The Last of Us and Beyond: Two Souls. These two are sure the next graphics king for consoles.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]Halo 4>>>>>The Last of Us and Beyond: Two Souls. These two are sure the next graphics king for consoles.
Mkavanaugh77
You're kidding, right?
Halo 4>>>>>[QUOTE="Mkavanaugh77"][QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]
The Last of Us and Beyond: Two Souls. These two are sure the next graphics king for consoles.
GamerwillzPS
You're kidding, right?
HALO 4 looked better than Last of Us, but nothing looks better than Beyond: Two souls.
Halo 4>>>>>[QUOTE="Mkavanaugh77"][QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]
The Last of Us and Beyond: Two Souls. These two are sure the next graphics king for consoles.
GamerwillzPS
You're kidding, right?
I certainly hopes so[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]
[QUOTE="Mkavanaugh77"] Halo 4>>>>>GOGOGOGURT
You're kidding, right?
HALO 4 looked better than Last of Us, but nothing looks better than Beyond: Two souls.
:lol:
[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]
[QUOTE="Mkavanaugh77"] Halo 4>>>>>GOGOGOGURT
You're kidding, right?
HALO 4 looked better than Last of Us, but nothing looks better than Beyond: Two souls.
lol lol :lol:sometimes lems take it too far
you guys said the same about gears 3
and uncharted 3 ended up with all the gfx awards
while gears 3 didn't won a damn thing not even one review said it's the best looking game on xbox let alone best on consoles
but you know what keep say whatever help you sleepand maybe halo 4 have a chance this year since all the big ps3 exclusives are coming next year
but i do agree that beyond look better than any thing on xbox too
This pretty much. Console games don't look very good in the first place so i don't see why everyone is nitpicking.The Last of Us and Beyond: Two Souls. These two are sure the next graphics king for consoles.
GamerwillzPS
Hard to say. Last of us has great lighting. But it's not the most impressive thing about last of us. It's the no health regen, apparently scarce ammo (i hope you won't end up with hundred of bullets), and that inventory system. **** blew me away, finally an actual survival console game without health regen That new forza game looked also great, and most importantly ran at a 60 fps.We have seen Watch Dogs and the bounty Hunter star wars game who's name completely escapes me.............. But What about Our Fanboy fighting on the Ps3 and 360 best looking E3 game?............... Or perhaps best Looking Console game for both platforms (Wii U counts as next gen) No Poles required lets do some old fashioned Debating.
worknow222
[QUOTE="worknow222"]Hard to say. Last of us has great lighting. But it's not the most impressive thing about last of us. It's the no health regen, apparently scarce ammo (i hope you won't end up with hundred of bullets), and that inventory system. **** blew me away, finally an actual survival console game without health regen That new forza game looked also great, and most importantly ran at a 60 fps.We have seen Watch Dogs and the bounty Hunter star wars game who's name completely escapes me.............. But What about Our Fanboy fighting on the Ps3 and 360 best looking E3 game?............... Or perhaps best Looking Console game for both platforms (Wii U counts as next gen) No Poles required lets do some old fashioned Debating.
mahmoudddd
Yeah, that's what I like the most about the game. A proper survival horror game.
Limited ammo, health packs and inventory system. Now we're talkin'!
Hard to say. Last of us has great lighting. But it's not the most impressive thing about last of us. It's the no health regen, apparently scarce ammo (i hope you won't end up with hundred of bullets), and that inventory system. **** blew me away, finally an actual survival console game without health regen That new forza game looked also great, and most importantly ran at a 60 fps.[QUOTE="mahmoudddd"][QUOTE="worknow222"]
We have seen Watch Dogs and the bounty Hunter star wars game who's name completely escapes me.............. But What about Our Fanboy fighting on the Ps3 and 360 best looking E3 game?............... Or perhaps best Looking Console game for both platforms (Wii U counts as next gen) No Poles required lets do some old fashioned Debating.
GamerwillzPS
Yeah, that's what I like the most about the game. A proper survival horror game.
Limited ammo, health packs and inventory system. Now we're talkin'!
Needs a hunger system.... They need to make the game as "hardcore" and challenging as possible to properly create the immersion their going for.[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"][QUOTE="Mkavanaugh77"] Halo 4>>>>>Mkavanaugh77
You're kidding, right?
You kidding?sure if you can pull up a source that compares Halo4 to one of those next generation games for having the best graphics see at E3, or another source referring to Halo 4 as the best looking or a standard for graphics on consoles...I am sure people can give your opinion some credit.
I am sure I can do that for any of PS3 exclusives here that people list as one of the best from E3 without even checking. :) If you can't do that for Halo 4, it is obviously not even in the discussion with the games referenced here.
[QUOTE="GOGOGOGURT"]
[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]
You're kidding, right?
shadiezz2012
HALO 4 looked better than Last of Us, but nothing looks better than Beyond: Two souls.
lol lol :lol:sometimes lems take it too far
you guys said the same about gears 3
and uncharted 3 ended up with all the gfx awards
while gears 3 didn't won a damn thing not even one review said it's the best looking game on xbox let alone best on consoles
but you know what keep say whatever help you sleepand maybe halo 4 have a chance this year since all the big ps3 exclusives are coming next year
but i do agree that beyond look better than any thing on xbox too
You do realize comparing console graphics is kinda redundant because nothing on consoles could ever touch pc (graphically)[QUOTE="casharmy"]
[QUOTE="laus_basic"]
You know for a "best looking game..." kind of thread, it sure is lacking pics in here.
Masenkoe
Halo 4
Terrible picture.
lol, that's not a picture. That's what in-game Halo 4 graphics look like. lol, trust me when I tell you I did not look for a bad pic to post because I could have choose alot worse...this is simply the reality of Halo 4 graphics. People need to accept it.
[QUOTE="shadiezz2012"]lol lol :lol:[QUOTE="GOGOGOGURT"]
HALO 4 looked better than Last of Us, but nothing looks better than Beyond: Two souls.
jimmyrussle117
sometimes lems take it too far
you guys said the same about gears 3
and uncharted 3 ended up with all the gfx awards
while gears 3 didn't won a damn thing not even one review said it's the best looking game on xbox let alone best on consoles
but you know what keep say whatever help you sleepand maybe halo 4 have a chance this year since all the big ps3 exclusives are coming next year
but i do agree that beyond look better than any thing on xbox too
You do realize comparing console graphics is kinda redundant because nothing on consoles could ever touch pc (graphically) not really you can look at my sig i only own pc for now but TLOU and Beyond and god of war ascension look really good and uncharted 3 look damn amazing tooDefine "best looking". Are we strictly talking graphics or are we talking about which I think looks like I will have the most fun? If most fun, then I vote The Last of Us.AmazonTreeBoaDepends on what you think is best looking, as in if you want to talk about whats more fun or whats best looking no need to ask just go for it
and for Gifs/pics heres a thread with alot of halo 4, to use, http://forums.gametrailers.com/thread/post-halo-gifs-here--/1292502
If I knew how to post them I would,
^^ Not surprising that, that looks a lot better than the above pictures.soulitane
implying?
games tend to look better in motion.
I could even go as far as saying this look great (thinking of halo) but when we are talking about comparaing it to the best looking games on consoles (the category that those other games mentioned in this thread qualify for) it's not there.
and I can quick prove I wasn't trying to make H4 look bad in what I posted because I actually look around to find one that good...what me to show you a pic I could have posted to make it bad since that seems to be what you are suggesting?
I could even go as far as saying this look great (thinking of halo) but when we are talking about comparaing it to the best looking games on consoles (the category that those other games mentioned in this thread qualify for) it's not there.casharmySo someone shouldn't have an opinion then?
[QUOTE="soulitane"]^^ Not surprising that, that looks a lot better than the above pictures.casharmy
implying?
games tend to look better in motion.
I could even go as far as saying this look great (thinking of halo) but when we are talking about comparaing it to the best looking games on consoles (the category that those other games mentioned in this thread qualify for) it's not there.
and I can quick prove I wasn't trying to make H4 look bad in what I posted because I actually look around to find that one that good...what me to show you a pic I could have posted to make it bad since that seems to be what you are suggesting?
They tend to look better in compressed animated gif's. Especially when the like to speed it up...[QUOTE="casharmy"]I could even go as far as saying this look great (thinking of halo) but when we are talking about comparaing it to the best looking games on consoles (the category that those other games mentioned in this thread qualify for) it's not there.soulitaneSo someone shouldn't have an opinion then?
That's not what I said, but if you make suggestions besed on what you think and end up being wrong someone might speak on it.
*edit*
I actually kind of wanted you to challenge me to post it because there is this lul whorthy pic from H4 that REALLY makes the graphics look laughable but since I wasn't trying to make Halo 4 look bad, I didn't post it....:P if you had dared me tho I would have.
So someone shouldn't have an opinion then?[QUOTE="soulitane"][QUOTE="casharmy"]I could even go as far as saying this look great (thinking of halo) but when we are talking about comparaing it to the best looking games on consoles (the category that those other games mentioned in this thread qualify for) it's not there.casharmy
That's not what I said, but if you make suggestions besed on what you think and end up being wrong someone might speak on it.
There is no right or wrong answer though, this is all opinionated. Sies giving games awards means very little, considering those awards come down to opinions, as far as I've seen no site has compared these games in depth technically, so at the moment all we have to go on is other people's opinions. I personally don't put much stock in other people's opinions, I'm quite capable of thinking for myself and what I like the look of more.[QUOTE="casharmy"][QUOTE="soulitane"] So someone shouldn't have an opinion then?soulitane
That's not what I said, but if you make suggestions besed on what you think and end up being wrong someone might speak on it.
There is no right or wrong answer though, this is all opinionated. Sies giving games awards means very little, considering those awards come down to opinions, as far as I've seen no site has compared these games in depth technically, so at the moment all we have to go on is other people's opinions. I personally don't put much stock in other people's opinions, I'm quite capable of thinking for myself and what I like the look of more.hmmhm
kind of a cop-out stance if you ask me when it comes to debates of things like this professional journists, game sites and reviewers always hold alot of weight . :P it's only when someone konws their argument dosen't hold any weight in those areas that they play the personal opinion card dismissing professional outside sources.
There is no right or wrong answer though, this is all opinionated. Sies giving games awards means very little, considering those awards come down to opinions, as far as I've seen no site has compared these games in depth technically, so at the moment all we have to go on is other people's opinions. I personally don't put much stock in other people's opinions, I'm quite capable of thinking for myself and what I like the look of more.[QUOTE="soulitane"][QUOTE="casharmy"]
That's not what I said, but if you make suggestions besed on what you think and end up being wrong someone might speak on it.
casharmy
hmmhm
kind of a cop-out stance if you ask me when it comes to debates of things like this professional journists, game sites and reviewers always hold alot of weight on things like this. :P it's only when someone konws their argument dosen't hold any weight in those areas that they play the personal opinion card dismissing professional outside sources.
Not really, these professionals don't all know the tech behind a game, they quite often judge based on what looks the best. This argument comes down to, either you have faith in your own opinion or you put more stock in that of another person/group. Do you actually have some facts to say Halo 4 isn't most certainly not the best looking game, or that another game is? Until then, this argument comes purely down to opinion, which is all console graphics king is.Sleeping dog looks betterWe have seen Watch Dogs and the bounty Hunter star wars game who's name completely escapes me.............. But What about Our Fanboy fighting on the Ps3 and 360 best looking E3 game?............... Or perhaps best Looking Console game for both platforms (Wii U counts as next gen) No Poles required lets do some old fashioned Debating.
worknow222
[QUOTE="casharmy"][QUOTE="soulitane"] There is no right or wrong answer though, this is all opinionated. Sies giving games awards means very little, considering those awards come down to opinions, as far as I've seen no site has compared these games in depth technically, so at the moment all we have to go on is other people's opinions. I personally don't put much stock in other people's opinions, I'm quite capable of thinking for myself and what I like the look of more.soulitane
hmmhm
kind of a cop-out stance if you ask me when it comes to debates of things like this professional journists, game sites and reviewers always hold alot of weight on things like this. :P it's only when someone konws their argument dosen't hold any weight in those areas that they play the personal opinion card dismissing professional outside sources.
Not really, these professionals don't all know the tech behind a game, they quite often judge based on what looks the best. This argument comes down to, either you have faith in your own opinion or you put more stock in that of another person/group. Do you actually have some facts to say Halo 4 isn't most certainly not the best looking game, or that another game is? Until then, this argument comes purely down to opinion, which is all console graphics king is.lol, that wasn't the case when Gears of War was determined to be the better looking game over Resistance Fall of Man and over all best looking game on consoles in 2006 and it's not the case now...sorry.
To make a nomination in arguments like these have to have at least SOME professional outside validation from unbiased sources to be taken seriously. Look not everyone picks the same game as best looking thing they've seen when so many good looking games are shown but if you can't even get one good outside source to back you up then your argument holds little to no weight.
Not really, these professionals don't all know the tech behind a game, they quite often judge based on what looks the best. This argument comes down to, either you have faith in your own opinion or you put more stock in that of another person/group. Do you actually have some facts to say Halo 4 isn't most certainly not the best looking game, or that another game is? Until then, this argument comes purely down to opinion, which is all console graphics king is.[QUOTE="soulitane"][QUOTE="casharmy"]
hmmhm
kind of a cop-out stance if you ask me when it comes to debates of things like this professional journists, game sites and reviewers always hold alot of weight on things like this. :P it's only when someone konws their argument dosen't hold any weight in those areas that they play the personal opinion card dismissing professional outside sources.
casharmy
lol, that wasn't the case when Gears of War was determined to be the better looking game over Resistance Fall of Man and over all best looking game on consoles in 2006 and it's not the case now...sorry.
To make a nomination in arguments like these have to have at least SOME professional outside validation from unbiased sources to be taken seriously. Look not everyone picks the same game as best looking thing they've seen when so many good looking games are shown but if you can't even get one good outside source to back you up then your argument holds little to no weight.
Hmmm, that's obviously not what I'm talking about, it doesn't take a genius to work that out. I'm talking about the games which are at the top of the bunch, it's quite difficult to say for a fact which looks better unless someone wants to do a full tech analysis. Without that it's all purely opinion based.[QUOTE="casharmy"]
[QUOTE="laus_basic"]
You know for a "best looking game..." kind of thread, it sure is lacking pics in here.
4dr1el
Halo 4
lewl
is this what lems think its gonna be the new graphics king? Not even the best lookin 360 exclusive let alone on consoles...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QWWzhpjS62I (720p) It's up there, and to say otherwise is ridiculous. I can still give the other games their dues (IE: Two souls...wow), and admit H4 looks really freaking good.[QUOTE="casharmy"][QUOTE="soulitane"]Not really, these professionals don't all know the tech behind a game, they quite often judge based on what looks the best. This argument comes down to, either you have faith in your own opinion or you put more stock in that of another person/group. Do you actually have some facts to say Halo 4 isn't most certainly not the best looking game, or that another game is? Until then, this argument comes purely down to opinion, which is all console graphics king is.soulitane
lol, that wasn't the case when Gears of War was determined to be the better looking game over Resistance Fall of Man and over all best looking game on consoles in 2006 and it's not the case now...sorry.
To make a nomination in arguments like these have to have at least SOME professional outside validation from unbiased sources to be taken seriously. Look not everyone picks the same game as best looking thing they've seen when so many good looking games are shown but if you can't even get one good outside source to back you up then your argument holds little to no weight.
Hmmm, that's obviously not what I'm talking about, it doesn't take a genius to work that out. I'm talking about the games which are at the top of the bunch, it's quite difficult to say for a fact which looks better unless someone wants to do a full tech analysis. Without that it's all purely opinion based.I can agree with that, the question is...is Halo4 even in the top of the bunch to be need to be compaired? See this is why I asked if there was some professional source referencing Halo 4 as a best looking game at E3, on consoles or setting some kind of new standard for consoles.
You see all of the other game mentioned here would have such scorces to reference that level of "top of the bunch" graphics from an objective outside viewpoint...Halo 4? well there is your opinion but...that's not as credible as gamespot, IGN or even one of those tech analysis sites.
[QUOTE="casharmy"][QUOTE="soulitane"]Not really, these professionals don't all know the tech behind a game, they quite often judge based on what looks the best. This argument comes down to, either you have faith in your own opinion or you put more stock in that of another person/group. Do you actually have some facts to say Halo 4 isn't most certainly not the best looking game, or that another game is? Until then, this argument comes purely down to opinion, which is all console graphics king is.soulitane
lol, that wasn't the case when Gears of War was determined to be the better looking game over Resistance Fall of Man and over all best looking game on consoles in 2006 and it's not the case now...sorry.
To make a nomination in arguments like these have to have at least SOME professional outside validation from unbiased sources to be taken seriously. Look not everyone picks the same game as best looking thing they've seen when so many good looking games are shown but if you can't even get one good outside source to back you up then your argument holds little to no weight.
Hmmm, that's obviously not what I'm talking about, it doesn't take a genius to work that out. I'm talking about the games which are at the top of the bunch, it's quite difficult to say for a fact which looks better unless someone wants to do a full tech analysis. Without that it's all purely opinion based.I can agree with that, the question is...is Halo4 even in the top of the bunch to deserve to be compared to other games that have actually been noted as being at the top of the bunch? See this is why I asked if there was some professional source referencing Halo 4 as a best looking game at E3, on consoles or setting some kind of new standard for consoles.
You see all of the other game mentioned here would have such scorces to reference that level of "top of the bunch" graphics from an objective outside viewpoint...Halo 4? well there is your opinion but...that's not as credible as gamespot, IGN or even one of those tech analysis sites.
Hmmm, that's obviously not what I'm talking about, it doesn't take a genius to work that out. I'm talking about the games which are at the top of the bunch, it's quite difficult to say for a fact which looks better unless someone wants to do a full tech analysis. Without that it's all purely opinion based.[QUOTE="soulitane"][QUOTE="casharmy"]
lol, that wasn't the case when Gears of War was determined to be the better looking game over Resistance Fall of Man and over all best looking game on consoles in 2006 and it's not the case now...sorry.
To make a nomination in arguments like these have to have at least SOME professional outside validation from unbiased sources to be taken seriously. Look not everyone picks the same game as best looking thing they've seen when so many good looking games are shown but if you can't even get one good outside source to back you up then your argument holds little to no weight.
casharmy
I can agree with that, the question is...is Halo4 even in the top of the bunch to be need to be compaired? See this is why I asked if there was some professional source referencing Halo 4 as a best looking game at E3, on consoles or setting some kind of new standard for consoles.
You see all of the other game mentioned here would have such scorces to reference that level of "top of the bunch" graphics from an objective outside viewpoint...Halo 4? well there is your opinion but...that's not as credible as gamespot, IGN or even one of those tech analysis sites.
and can you prove it isn't? Which the most likely answer is no, you cannot objectively say it isn't, which is why it all comes down to opinion, yet again.[QUOTE="casharmy"][QUOTE="soulitane"]Not really, these professionals don't all know the tech behind a game, they quite often judge based on what looks the best. This argument comes down to, either you have faith in your own opinion or you put more stock in that of another person/group. Do you actually have some facts to say Halo 4 isn't most certainly not the best looking game, or that another game is? Until then, this argument comes purely down to opinion, which is all console graphics king is.soulitane
lol, that wasn't the case when Gears of War was determined to be the better looking game over Resistance Fall of Man and over all best looking game on consoles in 2006 and it's not the case now...sorry.
To make a nomination in arguments like these have to have at least SOME professional outside validation from unbiased sources to be taken seriously. Look not everyone picks the same game as best looking thing they've seen when so many good looking games are shown but if you can't even get one good outside source to back you up then your argument holds little to no weight.
Hmmm, that's obviously not what I'm talking about, it doesn't take a genius to work that out. I'm talking about the games which are at the top of the bunch, it's quite difficult to say for a fact which looks better unless someone wants to do a full tech analysis. Without that it's all purely opinion based.I can agree with that, the question is...does Halo4 even deserve to be compared to other games that have already been noted as being at the top of the bunch? See this is why I asked if there was some professional source referencing Halo 4 as a best looking game at E3, on consoles or setting some kind of new standard for consoles.
You see all of the other game mentioned here would have such scorces to reference that level of "top of the bunch" graphics from an objective outside viewpoint...Halo 4? well there is your opinion but...that's not as credible as gamespot, IGN or even one of those tech analysis sites.
[QUOTE="casharmy"][QUOTE="soulitane"] Hmmm, that's obviously not what I'm talking about, it doesn't take a genius to work that out. I'm talking about the games which are at the top of the bunch, it's quite difficult to say for a fact which looks better unless someone wants to do a full tech analysis. Without that it's all purely opinion based.soulitane
I can agree with that, the question is...is Halo4 even in the top of the bunch to be need to be compaired? See this is why I asked if there was some professional source referencing Halo 4 as a best looking game at E3, on consoles or setting some kind of new standard for consoles.
You see all of the other game mentioned here would have such scorces to reference that level of "top of the bunch" graphics from an objective outside viewpoint...Halo 4? well there is your opinion but...that's not as credible as gamespot, IGN or even one of those tech analysis sites.
and can you prove it isn't? Which the most likely answer is no, you cannot objectively say it isn't, which is why it all comes down to opinion, yet again.lol, you are basically saying you already lost your argument because you konw you can't provide anything to back up your "opinion".
It like cows saying in 2006 to prove the resistance fall of man didn't have better graphics than Gears of war. What you have there is a stupid argument because NOONE was even talking about RFOM for graphics because they werent' impressive enough for professionals journlist to even compaire...haha which is the same situation you have for Halo4 :). Have a nice day.
and can you prove it isn't? Which the most likely answer is no, you cannot objectively say it isn't, which is why it all comes down to opinion, yet again.[QUOTE="soulitane"][QUOTE="casharmy"]
I can agree with that, the question is...is Halo4 even in the top of the bunch to be need to be compaired? See this is why I asked if there was some professional source referencing Halo 4 as a best looking game at E3, on consoles or setting some kind of new standard for consoles.
You see all of the other game mentioned here would have such scorces to reference that level of "top of the bunch" graphics from an objective outside viewpoint...Halo 4? well there is your opinion but...that's not as credible as gamespot, IGN or even one of those tech analysis sites.
casharmy
lol, you are basically saying you already lost your argument because you konw you can't provide anything to back up your "opinion".
It like cows saying in 2006 to prove the resistance fall of man didn't have better graphics. What you have there is a stupid argument because NOONE was even talking about RFOM for graphics because they didn't matter...haha which is the same situation you have for Halo4 :). Have a nice day.
Um, not really, I never stated that I think it looks the best, if you look back a page or two, I said I think that LoU looks the best. My argument this whole time is that it all comes down to subjectivity, which you have not yet proven me wrong with.[QUOTE="casharmy"][QUOTE="soulitane"] and can you prove it isn't? Which the most likely answer is no, you cannot objectively say it isn't, which is why it all comes down to opinion, yet again.soulitane
lol, you are basically saying you already lost your argument because you konw you can't provide anything to back up your "opinion".
It like cows saying in 2006 to prove the resistance fall of man didn't have better graphics. What you have there is a stupid argument because NOONE was even talking about RFOM for graphics because they didn't matter...haha which is the same situation you have for Halo4 :). Have a nice day.
Um, not really, I never stated that I think it looks the best, if you look back a page or two, I said I think that LoU looks the best. My argument this whole time is that it all comes down to subjectivity, which you have not yet proven me wrong with.No, I am saying it's not even in the top graphics of those other games in the first place.
lol, the developers of those other games have to remind people over and over again that what's being shown is in real-time because of how impressive the graphics are for consoles...no one would bother doing that for Halo4 because there is nothing uberly impressive or mindblowing being shown that would cause people to mistake it.
I'm not saying Halo 4 cant look good, heck Tomb Raider looks good....but it's not really brought up when talking about the best looking games of E3 and rightfully so--just like Halo 4 isn't.
Um, not really, I never stated that I think it looks the best, if you look back a page or two, I said I think that LoU looks the best. My argument this whole time is that it all comes down to subjectivity, which you have not yet proven me wrong with.[QUOTE="soulitane"][QUOTE="casharmy"]
lol, you are basically saying you already lost your argument because you konw you can't provide anything to back up your "opinion".
It like cows saying in 2006 to prove the resistance fall of man didn't have better graphics. What you have there is a stupid argument because NOONE was even talking about RFOM for graphics because they didn't matter...haha which is the same situation you have for Halo4 :). Have a nice day.
casharmy
No, I am saying it's not even in the top graphics of those other games in the first place.
lol, the developers of those other games have to remind people over and over again that what's being shown is in real-time because of how impressive they are for consoles...no one would bother doing that for Halo4 because there is nothing uberly impressive or mindblowing being shown that would cause people to mistake it.
Don't you think that's reaching? Apart from beyond (which has frame dips), nothing shown was mind blowing for consoles So again, no proof.[QUOTE="casharmy"][QUOTE="soulitane"] Um, not really, I never stated that I think it looks the best, if you look back a page or two, I said I think that LoU looks the best. My argument this whole time is that it all comes down to subjectivity, which you have not yet proven me wrong with.soulitane
No, I am saying it's not even in the top graphics of those other games in the first place.
lol, the developers of those other games have to remind people over and over again that what's being shown is in real-time because of how impressive they are for consoles...no one would bother doing that for Halo4 because there is nothing uberly impressive or mindblowing being shown that would cause people to mistake it.
Don't you think that's reaching? Apart from beyond (which has frame dips), nothing shown was mind blowing for consolesSo again, no proof.:twisted:you sure about that one? huh...huh?
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment