This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="adamosmaki"][QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"][QUOTE="Noldorin2646"][QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"]I think it will be a toss up between MGS 4 and Gears 2.
Crysis Warhead and Far Cry 2 just don't stack up imo.
nVidiaGaMer
I know, Crysis Warhead is nowhere near MGS 4 if you're playing it on an abacus, copper wires and 4 AAA batteries.
No I play it on a 3800X2 @ 2.5Ghz, 2GB RAM, and a 9800GTX at 1280x1024 with all high settings no AA and MGS 4 is just that good.
Bashing crysis again?
Are you sure you know what you talk about i didnt know ati had a 3800x2 ( thats because there isnt one ).and what do you mean by and a 9800gtx ( you cant use nvidia cards and ati cards on the same pc ). Also what does the @2.5ghz next to the 3800x2? is it your vga core speed (btw even with extreme overclocking vga speeds gpu speed that is can reach the most 1-1.2ghz ) or processor( and explain what processor because that might even be an old single core p4 at 2.5 ) . If you had one of these cards ( the 3870x2 or 3850x2 that is ) you would have been playing crysis at very high at that res with AA
For best graphics most likely crysis warhead but also Stalker clear sky has amazing graphics
The 3800X2 is my cpu. And Stalker and Crysis don't stand a chance.
"Metal Gear Solid 4 hands everything else a cigarette and a blindfold to everything else that has come before it (ign talking about MGS 4 graphics)."
Maybe thats why you think crysis dont look that good. Your CPU is a serious bottleneck for your vga.
Link
Athlon 4850x2 is 50-75% slower than a core 2 duo or the new athlons let alone the 3800x2 you own.
And really check your eyes or something
[QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"][QUOTE="adamosmaki"][QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"][QUOTE="Noldorin2646"][QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"]I think it will be a toss up between MGS 4 and Gears 2.
Crysis Warhead and Far Cry 2 just don't stack up imo.
adamosmaki
I know, Crysis Warhead is nowhere near MGS 4 if you're playing it on an abacus, copper wires and 4 AAA batteries.
No I play it on a 3800X2 @ 2.5Ghz, 2GB RAM, and a 9800GTX at 1280x1024 with all high settings no AA and MGS 4 is just that good.
Bashing crysis again?
Are you sure you know what you talk about i didnt know ati had a 3800x2 ( thats because there isnt one ).and what do you mean by and a 9800gtx ( you cant use nvidia cards and ati cards on the same pc ). Also what does the @2.5ghz next to the 3800x2? is it your vga core speed (btw even with extreme overclocking vga speeds gpu speed that is can reach the most 1-1.2ghz ) or processor( and explain what processor because that might even be an old single core p4 at 2.5 ) . If you had one of these cards ( the 3870x2 or 3850x2 that is ) you would have been playing crysis at very high at that res with AA
For best graphics most likely crysis warhead but also Stalker clear sky has amazing graphics
The 3800X2 is my cpu. And Stalker and Crysis don't stand a chance.
"Metal Gear Solid 4 hands everything else a cigarette and a blindfold to everything else that has come before it (ign talking about MGS 4 graphics)."
LOL IGN
MGS4 graphics is not that good
the textues look bad and low res
only the models look good
[QUOTE="killzowned24"][QUOTE="MojondeVACA"]On PC : Crysis Wardhead,and FarCry 2
On Consoles : Between FarCry 2 and Gears 2.
Nisim19
lol. look at gears model compared to Resistance.
A basic enemy vs main boss in gears2 got owned also this gears shot is even a bullshot..lol, and R2 is zoomed in and crouched + a fps with as close as you can get and STILL looks better..massive ownage.
its not a boss , its just anther enmy
gears have why better models the R2even the reviews say that R2 looks good but not amezing
gears 2 looks why better, R2 is noting comper to gears 2...
lol,wut?
also your pics dont look better. look at all the flat textures.
Alright lets all be honest here, we all know crysis looks good, but isnt a games graphics supposed to be about art direction? Be stylistic and what not?Animal-Mother
That's subjective... You can't say any game is graphics king in the eyes of art style when talking to someone else because not everyone has the same taste in art style.
dead space or Farcry 2 will get it IMO, crysis looked ppretty bad IMO but that may just be because i'm comparing it to the originalmarkop2003
What? Comparing Crysis to the original? What the heck is this guy smoking?
[QUOTE="Animal-Mother"]Alright lets all be honest here, we all know crysis looks good, but isnt a games graphics supposed to be about art direction? Be stylistic and what not?DragonfireXZ95
That's subjective... You can't say any game is graphics king in the eyes of art style when talking to someone else because not everyone has the same taste in art style.
Very true,
[QUOTE="Animal-Mother"]Alright lets all be honest here, we all know crysis looks good, but isnt a games graphics supposed to be about art direction? Be stylistic and what not?DragonfireXZ95
That's subjective... You can't say any game is graphics king in the eyes of art style when talking to someone else because not everyone has the same taste in art style.
Beat me to it, that's like watching a painting and deciding if it looks good or not. Obviously you're gonna get lost of mixed thoughts. While talking about graphics technically, there is no place for that kind of debate, well at least outside of SW.
PC FAR CRY 2
CRYSIS (PC)
Blind much?
Lidve
The Crysis screen is twice the res and thats the worst Far Cry 2 screenshot. Once I get my Fraps I'll take a screenshot of Far Cry 2 maxed it looks better.
mgs4 has the best graphical art style...gears 2 has the best texture graphics....but warhead takes the crownozmatic77
LOL ,wut??
gears does not have good texures as seen in EVERY pic it has:)
[QUOTE="ozmatic77"]mgs4 has the best graphical art style...gears 2 has the best texture graphics....but warhead takes the crownkillzowned24
LOL ,wut??
gears does not have good texures as seen in EVERY pic it has:)
[QUOTE="killzowned24"][QUOTE="ozmatic77"]mgs4 has the best graphical art style...gears 2 has the best texture graphics....but warhead takes the crownMojondeVACA
LOL ,wut??
gears does not have good texures as seen in EVERY pic it has:)
Gears and MGS 4 are some of the console games that beat out the PC games in Graphics. Crysis is not as good as once thought.
[QUOTE="killzowned24"][QUOTE="ozmatic77"]mgs4 has the best graphical art style...gears 2 has the best texture graphics....but warhead takes the crownMojondeVACA
LOL ,wut??
gears does not have good texures as seen in EVERY pic it has:)
???? LOL, every game looks better in motion whats your point.
Are you serious? Have you seen Crysis/Warhead?I think it will be a toss up between MGS 4 and Gears 2.
Crysis Warhead and Far Cry 2 just don't stack up imo.
nVidiaGaMer
They're the best looking games to date.
[QUOTE="MojondeVACA"][QUOTE="killzowned24"][QUOTE="ozmatic77"]mgs4 has the best graphical art style...gears 2 has the best texture graphics....but warhead takes the crownnVidiaGaMer
LOL ,wut??
gears does not have good texures as seen in EVERY pic it has:)
Gears and MGS 4 are some of the console games that beat out the PC games in Graphics. Crysis is not as good as once thought.
Oh God, care for some proof?
[QUOTE="Noldorin2646"][QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"]I think it will be a toss up between MGS 4 and Gears 2.
Crysis Warhead and Far Cry 2 just don't stack up imo.
nVidiaGaMer
I know, Crysis Warhead is nowhere near MGS 4 if you're playing it on an abacus, copper wires and 4 AAA batteries.
No I play it on a 3800X2 @ 2.5Ghz, 2GB RAM, and a 9800GTX at 1280x1024 with all high settings no AA and MGS 4 is just that good.
Are you kidding me? At that res you could easily go up to very high and 2x AA.
[QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"][QUOTE="Noldorin2646"][QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"]I think it will be a toss up between MGS 4 and Gears 2.
Crysis Warhead and Far Cry 2 just don't stack up imo.
rumtumtugger
I know, Crysis Warhead is nowhere near MGS 4 if you're playing it on an abacus, copper wires and 4 AAA batteries.
No I play it on a 3800X2 @ 2.5Ghz, 2GB RAM, and a 9800GTX at 1280x1024 with all high settings no AA and MGS 4 is just that good.
Are you kidding me? At that res you could easily go up to very high and 2x AA.
BBut is monitor does not support higher... woops?
[QUOTE="ozmatic77"]mgs4 has the best graphical art style...gears 2 has the best texture graphics....but warhead takes the crownkillzowned24
LOL ,wut??
gears does not have good texures as seen in EVERY pic it has:)
Dude your just embarassing yourself.
I think Crysis, MGS4, and Dead Space have the best chances to win it.CleanPlayerIn my opinion Dead Space or Crysis deserve to win based on visual realism. Gears of War doesn't actually look realistic at all, even the guys at Epic Games admitted that everything was OTT. That said, the style they did go with looks great :)
[QUOTE="CleanPlayer"]I think Crysis, MGS4, and Dead Space have the best chances to win it.king_boboIn my opinion Dead Space or Crysis deserve to win based on visual realism. Gears of War doesn't actually look realistic at all, even the guys at Epic Games admitted that everything was OTT. That said, the style they did go with looks great :)
How is Crysis realistic? 2D fire, 5 bullets to shoot a tree in half, the same enemies over and over that look exactly the same, and how is seeing thousands of pores on a guys face realistic if your standing 10 feet away from them! :lol: Talk about overdoing it a little. :lol:
Overall: Crysis Warhead
Consoles: Gears of war 2
/thread
butteman12
Agreed /thread. Honestly though. This is the answer end this thread.
If it wasn't for Crysis warhead then Crysis would still have the best graphics. Also considering Far Cry 2 is being mentioned as graphics of the year (console) is pretty laughable considering the PC version doesn't even come near Crysis, just shows you the gap between console graphics and PC. Brainkiller05
Well next year Heavy Rain and Killzone 2 will beat Crysis easily in terms of graphics.
[QUOTE="Brainkiller05"]If it wasn't for Crysis warhead then Crysis would still have the best graphics. Also considering Far Cry 2 is being mentioned as graphics of the year (console) is pretty laughable considering the PC version doesn't even come near Crysis, just shows you the gap between console graphics and PC. nVidiaGaMer
Well next year Heavy Rain and Killzone 2 will beat Crysis easily in terms of graphics.
:lol: alright sure, keep telling yourself that. PS3/360 games 10 years from now wont look as good as Crysis on max.[QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"][QUOTE="Brainkiller05"]If it wasn't for Crysis warhead then Crysis would still have the best graphics. Also considering Far Cry 2 is being mentioned as graphics of the year (console) is pretty laughable considering the PC version doesn't even come near Crysis, just shows you the gap between console graphics and PC. Brainkiller05
Well next year Heavy Rain and Killzone 2 will beat Crysis easily in terms of graphics.
:lol: alright sure, keep telling yourself that. PS3/360 games 10 years from now wont look as good as Crysis on max.I would be embarrassed too if a console with a crippled 7800 card and 256MB of RAM would beat a PC with 4GB of RAM a quad core and a 9800/4850 card. ( I have a dual core, 2GB of RAM , and a 9800GTX).
[QUOTE="Brainkiller05"][QUOTE="nVidiaGaMer"][QUOTE="Brainkiller05"]If it wasn't for Crysis warhead then Crysis would still have the best graphics. Also considering Far Cry 2 is being mentioned as graphics of the year (console) is pretty laughable considering the PC version doesn't even come near Crysis, just shows you the gap between console graphics and PC. nVidiaGaMer
Well next year Heavy Rain and Killzone 2 will beat Crysis easily in terms of graphics.
:lol: alright sure, keep telling yourself that. PS3/360 games 10 years from now wont look as good as Crysis on max.I would be embarrassed too if a console with a crippled 7800 card and 256MB of RAM would beat a PC with 4GB of RAM a quad core and a 9800/4850 card. ( I have a dual core, 2GB of RAM , and a 9800GTX).
I wouldn't be, you'd expect with work consoles could achieve the graphics of a PC game that is 2-3 years old, but it's just funny it can't :lol:Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment