts

[QUOTE="haberman13"]

[QUOTE="Ravensmash"] That's incredibly harsh and a massive generalisation...Ravensmash

Is it though? And even if its a 'generalization', statistically its probably true ... so ... whats the problem?

You just called a fanbase dull and obnoxious - of course it's harsh. I don't know how long you've been gaming, but it's perfectly acceptable for people to like different styles of game.

Absolutely, don't get me wrong, people can choose to do whatever they like ... I just don't want to game with them.

I can only hear my mom insulted, the word "bro", and obnoxious 13 yr olds being racist ~2 times before I blow a gasket and decry the death of society :)

Of course, thats on console, on PC I don't run into it much ... so BF3 on PC will probably be sanitized to a degree anyway.

Avatar image for TheEpicGoat
TheEpicGoat

2006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 TheEpicGoat
Member since 2011 • 2006 Posts

Fine by me as long as they are like BFBC2 maps

Avatar image for Mystic-G
Mystic-G

6462

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Mystic-G
Member since 2006 • 6462 Posts

Battlefield 2


64-players


32-players


16-players



/end topic

Avatar image for Gauloisess
Gauloisess

305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Gauloisess
Member since 2010 • 305 Posts

Eeew, the thought of playing BF3 on consoles even horrifies me.

Avatar image for Upparoom
Upparoom

2111

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Upparoom
Member since 2010 • 2111 Posts

I don't think its fair to continually put down console users who want to buy the game. We need to chill with the graphics and 64 players bragging :?.

Avatar image for rangegear
rangegear

3029

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#24 rangegear
Member since 2008 • 3029 Posts
As long as theres still jets im good.
Avatar image for eboyishere
eboyishere

12681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 eboyishere
Member since 2011 • 12681 Posts

[QUOTE="eboyishere"]heres the fun part: the jets will be be dominated on smaller maps unless there enough is protection in buildingsglez13

Will there even be jets on consoles? Have they mentioned something about this? In BF2 just like two maneuvers and you were already being warned for being outside the gamespace.

ehhh i thought it was stated that there will be jets on consoles

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#26 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts
LOL at console versions seeing how PC can do 24 players as well.
As long as theres still jets im good.rangegear
It was one of the 1st things confirmed, and wait until the 30th to see it in action.
Avatar image for eboyishere
eboyishere

12681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 eboyishere
Member since 2011 • 12681 Posts

I don't think its fair to continually put down console users who want to buy the game. We need to chill with the graphics and 64 players bragging :?.

Upparoom

it isnt it's all perference but people will put down the consoles all the time on here

Avatar image for Kinthalis
Kinthalis

5503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#28 Kinthalis
Member since 2002 • 5503 Posts

I don't think its fair to continually put down console users who want to buy the game. We need to chill with the graphics and 64 players bragging :?.

Upparoom

Because I'm sure the console fanboys on this forum will absolutley continue to chill about PC gaming and how we spend $10,000 every 10 seconds to keep our rigs updated, or how all we have are games no one cares about because there isn't someone on TV 24/7 telling us they are soo cool and we must buy them! or because the developers don't say thigns like "When you push this button AWESOME happens!", or how developers sell a billion more copies on consoles so PC gamers don't matter, or how we can't play games from our couch on our TV's.

Am I rite?

Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

I prefer smaller maps. it usually means less cheap*** snipers and campers.

arbitor365

That just means its easier for you to get picked off...

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#30 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="Upparoom"]

I don't think its fair to continually put down console users who want to buy the game. We need to chill with the graphics and 64 players bragging :?.

Kinthalis

Because I'm sure the console fanboys on this forum will absolutley continue to chill about PC gaming and how we spend $10,000 every 10 seconds to keep our rigs updated, or how all we have are games no one cares about because there isn't someone on TV 24/7 telling us they are soo cool and we must buy them! or because the developers don't say thigns like "When you push this button AWESOME happens!", or how developers sell a billion more copies on consoles so PC gamers don't matter, or how we can't play games from our couch on our TV's.

Am I rite?

They are so clueless when comes to PC, no wonder many of them have crappy PCs.

Avatar image for JohnF111
JohnF111

14190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#31 JohnF111
Member since 2010 • 14190 Posts

I prefer smaller maps. it usually means less cheap*** snipers and campers.

arbitor365
You must be a akimbo shotgun user with marathon? j/k :P Seems logical to me, i am betting they just cut wasteland out of the maps and leave in the map defining features like buildings and chokepoints, plus BF2 maps had quite a lot of dead space anyway so i feel console users will barely even notice or care about shrunken maps.
Avatar image for mattuk69
mattuk69

3050

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 mattuk69
Member since 2009 • 3050 Posts

[QUOTE="arbitor365"]

I prefer smaller maps. it usually means less cheap*** snipers and campers.

ChubbyGuy40

That just means its easier for you to get picked off...

Yeah out of all the BF ive played BC2 was the worst with snipers.
Avatar image for Harisemo
Harisemo

4133

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 Harisemo
Member since 2010 • 4133 Posts

as long as they are like bfbc2 then im happy

Avatar image for turtlethetaffer
turtlethetaffer

18973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 144

User Lists: 0

#34 turtlethetaffer
Member since 2009 • 18973 Posts

(insert something about consoles being evil here)

Avatar image for silversix_
silversix_

26347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 silversix_
Member since 2010 • 26347 Posts
Will the maps be big enough for jets is my question, because BC2 maps sure were small for Hinds and other combat helis.
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#36 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

Will the maps be big enough for jets is my question, because BC2 maps sure were small for Hinds and other combat helis.silversix_
Have you played on Heavy Metal? It's the biggest map in BC2 and is perfect for choppers, hell, it takes forever to get from places even in tanks. I honestly think that map was made for 64 players, even 32 players on PC was bad enough for it.

I agree with every other BC2 map though.

Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

Will the maps be big enough for jets is my question, because BC2 maps sure were small for Hinds and other combat helis.silversix_

They increased the out of bounds for jets so you have more freedom for flying.

Avatar image for Deevoshun
Deevoshun

868

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#38 Deevoshun
Member since 2003 • 868 Posts

It's obvious, anyone with a real choice will purchase the PC version, I will be doing just that. But considering BF3 is going to a BC3 to consoles, I just don't see that as a bad thing. Even in BF2 I would sometimes play on the smaller scale maps just for the more intense up close combat.

Think back to BF2, one of the most popular maps (if not most popular) was Karkand.

Karkand

This map had no aircraft of any kind, looking at it this could very well work for BC2 right now. Still as PC gamer we will have the option to play full 64 players or on a smaller 24 player scale. Good to have choices.

I am super hyped to know that we are returning to Karkand in BF3.

Avatar image for arbitor365
arbitor365

2726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#39 arbitor365
Member since 2009 • 2726 Posts

[QUOTE="arbitor365"]

I prefer smaller maps. it usually means less cheap*** snipers and campers.

ChubbyGuy40

That just means its easier for you to get picked off...

not if you are good at the game

Avatar image for Deevoshun
Deevoshun

868

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#40 Deevoshun
Member since 2003 • 868 Posts

[QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]

[QUOTE="arbitor365"]

I prefer smaller maps. it usually means less cheap*** snipers and campers.

arbitor365

That just means its easier for you to get picked off...

not if you are good at the game

Yes if the sniper is better than you.

See what I did.

Avatar image for psn8214
psn8214

14930

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 psn8214
Member since 2009 • 14930 Posts

Makes sense, considering the smaller player limit.

Avatar image for tenaka2
tenaka2

17958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 tenaka2
Member since 2004 • 17958 Posts

Everyone knows the console versions are 'lite' why are you surprised?

Avatar image for Chogyam
Chogyam

1887

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 Chogyam
Member since 2003 • 1887 Posts

[QUOTE="arbitor365"]

[QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"]

That just means its easier for you to get picked off...

Deevoshun

not if you are good at the game

Yes if the sniper is better than you.

See what I did.

like in Harvest Day, where i can pick you off in Russian base, from the US base?
Avatar image for linkin_guy109
linkin_guy109

8864

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#44 linkin_guy109
Member since 2005 • 8864 Posts

that makes perfect sense to me, far less players and this is the way for a dev to approach developing for consoles and pc at the same time, dont try and skim things off to make the games the exact same on all platforms, if one platform is going to have more features then so be it

Avatar image for hanslacher54
hanslacher54

3659

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 hanslacher54
Member since 2007 • 3659 Posts

That's good. I doubt people want to run around on empty maps.

Avatar image for lawlessx
lawlessx

48753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#46 lawlessx
Member since 2004 • 48753 Posts
i thought Dice already mentioned the maps being scaled down on the consoles? ah well..
Avatar image for Ravensmash
Ravensmash

13862

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 Ravensmash
Member since 2010 • 13862 Posts
How did Heavy Metal work on consoles? I saw a video of that map earlier and was very surprised by how large it was - maybe that was a test by DICE for BF3 on consoles.
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#48 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts
[QUOTE="Ravensmash"]How did Heavy Metal work on consoles? I saw a video of that map earlier and was very surprised by how large it was - maybe that was a test by DICE for BF3 on consoles.

It was probably a test, but was totally unnecessary for it's size and DICE did say due to network and hardware limitations that they can't add more than 24 players on consoles.
Avatar image for RoOodriGowW
RoOodriGowW

3309

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 RoOodriGowW
Member since 2008 • 3309 Posts

Fair enough lol , there'll be way less players on them (maps).

Avatar image for Cheesehead9099
Cheesehead9099

2849

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#50 Cheesehead9099
Member since 2008 • 2849 Posts

but overall, ps3 is the system to get it on because sony will continue supporting the game unlike other platforms imho.

also psn is better than live and steam imho

[spoiler] If you're playing it on console, you're doing it wrong. But I guess people who don't have PCs capable enough to handle BF3 will have to settle for consoles, it will still be great on PS360 [/spoiler]