I was very critical of the first Beta.
"BF4 Mod" and all that jazz.
But after playing a bit of this new Beta, it's honestly pretty decent and different enough from BF4.
Just enough, though.
I can see why someone would buy it, but i won't.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Oh yeah I'm sure the differences feel pretty significant for someone who's played BF a lot. Like if Valve were to change DOTA 2 even slightly the whole community has PTSD for a few weeks. But I've played like 5 hours of BF4 and most of it was in single player, I don't like the game feel. Call me superficial but I just can't relate to the way it presents itself. Battlefield isn't self aware and takes itself way too seriously, that's why BC2 will always be the best in the series for me.
Hardline takes itself seriously? Give me a break. Something tells me you didn't even play the game once. It has cops rolling around in ridiculous muscle-cruisers blasting dubstep and rap about smoking weed while mowing down robbers with giant gattling guns. This is WAY more tongue-in-cheek than Bad Company 2.
I honestly might be enjoying this more than Bad Company 2. BC2 was fun but it disgraced the Battlefield franchise with its arcadey consolized crap (no prone and such). This has the fun of BC2, as well as the versatility and tactics of a Battlefield game. They lightened up on the destruction-gimmick crap (which the Battlefield franchise has never really been about).
Well I played for about 10 minutes before leaving out of boredom lol.
@speedfog: Well if that's the case then they're going to have a hell of a time getting people away from Advanced Warfare, because its infinitely better than Hardline.
Bad Company was the series peak. Hardline feels like a shtty bad company. It's nice to do a driveby without being blown away by a tank or running into mines. But, the novelty wears off after a while, especially with the sht gunplay.
The people are bullet sponges and a small caliber gun has more recoil than an AK in BF4. I'm not gonna pay full price just to do drive bys with the shotgon, no matter how cool it is.
If the DLC was free like BC2, that would be more enticing. Just charge for the guns, and give away the maps. A ton of people already invested in BF4 and premium, and they will probably stick with that instead of shelling out for a glorified mod.
@silversix_: That's the most lazy and willfully ignorant statement about BF3 and BF4 possible that doesn't carry any weight to people who have been playing the series for the past few years. Battlefield 4 in its current state (not how it launched), is probably the finest Battlefield to date. Most refined mechanics, best balanced, excellent diversity in the maps, the most amount of gamemodes, and a renewed emphasis on teamplay, all while DICE and EA have shown their ability to support a game well after launch if they put their minds to it. The next major patch coming in a few weeks is refining the game even more and adding in tons of quality of life features that will just make the experience better. Which is good because Hardline is going to flop hardcore and Battlefield 4 will live on.
Vicersal was making a cop drama game and had worked on Battlefield titles in the past and some EA executive decided to merge it with the Battlefield series as DICE was given the go ahead to make Mirror's Edge 2 as well as Star Wars Battlefront. A lot has changed at EA since this decision was made, but it's still a product of EA's legacy of terrible management. It has no right being a Battlefield game. The series should just take a break while the whole modern military craze kind of dies down and DICE is off making other games.
The Battlefield series needs a break. It's suffering franchise fatigue and the BF4 fiasco was proof of that. EA has diversified their shooter lineup with Titan and Battlefront and doesn't need to be pumping out a modern military shooter each year. Battlefield 4 is great and could easily last a few more years if they just keep making DLC for it. A large expansion pack with 5-10 new maps, vehicles, and some game modes for like $30 would keep the game going for another year strong with ease. They don't need a sequel right now. The work they've done to BF4 is proof that the team is committed to it and isn't slowing down the support.
EA needs to rethink their strategy here.
Very well said BF4 is excellent now and I hope it continues to live on. I sure as hell will keep playing however I really do want another BC3 though.
After BF4, it's safe to say I am done with this franchise. BF4 is utter shit. Hardline is....well pitiful.
I was very critical of the first Beta.
"BF4 Mod" and all that jazz.
But after playing a bit of this new Beta, it's honestly pretty decent and different enough from BF4.
Just enough, though.
I can see why someone would buy it, but i won't.
i hate EA for all the bf4 mess, but surprisingly the game is good, well worth my money
i dont know what youre talking about, its 13 games + 14 expansions in 12 years
1942
expansion
expansion
vietnam
bf2
bf2 moder combat (very different game on consoles)
expansion
expansion
expansion
2142
expansion
bad company
heroes
1943
bad company 2
bc vietnam
bf3
expansion
expansion
expansion
expansion
expansion
bf4
expansion
expansion
expansion
expansion
expansion
bf hardline
Having spent almost 200 hours into bf4 mp, Hardline is a welcomed change although similar in a lot of ways. It's day one for me.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment