on PS3 Killzone 3 looks better than BC2 ps3, but pc version maxed is the better looking game. If Killzone 3 was on PC, then in 1080p 60fps and higher res textures and effects would most likely make it the better looking game.
Which one is better BC2 maxed out on PC or Killzone 3?
KeithFerns
Wtf? You are comparing a game that was made on 2005 hardware to a BRAND NEW pc game? How does that make sense? The very notion that you are even comparing them favors consoles, if you were trying to claim victory on pc. It's like comparing Starfox to Starfox 64, technically.
Which one is better BC2 maxed out on PC or Killzone 3?
Heirren
Wtf? You are comparing a game that was made on 2005 hardware to a BRAND NEW pc game? How does that make sense? The very notion that you are even comparing them favors consoles, if you were trying to claim victory on pc. It's like comparing Starfox to Starfox 64, technically.
Which one is better BC2 maxed out on PC or Killzone 3?
Heirren
Wtf? You are comparing a game that was made on 2005 hardware to a BRAND NEW pc game? How does that make sense? The very notion that you are even comparing them favors consoles, if you were trying to claim victory on pc. It's like comparing Starfox to Starfox 64, technically.
Bad Company 2 was released last year, Killzone 3 was released about 2 months ago.
Low res blur fest running at less than 30fps half the time? No thanks.
kraken2109
You can't be talking about any of the two games , none of them have low res nor they have motion blur , or blurred textures.You should play games before you talk about them.
agree it makes the game really inconsistent and registry is poor. I prefer smoother and responsive engine to one bloated to making things fall down. also that bloom in bfbc2 rivals halo 3 bloom. bfbc2 pc doesnt have to be maxxed to look better than kz3
Log in to comment