I knew this would be the case as soon as the X1 GPU specs were revealed. I even gave the benefit of the doubt to the ESRAM and made the assumption in my comparisons that it would be working at 100% which I knew would not be the case but if I did not do that then Ron would have had an even bigger cry about those comparisons. I always said the advantage would be 40-50% and in reality that gap is closer to 70%+.
BF4 is mostly CU bounded game and GCN will 12 CUs will not exceed GCN with 16 or 18 CUs.
W5000 (12 CU Pitcairn) is already at around 32 fps at 1080p Crysis 2 max details and if the target frame rate was 60 fps, the resolution has to be reduced i.e. looking at 1280x720p for 60 fps target.
Yeah that is your argument now..
We all know how you fiercely defended the xbox one,both against me and him to,look at the crap you still bringing,the W500 that is not the GPU on the xbox one for the 100 time,it is bonaire 7790,even on a die shot reveal is been tag as a 14 CU GPU 2 CU reserve,the same with the PS4 is a 7870 with 2CU disable for yields.
The W500 is 32 ROP and doesn't have a 10% GPU reservation,hell is 825mhz if i am not mistaken,the xbox one GPU is 857mhz that would mean over clocked.
Ron your arguments were all wrong the PS4 version is 900p and still keep a solid 10 FPS advantage on the xbox one version which is 720p,if the PS4 version was 720p the difference would be like 20 FPS or more.
Log in to comment