http://www.neoseeker.com/news/17606-battlefield-3-command-console-revealed-graphics-settings-explained/
Nice!
This topic is locked from further discussion.
http://www.neoseeker.com/news/17606-battlefield-3-command-console-revealed-graphics-settings-explained/
Nice!
So...looks like ill be running BF3 on my GTX 580 like i did with Crysis on my 8800GTX :P
painguy1
actually its pretty lenient their "ultra" setting can be played at 60+ fps @ 1080 on a gtx 570 (with the correct system to match naturally)
so no its not the next crysis its just exceptionally demanding.
[QUOTE="painguy1"]
So...looks like ill be running BF3 on my GTX 580 like i did with Crysis on my 8800GTX :P
ionusX
actually its pretty lenient their "ultra" setting can be played at 60+ fps @ 1080 on a gtx 570 (with the correct system to match naturally)
so no its not the next crysis its just exceptionally demanding.
If this is true then yes!!!You actually believe that too. May I ask where you got the 75% from? They can run it on low if need be.....and it will still look better :lol:Who cares :P
BF 3 gonna rock on consoles over PC anyways as 75 % PC gamers won't be able to run the game for high requirements or lag lol .
indzman
actually its pretty lenient their "ultra" setting can be played at 60+ fps @ 1080 on a gtx 570 (with the correct system to match naturally)
ionusX
Said who? DICE certainly said otherwise, and the beta was locked at medium settings so you can't judge it by that.
If people won't be able to play it due to high requirements, why would that affect people that are playing it? Why would there be more lag on PC? Pretty sure there would be less lag on PC. I can rarely get over 10Mb downstream on my console.Who cares :P
BF 3 gonna rock on consoles over PC anyways as 75 % PC gamers won't be able to run the game for high requirements or lag lol .
indzman
[QUOTE="ionusX"]
actually its pretty lenient their "ultra" setting can be played at 60+ fps @ 1080 on a gtx 570 (with the correct system to match naturally)
ChubbyGuy40
Said who? DICE certainly said otherwise, and the beta was locked at medium settings so you can't judge it by that.
There's no way it'll play on ultra at 1080 on a 570 card at over 60FPS.Your avatar pretty much gives you away.Who cares :P
BF 3 gonna rock on consoles over PC anyways as 75 % PC gamers won't be able to run the game for high requirements or lag lol .
indzman
beta was locked at medium settings so you can't judge it by that.It doesn't really matter, but wasn't it just the quality that was locked? I seemed to lose performance by increasing settings, but the actual image quality never changed.ChubbyGuy40
It doesn't really matter, but wasn't it just the quality that was locked? I seemed to lose performance by increasing settings, but the actual image quality never changed. Most likey was textures that were locked to reduce the download size.[QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"] beta was locked at medium settings so you can't judge it by that.
millerlight89
It doesn't really matter, but wasn't it just the quality that was locked? I seemed to lose performance by increasing settings, but the actual image quality never changed.[QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"] beta was locked at medium settings so you can't judge it by that.
millerlight89
Exactly. It was the actual quality that was locked, not the settings.
And yet the consoles will have factually inferior graphics...
LORD_BLACKGULT
Factual police here. We went ahead and corrected your violation sir. Have a nice day.
Factual police here. We went ahead and corrected your violation sir. Have a nice day.
ChubbyGuy40
Pshhh, more like factual nazis.... overstepping your authority :x
Every console player knows that sub HD, lower resolution textures, jaggies, etcetera, are factually superior!
It doesn't really matter, but wasn't it just the quality that was locked? I seemed to lose performance by increasing settings, but the actual image quality never changed.[QUOTE="millerlight89"]
[QUOTE="ChubbyGuy40"] beta was locked at medium settings so you can't judge it by that.
ChubbyGuy40
Exactly. It was the actual quality that was locked, not the settings.
I really need a better cpu now.:PWhy is it that the PC community sees this as some sort of victory over the console players? I mean seriously, more than alot of you ran out and spent what, $300-500 on new video cards so that you can run BF3 at its highest settings? You are bragging on your PC's abilities yet your supposed competition in this are two consoles that are 6 years old. To me that is like a 15 year old kid bragging that he beat up a 9 year old at the school play ground!! You should all be proud!!!!!ShoTTyMcNaDeS
HaHa :lol:
Anyways we are going to enjoy BF 3 as its meant to be enjoyed on consoles ( PSN / XBL ) . Modern Warfare , Bad Company mp success and sales proves lol .
Who cares :P
BF 3 gonna rock on consoles over PC anyways as 75 % PC gamers won't be able to run the game for high requirements or lag lol .
indzman
Many people think that the tiny player count and smaller maps will make the console version rather disappointing.
Why is it that the PC community sees this as some sort of victory over the console players? I mean seriously, more than alot of you ran out and spent what, $300-500 on new video cards so that you can run BF3 at its highest settings? You are bragging on your PC's abilities yet your supposed competition in this are two consoles that are 6 years old. To me that is like a 15 year old kid bragging that he beat up a 9 year old at the school play ground!! You should all be proud!!!!!ShoTTyMcNaDeSRight... How about you consolites go back to your 360 vs PS3 graphics threads. :roll:
[QUOTE="indzman"]
Who cares :P
BF 3 gonna rock on consoles over PC anyways as 75 % PC gamers won't be able to run the game for high requirements or lag lol .
tenaka2
Many people think that the tiny player count and smaller maps will make the console version rather disappointing.
I don't think anyone thinks that really. They just say the PC version is better in everyway (and it is).
[QUOTE="tenaka2"]
[QUOTE="indzman"]
Who cares :P
BF 3 gonna rock on consoles over PC anyways as 75 % PC gamers won't be able to run the game for high requirements or lag lol .
GD1551
Many people think that the tiny player count and smaller maps will make the console version rather disappointing.
I don't think anyone thinks that really. They just say the PC version is better in everyway (and it is).
No Origin/Battlelog :P[QUOTE="ActionRemix"]
No Origin/Battlelog :PGD1551
That's true haha. I kinda like battlelog though, I just hate how the game has to relaunch everytime.
I like it too. PC gamers have been hating on it hardcore, but I think it's a step in the right direction for online multiplayer games. Clicking on a friend's name to join his game is so convenient.Anyways we are going to enjoy BF 3 as its meant to be enjoyed on consoles ( PSN / XBL ) . Modern Warfare , Bad Company mp success and sales proves lol .No.indzman
No.[QUOTE="indzman"]Anyways we are going to enjoy BF 3 as its meant to be enjoyed on consoles ( PSN / XBL ) . Modern Warfare , Bad Company mp success and sales proves lol .
Doom_HellKnight
Sorry ,
You've no idea how popular Bad Company and Modern Warfare multiplayer are on consoles .
[QUOTE="indzman"]
Who cares :P
BF 3 gonna rock on consoles over PC anyways as 75 % PC gamers won't be able to run the game for high requirements or lag lol .
tenaka2
Many people think that the tiny player count and smaller maps will make the console version rather disappointing.
Absolutely No .
Why you think console versions of multiplayer games as Battlefeild , Call of Duty sell so much if it was so dissapointing ?
No.[QUOTE="Doom_HellKnight"]
[QUOTE="indzman"]Anyways we are going to enjoy BF 3 as its meant to be enjoyed on consoles ( PSN / XBL ) . Modern Warfare , Bad Company mp success and sales proves lol .
indzman
Sorry ,
You've no idea how popular Bad Company and Modern Warfare multiplayer are on consoles .
http://news.bigdownload.com/2010/03/07/battlefield-bad-company-2-has-more-pc-players-than-xbox-360-and/
This should clear that up.
[QUOTE="tenaka2"]
[QUOTE="indzman"]
Who cares :P
BF 3 gonna rock on consoles over PC anyways as 75 % PC gamers won't be able to run the game for high requirements or lag lol .
indzman
Many people think that the tiny player count and smaller maps will make the console version rather disappointing.
Absolutely No .
Why you think console versions of multiplayer games as Battlefeild , Call of Duty sell so much if it was so dissapointing ?
Because console gamers have no other options? No person would choose the vastly inferior console versions if they actually had a choice. For a number of multiplat games the console gamer can either have the inferior version or no version at all.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment