BF:BC2 vs MW2 which is better

MW2 was surpassed by a $20 game before it launched. Yeah, TF2.
It didn't offer me anything interesting.
BFBC2 is decently different and decently balanced i guess. I'm not blown away by it but i'm having fun with it for quite a few hours now.
As a previous BF2 player the hilarious BF moments are what sold this game to me.

on the internet BFBC2 is more popular but in reality MW2 is more popular. People on the internet just complain because they just suck at the game. Yes im aware that MW2 isnt all balanced but it does satisfy the players. And the people who cries about campers, play smarter there are PLENTY of ways to beat them. BFBC2 will only last on the PC but the console fanbase will not last half as long. and when Map pack drops people will be all over mw2 again.LenGen

nice assumption there kiddo...recently till i got Bad company 2 i had an average K/D of 1.5 nearly every match but prefer battlefield for so many reasons its unbelievable actually im trading in that glitchfest of a game for FF13 today seriously i have no use for MW2 anymore its just a poorly made multi.The unbalance is horrendous,air killstreaks are overpowered,glitches,noobs being rewarded...the list go's on and on.

BC2 has less camping than MW2?

I've played both and it seems to me than BC2 has much more camping. Not only that, but it seems the whole game and the way the maps are encourages camping, unfortunately.

Everything else about the game is good, but the camping is atrocious.

p2250

Actually the game is made in such a way that campers gets punished severely. The main element to take advantage of here is the destruction engine. When someone is camping and you know exactly where they are, just blow the wall up and the camper will get what the game calls a "Destruction 2.0". :)

There's definitely a lot of hiding and camping spots in the game, but if you want to conceal the information of your location you have to move around a lot.

[QUOTE="p2250"]

BC2 has less camping than MW2?

I've played both and it seems to me than BC2 has much more camping. Not only that, but it seems the whole game and the way the maps are encourages camping, unfortunately.

Everything else about the game is good, but the camping is atrocious.

PSdual_wielder

Actually the game is made in such a way that campers gets punished severely. The main element to take advantage of here is the destruction engine. When someone is camping and you know exactly where they are, just blow the wall up and the camper will get what the game calls a "Destruction 2.0". :)

There's definitely a lot of hiding and camping spots in the game, but if you want to conceal the information of your location you have to move around a lot.

eeh, I wouldnt consider them comparable at all apart from esthetics.

But I too if forced to chose would go for BC2, likely because I like games taht are more tacticle in nature over run and gun games.

To me the MW series has always reminded me of something like quake or Unreal Turnament... realism 0, despite the graphics attempting to pull of a quasi realistic feel.

BC3 IS more of a tactical game, where there is a "right weapon for each job" it makes the game alot more interresting in general to figure out where in the map to fight, and what equipment your squad needs to be better. It is WAY more team focused.

BC2, but there seems to be a lot of COD players on it.

Gameplay - MW2's is more polished and satisfying, they're about equal in variation Campaign - Have to give it to MW2 again, I haven't quite completed BC2 but it lacks the intensity and action of MW2 Multiplayer - BC2 seems larger, more balanced and generally better, however, that's cancelled out by the excellent Spec Ops mode. Draw. Graphics - Neither are amazing but BC2 is probably slightly betterangelkimne

BFBC2 No contest.

in my opinion?

Single Player - Modern Warfare 2 edges it out (way more intense imo). That does not mean Bad Company 2's is bad, it's just average i think. The one good thing about Bad Company 2's campaign is it doesn't end the chapter on a cliffhanger - like how MW2 doesn't even end it's story it just ends right there at what feels like the halfway point.

Co-Op - Modern Warfare 2 wins by default.

Multiplayer - Bad Company 2 miles and miles away.

but imo, i'm much more in the Battlefield camp now...

It's the only franchise that i could say i've bought each and everyone of their games (with the exception of stuff dealing with WW2..... ) since Battlefield 2.

sound design, graphically i think BC2 is sharper, classes and upgrades feel right and make sense. vehicle combat, destructable environments. all feel great.

Only thing i think i would of changed is make the buildings collapse easier. your given way too much lead time when a building is about to come down. I know the reason DICE didn't do this was because they they feared it might break the game, but my point still stands. you hear the building creak, you know its GTFO time. hell.... watch a Youtube video of a tank bringing down a building. no way is anyone gonna sit under that much fire - survive - and stick around...

Bad Company 2 is way better.

Bad Company 2 is better but I did like Spec Ops in Modern Warfare 2

I don't know about any of you but i'm tired of modern War we should go to World War 1 or 2 again I miss killing Nazis.

BC2. There is almost no lag, and the gameplay is much deeper. Also, the game is just more challenging and fun, every successful action feels rewarding.

in my opinion?

Single Player - Modern Warfare 2 edges it out (way more intense imo). That does not mean Bad Company 2's is bad, it's just average i think. The one good thing about Bad Company 2's campaign is it doesn't end the chapter on a cliffhanger - like how MW2 doesn't even end it's story it just ends right there at what feels like the halfway point.

Co-Op - Modern Warfare 2 wins by default.

Multiplayer - Bad Company 2 miles and miles away.

but imo, i'm much more in the Battlefield camp now...

It's the only franchise that i could say i've bought each and everyone of their games (with the exception of stuff dealing with WW2..... ) since Battlefield 2.

sound design, graphically i think BC2 is sharper, classes and upgrades feel right and make sense. vehicle combat, destructable environments. all feel great.

Only thing i think i would of changed is make the buildings collapse easier. your given way too much lead time when a building is about to come down. I know the reason DICE didn't do this was because they they feared it might break the game, but my point still stands. you hear the building creak, you know its GTFO time. hell.... watch a Youtube video of a tank bringing down a building. no way is anyone gonna sit under that much fire - survive - and stick around...

SaudiFury

I agree with everything you said except single player MW2 was too short that's why it was more intense because it ended too soon. so far i havent finished BC2 but it reminds me of World at War and I liked the single player alot better in that game than MW2 also it's more challenging than MW2 except for the spec op.

BC2. There is almost no lag, and the gameplay is much deeper. Also, the game is just more challenging and fun, every successful action feels rewarding.

Pug-Nasty

it depends. if im not playing with friends, mw2. if i have friends online ill play bc2. playing bc2 with randoms after playing on an organized squad is close to unbearable.

im also really looking forward to the bc2 fanboys moving onto the next passing bandwagon and leaving mw2 and bc2 alone. ill be like a few months after blazblue came out and all the sf4 haters were apparently in love with the game. in a few months bc2 will be significantly better to play online, and not because dice might fix the glitches and server issues.

BC2 is sooo fantastic ... just finished beating the campaign on hard, which took me sometime, and I've put in a couple of hours into the multiplayer and yea ... much much better than MW2.

MW2 got old quick but as for BC2 I can tell it'll keep my busy till Socom 4 is released.

Overall BC2

MW2 sp >>> BC2 sp

BC2 mp >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MW2 mp

BC2, but there seems to be a lot of COD players on it.

Yandere

BC2 has less camping than MW2?

I've played both and it seems to me than BC2 has much more camping. Not only that, but it seems the whole game and the way the maps are encourages camping, unfortunately.

Everything else about the game is good, but the camping is atrocious.

p2250

both are great tbh. ive been playing BC2 alot and imo the vehicles are extremely overpowered. a noob can get into the heli and wreck havoc + its really hard to take down the heli. i guarantee almost every top player in BFBC2 (just like BFBC1) is a complete chopper whore. there should be a limit on tanks and helis per round. majority of tank whores are also annoying when attacking all they do is sit back and fire especially in port valdez map

both are great tbh. ive been playing BC2 alot and imo the vehicles are extremely overpowered. a noob can get into the heli and wreck havoc + its really hard to take down the heli. i guarantee almost every top player in BFBC2 (just like BFBC1) is a complete chopper whore. there should be a limit on tanks and helis per round. majority of tank whores are also annoying when attacking all they do is sit back and fire especially in port valdez map

sikanderahmed

[QUOTE="sikanderahmed"]

both are great tbh. ive been playing BC2 alot and imo the vehicles are extremely overpowered. a noob can get into the heli and wreck havoc + its really hard to take down the heli. i guarantee almost every top player in BFBC2 (just like BFBC1) is a complete chopper whore. there should be a limit on tanks and helis per round. majority of tank whores are also annoying when attacking all they do is sit back and fire especially in port valdez map

Rockman999

the pilot must really suck if they flip the chopper, ive only used the heli once and i could control it quite well, couple more tries and i would have mastered it. helis are far from easiest vehicles to take out. the first thing most chopper pilots do is kill the guy using UAV so it gets pretty hard to even use UAV alot of times. havent tried the AA guns yet, will give them a go but i doubt its THAT easy to take it down even with AA. the pilot will just go somwhere and get the heli repaired. its kinda easy to blow tanks but not when they are firing from miles away, they get damaged a little then quickly move out of sight to get repaired. mortar strike is good but they get another tank quick lol

[QUOTE="Rockman999"][QUOTE="sikanderahmed"]

both are great tbh. ive been playing BC2 alot and imo the vehicles are extremely overpowered. a noob can get into the heli and wreck havoc + its really hard to take down the heli. i guarantee almost every top player in BFBC2 (just like BFBC1) is a complete chopper whore. there should be a limit on tanks and helis per round. majority of tank whores are also annoying when attacking all they do is sit back and fire especially in port valdez map

sikanderahmed

the pilot must really suck if they flip the chopper, ive only used the heli once and i could control it quite well, couple more tries and i would have mastered it. helis are far from easiest vehicles to take out. the first thing most chopper pilots do is kill the guy using UAV so it gets pretty hard to even use UAV alot of times. havent tried the AA guns yet, will give them a go but i doubt its THAT easy to take it down even with AA. the pilot will just go somwhere and get the heli repaired. its kinda easy to blow tanks but not when they are firing from miles away, they get damaged a little then quickly move out of sight to get repaired. mortar strike is good but they get another tank quick lol

[QUOTE="Rockman999"][QUOTE="sikanderahmed"]

both are great tbh. ive been playing BC2 alot and imo the vehicles are extremely overpowered. a noob can get into the heli and wreck havoc + its really hard to take down the heli. i guarantee almost every top player in BFBC2 (just like BFBC1) is a complete chopper whore. there should be a limit on tanks and helis per round. majority of tank whores are also annoying when attacking all they do is sit back and fire especially in port valdez map

sikanderahmed

the pilot must really suck if they flip the chopper, ive only used the heli once and i could control it quite well, couple more tries and i would have mastered it. helis are far from easiest vehicles to take out. the first thing most chopper pilots do is kill the guy using UAV so it gets pretty hard to even use UAV alot of times. havent tried the AA guns yet, will give them a go but i doubt its THAT easy to take it down even with AA. the pilot will just go somwhere and get the heli repaired. its kinda easy to blow tanks but not when they are firing from miles away, they get damaged a little then quickly move out of sight to get repaired. mortar strike is good but they get another tank quick lol

Yeah i have been a medio chopper pilot in BF2, especially for troop drops. Never been that good with the attacks in a chopper.
But in BFBC2 i haven't been able to keep one flying for over one minute i think >_>
Maybe my mouse is too sensitive or so... And there is hardly a way to practise flying a chopper. Sucks cause i'd like to (re)learn it.

When I hit a helicopter with a missle launcher blew it up and it came crashing to the ground killing 3 people.

I knew it was BC2.

So much more wll paced.

Everything is just better and less crazy about it.

I mean MW2 MP completely stank.

[QUOTE="angelkimne"]Gameplay - MW2's is more polished and satisfying, they're about equal in variation Campaign - Have to give it to MW2 again, I haven't quite completed BC2 but it lacks the intensity and action of MW2 Multiplayer - BC2 seems larger, more balanced and generally better, however, that's cancelled out by the excellent Spec Ops mode. Draw. Graphics - Neither are amazing but BC2 is probably slightly betterscottiescott238

From a pure core gameplay standpoint Cod4/MW2 is the BEST FPS on consoles ever, simply talking about how well it controls, it's the closest thing on consoles to mouse and keyboard control similarity, you can really pull off shots that are almost on mouse and keyboard level precision.

From a pure core gameplay standpoint Cod4/MW2 is the BEST FPS on consoles ever, simply talking about how well it controls, it's the closest thing on consoles to mouse and keyboard control similarity, you can really pull off shots that are almost on mouse and keyboard level precision.

Eddie-Vedder

[QUOTE="Eddie-Vedder"]

From a pure core gameplay standpoint Cod4/MW2 is the BEST FPS on consoles ever, simply talking about how well it controls, it's the closest thing on consoles to mouse and keyboard control similarity, you can really pull off shots that are almost on mouse and keyboard level precision.

Rockman999

BC2 is the new standar..

[QUOTE="Yandere"]

BC2, but there seems to be a lot of COD players on it.

punkrocker163

That and also campers (I have seen a lot of defenders camp near the attackers base to get cheap kills), "noobtubers", and something that was not in COD vehicle spammers.

Nothing is more annoying than facing a team that waits in their base till a vehicle spawns and only leaves it to kill a few guys with it, especially in hardcore mode.

[QUOTE="punkrocker163"][QUOTE="Yandere"]

BC2, but there seems to be a lot of COD players on it.

Yandere

That and also campers (I have seen a lot of defenders camp near the attackers base to get cheap kills), "noobtubers", and something that was not in COD vehicle spammers.

Nothing is more annoying than facing a team that waits in their base till a vehicle spawns and only leaves it to kill a few guys with it, especially in hardcore mode.

[QUOTE="Yandere"]

[QUOTE="punkrocker163"] As in they ignore the objective and just kill kill kill? Theguy56

That and also campers (I have seen a lot of defenders camp near the attackers base to get cheap kills), "noobtubers", and something that was not in COD vehicle spammers.

Nothing is more annoying than facing a team that waits in their base till a vehicle spawns and only leaves it to kill a few guys with it, especially in hardcore mode.

Another thing that is annoying is when my team gets a helicopter and they slam it into the ground trying to get a road kill.

[QUOTE="Theguy56"][QUOTE="Yandere"]

That and also campers (I have seen a lot of defenders camp near the attackers base to get cheap kills), "noobtubers", and something that was not in COD vehicle spammers.

Nothing is more annoying than facing a team that waits in their base till a vehicle spawns and only leaves it to kill a few guys with it, especially in hardcore mode.

Yandere

Another thing that is annoying is when my team gets a helicopter and they slam it into the ground trying to get a road kill.

Ah that used to happen in Battlefield 2 with jets. People would fly towards a helicopter and bail out at the last second and they would still get the kill (or 4 depending on the number of passengers). Some were kicked for stuff like that but sometimes the game would, for some reason, count the helicopter that died from the jet's impact as a suicide or teamkill and the pilot would get kicked instead.

[QUOTE="Theguy56"][QUOTE="Yandere"]

That and also campers (I have seen a lot of defenders camp near the attackers base to get cheap kills), "noobtubers", and something that was not in COD vehicle spammers.

Nothing is more annoying than facing a team that waits in their base till a vehicle spawns and only leaves it to kill a few guys with it, especially in hardcore mode.

Yandere

Another thing that is annoying is when my team gets a helicopter and they slam it into the ground trying to get a road kill.

MW2 seems to have better SP. It has Spec ops, which are very very fun, best with 2 people but heck theyre fun SP. Both campaigns are short, but MW2 seems to have a greater variety (for instance, stealth scenes), though both campaigns as with most modern shooters let you experience a lot of different stuff. I think from the reviews it sounds as if the MW2 campaign pacing is better, with such things LIKE stealth to break it up.

MW2 seems to have better SP. It has Spec ops, which are very very fun, best with 2 people but heck theyre fun SP. Both campaigns are short, but MW2 seems to have a greater variety (for instance, stealth scenes), though both campaigns as with most modern shooters let you experience a lot of different stuff. I think from the reviews it sounds as if the MW2 campaign pacing is better, with such things LIKE stealth to break it up.

MellowMighty

MW2 seems to have better SP. It has Spec ops, which are very very fun, best with 2 people but heck theyre fun SP. Both campaigns are short, but MW2 seems to have a greater variety (for instance, stealth scenes), though both campaigns as with most modern shooters let you experience a lot of different stuff. I think from the reviews it sounds as if the MW2 campaign pacing is better, with such things LIKE stealth to break it up.

bc2.... most definately. fits my preferences...

MW2 uses old fashion infantry-combat, while BC2 continues the versatility of the Battlefield franchise.

nice assumption there kiddo...recently till i got Bad company 2 i had an average K/D of 1.5 nearly every match but prefer battlefield for so many reasons its unbelievable actually im trading in that glitchfest of a game for FF13 today seriously i have no use for MW2 anymore its just a poorly made multi.The unbalance is horrendous,air killstreaks are overpowered,glitches,noobs being rewarded...the list go's on and on.