Better peformance or better graphics?

Both. I can usually max all PC games and get over 50 fps.

Cloud567kar

Noticed that you didn't mention a PS3 in your sig. You are missing out A LOT!

[QUOTE="Cloud567kar"]

Both. I can usually max all PC games and get over 50 fps.

GamerwillzPS

Noticed that you didn't mention a PS3 in your sig. You are missing out A LOT!

I had a PS3 and sold it to get a PC and don't feel I'm missing anything.

Performance.

If the game doesn't run well, then I don't care how it looks.

Better performance definitely.

Compromise for the best of both worlds. With PC games i generally like to have atleast 45fps if i can get 60 fps with good settings i will do that but if the graphical bump only lowers the framerate to 45 or so i don't mind playing like that as long as its a steady framerate slowdown is horrible.

Depends on the genre, but I will almost always take performance over graphics.

Slightly better performance can greatly improve gameplay. Slightly better graphics doesn't really do anything for me.

Yes, I get really annoyed if a game I'm playing doesn't consistently run at 60 fps. Doesn't matter to me as much on consoles because I'm bad with those controls anyways.

I'd upgrade so I could get good performance at the graphics settings I want:P

Why choose? Have both.