ok so lets get this over and done with for the time being untill the next big game comes out
so if a great dev (interms of graphix) makes a game (Crysis 2) and gamespot (we r using them since this is their website and thats what counts here) says themselves "on 360 crysis 2 is console graphix king" but later also says "crysis 2 is NOT in the league of killzone 3" this is 100% enough to say ps3 IS the console graphix king right? basically crysis 2 is better looking than any other game on 360 but kz3 looks better than that..therefore kz3/ps3 is graphix king. Personally using exclusives to compare what consoles can do makes more sense, but if u wana use multiplats then this can work too...
and yes i know some people say ps3 version of crysis 2 looks worse...whatev.. but what about this, if u go to the lenseofproof.com they have 2 comaprisons, one showing that ps3 version of crysis 2 actaully looks better and another showing kz3 graphix r better than crysis 2
seems pretty simple to me...just saying lol
EDIT quote taken from GS video review of crysis 2
winner-ps3
It's already been proven by the technical manual released for crysis 2 that it has much mroe graphical advances than ANY game on consoles, including KZ3 and U2. Crysis 2 is the better game as all parts are dynamic and rendered on the fly. KZ3 still uses "old" baked in lighting
[QUOTE="2Chalupas"]I'm just starting Crysis 2, and I think it's right there with Killzone 3 so far (just in terms of graphics). So far the story is almost non-existant in Crysis 2, at least it's not force-fed to you like in Killzone 3, but there's literally NOTHING in the 1st hour of Crysis 2. You get the intro... you get your suit...and then....you shoot...you cloak... you shoot. I can't even figure out who I'm shooting at or WHY. Hopefully it picks up the pace. I went ahead and got it just because people were saying the single player was great. There are some little inconsistencies graphically of course, but I take back whatever I said about the CryEngine 3 being an over-hyped joke after playing the multi-player demo. The single player is pretty well polished even on this console version. It easily blows away most every Unreal Engine game I've seen on PS3 (yeah, a bunch of them have problems), and it's right there with any other games people might put at the top of the graphics heap. The lighting and water in this game are just flat out amazing for a PS3 game. The lighting does cause some funky shadows at times but even with it's flaws it's right there among the best looking PS3 games, just don't zoom in on the shadows anywhere LOL. Yeah there are some blurry textures also, but Killzone 3 has some questionable textures in places as well. I will say it's a pretty close call between Crysis 2 vs KZ3 vs Uncharted 2, I think Uncharted 2 still has the edge overall and it's tough call, but I think Crysis 2 has the edge on Killzone. That's just me though. good points!
Learn to listenwhen Kevin said Crysis 2 is not in league of KZ3 it was in the context of multiplayer NOT graphics.
themyth01
This. He wasn't talking about graphics in the video review. Though he did post in the sticky thread about it.
Well that settles that argument then, according to GS anyways, Crysis 2 is the console graphics king =o lol u know i thought it might have been referring to multiplayer but its not like kz3 does anything amazing in multiplayer bc its basically the same as kz2, with a separate DM mode and operations mode...and cryisis 2 is basically follows cod in many ways in multiplayer which is great on its own...so and not only that why would kevin say specifically "on 360 it is console graphix king" and not on consoles in general, which implies NOT including PS3, which again crysis 2 is not graphix king on ps3...so i believe your point is moot...
"on 360 crysis 2 is console graphix king" but later also says "crysis 2 is NOT in the league of killzone 3"
Gamerz1569
Learn to listenwhen Kevin said Crysis 2 is not in league of KZ3 it was in the context of multiplayer NOT graphics.
again he would NOT have said 360 specifically if it was also graphix king on ps3, therefore on ps3 its NOT graphix king as in there are ps3 games that have better graphix than it...
oh okay, gamespots word... so it's the excepted consensus that MGS4 has better graphics than Crysis is it?
winner-ps3
how? mgs4 looked great when it came out, at that point, today not so much... yes MGS4 looked great when it was released but it was competing with Crysis which technically blew it away BY FAR. Crysis was widely acknowledged by many different sources to have been a visual benchmark- even today PCs struggle to run the game. Basically MGS4 should never been given that graphics award by Gamespot.
This. He wasn't talking about graphics in the video review. Though he did post in the sticky thread about it.
winner-ps3
Well that settles that argument then, according to GS anyways, Crysis 2 is the console graphics king =o lol u know i thought it might have been referring to multiplayer but its not like kz3 does anything amazing in multiplayer bc its basically the same as kz2, with a separate DM mode and operations mode...and cryisis 2 is basically follows cod in many ways in multiplayer which is great on its own...so and not only that why would kevin say specifically "on 360 it is console graphix king" and not on consoles in general, which implies NOT including PS3, which again crysis 2 is not graphix king on ps3...so i believe your point is moot...
So... Let me see if I'm following.. You're saying the 360 has the console graphics king, with Killzone 3 in second place?
Log in to comment