This topic is locked from further discussion.
Agreed.
BF: BC does everything better then COD4 MP wise.
Gh0st_Of_0nyx
I gernade launched with my assult rifle. And hit a tree the tree fell over onto an enmy trying to run and it killed him. It was classic.
Whoa, I thought CoD4 was very overated, and yet even I think thats an insult.Meu2k7
COD4 is a very very good game for MP. But BC is just a better funner MP. Full open huge levels with full destruction and vehicles just own COD4 MP.
[QUOTE="Gh0st_Of_0nyx"]Agreed.
BF: BC does everything better then COD4 MP wise.
Fish_Muffins
I gernade launched with my assult rifle. And hit a tree the tree fell over onto an enmy trying to run and it killed him. It was classic.
The sound design and epic scale of the battles is also a very nice touch. You dont get that feeling in CoD4. You get a bunch of campers/martydom whores.way too much lag...and why does it take half a clip to kill somebody. This isnt halo!!!
other than that, its awesome!!!
[QUOTE="Fish_Muffins"][QUOTE="Gh0st_Of_0nyx"]Agreed.
BF: BC does everything better then COD4 MP wise.
Gh0st_Of_0nyx
I gernade launched with my assult rifle. And hit a tree the tree fell over onto an enmy trying to run and it killed him. It was classic.
The sound design and epic scale of the battles is also a very nice touch. You dont get that feeling in CoD4. You get a bunch of campers/martydom whores.Word to that.
How is it compared to BF2?agentfred
It's better. The graphics are freaking real good for an online game with full destruction. I do wish they had jets like BF2 Oh well.
Whoa, I thought CoD4 was very overated, and yet even I think thats an insult.Meu2k7#
dont be sad that hermits didnt get BF BC :) anyways.......NO, BF BC is too glitchy and buggy to be compared to cod4, if only Dice can fix these bugs and make BF BC one of the greatest game ever
[QUOTE="agentfred"]How is it compared to BF2?Fish_Muffins
It's better. The graphics are freaking real good for an online game with full destruction. I do wish they had jets like BF2 Oh well.
lol...its not even close to being better....it lacks so many things that made BF on the PC good.
[QUOTE="Fish_Muffins"][QUOTE="agentfred"]How is it compared to BF2?cobrax75
It's better. The graphics are freaking real good for an online game with full destruction. I do wish they had jets like BF2 Oh well.
lol...its not even close to being better....it lacks so many things that made BF on the PC good.
Full destructible environments online >>> BF2 no environment destruction.
[QUOTE="cobrax75"][QUOTE="Fish_Muffins"][QUOTE="agentfred"]How is it compared to BF2?Fish_Muffins
It's better. The graphics are freaking real good for an online game with full destruction. I do wish they had jets like BF2 Oh well.
lol...its not even close to being better....it lacks so many things that made BF on the PC good.
Full destructible environments online >>> BF2 no environment destruction.
So Destructable enviroments make the game :roll: ... must be, because it lacks everything else that made Battlefields good in the first place.
I didnt know scripted segements of walls was impressive :lol: ... maybe back in red faction 1 days :lol:
[QUOTE="cobrax75"][QUOTE="Fish_Muffins"][QUOTE="agentfred"]How is it compared to BF2?Fish_Muffins
It's better. The graphics are freaking real good for an online game with full destruction. I do wish they had jets like BF2 Oh well.
lol...its not even close to being better....it lacks so many things that made BF on the PC good.
Full destructible environments online >>> BF2 no environment destruction.
64 player BF > 24 player BF
parachutes > no parachutes
Conquest > gold Rush
Prone > No prone
BF2 Squad System > Bad Company Squad System
Commanders > no commanders
Chain of Command > no chain of command
Jets > no Jets
Large maps > Smaller maps
Dynamic PC BF gameplay > Scripted and closed (relative) gameplay of Bad Company.
[QUOTE="cobrax75"][QUOTE="Fish_Muffins"][QUOTE="agentfred"]How is it compared to BF2?Fish_Muffins
It's better. The graphics are freaking real good for an online game with full destruction. I do wish they had jets like BF2 Oh well.
lol...its not even close to being better....it lacks so many things that made BF on the PC good.
Full destructible environments online >>> BF2 no environment destruction.
Are destructible environments the only criteria? Nothing else really matters?
[QUOTE="cobrax75"][QUOTE="Fish_Muffins"][QUOTE="agentfred"]How is it compared to BF2?Fish_Muffins
It's better. The graphics are freaking real good for an online game with full destruction. I do wish they had jets like BF2 Oh well.
lol...its not even close to being better....it lacks so many things that made BF on the PC good.
Full destructible environments online >>> BF2 no environment destruction.
I disagree. And people claim PC gamers are graphics whores? Absolutely not...
[QUOTE="Fish_Muffins"][QUOTE="cobrax75"][QUOTE="Fish_Muffins"][QUOTE="agentfred"]How is it compared to BF2?cobrax75
It's better. The graphics are freaking real good for an online game with full destruction. I do wish they had jets like BF2 Oh well.
lol...its not even close to being better....it lacks so many things that made BF on the PC good.
Full destructible environments online >>> BF2 no environment destruction.
64 player BF > 24 player BF
parachutes > no parachutes
Conquest > gold Rush
Prone > No prone
BF2 Squad System > Bad Company Squad System
Commanders > no commanders
Chain of Command > no chain of command
Jets > no Jets
Large maps > Smaller maps
Dynamic PC BF gameplay > Scripted and closed (relative) gameplay of Bad Company.
I admit you do make good points. And i agree on just about everything.
I'm just saying BC is funner to play becuase you can roll a freaking tank right through a wall and kill someone trying to hide. But yes there is very good points to BF2 on PC also.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment