Battlefield 4 confirmed by EA, beta coming fall 2013

  • 86 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for TheShadowLord07
TheShadowLord07

23083

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 TheShadowLord07
Member since 2006 • 23083 Posts

guess no 2143,bc3,(or even mirrors edge 2) anytime soonvg247

Avatar image for Badosh
Badosh

12774

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#2 Badosh
Member since 2011 • 12774 Posts
Let the milkage begin!
Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50074

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#3 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50074 Posts
Fall of 2013 for the beta... Actual release in 2014 then?
Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50074

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#4 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50074 Posts
Let the milkage begin!Badosh
The milkage of Battlefield started long ago, don't be a twit.
Avatar image for lowe0
lowe0

13692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 lowe0
Member since 2004 • 13692 Posts
Shut up and take my money, EA.
Avatar image for Animal-Mother
Animal-Mother

27362

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#7 Animal-Mother
Member since 2003 • 27362 Posts

I think they're probably trying to get out one more game before the generation ends.

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#8 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

[QUOTE="Badosh"]Let the milkage begin!Stevo_the_gamer
The milkage of Battlefield started long ago, don't be a twit.

More or less what he said.

There hasn't been an outright bad Battlefield game either and all of them have had some significant changes over predecessors.

Since it looks like a winter 2013 launch and that DICE has said that the Frostbite 2 engine was built for the next gen, maybe we'll see it on the next gen consoles instead? I guess that will depend on Sony and Microsoft.

I would prefer a 2014 release to make sure that both Sony and Microsoft have their next gen consoles out so that BF4 doesn't have to be scaled down for 24 players again. That was probably the biggest factor in terms of design. I know that they'll never have 100% massive maps again because of how popular the smaller maps were in BF3, but things like squad size, squad communication tools, and even a commander mode all cut because they had to build the game with 24 players in mind.

I have no problem with a new game every 2 years. Why bother beating around the bush and taking 5 years for a sequel when development teams are massive now and they can pump out quality games in half the time they used to be able to.

Avatar image for Malta_1980
Malta_1980

11890

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Malta_1980
Member since 2008 • 11890 Posts

[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"][QUOTE="Badosh"]Let the milkage begin!Wasdie

The milkage of Battlefield started long ago, don't be a twit.

More or less what he said.

There hasn't been an outright bad Battlefield game either and all of them have had some significant changes over predecessors.

Since it looks like a winter 2013 launch and that DICE has said that the Frostbite 2 engine was built for the next gen, maybe we'll see it on the next gen consoles instead? I guess that will depend on Sony and Microsoft.

I would prefer a 2014 release to make sure that both Sony and Microsoft have their next gen consoles out so that BF4 doesn't have to be scaled down for 24 players again. That was probably the biggest factor in terms of design. I know that they'll never have 100% massive maps again because of how popular the smaller maps were in BF3, but things like squad size, squad communication tools, and even a commander mode all cut because they had to build the game with 24 players in mind.

I have no problem with a new game every 2 years. Why bother beating around the bush and taking 5 years for a sequel when development teams are massive now and they can pump out quality games in half the time they used to be able to.

I agree..

if the BETA is available towards the end of 2013 then the game will probably be released early 2014, so as long as DICE will make sure they release an AAA title and futher improve the game I'll be more than happy to buy BF4..

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#10 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

I agree..

if the BETA is available towards the end of 2013 then the game will probably be released early 2014, so as long as DICE will make sure they release an AAA title and futher improve the game I'll be more than happy to buy BF4..

Malta_1980

I think Battlefield 3 is as streamlined as the series is going to go. It's by far the most selling Battlefield game to date. They have no reason to change the formula any more to try to expand the audience. They were successful in that. If anything, I can see them improving on stuff that was lacking BF3. I know it will launch in a better state than BF3 becuase the engine will be much more mature and they've learned a lot from their current audience.

One can only be hopeful that it is on the next gen console and they drop that silly 24 player limit. At the least, I want every map to be design with 64 players in mind. Maps like Sharaqi and Back to Karkand prove that you can have urban experiances without all of the obvious chokepoints that they had in their latest maps.

Though I have to admit, the CQ pack was great for what it is. Also I really hope that Armor Kill is a massive success.

Avatar image for WarTornRuston
WarTornRuston

2712

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 WarTornRuston
Member since 2011 • 2712 Posts

Pretty sure they are gonna relese Battlefield and Medal of Honor in opposite years and try to take away from Call of Duty sales. Smart strategy but we will see if they can keep the quality up.

Avatar image for viper-kid
viper-kid

811

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 viper-kid
Member since 2007 • 811 Posts

Milkage. But then again if you want to dethrone the Beasty COD then you need yearly release, otherwise the gap year would be Cod stealing your fanbase and thats why they have yearly releases now (MOH and BF are the same engine, just 1 is on a smaller scale). In terms of business, it makes sense and I just hope they don't talk too much like they did before BF3 release and end up looking like fools. Remember when BF3 come out they apologiesed for their comments of cod, since they noticed that their sales were no where near COD and didn't even let Cod come out before they apologiesed. But hey nothing like getting the fanboys bashing Cod to buy your game as a way to express their hate for Cod.

I did end up buying BF3 on PC thanks to a sale, but cod still carries water. imo But hey BF can never be milkage right? only cod can be classed as milking. It's funny how when EA copies cod's yearly release it's not called milking. Why? because they named the titles different(MOH and BF) they are apart, although they use the same engine and the same mechanics.

Avatar image for xXDrPainXx
xXDrPainXx

4001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 xXDrPainXx
Member since 2008 • 4001 Posts
Business stand point it makes sense to fight fire with fire. My stand point I'll be passing on this just like I did with Battlefield 3 and will continue to play Battlefield 2 until nobody plays anymore.
Avatar image for razgriz_101
razgriz_101

16875

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#14 razgriz_101
Member since 2007 • 16875 Posts

Milkage. But then again if you want to dethrone the Beasty COD then you need yearly release, otherwise the gap year would be Cod stealing your fanbase and thats why they have yearly releases now (MOH and BF are the same engine, just 1 is on a smaller scale). In terms of business, it makes sense and I just hope they don't talk too much like they did before BF3 release and end up looking like fools. Remember when BF3 come out they apologiesed for their comments of cod, since they noticed that their sales were no where near COD and didn't even let Cod come out before they apologiesed. But hey nothing like getting the fanboys bashing Cod to buy your game as a way to express their hate for Cod.

I did end up buying BF3 on PC thanks to a sale, but cod still carries water. imo But hey BF can never be can never be milkage right? only cod can be classed as milking. It's funny how when EA copies cod's yearly release it's not called milking. Why? because they named the titles different(MOH and BF) they are apart, although they use the same engine and the same mechanics.

viper-kid

thing is though battlefield is bi-yearly and will continue to be.

Avatar image for viper-kid
viper-kid

811

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 viper-kid
Member since 2007 • 811 Posts

[QUOTE="viper-kid"]

Milkage. But then again if you want to dethrone the Beasty COD then you need yearly release, otherwise the gap year would be Cod stealing your fanbase and thats why they have yearly releases now (MOH and BF are the same engine, just 1 is on a smaller scale). In terms of business, it makes sense and I just hope they don't talk too much like they did before BF3 release and end up looking like fools. Remember when BF3 come out they apologiesed for their comments of cod, since they noticed that their sales were no where near COD and didn't even let Cod come out before they apologiesed. But hey nothing like getting the fanboys bashing Cod to buy your game as a way to express their hate for Cod.

I did end up buying BF3 on PC thanks to a sale, but cod still carries water. imo But hey BF can never be can never be milkage right? only cod can be classed as milking. It's funny how when EA copies cod's yearly release it's not called milking. Why? because they named the titles different(MOH and BF) they are apart, although they use the same engine and the same mechanics.

razgriz_101

thing is though battlefield is bi-yearly and will continue to be.

Cod is too in that sense. There is 2 devs working on the game for 2 years and they release in turns. Just like BF they have 2 devs working on MOH and BF and they also release in turns just with different names, but like Cod, they use the same engine.
Avatar image for razgriz_101
razgriz_101

16875

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#16 razgriz_101
Member since 2007 • 16875 Posts

[QUOTE="razgriz_101"]

[QUOTE="viper-kid"]

Milkage. But then again if you want to dethrone the Beasty COD then you need yearly release, otherwise the gap year would be Cod stealing your fanbase and thats why they have yearly releases now (MOH and BF are the same engine, just 1 is on a smaller scale). In terms of business, it makes sense and I just hope they don't talk too much like they did before BF3 release and end up looking like fools. Remember when BF3 come out they apologiesed for their comments of cod, since they noticed that their sales were no where near COD and didn't even let Cod come out before they apologiesed. But hey nothing like getting the fanboys bashing Cod to buy your game as a way to express their hate for Cod.

I did end up buying BF3 on PC thanks to a sale, but cod still carries water. imo But hey BF can never be can never be milkage right? only cod can be classed as milking. It's funny how when EA copies cod's yearly release it's not called milking. Why? because they named the titles different(MOH and BF) they are apart, although they use the same engine and the same mechanics.

viper-kid

thing is though battlefield is bi-yearly and will continue to be.

Cod is too in that sense. There is 2 devs working on the game for 2 years and they release in turns. Just like BF they have 2 devs working on MOH and BF and they also release in turns just with different names, but like Cod, they use the same engine.

thing is MoH and BF are diffrent IP'.

CoD is the same year in year out, same mechanics as one another and various other bits.

Sorry but viper we've been over this last year, this nonsense doesnt wash.

Avatar image for Dreams0fChaos
Dreams0fChaos

109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Dreams0fChaos
Member since 2008 • 109 Posts

Milkage. But then again if you want to dethrone the Beasty COD then you need yearly release, otherwise the gap year would be Cod stealing your fanbase and thats why they have yearly releases now (MOH and BF are the same engine, just 1 is on a smaller scale). In terms of business, it makes sense and I just hope they don't talk too much like they did before BF3 release and end up looking like fools. Remember when BF3 come out they apologiesed for their comments of cod, since they noticed that their sales were no where near COD and didn't even let Cod come out before they apologiesed. But hey nothing like getting the fanboys bashing Cod to buy your game as a way to express their hate for Cod.

I did end up buying BF3 on PC thanks to a sale, but cod still carries water. imo But hey BF can never be milkage right? only cod can be classed as milking. It's funny how when EA copies cod's yearly release it's not called milking. Why? because they named the titles different(MOH and BF) they are apart, although they use the same engine and the same mechanics.

viper-kid

i think you are wrong on that, cod is the same ip with two different developers which follow thier own stories, but in all its the same gameplay. MOH and BF are two completely different ips, like you said MOH is a small map mp while BF is a large scale MP. thier smallest maps are the size of MOH's biggest maps and dont forget that one has more vehicles than the other along with jet and chopper battles. i believe that ea release them that way so they dont loose sales on both. better to spread the release dates on them than having your own two games battle each other out.

Avatar image for OpenHat
OpenHat

64

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 OpenHat
Member since 2012 • 64 Posts
They might not even need to battle CoD because if someone buys Activision they'll likely ruin the series anyway and I think Vivendi might be selling Acti/Blizz because WoW is declining and the CoD fanbase is at it's peak AND there is more competition so who knows, maybe someone will buy Acti/Blizz and change their focus to something else and CoD will either fizzle out or no longer be the AAA budget massive grossing title it is now.
Avatar image for Jebus213
Jebus213

10056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Jebus213
Member since 2010 • 10056 Posts

[QUOTE="viper-kid"][QUOTE="razgriz_101"]

thing is though battlefield is bi-yearly and will continue to be.

razgriz_101

Cod is too in that sense. There is 2 devs working on the game for 2 years and they release in turns. Just like BF they have 2 devs working on MOH and BF and they also release in turns just with different names, but like Cod, they use the same engine.

thing is MoH and BF are diffrent IP'.

CoD is the same year in year out, same mechanics as one another and various other bits.

Sorry but viper we've been over this last year, this nonsense doesnt wash.

One has an MP with vehicles and big maps and the other one doesn't. That's the only real difference I see so far. Guarantee you the SP will be another 6 hour movie. Oh lets forget you also need a cheap co-op mode to compete with CoD.
Avatar image for Truth_Hurts_U
Truth_Hurts_U

9703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#20 Truth_Hurts_U
Member since 2006 • 9703 Posts
Hated BF3... Pass.
Avatar image for ShadowDeathX
ShadowDeathX

11699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#21 ShadowDeathX
Member since 2006 • 11699 Posts

BF4 Beta, One month before release confirmed. EA will be fools to ignore the November and December buying rush.

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#22 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts

Milkage. But then again if you want to dethrone the Beasty COD then you need yearly release, otherwise the gap year would be Cod stealing your fanbase and thats why they have yearly releases now (MOH and BF are the same engine, just 1 is on a smaller scale). In terms of business, it makes sense and I just hope they don't talk too much like they did before BF3 release and end up looking like fools. Remember when BF3 come out they apologiesed for their comments of cod, since they noticed that their sales were no where near COD and didn't even let Cod come out before they apologiesed. But hey nothing like getting the fanboys bashing Cod to buy your game as a way to express their hate for Cod.

I did end up buying BF3 on PC thanks to a sale, but cod still carries water. imo But hey BF can never be milkage right? only cod can be classed as milking. It's funny how when EA copies cod's yearly release it's not called milking. Why? because they named the titles different(MOH and BF) they are apart, although they use the same engine and the same mechanics.

viper-kid
ea came up with annual releases of medal of honor, they couldnt deliver good products so they stopped. Now they are pissed cod is doing it and making billions with it, kicking ea's ass in the process [QUOTE="razgriz_101"] thing is MoH and BF are diffrent IP'.

CoD is the same year in year out, same mechanics as one another and various other bits.

Sorry but viper we've been over this last year, this nonsense doesnt wash.

considering how ea put another bull talk press release sayign that moh and bf appeal to diffirent audiences, id say know, they still milk, they just feed off by cod haters who seek another shooter to play as long as it is not cod its good to them. The way ea sees it, they make profit without having to release annually, they just release 2 games. All they care is the money coming in, so its basicly the same thing to them.
Avatar image for TyberZannxxxx
TyberZannxxxx

712

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 TyberZannxxxx
Member since 2009 • 712 Posts

I'm guessing this will be coming to PC, Wii U, Xbox 720, and PS4.

Avatar image for viper-kid
viper-kid

811

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 viper-kid
Member since 2007 • 811 Posts

[QUOTE="viper-kid"]

Milkage. But then again if you want to dethrone the Beasty COD then you need yearly release, otherwise the gap year would be Cod stealing your fanbase and thats why they have yearly releases now (MOH and BF are the same engine, just 1 is on a smaller scale). In terms of business, it makes sense and I just hope they don't talk too much like they did before BF3 release and end up looking like fools. Remember when BF3 come out they apologiesed for their comments of cod, since they noticed that their sales were no where near COD and didn't even let Cod come out before they apologiesed. But hey nothing like getting the fanboys bashing Cod to buy your game as a way to express their hate for Cod.

I did end up buying BF3 on PC thanks to a sale, but cod still carries water. imo But hey BF can never be milkage right? only cod can be classed as milking. It's funny how when EA copies cod's yearly release it's not called milking. Why? because they named the titles different(MOH and BF) they are apart, although they use the same engine and the same mechanics.

Dreams0fChaos

i think you are wrong on that, cod is the same ip with two different developers which follow thier own stories, but in all its the same gameplay. MOH and BF are two completely different ips, like you said MOH is a small map mp while BF is a large scale MP. thier smallest maps are the size of MOH's biggest maps and dont forget that one has more vehicles than the other along with jet and chopper battles. i believe that ea release them that way so they dont loose sales on both. better to spread the release dates on them than having your own two games battle each other out.

Moh is just BF with less features, on the same engine.
Avatar image for viper-kid
viper-kid

811

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 viper-kid
Member since 2007 • 811 Posts

[QUOTE="viper-kid"][QUOTE="razgriz_101"]

thing is though battlefield is bi-yearly and will continue to be.

razgriz_101

Cod is too in that sense. There is 2 devs working on the game for 2 years and they release in turns. Just like BF they have 2 devs working on MOH and BF and they also release in turns just with different names, but like Cod, they use the same engine.

thing is MoH and BF are diffrent IP'.

CoD is the same year in year out, same mechanics as one another and various other bits.

Sorry but viper we've been over this last year, this nonsense doesnt wash.

Different IPs but same devs and engine. It's not like MOH is any different to BF gameplaywise, like I said before MOH is just just BF with less features. Don't get confused because of the different name, Dice are the ones working on the multiplayer for both, at least Cod rotates the devs in terms of Multiplayer. And how can you say Cod is the same when BO2 has proven otherwise, come on fanboys you need a different excuse for hating the Beast COD. What did BF3 add that was revolutionary? Vehicles, jets and tanks have been done in every BF, so what was new? except clustered maps like operation metro, grand bazzar and the close quarters DLC trying to mimic COD. Its funny you hate Cod when it has influenced a lot of features for BF3 like the weapon customization, perks and maps. MOH has killstreaks lol and yet you guys don't complain. Hypocrisy at it's finest

Avatar image for Jebus213
Jebus213

10056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Jebus213
Member since 2010 • 10056 Posts

I'm guessing this will be coming to PC, Wii U, Xbox 720, and PS4.

TyberZannxxxx
No, BF4 is coming out next year...
Avatar image for vashkey
vashkey

33781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 135

User Lists: 25

#27 vashkey
Member since 2005 • 33781 Posts
Let the milkage begin!Badosh
You mean resumes
Avatar image for Mr_BillGates
Mr_BillGates

3211

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#28 Mr_BillGates
Member since 2005 • 3211 Posts

Just what we needed, another generic shooter.

Avatar image for razgriz_101
razgriz_101

16875

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#29 razgriz_101
Member since 2007 • 16875 Posts

[QUOTE="razgriz_101"]

[QUOTE="viper-kid"] Cod is too in that sense. There is 2 devs working on the game for 2 years and they release in turns. Just like BF they have 2 devs working on MOH and BF and they also release in turns just with different names, but like Cod, they use the same engine.viper-kid

thing is MoH and BF are diffrent IP'.

CoD is the same year in year out, same mechanics as one another and various other bits.

Sorry but viper we've been over this last year, this nonsense doesnt wash.

Different IPs but same devs and engine. It's not like MOH is any different to BF gameplaywise, like I said before MOH is just just BF with less features. Don't get confused because of the different name, Dice are the ones working on the multiplayer for both, at least Cod rotates the devs in terms of Multiplayer. And how can you say Cod is the same when BO2 has proven otherwise, come on fanboys you need a different excuse for hating the Beast COD. What did BF3 add that was revolutionary? Vehicles, jets and tanks have been done in every BF, so what was new? except clustered maps like operation metro, grand bazzar and the close quarters DLC trying to mimic COD. Its funny you hate Cod when it has influenced a lot of features for BF3 like the weapon customization, perks and maps. MOH has killstreaks lol and yet you guys don't complain. Hypocrisy at it's finest

As is clear you've never played either of the latest MoH or BF titles.

2 are vastly diffrent games.

Oh yeh Dice isnt involved in Warfighter either btw.So yup kid like you did all last year with MW3 you will continually shoot yourself in the foot to save face or at least attempt to.

Avatar image for Pug-Nasty
Pug-Nasty

8508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#30 Pug-Nasty
Member since 2009 • 8508 Posts

I'm gonna laugh when this one sells like crap because BF 3 sucked ass.

Avatar image for nolson
nolson

1141

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 nolson
Member since 2003 • 1141 Posts

[QUOTE="razgriz_101"]

[QUOTE="viper-kid"] Cod is too in that sense. There is 2 devs working on the game for 2 years and they release in turns. Just like BF they have 2 devs working on MOH and BF and they also release in turns just with different names, but like Cod, they use the same engine.viper-kid

thing is MoH and BF are diffrent IP'.

CoD is the same year in year out, same mechanics as one another and various other bits.

Sorry but viper we've been over this last year, this nonsense doesnt wash.

Different IPs but same devs and engine. It's not like MOH is any different to BF gameplaywise, like I said before MOH is just just BF with less features. Don't get confused because of the different name, Dice are the ones working on the multiplayer for both, at least Cod rotates the devs in terms of Multiplayer. And how can you say Cod is the same when BO2 has proven otherwise, come on fanboys you need a different excuse for hating the Beast COD. What did BF3 add that was revolutionary? Vehicles, jets and tanks have been done in every BF, so what was new? except clustered maps like operation metro, grand bazzar and the close quarters DLC trying to mimic COD. Its funny you hate Cod when it has influenced a lot of features for BF3 like the weapon customization, perks and maps. MOH has killstreaks lol and yet you guys don't complain. Hypocrisy at it's finest

You really are proving how much you have no clue what you are talking about. It's Different IP's AND different DEVS. DICE has nothing to do with MOH: Warfighter. The single and multiplayer are being developed by Danger Close. I played MOH and BF3 and I can tell you they are no where near the same thing. I know you are trying to justify the COD milkage by comparing the two but the fact is they are not really comparable.
Avatar image for bonesawisready5
bonesawisready5

4971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 bonesawisready5
Member since 2011 • 4971 Posts

Sounds like no new consoles in 2013 then.

Avatar image for bonesawisready5
bonesawisready5

4971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 bonesawisready5
Member since 2011 • 4971 Posts

[QUOTE="TyberZannxxxx"]

I'm guessing this will be coming to PC, Wii U, Xbox 720, and PS4.

Jebus213

No, BF4 is coming out next year...

No the beta starts Fall 2013 which implies a 2014 release

Avatar image for xhawk27
xhawk27

12194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 xhawk27
Member since 2010 • 12194 Posts

So is this going to be on Xbox 720 and PS4? I bet it has 64 players since the next gen systems are going to be really powerful.

Bring back the Commander so I can use Artilery and supply drops.

Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#35 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts

An Xbox3/PS4 port with 64 player matches would be a day one to me.

Avatar image for bonesawisready5
bonesawisready5

4971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 bonesawisready5
Member since 2011 • 4971 Posts

So is this going to be on Xbox 720 and PS4? I bet it has 64 players since the next gen systems are going to be really powerful.

Bring back the Commander so I can use Artilery and supply drops.

xhawk27

It would insulting to give 360/PS3 players beta codes for unreleased console versions of the game.

If anything this means we may not see new consoles next year

Avatar image for xhawk27
xhawk27

12194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 xhawk27
Member since 2010 • 12194 Posts

[QUOTE="xhawk27"]

So is this going to be on Xbox 720 and PS4? I bet it has 64 players since the next gen systems are going to be really powerful.

Bring back the Commander so I can use Artilery and supply drops.

bonesawisready5

It would insulting to give 360/PS3 players beta codes for unreleased console versions of the game.

If anything this means we may not see new consoles next year

Yeah but I still think 2014 is the year the Next Xbox and the PS4 are released. So there might be a version for them in 2014.

Avatar image for PhazonBlazer
PhazonBlazer

12013

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#38 PhazonBlazer
Member since 2007 • 12013 Posts

If the beta is in fall it could come out in early 2014.

Avatar image for nolson
nolson

1141

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 nolson
Member since 2003 • 1141 Posts

[QUOTE="Jebus213"][QUOTE="TyberZannxxxx"]

I'm guessing this will be coming to PC, Wii U, Xbox 720, and PS4.

bonesawisready5

No, BF4 is coming out next year...

No the beta starts Fall 2013 which implies a 2014 release

No it doesn't. The BF3 beta was fall 2011 and the game launched fall 2011.
Avatar image for Cranler
Cranler

8809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 Cranler
Member since 2005 • 8809 Posts
Let the milkage begin!Badosh
How is this milkage and previous installments not? BF 1942, BF Vietnam, BF 2 and BF 2142 all released within a 4 year period.
Avatar image for Ondoval
Ondoval

3103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#41 Ondoval
Member since 2005 • 3103 Posts

[QUOTE="Badosh"]Let the milkage begin!Cranler
How is this milkage and previous installments not? BF 1942, BF Vietnam, BF 2 and BF 2142 all released within a 4 year period.

Battlefield 2: June 2005.

Battlefield 3: October 2011.

Battlefield 4: fall 2013.

From 6 years to barely 2 years. I'm angry: BF3 was not only worse than Bad Company 2, but now instead of releasing BF 2143 or a Bad Company 3 game saving BF4 to the next gen of consoles they will release a BF3 mod called "Battlefield 4" aiming to prehistoric consoles with a collapsing cycle of sales as the main focus od the development.

Good luck with that EA: I fell in BF3 but mercifully avoided the DLCs and will not purchase your new Medal of Horror or new Battlefiled rehas; please call again when a new BC of BF 214X game would be ready, due are at most your obly franchises I could remotely care from you at this moment. And fire the Battlelog designer, please.

Avatar image for nolson
nolson

1141

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 nolson
Member since 2003 • 1141 Posts
[QUOTE="Badosh"]Let the milkage begin!Cranler
How is this milkage and previous installments not? BF 1942, BF Vietnam, BF 2 and BF 2142 all released within a 4 year period.

Because people are stupid and don't know what they are talking about.
Avatar image for Cranler
Cranler

8809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 Cranler
Member since 2005 • 8809 Posts

[QUOTE="Cranler"][QUOTE="Badosh"]Let the milkage begin!Ondoval

How is this milkage and previous installments not? BF 1942, BF Vietnam, BF 2 and BF 2142 all released within a 4 year period.

Battlefield 2: June 2005.

Battlefield 3: October 2011.

Battlefield 4: fall 2013.

From 6 years to barely 2 years. I'm angry: BF3 was not only worse than Bad Company 2, but now instead of releasing BF 2143 or a Bad Company 3 game saving BF4 to the next gen of consoles they will release a BF3 mod called "Battlefield 4" aiming to prehistoric consoles with a collapsing cycle of sales as the main focus od the development.

Good luck with that EA: I fell in BF3 but mercifully avoided the DLCs and will not purchase your new Medal of Horror or new Battlefiled rehas; please call again when a new BC of BF 214X game would be ready, due are at most your obly franchises I could remotely care from you at this moment. And fire the Battlelog designer, please.

BF 2142 came out in 2006 and Bad Company came out in 2008. BC is a Battlefield game regardless of whether Dice or fans consider it to be. How different do you think BC 3 would be from BF 4? BC 2 has as much in common with BF 2 as BC 2 does with BF 3.
Avatar image for shogunduk
shogunduk

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 shogunduk
Member since 2012 • 25 Posts
They were right. Battlefield has become the new CoD.
Avatar image for Far_RockNYC
Far_RockNYC

1244

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 Far_RockNYC
Member since 2012 • 1244 Posts

Lets see the BF fanboys (hypocrites) defend this now. BF is now a COD clone in all but name.

Avatar image for Merex760
Merex760

4381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#46 Merex760
Member since 2008 • 4381 Posts
We really didn't need another Battlefield already. Give us Mirror's Edge 2, please.
Avatar image for dirtyd89
dirtyd89

52

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 dirtyd89
Member since 2012 • 52 Posts
Is Battlefield 4 really necessary this early? I'd prefer it if EA save it for PS4/Xbox 720/PC.
Avatar image for nolson
nolson

1141

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 nolson
Member since 2003 • 1141 Posts
They were right. Battlefield has become the new CoD.shogunduk
How so? COD releases every year. This would be 2 years between BF games. BTW, a lot of games release on 2 year dev cycles, uncharted 2007, uncharted 2, 2009, uncharted 3, 2011 just as an example. Yet, no one calls them the new 'COD'. COD is the same franchise every single year even though it has 2 year dev cycle it still releases every year.
Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#49 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

[QUOTE="Cranler"][QUOTE="Badosh"]Let the milkage begin!Ondoval

How is this milkage and previous installments not? BF 1942, BF Vietnam, BF 2 and BF 2142 all released within a 4 year period.

Battlefield 2: June 2005.

Battlefield 3: October 2011.

Battlefield 4: fall 2013.

From 6 years to barely 2 years. I'm angry: BF3 was not only worse than Bad Company 2, but now instead of releasing BF 2143 or a Bad Company 3 game saving BF4 to the next gen of consoles they will release a BF3 mod called "Battlefield 4" aiming to prehistoric consoles with a collapsing cycle of sales as the main focus od the development.

Good luck with that EA: I fell in BF3 but mercifully avoided the DLCs and will not purchase your new Medal of Horror or new Battlefiled rehas; please call again when a new BC of BF 214X game would be ready, due are at most your obly franchises I could remotely care from you at this moment. And fire the Battlelog designer, please.

Wow really? What's the difference between waiting 6 years and waiting 2 years? Do you really think they worked on BF3 for 6 years?

They didn't start working on the meat of BF3 until they were done with BC2 which gave them a bit under 2 years to make the game.

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#50 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

Lets see the BF fanboys (hypocrites) defend this now. BF is now a COD clone in all but name.

Far_RockNYC

I dont follow your logic...